Skip to content

Cyclization of Motor Cortex Stimulation

The Relationship Between Cyclizing Stimulation and Effective Stimulation During Motor Cortex Stimulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02465918
Enrollment
6
Registered
2015-06-09
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2020-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Brief summary

Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a form of brain stimulation for patients with neuropathic pain not responsive to medication. An electrode is placed on the surface of the brain and connected to a programmable battery in the chest. The strength of stimulation can be individually adjusted by changing the voltage of stimulation. A too high voltage will produce side effects (e.g. seizures) while a too low voltage will not provide pain control. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal stimulation timing parameters in patients already implanted with MCS and have received good pain relief. The investigators wish to cyclize on/off MCS in order to save the battery life of the stimulator and also decrease stimulus habituation. The investigators hope to determine these timing parameters while maintaining optimal pain relief.

Interventions

DEVICEmotor cortex stimulation (Change of Stimulation Timing)

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient more than 18 years of age * Chronic neuropathic pain effectively treated with motor cortex stimulation * Stable medication during the trial * Willing and able to comply with the study protocol and to return per the follow-up visit schedule and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator * Technical malfunction of the MCS device * History of seizures * Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Pain measured on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with different stimulation settingsAt the End of each trial period, typically 14 days after change in stimulation settings

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of Life assessment with the SF-36 questionnaireAt the end of each trial period, typically at 14 days after change in stimulation settings

Other

MeasureTime frame
Pain assessment with the McGill pain questionnaire to record impact of painAt the end of each trial period, typically 14 days after change in stimulation setting

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026