Skip to content

Veliparib With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel and as Continuation Maintenance Therapy in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Stage III or IV, High-grade Serous, Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

A Phase 3 Placebo-Controlled Study of Carboplatin/Paclitaxel With or Without Concurrent and Continuation Maintenance Veliparib (PARP Inhibitor) in Subjects With Previously Untreated Stages III or IV High-Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02470585
Acronym
VELIA
Enrollment
1140
Registered
2015-06-12
Start date
2015-07-14
Completion date
2023-10-05
Last updated
2024-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Cancer, Ovarian Neoplasm

Keywords

Veliparib, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Overall Survival, ABT-888, Randomized, Poly Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) - Ribose Polymerase (PARP), Ovarian, BRCA, VELIA

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate whether progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged with the addition of veliparib to standard platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel \[C/P\]) and continued as maintenance therapy compared with chemotherapy alone.

Detailed description

Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three arms. Randomization in the entire population was stratified according to the timing of surgery and residual disease status (any residual disease after primary surgery vs. no residual disease after primary surgery vs. interval surgery) and the paclitaxel schedule (weekly vs. every 3 -weeks), stage of disease (III vs. IV), geographic region (Japan vs. North America and rest of world \[ROW\]), and germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation status (positive versus negative or Unknown). Cytoreductive surgery could be performed before randomization and the initiation of study treatment (primary) or after 3 cycles of study treatment (interval). The weekly or every-3-week paclitaxel schedule and the choice of primary or interval cytoreductive surgery were determined at the discretion of the investigator. The primary objective was evaluated in the BRCA-deficient cohort, participants with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. These populations were sequentially inclusive, with the HRD population including the BRCA-deficient population, and the ITT population including the HRD and BRCA-deficient populations. The BRCA-deficient population was defined as participants with either a germline (gBRCA) and/or tissue-based (tBRCA) deleterious or suspected deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 confirmed by centralized testing. The HRD population was defined as participants with HRD tumors based on HRD score or presence of a deleterious or suspected deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 as determined by centralized testing.

Interventions

DRUGVeliparib

Capsules for oral administration

DRUGPaclitaxel

Administered by intravenous infusion, either 80 mg/m² of body-surface area (BSA) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle (weekly dosing), or 175 mg/m² of BSA on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (3-week dosing).

DRUGCarboplatin

Administered by intravenous infusion at an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 mg/mL/min every 3 weeks.

Capsules for oral administration

Sponsors

Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group
CollaboratorOTHER
AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Histologic diagnosis of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III or IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma, with the appropriate tissue available for histologic evaluation. 2. High-grade serous adenocarcinoma 3. Willing to undergo testing for gBRCA. 4. Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. 5. Neuropathy (sensory and motor) less than or equal to Grade 1. 6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2. 7. Participants who undergo primary cytoreductive surgery must be entered between 1 and 12 weeks after surgery. Participants undergoing interval surgery must have a tumor sample confirming the histological diagnosis prior to enrollment. 8. Participants with measurable disease or non-measurable disease are eligible. Participants may or may not have cancer-related symptoms. 9. Participant has one of the following available for pharmacodynamic analyses including somatic BRCA testing: Archived diagnostic formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue; or tumor tissue biopsy collected prior to Cycle 1 Day 1.

Exclusion criteria

1. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, mixed epithelial adenocarcinoma, adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, mucinous adenocarcinoma, clear cell adenocarcinoma, low-grade serous adenocarcinoma, or malignant Brenner's tumor. 2. Participants with synchronous primary endometrial cancer, or a past history of endometrial cancer unless all of the following conditions are met: endometrial cancer stage not greater than IA, no vascular or lymphatic invasion, no poorly differentiated subtypes including serous, clear cell, or other FIGO grade 3 lesions. 3. Participants with any evidence of other invasive malignancy being present within the last 3 years (with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer). Participants are also excluded if their previous cancer treatment contraindicates this protocol's therapy. 4. Received prior radiotherapy to any portion of the abdominal cavity or pelvis. 5. Received prior chemotherapy for any abdominal or pelvic tumor. 6. Clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s). 7. Known history of allergic reaction to Cremophor-paclitaxel, carboplatin, Azo-Colourant Tartrazine (also known as FD&C Yellow 5 or E102), Azo-Colourant Orange Yellow-S (also known as FD&C Yellow 6 or E110) or known contraindications to any study supplied drug. 8. History or evidence upon physical examination of central nervous system (CNS) disease, including primary brain tumor, any brain metastases, or history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke), transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months of Cycle 1 Day 1.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression or death prior to the analysis cut-off date, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression or death, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached and was performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. .
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death (all causes of mortality) if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (as or death, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. The primary analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) in the BRCA-deficient PopulationFrom the time of randomization to the end of the study, up to 98 monthsOS is defined as the time from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death, and was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. All events of death will be included, regardless of whether the event occurs while the participant is still taking study drug, or after discontinuation of study drug. If a participant has not died, then the data will be censored at the date the participant is last known to be alive.
Overall Survival (OS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency PopulationFrom the time of randomization to the end of the study, up to 98 monthsOS is defined as the time from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death, and was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. All events of death will be included, regardless of whether the event occurs while the participant is still taking study drug, or after discontinuation of study drug. If a participant has not died, then the data will be censored at the date the participant is last known to be alive.
Overall Survival (OS) in the Whole PopulationFrom the time of randomization to the end of the study, up to 98 monthsOS is defined as the time from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death, and was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. All events of death will be included, regardless of whether the event occurs while the participant is still taking study drug, or after discontinuation of study drug. If a participant has not died, then the data will be censored at the date the participant is last known to be alive.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression or death prior to the analysis cut-off date, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions.
Change From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationBaseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35The Disease Related Symptom score is a subset of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Symptom Index-18 (NFOSI-18), which evaluates nine symptoms related to ovarian cancer. The NFOSI-18 DRS score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a lower burden of symptoms and a score of 0 being severely symptomatic. A 3-point difference was defined as clinically meaningful. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline was calculated using a used a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors of residual disease and stage of disease, time point and treatment-by-time point interaction as fixed effect factors, and Baseline DRS score as a covariate. DRS was not included in the fixed-sequence testing procedure.
Change From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationBaseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35The Disease Related Symptom score is a subset of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Symptom Index-18 (NFOSI-18), which evaluates nine symptoms related to ovarian cancer. The NFOSI-18 DRS score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a lower burden of symptoms and a score of 0 being severely symptomatic. A 3-point difference was defined as clinically meaningful. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline was calculated using a used a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors of residual disease, stage of disease, choice of paclitaxel dosing regimen and BRCA-deficient status, time point and treatment-by-time point interaction as fixed effect factors, and Baseline DRS score as a covariate. DRS was not included in the fixed-sequence testing procedure.
Change From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationBaseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35The Disease Related Symptom score is a subset of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Symptom Index-18 (NFOSI-18), which evaluates nine symptoms related to ovarian cancer. The NFOSI-18 DRS score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a lower burden of symptoms and a score of 0 being severely symptomatic. A 3-point difference was defined as clinically meaningful. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline was calculated using a used a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors of residual disease and stage of disease, time point and treatment-by-time point interaction as fixed effect factors, and Baseline DRS score as a covariate. DRS was not included in the fixed-sequence testing procedure.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression or death, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached and was performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. .
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death (all causes of mortality) if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (as or death, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. The primary analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached.

Countries

Australia, Brazil, Denmark, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This trial was conducted at 188 sites in 10 countries (Australia, Brazil, Denmark, Israel, Japan, Poland, Republic of Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States).

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups. Randomization was stratified according to the timing of surgery and residual disease after primary surgery or interval surgery, the paclitaxel schedule, stage of disease, geographic region, and germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation status.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> Placebo
Participants received placebo to veliparib orally twice a day in combination with carboplatin given at an area under the curve \[AUC\] of 6 mg per milliliter per minute (mg/mL/min), every 3 weeks, and paclitaxel 175 mg per square meter (mg/m²) of body-surface area (BSA), administered every 3 weeks, or 80 mg/m² administered weekly, for six 21-day cycles. Participants who completed chemotherapy without disease progression received matching placebo twice daily for an additional thirty 21-day cycles of maintenance therapy.
375
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> Placebo
Participants received 150 mg veliparib orally twice a day in combination with carboplatin given at an AUC of 6 mg/mL/min every 3 weeks, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² of BSA administered every 3 weeks, or 80 mg/m² administered weekly, for six 21-day cycles. Participants who completed chemotherapy without disease progression received matching placebo twice daily for an additional thirty 21-day cycles of maintenance therapy.
383
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> Veliparib
Participants received 150 mg veliparib orally twice a day in combination with carboplatin given at an AUC of 6 mg/mL/min every 3 weeks, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² of BSA administered every 3 weeks, or 80 mg/m² administered weekly, for six 21-day cycles. Participants who completed chemotherapy without disease progression received single-agent veliparib at a dose of 300 mg twice daily for 2 weeks (transition period) and then 400 mg veliparib twice daily if the dose in the transition period was not associated with limiting side effects for an additional thirty 21-day cycles of maintenance therapy.
382
Total1,140

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath224227199
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up81513
Overall StudyMissing due to site non-compliance023
Overall StudyOther, not specified5714
Overall StudySponsor discontinued study117110122
Overall StudyWithdrew consent212231

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboVeliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboVeliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibTotal
Age, Continuous62.0 years62.0 years62.0 years62.0 years
Age, Customized
< 65 years
233 Participants226 Participants228 Participants687 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
142 Participants157 Participants154 Participants453 Participants
BRCA-Deficient Status
Germline or tissue BRCA1/2 mutation
92 Participants98 Participants108 Participants298 Participants
BRCA-Deficient Status
Germline or tissue BRCA1/2 wildtype
254 Participants243 Participants245 Participants742 Participants
BRCA-Deficient Status
Missing
29 Participants42 Participants29 Participants100 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants27 Participants26 Participants81 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
347 Participants356 Participants356 Participants1059 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Geographic Region
Japan
23 Participants30 Participants25 Participants78 Participants
Geographic Region
North America
266 Participants261 Participants267 Participants794 Participants
Geographic Region
Rest of World
86 Participants92 Participants90 Participants268 Participants
Germline BRCA Status
Germline BRCA1/2 mutation
63 Participants71 Participants80 Participants214 Participants
Germline BRCA Status
Germline BRCA1/2 wildtype
305 Participants305 Participants298 Participants908 Participants
Germline BRCA Status
Missing
7 Participants7 Participants4 Participants18 Participants
Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Status
HRD
207 Participants206 Participants214 Participants627 Participants
Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Status
Missing
44 Participants54 Participants43 Participants141 Participants
Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Status
Non-HRD
124 Participants123 Participants125 Participants372 Participants
Paclitaxel Dosing Regimen
Every 3 weeks
179 Participants178 Participants189 Participants546 Participants
Paclitaxel Dosing Regimen
Missing
3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Paclitaxel Dosing Regimen
Weekly
193 Participants203 Participants190 Participants586 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
59 Participants69 Participants56 Participants184 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
10 Participants13 Participants20 Participants43 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multi-race
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
299 Participants297 Participants300 Participants896 Participants
Residual Disease After Interval Surgery
Any macroscopic residual disease
31 Participants34 Participants27 Participants92 Participants
Residual Disease After Interval Surgery
Microscopic residual disease only
22 Participants30 Participants24 Participants76 Participants
Residual Disease After Interval Surgery
Missing
4 Participants4 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Residual Disease After Interval Surgery
No residual disease
50 Participants46 Participants45 Participants141 Participants
Residual Disease After Primary Surgery
Any macroscopic residual disease
76 Participants89 Participants83 Participants248 Participants
Residual Disease After Primary Surgery
Microscopic residual disease only
58 Participants46 Participants54 Participants158 Participants
Residual Disease After Primary Surgery
No residual disease
116 Participants118 Participants124 Participants358 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
375 Participants383 Participants382 Participants1140 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stage of Disease
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Stage of Disease
Stage III
292 Participants288 Participants295 Participants875 Participants
Stage of Disease
Stage IV
82 Participants94 Participants87 Participants263 Participants
Type of Surgery Received
Interval
107 Participants114 Participants99 Participants320 Participants
Type of Surgery Received
No surgery received
18 Participants16 Participants22 Participants56 Participants
Type of Surgery Received
Primary
250 Participants253 Participants261 Participants764 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
228 / 375234 / 383209 / 382
other
Total, other adverse events
369 / 375375 / 383376 / 382
serious
Total, serious adverse events
143 / 375130 / 383146 / 382

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)

PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression or death prior to the analysis cut-off date, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.

Population: Analyses were performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. The first analysis was conducted using the BRCA-mutation cohort which included participants with either a gBRCA and/or tBRCA deleterious or suspected deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)22.0 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)21.1 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)34.7 months
Comparison: The primary efficacy analyses compared investigator-assessed PFS in the Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Veliparib group (Arm 3) vs. the Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 1).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.277, 0.683]Log Rank
Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)

PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression or death, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached and was performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. .

Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.

Population: Analyses were performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. The second analysis was conducted using the HRD cohort which included participants in the BRCA-mutation cohort and those determined to have HRD tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)20.5 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)18.1 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)31.9 months
Comparison: The primary efficacy analyses compared investigator-assessed PFS in the Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Veliparib group (Arm 3) vs. the Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 1).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.433, 0.756]Log Rank
Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)

PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death (all causes of mortality) if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (as or death, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. The primary analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached.

Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.

Population: Analyses were performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. The third analysis was conducted using the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all randomized participants).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)17.3 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)15.2 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 3 vs Arm 1)23.5 months
Comparison: The primary efficacy analyses compared investigator-assessed PFS in the Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Veliparib group (Arm 3) vs. the Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 1).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.562, 0.831]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation Population

The Disease Related Symptom score is a subset of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Symptom Index-18 (NFOSI-18), which evaluates nine symptoms related to ovarian cancer. The NFOSI-18 DRS score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a lower burden of symptoms and a score of 0 being severely symptomatic. A 3-point difference was defined as clinically meaningful. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline was calculated using a used a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors of residual disease and stage of disease, time point and treatment-by-time point interaction as fixed effect factors, and Baseline DRS score as a covariate. DRS was not included in the fixed-sequence testing procedure.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35

Population: BRCA-mutation population, participants with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 333.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 254.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 154.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 72.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 234.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 173.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 354.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 214.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 194.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 314.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 93.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 51.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 294.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 113.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 31.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 274.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 133.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 274.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 30.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 50.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 71.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 93.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 113.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 133.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 154.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 174.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 194.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 213.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 234.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 255.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 335.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 295.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 314.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 355.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 133.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 50.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 253.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 112.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 333.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 273.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 92.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 30.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 292.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 71.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 192.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 173.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 353.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 213.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 153.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 312.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the BRCA-mutation PopulationCycle 232.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD Population

The Disease Related Symptom score is a subset of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Symptom Index-18 (NFOSI-18), which evaluates nine symptoms related to ovarian cancer. The NFOSI-18 DRS score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a lower burden of symptoms and a score of 0 being severely symptomatic. A 3-point difference was defined as clinically meaningful. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline was calculated using a used a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors of residual disease and stage of disease, time point and treatment-by-time point interaction as fixed effect factors, and Baseline DRS score as a covariate. DRS was not included in the fixed-sequence testing procedure.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35

Population: HRD population, participants with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 93.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 334.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 234.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 214.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 354.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 154.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 72.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 31.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 274.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 51.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 194.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 133.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 294.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 173.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 113.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 313.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 254.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 71.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 213.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 233.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 254.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 274.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 294.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 314.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 334.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 354.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 30.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 51.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 93.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 113.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 133.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 153.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 173.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 193.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 233.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 92.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 293.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 192.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 112.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 273.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 173.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 132.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 253.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 213.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 30.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 153.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 50.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 353.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 333.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 72.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the HRD PopulationCycle 313.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole Population

The Disease Related Symptom score is a subset of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Symptom Index-18 (NFOSI-18), which evaluates nine symptoms related to ovarian cancer. The NFOSI-18 DRS score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a lower burden of symptoms and a score of 0 being severely symptomatic. A 3-point difference was defined as clinically meaningful. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline was calculated using a used a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors of residual disease, stage of disease, choice of paclitaxel dosing regimen and BRCA-deficient status, time point and treatment-by-time point interaction as fixed effect factors, and Baseline DRS score as a covariate. DRS was not included in the fixed-sequence testing procedure.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35

Population: All randomized participants with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 133.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 354.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 214.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 154.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 334.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 194.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 174.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 314.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 72.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 31.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 294.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 93.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 51.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 274.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 113.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 254.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 234.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 93.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 30.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 50.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 71.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 114.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 134.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 153.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 173.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 194.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 213.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 233.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 254.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 274.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 294.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 314.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 334.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 354.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 233.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 313.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 253.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 92.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 353.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 273.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 72.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 333.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 173.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 153.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 293.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 193.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 133.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 50.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 213.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 113.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibChange From Baseline in Disease Related Symptom (DRS) Score in the Whole PopulationCycle 30.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) in the BRCA-deficient Population

OS is defined as the time from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death, and was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. All events of death will be included, regardless of whether the event occurs while the participant is still taking study drug, or after discontinuation of study drug. If a participant has not died, then the data will be censored at the date the participant is last known to be alive.

Time frame: From the time of randomization to the end of the study, up to 98 months

Population: BRCA-Deficient population: All randomized participants with germline and/or tissue deleterious/suspected deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboOverall Survival (OS) in the BRCA-deficient Population89.5 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboOverall Survival (OS) in the BRCA-deficient PopulationNA months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibOverall Survival (OS) in the BRCA-deficient PopulationNA months
Comparison: Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Veliparib (Arm 3) versus Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 1)p-value: 0.32895% CI: [0.567, 1.429]Log Rank
Comparison: Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 2) versus Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 1)p-value: 0.80895% CI: [0.78, 1.903]Log Rank
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Population

OS is defined as the time from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death, and was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. All events of death will be included, regardless of whether the event occurs while the participant is still taking study drug, or after discontinuation of study drug. If a participant has not died, then the data will be censored at the date the participant is last known to be alive.

Time frame: From the time of randomization to the end of the study, up to 98 months

Population: All randomized participants considered BRCA-Deficient and those determined to have HRD tumors based on HRD score

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboOverall Survival (OS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Population71.5 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboOverall Survival (OS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Population74.4 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibOverall Survival (OS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency PopulationNA months
Comparison: Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Veliparib (Arm 3) versus Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 1)p-value: 0.11695% CI: [0.64, 1.114]Log Rank
Comparison: Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 2) versus Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 1)p-value: 0.35295% CI: [0.726, 1.242]Log Rank
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) in the Whole Population

OS is defined as the time from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death, and was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. All events of death will be included, regardless of whether the event occurs while the participant is still taking study drug, or after discontinuation of study drug. If a participant has not died, then the data will be censored at the date the participant is last known to be alive.

Time frame: From the time of randomization to the end of the study, up to 98 months

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboOverall Survival (OS) in the Whole Population57.8 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboOverall Survival (OS) in the Whole Population58.0 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibOverall Survival (OS) in the Whole Population59.2 months
Comparison: Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Veliparib (Arm 3) versus Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 1)p-value: 0.28395% CI: [0.782, 1.144]Log Rank
Comparison: Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 2) versus Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo (Arm 1)p-value: 0.63895% CI: [0.859, 1.244]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)

PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression or death prior to the analysis cut-off date, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.

Population: Analyses were performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. The first analysis was conducted using the BRCA-mutation cohort which included participants with either a gBRCA and/or tBRCA deleterious or suspected deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)22.0 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)21.1 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the BRCA-deficient Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)34.7 months
Comparison: The secondary efficacy analyses compared investigator-assessed PFS in the Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 2) vs. the Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 1).p-value: 0.33595% CI: [0.821, 1.799]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)

PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression or death, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached and was performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. .

Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.

Population: Analyses were performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. The second analysis was conducted using the HRD cohort which included participants in the BRCA-mutation cohort and those determined to have HRD tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)20.5 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)18.1 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Homologous Recombination Deficiency Cohort (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)31.9 months
Comparison: The secondary efficacy analyses compared investigator-assessed PFS in the Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 2) vs. the Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 1).p-value: 0.46295% CI: [0.855, 1.414]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)

PFS was defined as the time from the date that the participant was randomized to the date the participant experienced an event of disease progression, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1 (as determined by the investigator) or to the date of death (all causes of mortality) if disease progression was not reached. If the participant did not have an event of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (as or death, the participant's data were censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, compared with the smallest size recorded since the treatment started, and an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. The primary analysis of PFS occurred when the protocol-specified number of PFS events was reached.

Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 03 May 2019, the median duration of follow-up was 28 months.

Population: Analyses were performed in 3 sequentially inclusive populations. The third analysis was conducted using the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all randomized participants).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)17.3 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)15.2 months
Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -> VeliparibProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Intention-to-treat Population (Arm 2 vs Arm 1)23.5 months
Comparison: The secondary efficacy analyses compared investigator-assessed PFS in the Veliparib + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 2) vs. the Placebo + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel -\> Placebo group (Arm 1).p-value: 0.4595% CI: [0.895, 1.287]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026