Skip to content

Effect of Tourniquet on UKA

The Role of a Thigh Tourniquet in Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02465684
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-06-08
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Tourniquets

Brief summary

There is obviously a lack of evidence regarding the risk-benefit ratio of a thigh tourniquet in unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). This refers to many possible outcome criteria like operating time, blood loss, quality of prosthesis fixation in the bone, adverse events, radiographic result, clinical score outcome, easy of rehabilitation etc. It is not appropriate to rely on findings from the field of total knee arthroplasty. It is the aim of the current study, to clarify the role of a thigh tourniquet during UKA with regard to component fixation quality, component positioning and sizing, clinical outcome and rehabilitation process. Patients scheduled for routine UKA implantation due to osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis in the medial compartment will be considered for participation. Patients are then randomized for surgery with or without tourniquet. After an anteromedial Quad-Sparing approach the UKA procedure itself is then carried out, as suggested by the manufacturer. For both groups puls lavage and meticulous drying is applied before cementing. The following outcome parameters are assessed: 1)radiographic cement mantle thickness, 2)component position & sizing, 3)diolucencies, 4)score outcome and 5)parameters of early Rehab.

Interventions

Sponsors

Medical University Linz, Austria
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Medical University Innsbruck
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* waiting list for unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* failed upper tibial osteotomy, * insufficiency of the collateral or anterior cruciate ligaments, * a fixed varus or valgus deformity (not passively correctable) above 15°, * a flexion deformity greater than 15° and 5) rheumatoid arthritis. In addition - with regard to the scope of the current study - further

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
cement mantle thickness1 week

Contacts

Primary ContactMichael Liebensteiner, Assoc. Prof.
michael.liebensteiner@i-med.ac.at+43 512 50480547

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026