Skip to content

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation to Evaluate Neural Plasticity After Stroke

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation to Evaluate Neural Plasticity After Stroke

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02465034
Enrollment
45
Registered
2015-06-08
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2019-07-24
Last updated
2021-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Stroke

Keywords

Neural plasticity, Noninvasive brain stimulation, Motor cortex

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine how different areas in the brain interact with each other and how using brain imaging and brain stimulation approaches can influence these interactions.

Detailed description

Subcortical strokes affect small vessels deep in the brain, and typically present with motor hemiparesis. The investigator will assess the effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on motor function and examine how different areas in the human brain interact with each other using brain imaging and brain stimulation. The investigator will also evaluate the capacity for noninvasive stimulation to transiently modify brain activity supporting arm movement.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) will be performed using the Magstim BiStim\^2 paired pulse stimulator to measure transient cortical excitability. Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation applied at low frequencies (not greater than 0.25 hertz (Hz)) will be used. The may be repeated at multiple study visits. All five study visits will be completed within four weeks of the initial visit.

DEVICETraditional Paired Associative Stimulation

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) is a combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation of the median nerve. 180 paired stimuli are delivered at 0.25 Hz for 12 minutes. Median nerve stimuli at 300% of the perceptual threshold will be applied 25ms prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation delivery over the ipsilesional (stroke) or non-dominant (control) cortex. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) will be performed using the Magstim BiStim\^2 paired pulse stimulator unit and a bipolar bar electrode will be used for median nerve stimulation. This traditional paired associative stimulation may be repeated at multiple study visits. All five study visits will be completed within four weeks of the initial visit.

Stimulation of the median nerve will be performed using a bipolar bar electrode affixed to palmar aspect of the forearm proximal to the crease of the wrist bilaterally. Stimuli will be delivered 23ms prior to the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse with 0.1 milliseconds (ms) rectangular pulses at an intensity to evoke a 1 millivolt (mV) response in the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. This may may be repeated at multiple study visits. All five study visits will be completed within four weeks of the initial visit.

DEVICECorticocortical Paired Associative Stimulation

Cortico-cortical Paired Associative Stimulation (CC-PAS) is a combination of TMS and electrical stimulation of the median nerve. 180 paired stimuli are delivered at 0.25 Hz for 12 minutes. The interstimulus interval will range from 5-15 ms depending on site of stimulation.TMS will be performed using the Magstim BiStim\^2 paired pulse stimulator unit and a bipolar bar electrode will be used for median nerve stimulation. This CC-PAS may be repeated at multiple study visits. All five study visits will be completed within four weeks of the initial visit.

The sham PAS is a combination of TMS and electrical stimulation of the median nerve. The coil is rotated and separated from the head with a plastic spacer to ensure indirect contact with the head.180 paired stimuli are delivered at 0.25 Hz for 12 minutes. TMS will be performed using the Magstim BiStim\^2 paired pulse stimulator unit and a bipolar bar electrode will be used for median nerve stimulation. This sham paired associative stimulation may be repeated at multiple study visits. All five study visits will be completed within four weeks of the initial visit.

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 18-85 years 2. Middle cerebral artery stroke 3. Individuals with a first time stroke that affects the corona radiata and/or internal capsule

Exclusion criteria

1. Age outside the age range of 18-85 years 2. Signs of dementia (score \< 24 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment) 3. Aphasia (score \< 13 on the Frenchay Aphasia Screen) 4. History of head trauma 5. History of a major psychiatric diagnosis 6. History of a neurodegenerative disorder 7. History of substance abuse 8. Contraindications to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Long-term Potentiation-like PlasticityBaseline, 1 Minute Post-Paired Associative StimulationLong-term potentiation-like plasticity was measured using paired associative stimulation (PAS). PAS consists of repeated peripheral electric stimulation paired with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) applied to the motor cortex at varying interstimulus intervals. Participants received 180 paired stimuli at 0.25 hertz (Hz) for 12 minutes. Impaired long-term potentiation-like plasticity points towards reduced excitatory synaptic connectivity and deficits in sensorimotor integration. Decrease or no change in the amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) indicates impaired long-term potentiation-like plasticity.
Electroencephalography Recordings at Baseline and 5 MInutes Post-PASBaseline, 5 Minutes Post-Paired Associative StimulationElectroencephalography (EEG) data were recorded using a 64-channel TMS-compatible electrode cap (Easy Cap). Signals were collected at 2000 hertz (Hz) during pre- and post-transcranial magnetic stimulation epochs (-100ms to 200ms). Up to fifty suprathreshold (120% AMT) transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were applied to motor cortex while the subject was seated quietly with eyes open. This procedure was conducted bilaterally. Data epochs (-1000 to 4000 ms with respect to TMS delivery) were extracted for subsequent imaginary phase coherence analysis. Post-TMS coherence values between electrodes overlying M1 bilaterally (C3 and C4) were calculated within the beta frequency range (15 to 30 Hz). EEG data values are unit-free that can range from 0 to 1. Higher values represent greater coherence which is thought to indicate stronger connectivity.
Abbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeBaseline, 10 Minutes Post-Paired Associative StimulationThree items of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) were used to evaluate functional motor performance. The 3 items were selected based on task difficulty ranging from easiest (hand to table) to most difficult (stack checkers) along with a task of moderate difficulty (lift can). Each task has different control demands and number of actions required to complete successfully. Task performance is timed in seconds, with a maximum time of 120 seconds.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electroencephalography Recordings at 30 Minutes and 24 Hours Post-PAS30 minutes post-Paired Associative Stimulation, 24 hours post-Paired Associative StimulationElectroencephalography (EEG) data were recorded using a 64-channel TMS-compatible electrode cap (Easy Cap). Signals were collected at 2000 hertz (Hz) during pre- and post-transcranial magnetic stimulation epochs (-100ms to 200ms). Up to fifty suprathreshold (120% AMT) transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were applied to motor cortex while the subject was seated quietly with eyes open. This procedure was conducted bilaterally. Data epochs (-1000 to 4000 ms with respect to TMS delivery) were extracted for subsequent imaginary phase coherence analysis. Post-TMS coherence values between electrodes overlying M1 bilaterally (C3 and C4) were calculated within the beta frequency range (15 to 30 Hz). EEG data values are unit-free that can range from 0 to 1. Higher values represent greater coherence which is thought to indicate stronger connectivity.
Wolf Motor Function TestBaselineThe arm function in subjects in the subcortical stroke group was evaluated by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The test consists of timed and functional tasks and has 17 items. It is composed of 3 parts: Time, functional ability and strength and includes 15 function-based tasks and 2 strength based tasks. Items 1-6 involve timed functional tasks, items 7-14 are measures of strength, and the remaining 9 items consist of analyzing movement quality when completing various tasks. The examiner will test the less affected upper extremity followed by the most affected side. Scores are based on time taken to complete each task. The median time to complete all tasks will be be used to evaluate motor function. Larger values indicate greater upper extremity motor dysfunction.
Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) PerformanceBaseline, 10 minutes post-PAS, 30 minutes post-PAS, and 24 hours post-PASThe SRTT involves pressing a key that corresponds to a target square positioned on a screen in front of the participant as quickly and accurately as possible. The response time for repeated and random sequences evaluate SRTT performance and skill is measured as the difference in response times between repeated and random sequences. Lower response times indicate better performance and a larger positive difference in response times represents greater sequence-specific skill. Negative values represent better performance on random sequences compared to repeated sequences.
Abbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test Time30 minutes post-Paired Associative Stimulation, 24 hours post-Paired Associative StimulationThree items of the WMFT were used to evaluate functional motor performance. The 3 items were selected based on task difficulty ranging from easiest (hand to table) to most difficult (stack checkers) along with a task of moderate difficulty (lift can). Each task has different control demands and number of actions required to complete successfully. Task performance will be timed, with a maximum time of 120 seconds.
Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity30 minutes post-Paired Associative Stimulation, 24 hours post-Paired Associative StimulationLong-term potentiation-like plasticity was measured using paired associative stimulation (PAS). PAS consists of repeated peripheral electric stimulation paired with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) applied to the motor cortex at varying interstimulus intervals. Participants receive 180 paired stimuli at 0.25 Hz for 12 minutes. Impaired long-term potentiation-like plasticity points towards reduced excitatory synaptic connectivity and deficits in sensorimotor integration. Decrease or no change in the amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) indicates impaired long-term potentiation-like plasticity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participant enrollment began in May 2015 and all study follow up was completed by July 24, 2019. Study activities took place at the Emory Wesley Woods Health Center in Atlanta, Georgia.

Pre-assignment details

Forty-five individuals gave consent to participate in the study and were enrolled into the appropriate study arm based on health status. Four screen failed or withdrew resulting in 41 who participated in the study. Participants with subcortical stroke could take part in both the PAS and CC-PAS studies.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants With Subcortical Stroke
Participants with subcortical stroke in the chronic phase of recovery with mild-moderate impairment of arm function undergoing noninvasive targeting of cortical locations by stereotactic neuronavigation using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), median nerve stimulation and arm motor function assessments. A paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocol using noninvasive stimulation was used where participants received traditional PAS and sham PAS or a cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation (CC-PAS) and sham CC-PAS. Participants also underwent median nerve stimulation.
19
Healthy Controls
Healthy individuals underwent noninvasive targeting of cortical locations by stereotactic neuronavigation using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), median nerve stimulation and arm motor function assessments. A paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocol using noninvasive stimulation was used where participants received traditional PAS and sham PAS.
26
Total45

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCould not be scheduled for study visit05
Overall StudyScreen fail20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants With Subcortical StrokeHealthy ControlsTotal
Age, Continuous58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
26.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants25 Participants44 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants16 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 Participants26 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants13 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants13 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Abbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test Time

Three items of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) were used to evaluate functional motor performance. The 3 items were selected based on task difficulty ranging from easiest (hand to table) to most difficult (stack checkers) along with a task of moderate difficulty (lift can). Each task has different control demands and number of actions required to complete successfully. Task performance is timed in seconds, with a maximum time of 120 seconds.

Time frame: Baseline, 10 Minutes Post-Paired Associative Stimulation

Population: Only participants receiving CC-PAS were studied for this outcome. Errors with data acquisition occurred with two participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeHand to Table Baseline1.34 secondsStandard Deviation 1
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeHand to Table 10 Minutes Post-PAS1.22 secondsStandard Deviation 1.04
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeStack Checkers Baseline3.72 secondsStandard Deviation 3.91
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeStack Checkers 10 Minutes Post-PAS3.03 secondsStandard Deviation 2.29
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeLift Can Baseline7.76 secondsStandard Deviation 4.6
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeLift Can 10 Minutes Post-PAS7.40 secondsStandard Deviation 4.47
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeLift Can Baseline6.17 secondsStandard Deviation 2.52
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeHand to Table Baseline1.20 secondsStandard Deviation 0.94
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeStack Checkers 10 Minutes Post-PAS3.20 secondsStandard Deviation 2.26
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeHand to Table 10 Minutes Post-PAS0.98 secondsStandard Deviation 0.76
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeLift Can 10 Minutes Post-PAS7.19 secondsStandard Deviation 2.93
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeStack Checkers Baseline3.26 secondsStandard Deviation 2.56
Primary

Change in Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity

Long-term potentiation-like plasticity was measured using paired associative stimulation (PAS). PAS consists of repeated peripheral electric stimulation paired with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) applied to the motor cortex at varying interstimulus intervals. Participants received 180 paired stimuli at 0.25 hertz (Hz) for 12 minutes. Impaired long-term potentiation-like plasticity points towards reduced excitatory synaptic connectivity and deficits in sensorimotor integration. Decrease or no change in the amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) indicates impaired long-term potentiation-like plasticity.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 Minute Post-Paired Associative Stimulation

Population: This analysis includes participants with complete and usable data. Errors with data acquisition occurred with three participants in the stroke PAS assessment, two participants in the stroke CC-PAS assessment, and three healthy controls. Two additional control participants were not included in the analysis due to data quality issues.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcortical Stroke PASChange in Long-term Potentiation-like PlasticityBaseline813.86 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 619.81
Subcortical Stroke PASChange in Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity1 minute post-PAS1455.77 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 1383.06
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamChange in Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity1 minute post-PAS883.74 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 424.24
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamChange in Long-term Potentiation-like PlasticityBaseline819.47 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 387.37
Subcortical Stroke CC-PASChange in Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity1 minute post-PAS644.46 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 627.7
Subcortical Stroke CC-PASChange in Long-term Potentiation-like PlasticityBaseline665.14 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 645.05
Subcortical Stroke CC-PAS ShamChange in Long-term Potentiation-like PlasticityBaseline427.80 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 360.45
Subcortical Stroke CC-PAS ShamChange in Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity1 minute post-PAS525.34 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 502.67
Healthy Control GroupChange in Long-term Potentiation-like PlasticityBaseline1408.08 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 871.52
Healthy Control GroupChange in Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity1 minute post-PAS1777.57 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 1192.83
Healthy Control ShamChange in Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity1 minute post-PAS1121.38 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 641.96
Healthy Control ShamChange in Long-term Potentiation-like PlasticityBaseline1025.60 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 451.76
Primary

Electroencephalography Recordings at Baseline and 5 MInutes Post-PAS

Electroencephalography (EEG) data were recorded using a 64-channel TMS-compatible electrode cap (Easy Cap). Signals were collected at 2000 hertz (Hz) during pre- and post-transcranial magnetic stimulation epochs (-100ms to 200ms). Up to fifty suprathreshold (120% AMT) transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were applied to motor cortex while the subject was seated quietly with eyes open. This procedure was conducted bilaterally. Data epochs (-1000 to 4000 ms with respect to TMS delivery) were extracted for subsequent imaginary phase coherence analysis. Post-TMS coherence values between electrodes overlying M1 bilaterally (C3 and C4) were calculated within the beta frequency range (15 to 30 Hz). EEG data values are unit-free that can range from 0 to 1. Higher values represent greater coherence which is thought to indicate stronger connectivity.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 Minutes Post-Paired Associative Stimulation

Population: Only participants receiving CC-PAS were studied for this outcome. Errors with data acquisition occurred with two participants. Data were not collected for one participant due to EEG equipment malfunction, and not collected for one participant due to time constraints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcortical Stroke PASElectroencephalography Recordings at Baseline and 5 MInutes Post-PAS5 minutes post-PAS0.19 coefficient of coherenceStandard Deviation 0.08
Subcortical Stroke PASElectroencephalography Recordings at Baseline and 5 MInutes Post-PASBaseline0.20 coefficient of coherenceStandard Deviation 0.08
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamElectroencephalography Recordings at Baseline and 5 MInutes Post-PASBaseline0.20 coefficient of coherenceStandard Deviation 0.07
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamElectroencephalography Recordings at Baseline and 5 MInutes Post-PAS5 minutes post-PAS0.19 coefficient of coherenceStandard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Abbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test Time

Three items of the WMFT were used to evaluate functional motor performance. The 3 items were selected based on task difficulty ranging from easiest (hand to table) to most difficult (stack checkers) along with a task of moderate difficulty (lift can). Each task has different control demands and number of actions required to complete successfully. Task performance will be timed, with a maximum time of 120 seconds.

Time frame: 30 minutes post-Paired Associative Stimulation, 24 hours post-Paired Associative Stimulation

Population: Only participants receiving CC-PAS were studied for this outcome. Errors with data acquisition occurred with two participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeHand to Table 30 minutes post-PAS1.09 secondsStandard Deviation 0.89
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeHand to Table 24 hours post-PAS1.18 secondsStandard Deviation 0.79
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeStack Checkers 30 minutes post-PAS3.15 secondsStandard Deviation 2.49
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeStack Checkers 24 hours post-PAS3.45 secondsStandard Deviation 4.78
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeLift Can 30 minutes post-PAS7.23 secondsStandard Deviation 3.83
Subcortical Stroke PASAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeLift Can 24 hours post-PAS7.23 secondsStandard Deviation 3.46
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeLift Can 30 minutes post-PAS7.79 secondsStandard Deviation 5.33
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeHand to Table 30 minutes post-PAS1.06 secondsStandard Deviation 0.8
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeStack Checkers 24 hours post-PAS2.81 secondsStandard Deviation 2.39
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeHand to Table 24 hours post-PAS1.20 secondsStandard Deviation 1.1
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeLift Can 24 hours post-PAS6.28 secondsStandard Deviation 2.9
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamAbbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test TimeStack Checkers 30 minutes post-PAS2.84 secondsStandard Deviation 1.41
Secondary

Electroencephalography Recordings at 30 Minutes and 24 Hours Post-PAS

Electroencephalography (EEG) data were recorded using a 64-channel TMS-compatible electrode cap (Easy Cap). Signals were collected at 2000 hertz (Hz) during pre- and post-transcranial magnetic stimulation epochs (-100ms to 200ms). Up to fifty suprathreshold (120% AMT) transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were applied to motor cortex while the subject was seated quietly with eyes open. This procedure was conducted bilaterally. Data epochs (-1000 to 4000 ms with respect to TMS delivery) were extracted for subsequent imaginary phase coherence analysis. Post-TMS coherence values between electrodes overlying M1 bilaterally (C3 and C4) were calculated within the beta frequency range (15 to 30 Hz). EEG data values are unit-free that can range from 0 to 1. Higher values represent greater coherence which is thought to indicate stronger connectivity.

Time frame: 30 minutes post-Paired Associative Stimulation, 24 hours post-Paired Associative Stimulation

Population: Only participants receiving CC-PAS were studied for this outcome. Errors with data acquisition occurred with two participants. Data were not collected for one participant due to EEG equipment malfunction and not collected for another participant due to time constraints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcortical Stroke PASElectroencephalography Recordings at 30 Minutes and 24 Hours Post-PAS30 minutes post-PAS0.18 coefficient of coherenceStandard Deviation 0.13
Subcortical Stroke PASElectroencephalography Recordings at 30 Minutes and 24 Hours Post-PAS24 hours post-PAS0.18 coefficient of coherenceStandard Deviation 0.07
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamElectroencephalography Recordings at 30 Minutes and 24 Hours Post-PAS30 minutes post-PAS0.18 coefficient of coherenceStandard Deviation 0.07
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamElectroencephalography Recordings at 30 Minutes and 24 Hours Post-PAS24 hours post-PAS0.17 coefficient of coherenceStandard Deviation 0.06
Secondary

Long-term Potentiation-like Plasticity

Long-term potentiation-like plasticity was measured using paired associative stimulation (PAS). PAS consists of repeated peripheral electric stimulation paired with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) applied to the motor cortex at varying interstimulus intervals. Participants receive 180 paired stimuli at 0.25 Hz for 12 minutes. Impaired long-term potentiation-like plasticity points towards reduced excitatory synaptic connectivity and deficits in sensorimotor integration. Decrease or no change in the amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) indicates impaired long-term potentiation-like plasticity.

Time frame: 30 minutes post-Paired Associative Stimulation, 24 hours post-Paired Associative Stimulation

Population: This analysis includes participants with complete and usable data. Errors with data acquisition occurred with three participants in the stroke PAS assessment, two participants in the stroke CC-PAS assessment, and three healthy controls. Two additional control participants were not included in the analysis due to data quality issues. Data from one participant with subcortical stroke receiving CC-PAS was not able to be analyzed due to excessive noise in the signal.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcortical Stroke PASLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity30 minutes post-PAS1162.76 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 585.18
Subcortical Stroke PASLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity24 hours post-PAS1176.71 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 737.16
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity30 minutes post-PAS847.61 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 421.28
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity24 hours post-PAS749.86 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 352.13
Subcortical Stroke CC-PASLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity24 hours post-PAS424.17 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 410.79
Subcortical Stroke CC-PASLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity30 minutes post-PAS532.66 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 510.49
Subcortical Stroke CC-PAS ShamLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity30 minutes post-PAS503.87 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 472.5
Subcortical Stroke CC-PAS ShamLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity24 hours post-PAS445.29 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 438.84
Healthy Control GroupLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity24 hours post-PAS1542.62 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 1219.24
Healthy Control GroupLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity30 minutes post-PAS1757.44 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 960.64
Healthy Control ShamLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity30 minutes post-PAS1310.29 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 684.84
Healthy Control ShamLong-term Potentiation-like Plasticity24 hours post-PAS1387.98 microvolts (µV)Standard Deviation 758.53
Secondary

Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance

The SRTT involves pressing a key that corresponds to a target square positioned on a screen in front of the participant as quickly and accurately as possible. The response time for repeated and random sequences evaluate SRTT performance and skill is measured as the difference in response times between repeated and random sequences. Lower response times indicate better performance and a larger positive difference in response times represents greater sequence-specific skill. Negative values represent better performance on random sequences compared to repeated sequences.

Time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes post-PAS, 30 minutes post-PAS, and 24 hours post-PAS

Population: Errors with data acquisition occurred with three participants in the stroke PAS assessment, two participants in the stroke CC-PAS assessment, and three healthy controls. Two additional control participants were not included due to data quality issues. One participant with subcortical stroke receiving PAS and two receiving CC-PAS were unable to perform the task due to severe upper extremity motor impairment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcortical Stroke PASSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) PerformanceBaseline805.00 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 188.63
Subcortical Stroke PASSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance10 minutes post-PAS806.00 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 155.6
Subcortical Stroke PASSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance30 minutes post-PAS812.80 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 192.42
Subcortical Stroke PASSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance24 hours post-PAS726.00 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 112.81
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance30 minutes post-PAS788.40 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 197.86
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) PerformanceBaseline1030.26 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 398.4
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance10 minutes post-PAS838.12 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 172.58
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance24 hours post-PAS790.25 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 199.97
Subcortical Stroke CC-PASSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance10 minutes post-PAS-1.69 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 142.72
Subcortical Stroke CC-PASSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance30 minutes post-PAS9.35 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 36.69
Subcortical Stroke CC-PASSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) PerformanceBaseline19.21 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 54.01
Subcortical Stroke CC-PASSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance24 hours post-PAS-14.21 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 114.31
Subcortical Stroke CC-PAS ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) PerformanceBaseline13.02 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 67.51
Subcortical Stroke CC-PAS ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance10 minutes post-PAS28.38 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 114.26
Subcortical Stroke CC-PAS ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance30 minutes post-PAS3.99 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 70.74
Subcortical Stroke CC-PAS ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance24 hours post-PAS8.94 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 81.99
Healthy Control GroupSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance30 minutes post-PAS66.16 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 63.71
Healthy Control GroupSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance10 minutes post-PAS52.73 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 53.43
Healthy Control GroupSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) PerformanceBaseline45.13 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 43.68
Healthy Control GroupSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance24 hours post-PAS83.41 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 82.96
Healthy Control ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance24 hours post-PAS77.05 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 51.59
Healthy Control ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance30 minutes post-PAS61.61 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 57.97
Healthy Control ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Performance10 minutes post-PAS57.50 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 59.76
Healthy Control ShamSerial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) PerformanceBaseline52.30 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 48.71
Secondary

Wolf Motor Function Test

The arm function in subjects in the subcortical stroke group was evaluated by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The test consists of timed and functional tasks and has 17 items. It is composed of 3 parts: Time, functional ability and strength and includes 15 function-based tasks and 2 strength based tasks. Items 1-6 involve timed functional tasks, items 7-14 are measures of strength, and the remaining 9 items consist of analyzing movement quality when completing various tasks. The examiner will test the less affected upper extremity followed by the most affected side. Scores are based on time taken to complete each task. The median time to complete all tasks will be be used to evaluate motor function. Larger values indicate greater upper extremity motor dysfunction.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: This analysis includes participants with subcortical stroke, during the active PAS and CC-PAS assessments. Errors with data acquisition occurred with three participants in the stroke PAS assessment and two participants in the stroke CC-PAS assessment. This test was not performed for three participants receiving CC-PAS due to time constraints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcortical Stroke PASWolf Motor Function Test5.79 secondsStandard Deviation 10.74
Subcortical Stroke PAS ShamWolf Motor Function Test23.30 secondsStandard Deviation 47.81

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026