Skip to content

The Clinical Efficacy of Next Science Wound Gel (NXTSC) in the Healing of Chronic Wounds

The Clinical Efficacy of Next Science Wound Gel (NXTSC) in the Healing of Chronic Wounds

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02465073
Enrollment
49
Registered
2015-06-08
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2019-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound Infection

Brief summary

Determine the effect on wound treatment outcomes using a novel antimicrobial wound gel (NXTSC) for the treatment of infected wounds as the sole topical treatment of microbial infection at the wound site.

Detailed description

1. Determine the effect on wound treatment outcomes using a novel antimicrobial wound gel (NXTSC) for the treatment of infected wounds as the sole topical treatment of microbial infection at the wound site. 2. Determine the effect on wound treatment outcomes using a novel antimicrobial wound gel for the treatment of infected wounds when this gel is used in conjunction with the current standard of care infection controls to treat microbial infection at the wound site. 3. Determine the effect on wound treatment outcomes using standard of care treatment. (SOC).

Interventions

DEVICENXTSC wound gel

Subjects will receive NXTSC wound gel only.

DEVICENXTSC wound gel plus Standard of Care

Subjects will be randomized to the NXTSC wound gel plus Standard of Care of only.

Subjects will receive Standard of Care only.

Sponsors

Next Science TM
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Southwest Regional Wound Care Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject must have a full-thickness chronic wound for greater than one month. 2. The subject must be at least 18 years of age. 3. The ulcer to be biopsied must be greater than 1 centimeter in area. 4. The subject must be able to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Medical or emotional risk associated with the potential biopsy that outweighs the risk of not taking a biopsy as determined by the investigator. 2. Those patients that have significant contributions from other disease processes such as arterial disease (Ankle Brachial Index \[ABI\] less than .7, OR Transcutaneous Partial Oxygen Pressure \[TCpO2 \] less than 20) will be considered to have mixed vascular disease producing their wound and will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Percentage of Patients Who Had a 50% or Greater Wound Size Volume Reduction After 4 Weeks of Treatment With the Next Science Wound Gel, as Compared to Wounds Treated With Standard of CarePercentage after 4 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NXTSC
This group will receive the NXTSC gel only. NXTSC wound gel: Subjects will receive NXTSC wound gel only.
15
NXTSC Plus SOC
This group will receive the NXTSC wound gel plus Standard of Care. NXTSC wound gel plus Standard of Care: Subjects will be randomized to the NXTSC wound gel plus Standard of Care of only.
15
Standard of Care
This group will receive Standard of Care only. Standard of Care Group: Subjects will receive Standard of Care only.
15
Total45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNXTSC Plus SOCStandard of CareNXTSCTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants3 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants12 Participants9 Participants34 Participants
Age, Continuous63 years60 years57 years60 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants15 participants15 participants45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants6 Participants10 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants9 Participants5 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

The Percentage of Patients Who Had a 50% or Greater Wound Size Volume Reduction After 4 Weeks of Treatment With the Next Science Wound Gel, as Compared to Wounds Treated With Standard of Care

Time frame: Percentage after 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NXTSCThe Percentage of Patients Who Had a 50% or Greater Wound Size Volume Reduction After 4 Weeks of Treatment With the Next Science Wound Gel, as Compared to Wounds Treated With Standard of Care62 percentage of participants
NXTSC Plus SOCThe Percentage of Patients Who Had a 50% or Greater Wound Size Volume Reduction After 4 Weeks of Treatment With the Next Science Wound Gel, as Compared to Wounds Treated With Standard of Care72 percentage of participants
Standard of CareThe Percentage of Patients Who Had a 50% or Greater Wound Size Volume Reduction After 4 Weeks of Treatment With the Next Science Wound Gel, as Compared to Wounds Treated With Standard of Care47 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026