Skip to content

Efficacy Trial for the Reduction of Glabellar Lines

Multicenter Efficacy Trial of the Serene RF System for the Reduction of Glabellar Lines

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02466178
Enrollment
78
Registered
2015-06-09
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhytids in the Glabellar Region

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of the Serene RF System to effectively improve the appearance of dynamic glabellar lines and sustain the effect for a minimum of 3 months.

Interventions

DEVICESerene RF System

The Serene RF System provides percutaneous delivery of radiofrequency (RF) energy to a targeted nerve.

Sponsors

Serene Medical Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Glabellar lines rating of at least two per the Merz Scale 2. Written informed consent 3. Understands and accepts the following obligations during the follow-up period (minimum of three months and up to one year) 4. available for the 3 day phone call and present for each follow-up visit; 5. receive NO other facial procedures in the upper face for a minimum of three months and up to one year after the RF procedure; 6. make NO changes to the eyebrows for a minimum of three months after the RF procedure.

Exclusion criteria

1. Injection of botulinum toxin to the upper face within the previous four months 2. Use of fillers in the upper face within the previous twelve months 3. Use of prescription treatments (e.g., Renova, Retin-A, micro-dermabrasion, chemical peels) on the upper face, in the area between the eyebrows where frown lines occur, within the previous four weeks or plans to use these treatments during the study 4. Facial or skin conditions that could interfere with treatment or confound results (e.g., signs or symptoms of eyebrow or eyelid ptosis, facial nerve palsy, scarring, infection) 5. Implanted pacemaker or automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator 6. History of keloid formation 7. Known bleeding disorder 8. Use of thrombolytics, anticoagulants, aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within seven days prior to study treatment Is receiving systemic corticosteroids or anabolic steroids (standard doses of inhaled or nasal corticosteroids are acceptable) 9. History of chronic or recurrent infection, or compromised immune system 10. Known lidocaine hypersensitivity 11. Enrollment in another research study 12. Pregnant, or plans to get pregnant during the follow-up period 13. Any other condition or circumstance that might either pose a risk, in the investigator's opinion, to the subject or interfere with the ability to acquire satisfactory clinical data throughout the follow-up period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The reduction of glabellar lines3 monthsThe reduction of glabellar lines will be assessed by a panel of 3 independent reviewers with expertise in dermatology and/or plastic surgery of the change in glabellar lines measured from baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post procedure. Photographs will be presented in a random order and the reviewers will be blinded to whether the photograph is baseline or a follow up. Effectiveness of the procedure is defined by a ≥ 1 point improvement in score (i.e., numerical decrease) on the Mertz Aesthetics Scale™ (Merz Scale) for dynamic glabellar lines. At each time point the severity of the glabellar lines is assessed on a 5 point scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence and severity of adverse events3 months
The reduction of glabellar lines12 monthsThe reduction of glabellar lines will be assessed by a panel of 3 independent reviewers with expertise in dermatology and/or plastic surgery of the change in glabellar lines measured from baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post procedure. Photographs will be presented in a random order and the reviewers will be blinded to whether the photograph is baseline or a follow up. Effectiveness of the procedure is defined by a ≥ 1 point improvement in score (i.e., numerical decrease) on the Mertz Aesthetics Scale™ (Merz Scale) for dynamic glabellar lines. At each time point the severity of the glabellar lines is assessed on a 5 point scale.
Subject satisfaction12 monthsSubject satisfaction will be assessed by a survey given every 3 months. This survey asks the subject questions to rate on a scale of 0-4 with 0 representing very dissatisfied and 4 representing very satisfied.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026