Skip to content

Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Skin Incision Closure

Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type in Post-Cesarean Wound Complications

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02459093
Enrollment
550
Registered
2015-06-01
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2018-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complications; Cesarean Section, Surgical Wound Infection

Keywords

wound complications

Brief summary

A comparison of the type of suture used for cesarean skin incision approximation and the subsequent rate of wound complications has not been widely studied. Investigators seek to compare poliglecaprone 25 and polyglactin 910 suture used in a subcuticular skin closure in Pfannenstiel incisions during cesarean birth and determine the subsequent wound complication rates (SSI, hematoma, seroma, wound separation).

Detailed description

In the United States cesarean delivery rates in 2012 were 32.8%. The incidence of wound complications post-cesarean delivery has been quoted to be anywhere from 3-30%. Wound complications can include surgical site infection (SSI), hematoma, seroma, and wound separation. Risk factors for wound complications include elevated body mass index (BMI), prolonged duration of surgery, maternal diabetes, coexisting infection (chorioamnionitis), anemia, and increasing number of prior cesarean deliveries. The majority of cesarean deliveries are performed through a suprapubic low-transverse skin incision (Pfannenstiel incision). The incidence of wound complication post-cesarean comparing suture and staple skin closure has been extensively studied with the over all conclusion recommending suture skin closer. A comparison of the type of suture used for skin closer and wound complication has not been widely studied. Vats et al. compared three types of suture material in post-cesarean wound complication and found statistical difference in wound discomfort, swelling and induration, wound discharge, and wound dehiscence. Their quoted wound complication rate was as high as thirty-three percent. Although, their study population was limited to emergent cesarean deliveries, the sample size was small, and their method of randomization was not explained. Physiologic wound healing involves five steps: inflammation, granulation, epithelialization, wound contraction, and scar maturation. These biologic processes overlap in occurrence but happen in a defined order. Investigators hypothesize that suture materials with differing profiles will have different effects on these biologic processes. The two most widely used sutures for low-transverse cesarean skin incision closure in our institution are poliglecaprone 25 and polyglactin 910. Poliglecaprone 25 (monocryl) is a monofilament suture with an absorption profile of 91-119 days. Polyglactin 910 (coated vicryl) is a braided suture with an absorption profile of 56-70 days. Given the difference in profile for each suture and the physiologic wound healing process investigators question which would be more effective for wound healing. The purpose of the study: 1. To compare poliglecaprone 25 and polyglactin 910 suture in Pfannenstiel incision closure for prevention of wound complication (SSI, hematoma, seroma, wound separation). 2. To determine if risk factors for wound complication should guide the choice of suture used for closure of Pfannenstiel incision. Methods Patient enrollment will occur during their admission to labor and delivery. Patients will be approached if they meet the enrollment criteria. If they agree to participate in the trial a pre-randomized sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelope will be assigned to them and opened at the time of cesarean delivery which will assign the surgical suture to be used for skin closure. Inclusion criteria for the trial: 1. Gestational age of 37 completed weeks or greater based on their estimated due date calculated from last menstrual period or early ultrasound. 2. Scheduled cesarean delivery or... 3. Non-emergent cesarean delivery Patients participating will be undergoing either: 1. Scheduled cesarean delivery 2. Non-emergent cesarean delivery Non-emergent cesarean delivery will be defined as an indicated cesarean delivery based on obstetrical criteria without significant fetal heart tracing abnormalities. This would include women diagnosed with a labor dystocia or arrest of labor, failed labor induction, fetal malpresentation in labor (i.e. breech presentation) or any other non-emergent indication for cesarean delivery in which there is no immediate danger to mother or fetus. The following exclusion criteria will be used: 1. Urogenital tract infection within 2 weeks prior to surgery 2. Chronic oral or injectable steroid use (\> 2 weeks) 3. Emergency cesarean delivery (need to deliver immediately due to a maternal or fetal indication) 4. Vertical skin incision 5. Participation in another research study The patients will be randomized after informed consent is obtained into two groups. Group 1: Incision closure with poliglecaprone 25 suture Group 2: Incision closure with polyglactin 910 suture Randomization for the study will be generated using www.randomization.com, in blocks of 6 and 10 prior to the start of enrollment for the trial. Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes will contain the surgical suture to be used for skin closure, poliglecaprone 25 or polyglactin 910. Surgical preparation will follow departmental protocol. Once the patient is randomized to a suture group the corresponding suture will be pulled and placed on the sterile field for use after completion of the cesarean in accordance to manufacturer's guidelines. Cesarean delivery will occur following the technique of the surgeon. Maternal demographics to be obtained will include BMI, gestational age, pre and postoperative day #1 complete blood count, estimated blood loss, type of preoperative skin preparation, surgical time from skin incision to closure, birth weight, Apgar scores, newborn outcome, indication for cesarean delivery, medical history and any antenatal complications, past surgical history, postoperative course, and intraoperative or postoperative complications. Wound complication will be defined as wound separation of ≥ 1 cm in length, hematoma or seroma (serous fluid collection or subcutaneous blood collection), and surgical site infection defined by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. The primary outcome will include a composite finding of a wound complication in the 30 day period post-operatively. All patients will be followed until the routine postpartum visit occurs at 6-8 weeks following delivery with their primary prenatal care provider. Postpartum visit information will be extracted from the medical record. All patients will receive a follow up telephone call at post-operative day 30 or greater to monitor any post-operative complications as listed above. An alert notification will be placed in each patient's medical record that they are enrolled in this study and close monitoring and documentation of the cesarean incision is necessary. The definition of wound complication as listed in the first paragraph above will be included in the alert notification to standardize reporting for each patient. Recruitment Mechanisms Clinicians will ask patients during admission to labor and delivery after they meet enrollment criteria whether they are interested in the study. Consent will then be obtained by the research clinicians. Informed Consent Patient consent will occur on admission to the labor and delivery unit. The capacity of each patient to provide ethically adequate informed consent will be assessed by the PI or his designee. It is possible that patients will be enrolled during labor prior to cesarean section if not in significant pain although the majority of patients will be presenting for scheduled cesarean sections prior to labor. Consent will be obtained from women in active labor after labor analgesia has occurred. Emergency cesareans are excluded.

Interventions

DEVICEpoliglecaprone 25 suture

cesarean delivery incision closure with poliglecaprone 25 suture

DEVICEpolyglactin 910 suture

cesarean delivery incision closure with polyglactin 910 suture

Sponsors

Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Gestational age of 37 completed weeks or greater based on their estimated due date calculated from last menstrual period or early ultrasound. * Patients participating will be undergoing either: * Scheduled cesarean delivery * Non-emergent cesarean delivery

Exclusion criteria

* Urogenital tract infection within 2 weeks prior to surgery * Chronic oral or injectable steroid use (\> 2 weeks) * Emergency cesarean delivery (need to deliver immediately due to a maternal or fetal indication) * Vertical skin incision * Active participation in another research study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)30 daysAny wound disruption, fluid accumulation, separation, all CDC defined stages of surgical site infection (SSI)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Poliglecaprone 25 Suture
Subcuticular skin approximation with poliglecaprone 25 suture at cesarean birth surgery poliglecaprone 25 suture: cesarean delivery incision closure with poliglecaprone 25 suture
263
Polyglactin 910 Suture
Subcuticular skin approximation with polyglactin 910 suture at cesarean birth surgery polyglactin 910 suture: cesarean delivery incision closure with polyglactin 910 suture
257
Total520

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up67
Overall StudyProtocol Violation611

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPoliglecaprone 25 SuturePolyglactin 910 SutureTotal
Age, Continuous31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
31.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Cesarean delivery with labor
Any labor
39 Participants50 Participants89 Participants
Cesarean delivery with labor
Scheduled or no labor
224 Participants207 Participants431 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
64 Participants61 Participants125 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
17 Participants11 Participants28 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
128 Participants130 Participants258 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
22 Participants12 Participants34 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
14 Participants26 Participants40 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
263 Participants257 Participants520 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2630 / 257
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2630 / 257
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2630 / 257

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)

Any wound disruption, fluid accumulation, separation, all CDC defined stages of surgical site infection (SSI)

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Surgical Site Infection16 Participants
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Seroma2 Participants
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Hematoma1 Participants
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Separation7 Participants
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Composite wound23 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Separation13 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Composite wound37 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Surgical Site Infection25 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Hematoma3 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Seroma1 Participants
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [0.37, 0.99]Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)

Any wound disruption, fluid accumulation, separation, all CDC defined stages of surgical site infection (SSI)

Time frame: 30 days

Population: As treated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Surgical Site Infection16 Participants
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Seroma1 Participants
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Hematoma1 Participants
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Separation8 Participants
Poliglecaprone 25 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Composite wound22 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Separation8 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Composite wound30 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Surgical Site Infection20 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Hematoma2 Participants
Polyglactin 910 SutureNumber of Participants With Wound Complications (Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Hematoma, Separation, Seroma, Etc)Seroma2 Participants
p-value: 0.0595% CI: [0.36, 1.01]Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026