Skip to content

A Study of Intramuscular Sebacoyl Dinalbuphine Ester for Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain Management

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Dose Study to Assess The Safety and Efficacy of Intramuscular Sebacoyl Dinalbuphine Ester (SDE) for Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain Management

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02468128
Enrollment
221
Registered
2015-06-10
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2026-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia Disorder, Pain

Keywords

Analgesic, Opioids, Pain relief after surgery, Dinalbuphine, Sebacoyl Dinalbuphine Ester, SDE, SDN, LT1001

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, single dose study to assess the safety and efficacy of intramuscular sebacoyl dinalbuphine ester (SDE) for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management.

Detailed description

This study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, pretreatment study, sponsored by Lumosa therapeutics Co., Ltd (Taiwan). All subjects received training of visual analog scores (VAS) before surgery using the 10-mm horizontal version. VAS was taken by study subjects themselves before the first dose of PCA ketorolac, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 hours after surgery. After discharge, VAS was taken, also by the study subjects, twice a day, in the morning and evening of Dayday 3 through Dayday 7. Subjects were asked to complete a short form questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory, on day 1, day 2, and final visit (day 7-10) after surgery. Patient satisfaction of postsurgical analgesia was assessed at the final visit using a 5-grade categorical scale. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single intramuscular injection of SDE in an extended-release formulation, against placebo control, administrated pre-operatively in subjects scheduled to undergo elective hemorrhoidectomies.

Interventions

Intramuscular injection 2mL/vial (75mg/mL)

DRUGPlacebo

Sebacoyl Dinalbuphine Ester injection placebo, 2mL/vial

Sponsors

Lumosa Therapeutics Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female \>= 20 years of age at Screening * Scheduled to electively undergo 2 or 3-column excisional hemorrhoidectomy * American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Class 1 - 3 * Adequate clinical lab values (values of potential clinical concern are detailed in Appendix) or, if abnormal, deemed not clinically significant per the Investigator. * Ability and willingness to provide informed consent, adhere to the study visit schedule and complete all study assessments and language specific questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

* Body weight less than 40 kg. * Concurrent fissurectomy. * Subject is pregnant or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline. * Women of childbearing potential disagree to use an acceptable method of contraception (e.g., hormonal contraceptives, IUD, barrier device or abstinence) throughout the study. * History of hypersensitivity or allergy to amide-type local anesthetics, opioid, or any ingredient of the medications administered in this study. * Subject has a resting respiratory rate less than 8 per minute and blood oxygen saturation less than 90 mmHg. * Use of any NSAIDs, selective COX-2 inhibitors, opioid, acetaminophen, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), gabapentin, or pregabalin within three days of surgery. * Chronic use of opioid medications for more than 14 days in the last 3 months, or non-opioid pain medications more than 5 times per week before screening visit. * Use of any long-acting opioid medication within 3 days of surgery or any opioid medication within 24 hours of surgery. * Current painful physical condition or concurrent surgery requires analgesic treatment in the postoperative period. * Contraindication to epinephrine or any of the pain-control agents planned for postoperative use. * Administration of an investigational drug within the longer of 30 days or 5 elimination half-lives of such investigational drug prior to study drug administration. * Any psychiatric disorder, psychological, medical, or laboratory condition that may interfere with study assessments or compliance. * Significant medical conditions or laboratory results that may indicate an increased vulnerability to study drugs and procedures, and thus expose the subject to an unreasonable risk as a result of participating in this clinical trial. * Any clinically significant event or condition may be uncovered during surgery. * History of abuse illicit drugs, prescription medicines or alcohol within the past 2 years. * Known history of anti-HIV antibody positive * Failure to pass drug and alcohol screen.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Assessment Calculated as the Area Under the Curve of VAS Pain Intensity Scores Through 48 Hours After Surgery1±0.1, 2±0.1, 3±0.1, 4±0.25, 8±0.5, 12±0.5, 16±0.5, 20±0.5, 24±1, 28±1, 32±2, 36±2, 40±2, 44±2, 48±2 h after the surgeryThe primary outcome measure of this study is pain assessment (time-specific pain intensity) calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) of VAS pain intensity scores through 48 hours after surgery (AUC0-48). Pain intensity was measured with visual analog scale (VAS) and the assessment began right before the first use of analgesics, and at 1±0.1, 2±0.1, 3±0.1, 4±0.25, 8±0.5, 12±0.5, 16±0.5, 20±0.5, 24±1, 28±1, 32±2, 36±2, 40±2, 44±2, 48±2 hours after the operation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day 3-7Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), reported as units on a scale. Higher values indicate worse pain. Pain intensity were measured with VAS scores in the morning and evening during Day 3-7. It should be noted that the VAS scores during Day 3-7 were not adjusted by rescue medications used for pain relief.
Time From the End of Operation to the First PCA Ketorolac DoseFrom the end of operation until the first PCA ketorolac dose used, assessed up to 48 hrs
Consumption of Ketorolac Via Intravenous Patient- Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)Day 1-2Consumption of ketorolac via intravenous Patient- Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) was calculated through 48 hrs after surgery (study day1-2)
Consumption of Oral Ketorolac (Day 3-7)Day 3-7Patients discharged on Day 2. The total amount of oral Ketorolac, as supplemental analgesics after discharge, was used to evaluate the efficacy of extended-release SDE compared with the placebo group.
Subject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsDay 7Subject will be asked to classify themselves as either: 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied', 'uncertain', 'dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' at final visit, and a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used in comparison of subjects' satisfaction with post-surgical analgesic between treatment groups.
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Day 1, 2 and Day 7Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI pain severity score is based on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 units on a scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores represent worse pain outcomes. Assessments were conducted on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 7.

Countries

Taiwan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study enrolled hemorrhoid subjects from 6 sites in Taiwan between 29th December 2012 and 14th April 2015.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 221 subjects (109 subjects in SDE group; 112 subjects in placebo group) were enrolled into the study and randomized to receive either SDE or placebo treatment.There were 12 of the 221 subjects excluded from the original ITT population since they were protocol violation; therefore, 209 subjects comprised the mITT population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SDE 150mg
Single dose, intramuscular, Sebacoyl Dinalbuphine Ester injection 150 mg (2 ml) Sebacoyl Dinalbuphine Ester: Intramuscular injection 2mL/vial (75mg/mL)
103
Placebo
Single dose, intramuscular , Sebacoyl Dinalbuphine Ester placebo injection (2mL) Placebo: Sebacoyl Dinalbuphine Ester injection placebo, 2mL/vial
106
Total209

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation66

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboSDE 150mgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
104 Participants101 Participants205 Participants
Age, Continuous44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
106 participants103 participants209 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
59 Participants52 Participants111 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants51 Participants98 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
76 / 10962 / 112
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 1092 / 112

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Assessment Calculated as the Area Under the Curve of VAS Pain Intensity Scores Through 48 Hours After Surgery

The primary outcome measure of this study is pain assessment (time-specific pain intensity) calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) of VAS pain intensity scores through 48 hours after surgery (AUC0-48). Pain intensity was measured with visual analog scale (VAS) and the assessment began right before the first use of analgesics, and at 1±0.1, 2±0.1, 3±0.1, 4±0.25, 8±0.5, 12±0.5, 16±0.5, 20±0.5, 24±1, 28±1, 32±2, 36±2, 40±2, 44±2, 48±2 hours after the operation.

Time frame: 1±0.1, 2±0.1, 3±0.1, 4±0.25, 8±0.5, 12±0.5, 16±0.5, 20±0.5, 24±1, 28±1, 32±2, 36±2, 40±2, 44±2, 48±2 h after the surgery

Population: The analysis included all patients in the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Calculated as the Area Under the Curve of VAS Pain Intensity Scores Through 48 Hours After Surgery209.93 VAS score*hourStandard Deviation 111.26
PlaceboPain Assessment Calculated as the Area Under the Curve of VAS Pain Intensity Scores Through 48 Hours After Surgery253.53 VAS score*hourStandard Deviation 108.49
p-value: <0.0195% CI: [-71.68, -12.71]ANOVA
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI pain severity score is based on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 units on a scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores represent worse pain outcomes. Assessments were conducted on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 7.

Time frame: Day 1, 2 and Day 7

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SDE 150mgBrief Pain Inventory (BPI)Day72.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
SDE 150mgBrief Pain Inventory (BPI)Day13.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
SDE 150mgBrief Pain Inventory (BPI)Day23.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
PlaceboBrief Pain Inventory (BPI)Day73.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboBrief Pain Inventory (BPI)Day13.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
PlaceboBrief Pain Inventory (BPI)Day23.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Comparison: ANOVA with Treatment, Center effect (and Treatment\*Center effect if p-value ≤ 0.1 in non-reduced model)p-value: <0.05ANOVA
Secondary

Consumption of Ketorolac Via Intravenous Patient- Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

Consumption of ketorolac via intravenous Patient- Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) was calculated through 48 hrs after surgery (study day1-2)

Time frame: Day 1-2

Population: The analysis included all patients in the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SDE 150mgConsumption of Ketorolac Via Intravenous Patient- Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)50.06 mgStandard Deviation 45.72
PlaceboConsumption of Ketorolac Via Intravenous Patient- Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)82.33 mgStandard Deviation 66.44
p-value: <0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Consumption of Oral Ketorolac (Day 3-7)

Patients discharged on Day 2. The total amount of oral Ketorolac, as supplemental analgesics after discharge, was used to evaluate the efficacy of extended-release SDE compared with the placebo group.

Time frame: Day 3-7

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SDE 150mgConsumption of Oral Ketorolac (Day 3-7)3.86 mgStandard Deviation 0.81
PlaceboConsumption of Oral Ketorolac (Day 3-7)4.29 mgStandard Deviation 0.69
p-value: <0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.

Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), reported as units on a scale. Higher values indicate worse pain. Pain intensity were measured with VAS scores in the morning and evening during Day 3-7. It should be noted that the VAS scores during Day 3-7 were not adjusted by rescue medications used for pain relief.

Time frame: Day 3-7

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day3 Evening3.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day5 Evening3.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day4 Evening3.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day6 Morning2.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day4 Morning3.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day6 Evening2.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day5 Morning3.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day7 Morning2.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
SDE 150mgPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day3 Morning2.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day7 Morning2.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day3 Morning2.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day3 Evening3.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day4 Morning3.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day4 Evening3.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day5 Morning3.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day5 Evening3.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day6 Morning3.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
PlaceboPain Assessment Measured With VAS During Day 3-7 in the Morning and Evening, as Well as During Special Events Such as Bowel Movements.Day6 Evening3.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
p-value: >0.05ANOVA
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment Groups

Subject will be asked to classify themselves as either: 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied', 'uncertain', 'dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' at final visit, and a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used in comparison of subjects' satisfaction with post-surgical analgesic between treatment groups.

Time frame: Day 7

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SDE 150mgSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsSatisfied68 participants
SDE 150mgSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsDissatisfied3 participants
SDE 150mgSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsUncertain13 participants
SDE 150mgSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsVery dissatisfied0 participants
SDE 150mgSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsHighly satisfied18 participants
PlaceboSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsVery dissatisfied1 participants
PlaceboSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsHighly satisfied20 participants
PlaceboSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsSatisfied69 participants
PlaceboSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsUncertain10 participants
PlaceboSubject Satisfaction With Post-Surgical Analgesic Between Treatment GroupsDissatisfied6 participants
Comparison: At the final visit, each subject was asked the questions for evaluation of satisfaction and a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used in comparison of subjects' satisfaction with post-surgical analgesic between treatment groups.p-value: >0.05Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Time From the End of Operation to the First PCA Ketorolac Dose

Time frame: From the end of operation until the first PCA ketorolac dose used, assessed up to 48 hrs

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SDE 150mgTime From the End of Operation to the First PCA Ketorolac Dose4.67 hours
PlaceboTime From the End of Operation to the First PCA Ketorolac Dose4.32 hours
p-value: <0.05Log-rank tests
Post Hoc

Post-hoc Analysis of Secondary Outcome Measures (Pain Assessment During Day 3-7)

Pain assessment during Day 3-7 was not corrected for the use of rescue medication in the initial secondary endpoint analysis as that was done for the primary end point, where the VAS scores for the measurement of pain intensity from 0 to 48 hours post-surgery were calculated as the area under the curve (AUC0-48). And for the calculation of AUC, data were imputed with the use of the windowed worst observation carried forward plus last observation carried forward method.For subjects who used rescue medication for pain relief, their VAS scores recorded within the window of ketorolac medication (6 hours, which is one half-life of ketorolac) was replaced by the worst observation (i.e., the highest score before taking ketorolac). For the post hoc analysis, the same principle was applied, i.e. the VAS scores AUC0-final (Time zero post-surgery to final visit) were analyzed following the same methodology used for AUC0-48

Time frame: Day 3-7

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SDE 150mgPost-hoc Analysis of Secondary Outcome Measures (Pain Assessment During Day 3-7)630.79 VAS score*hourStandard Deviation 350.9
PlaceboPost-hoc Analysis of Secondary Outcome Measures (Pain Assessment During Day 3-7)749.94 VAS score*hourStandard Deviation 353.72
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-209.153, -21.26]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026