Skip to content

Comparison of Forced Air and Conductive Patient Heating Systems During Ambulatory Surgeries

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02467777
Enrollment
50
Registered
2015-06-10
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2017-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypothermia

Keywords

orthopaedics, post-operative warming

Brief summary

Comparison of forced air and conductive warming devices in outpatient orthopaedic surgeries.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized into either the Forced Air group (FA) or Conductive Heat group (CH). Randomization will be based on computer-generated codes that will be maintained in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. Fifty patients will be recruited with 25 patients being randomized into each group. In patients assigned to the FA group, a Bair Hugger (Arizant Medical, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota) forced-air cover will be positioned over the upper body (if lower extremity surgery) or lower body (if upper extremity surgery). The forced-air blower will be set and activated per standard practice usually after prepping and draping. In patients assigned to the CH group, a VitaHeat (VitaHeat, Inc, Aurora, IL) conductive heating device will be placed under the torso of the patient. The device will be set and activated per standard practice usually just after positioning of the patient on the operating table. Patients in both groups will be otherwise draped per surgical routine. Ambient temperature will be maintained near 20°C. Temperatures will be recorded using a temporal artery thermometer.

Interventions

DEVICEVitaHeat

Sponsors

Fox Valley Orthopedic Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients undergoing orthopaedic outpatient surgeries over 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

* allergic to material of bair hugger

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TemperatureIntra-OperativeMeasured by temporal artery thermometer

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Forced Air
Bair Hugger Bair Hugger
23
Conductive Warming
VitaHeat VitaHeat
27
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConductive WarmingForced AirTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants19 Participants39 Participants
Age, Continuous50.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.15
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.52
51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.41
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants23 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Temperature

Measured by temporal artery thermometer

Time frame: Intra-Operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced AirTemperature97.95 degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.6
Conductive WarmingTemperature97.64 degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.58

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026