Skip to content

Three New Ideas to Protect Special Forces From the Stress of High Altitude

Three New Ideas to Protect Special Forces From the Stress of High Altitude

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02463357
Enrollment
148
Registered
2015-06-04
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2021-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mountain Sickness

Keywords

Exercise, Aerobic, Cognitive Function

Brief summary

Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS) is a well-documented syndrome that affects 42% of non-acclimatized individuals traveling to altitudes above 10,000 feet. Decreased barometric pressure, which leads to low blood oxygen levels, is the primary casual factor of AMS. Symptoms of AMS are characterized by headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, fatigue and difficultly sleeping. Moreover, when people travel to high altitude, cognitive performance and endurance exercise capacity are impaired. Therefore, the goal of this research is to identify effective pharmacological agents that will help reduce the symptoms of AMS and improve physical and cognitive performance at high altitude. The investigators will study the efficacy of the dietary supplement, quercetin, the drugs nifedipine (extended release) and methazolamide taken together, the drug metformin, and the drug nitrite in reducing symptoms of AMS and improving cognitive and exercise performance at high altitudes.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTQuercetin
DRUGMetformin
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Alma College
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy, * young (18-30 years old) men who can meet APFT requirements for special operation forces (SOF) training as outlined by the US Army (42 push ups, 53 sit-ups, 6 pull-ups, 2 mile run in \< 15 min 54 s)

Exclusion criteria

* women; * smokers; * participants with diseases or disorders known to be affected by hypoxia or the drugs used in this study, such as hypotension, anemia, sickle cell trait or disease, and diabetes; * participants with a history of significant head injury, migraines or seizures; * participants taking any medication (over-the-counter or prescription) or herbal supplements; * participants with known flavonoid allergies; * participants with known allergies to metformin; * participants with known hypersensitivity reaction to nifedipine; * participants with known allergies to sulfonamide-based drugs; * participants with inability to be headache-free when consuming the amount of caffeine in two six ounce cups of coffee or less per day; * exposure to high altitude above 1000m in the previous three months; or * participants who have been on an airline flight over six hours (the lowered cabin pressure for an extended period of time approximates exposure to high altitude); * participants who are unable to achieve the minimum physical criteria required for SOF training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeBaseline and during high altitude exposure (3 days, AM/PM)Self-reported assessment of AMS symptoms (headache, lightheaded, dizzy, etc.). The 11-item Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire measures Acute Mountain Sickness symptoms (nausea, weakness, lightheadedness, dizziness, headache, etc.). Possible scores range from 0 to 55 (0-5 per item), with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Change in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeBaseline and during high altitude exposure (3 days, AM/PM)Self-reported assessment of AMS symptoms (headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, fatigue and difficultly sleeping). The Lake Louise AMS Scoring System measures symptoms of altitude sickness. Possible scores range from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Change in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeBaseline, 1st day at high altitudeTimed 2 mile run, push-ups, sit-ups, and pull-ups. The Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) measures physical fitness. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. A score of 60 is considered minimum passing score. The maximum possible score is 300, indicating the highest level of physical fitness.
Change in Uphill Hike at High Altitude2nd day at altitudeTimed 3.1 mile uphill run/hike, with weighted back-pack
Change in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeBaseline and and 1st day at high altitudeBattery of nine cognitive function tests. The Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) measures cognitive function and was used to measure mean reaction time. Possible scores range from 180 to 500 milliseconds, with lower scores indicating a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

49 participants were excluded after consent/enrollment but prior to starting the study because some subjects did not meet baseline criteria, and others had to be excluded due to resource limitations.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Quercetin
Quercetin: 500mg pill, twice daily for 5 days Quercetin
20
Nifedipine+Methazolamide
Nifedipine extended release: 30mg pill, twice daily for 5 days; Methazolamide: 125mg pill, twice daily for 5 days Nifedipine extended release Methazolamide
20
Metformin
Metformin: 500mg pill, once daily for 2 days, then 500mg twice daily at altitude (3 days) Metformin
20
Placebo
Sugar pill manufactured to look like all other investigational products Placebo
19
Nitrite
Nitrite: 20mg pill, three times daily for 5 days Nitrite
20
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNifedipine+MethazolamideMetforminPlaceboQuercetinNitriteTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants20 Participants19 Participants20 Participants20 Participants99 Participants
Age, Continuous21.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
21.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
21.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
22.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
22.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
21.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.27
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants20 participants19 participants20 participants20 participants99 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants20 Participants19 Participants20 Participants20 Participants99 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 200 / 200 / 190 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 200 / 202 / 201 / 191 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 200 / 200 / 190 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High Altitude

Timed 2 mile run, push-ups, sit-ups, and pull-ups. The Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) measures physical fitness. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. A score of 60 is considered minimum passing score. The maximum possible score is 300, indicating the highest level of physical fitness.

Time frame: Baseline, 1st day at high altitude

Population: Two participants who withdrew from the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
QuercetinChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeBaseline247.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.1
QuercetinChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeChange at Day 1-27.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeBaseline251.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.4
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeChange at Day 1-59.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
MetforminChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeBaseline254.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.9
MetforminChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeChange at Day 1-32.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
PlaceboChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeChange at Day 1-23.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
PlaceboChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeBaseline251.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
NitriteChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeBaseline252.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
NitriteChange in Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at High AltitudeChange at Day 1-26.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Primary

Change in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High Altitude

Battery of nine cognitive function tests. The Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) measures cognitive function and was used to measure mean reaction time. Possible scores range from 180 to 500 milliseconds, with lower scores indicating a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and and 1st day at high altitude

Population: Seven participants were not analyzed due to lack of data collection at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
QuercetinChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeChange from baseline at day 1-0.5 millisecondsStandard Deviation 27.8
QuercetinChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeBaseline308.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 34.7
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeChange from baseline at day 114.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 26.6
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeBaseline302.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 49.5
MetforminChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeBaseline312.3 millisecondsStandard Deviation 46.1
MetforminChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeChange from baseline at day 1-8.3 millisecondsStandard Deviation 37.9
PlaceboChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeBaseline333.9 millisecondsStandard Deviation 41.5
PlaceboChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeChange from baseline at day 10.5 millisecondsStandard Deviation 30.6
NitriteChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeChange from baseline at day 1-4.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 30.8
NitriteChange in Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Reaction Time at High AltitudeBaseline310.7 millisecondsStandard Deviation 29.32
Primary

Change in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High Altitude

Self-reported assessment of AMS symptoms (headache, lightheaded, dizzy, etc.). The 11-item Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire measures Acute Mountain Sickness symptoms (nausea, weakness, lightheadedness, dizziness, headache, etc.). Possible scores range from 0 to 55 (0-5 per item), with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and during high altitude exposure (3 days, AM/PM)

Population: Two participants who withdrew from the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
QuercetinChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeBaseline0.132 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.179
QuercetinChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeChange at 3 days-0.088 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.214
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeBaseline0.122 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.214
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeChange at 3 days-0.073 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.224
MetforminChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeBaseline0.080 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.132
MetforminChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeChange at 3 days0.128 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.425
PlaceboChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeChange at 3 days0.035 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.184
PlaceboChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeBaseline0.069 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.109
NitriteChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeBaseline0.121 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
NitriteChange in Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire at High AltitudeChange at 3 days0.044 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Primary

Change in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High Altitude

Self-reported assessment of AMS symptoms (headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, fatigue and difficultly sleeping). The Lake Louise AMS Scoring System measures symptoms of altitude sickness. Possible scores range from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and during high altitude exposure (3 days, AM/PM)

Population: Two participants who withdrew from the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
QuercetinChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeBaseline0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
QuercetinChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeChange at Day 30.053 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.229
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeBaseline0.150 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.489
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeChange at Day 30.150 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.875
MetforminChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeBaseline0.150 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.671
MetforminChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeChange at Day 30.750 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.124
PlaceboChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeChange at Day 30.632 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.012
PlaceboChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeBaseline0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
NitriteChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeBaseline0.250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.118
NitriteChange in Lake Louise AMS Scoring System at High AltitudeChange at Day 30.474 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.896
Primary

Change in Uphill Hike at High Altitude

Timed 3.1 mile uphill run/hike, with weighted back-pack

Time frame: 2nd day at altitude

Population: Two participants who withdrew from the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
QuercetinChange in Uphill Hike at High Altitude4685 secondsStandard Deviation 364.4
Nifedipine+MethazolamideChange in Uphill Hike at High Altitude4993 secondsStandard Deviation 595.4
MetforminChange in Uphill Hike at High Altitude5005 secondsStandard Deviation 975.9
PlaceboChange in Uphill Hike at High Altitude4819 secondsStandard Deviation 685.1
NitriteChange in Uphill Hike at High Altitude4953 secondsStandard Deviation 670.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026