Skip to content

Ultra Low Dose CT for CACS and AC of SPECT

Usefulness of Ultra Low Dose Cardiac CT for Coronary Calcium Scoring and for Attenuation Correction of SPECT

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02458352
Enrollment
105
Registered
2015-06-01
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2019-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the CACS obtained from standard dose CT to the CACS obtained from ultra-low-dose scans. Additionally, the usefulness of ultra-low-dose CT for AC of myocardial perfusion SPECT will be assessed.

Interventions

DEVICEUltra low dose non-contrast enhanced CT

Non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC using a novel protocol for ultra low dose radiation dose exposure

DEVICEStandard dose non-contrast enhanced CT

Clinically indicated non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC according to routine protocol

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients referred for myocardial perfusion SPECT * Male and Female subjects ≥18 years of age, * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or breast-feeding * CACS of 0 after inclusion of 10 patients with CACS 0 * Stents or implanted cardiac devices (valves, pace makers, ICD) * Coronary artery bypass grafts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement and Correlation of Coronary Artery Calcium Score Obtained From Ultra-low-dose and Standard CT1 daysCAC and BA limits of agreement between coronary artery calcium score obtained from ultra-low-dose and standard CT. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a measure for quantification of coronary artery calcification based on non-contrast enhanced CT, ranging from 0 (no calcifications) to infinite. It is an arbitrary unit. Increasing CAC means higher amounts of coronary artery calcifications and is associated with worse prognosis. Bland-Altman (BA) analysis is a statistical method to compare two modalities or techniques assessing the same measure. Limits of agreement is defined as +/- twice the standard deviation of the differences between the reference method and the new modality/technique. Broader limits of agreement mean less accurate results obtained by the new modality/techniqe, while a 0 BA limit of agreement would theoretically reflect perfect agreement.
Intra-class Correlation Coefficient Between Segmental Relative Tracer Uptake From SPECT Datasets Reconstructed With AC Maps Based on Ultra-Low-Dose and Standard Dose CT1 dayFor every patient, the CT images from 120 and 70 kVp-CT scans were used to create CTAC maps which were then used to reconstruct SPECT images, displayed as a 17-segment model polar plot with normalized percent tracer uptake given for every segment. Intra-class correlation was then applied to compare segmental relative tracer uptake. Analysis and the resulting correlation coefficient of 0.987 basically demonstrates interchangeability between the two datasets.

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Dose CT, Ultra-low Dose CT
Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT: Clinically indicated non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC according to routine protocol
105
Total105

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard Dose CT, Ultra-low Dose CT
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
68 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1050 / 105
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1050 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1050 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Agreement and Correlation of Coronary Artery Calcium Score Obtained From Ultra-low-dose and Standard CT

CAC and BA limits of agreement between coronary artery calcium score obtained from ultra-low-dose and standard CT. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a measure for quantification of coronary artery calcification based on non-contrast enhanced CT, ranging from 0 (no calcifications) to infinite. It is an arbitrary unit. Increasing CAC means higher amounts of coronary artery calcifications and is associated with worse prognosis. Bland-Altman (BA) analysis is a statistical method to compare two modalities or techniques assessing the same measure. Limits of agreement is defined as +/- twice the standard deviation of the differences between the reference method and the new modality/technique. Broader limits of agreement mean less accurate results obtained by the new modality/techniqe, while a 0 BA limit of agreement would theoretically reflect perfect agreement.

Time frame: 1 days

Population: 2/105 participants were not analyzed due to corrupt datasets.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard Dose CTAgreement and Correlation of Coronary Artery Calcium Score Obtained From Ultra-low-dose and Standard CT212 Agatston score
Ultra-low Dose CTAgreement and Correlation of Coronary Artery Calcium Score Obtained From Ultra-low-dose and Standard CT178 Agatston score
Primary

Intra-class Correlation Coefficient Between Segmental Relative Tracer Uptake From SPECT Datasets Reconstructed With AC Maps Based on Ultra-Low-Dose and Standard Dose CT

For every patient, the CT images from 120 and 70 kVp-CT scans were used to create CTAC maps which were then used to reconstruct SPECT images, displayed as a 17-segment model polar plot with normalized percent tracer uptake given for every segment. Intra-class correlation was then applied to compare segmental relative tracer uptake. Analysis and the resulting correlation coefficient of 0.987 basically demonstrates interchangeability between the two datasets.

Time frame: 1 day

Population: 2/105 participants were not analyzed due to corrupt datasets.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard Dose CTIntra-class Correlation Coefficient Between Segmental Relative Tracer Uptake From SPECT Datasets Reconstructed With AC Maps Based on Ultra-Low-Dose and Standard Dose CT1 Intraclass correlation coefficient
Ultra-low Dose CTIntra-class Correlation Coefficient Between Segmental Relative Tracer Uptake From SPECT Datasets Reconstructed With AC Maps Based on Ultra-Low-Dose and Standard Dose CT0.987 Intraclass correlation coefficient

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026