Skip to content

Oral Nitrite for Older Heart Failure Patients

Study of the Utility of Oral Nitrite Therapy to Improve Skeletal Muscle Bioenergetics and Physical Capacity in Older Heart Failure Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02457260
Acronym
ONTx+HF
Enrollment
21
Registered
2015-05-29
Start date
2016-01-08
Completion date
2017-03-06
Last updated
2018-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

Studies have demonstrated nitrite therapy increases adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis in skeletal muscle mitochondria concomitant with reduced whole-body oxygen cost during steady state exercise. Our own work has demonstrated safety and efficacy of an FDA investigational new drug (IND) approved sodium nitrite (10 milligram \[mg\]) capsule, and its utility to upregulate the sirtuin 3 adenosine monophosphate protein kinase (SIRT3-AMP) pathway of skeletal muscle of younger heart failure (HF) patients. It now seems exceptionally logical and opportune to apply these insights to older HF patients and to delineate mechanisms of disease and aging that respond to nitrite therapy.

Detailed description

Heart failure (HF) is epidemic with aging and prevalence of HF is steadily increasing as the population of older adults expands. Despite the fact that age always stands out as a leading risk factor for HF incidence as well as for poor HF prognosis, few HF trials focus specifically on aging physiology as a key determinant of the disease, and/or on the utility of targeting mechanisms associated with aging as beneficial therapeutic targets. Consistently, HF trials have tended to focus primarily on central mechanisms of cardiac pumping dysfunction despite the fact that HF-outcomes are strongly related to functional decrements that are largely mediated by peripheral manifestations of the disease, and which are particularly interrelated with aging physiology. HF-related skeletal muscle myopathy is a manifestation of HF that diminishes physical function, and which is likely exacerbated by sarcopenia, vascular stiffening, and other aspects of aging such that exercise intolerance is disproportionate among older HF populations as well as its insidious clinical implications. In a pilot investigation, the investigators will study older (age ≥70 years) adults, including patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and age-matched healthy controls, to study benefits of nitrite therapy (in addition to established standards of HF care) to improve physical function. In this pilot analysis the investigators will focus on the utility of daily nitrite supplements to moderate aerobic (maximal and submaximal) and strength (maximal, endurance, and power) indices as well as underlying skeletal muscle mechanisms (skeletal muscle mitochondrial performance, gene expression, and capillarity). Atrophy of type 1 skeletal muscle myocytes is associated with HFrEF and HFpEF. Multiple studies of normal aging have also demonstrated typical atrophy of type 2 skeletal muscle fibers. Consistently, older adults are compromised by cumulative atrophy risks, with studies showing losses of lean body mass as well as intrinsic skeletal muscle weakening, increased interstitial fat, and increased inflammation, with associated functional decrements and fatigue. While aerobic and strength exercise training may be used to modify such HF-related muscle patterns, deconditioning remains pervasive among older HF patients, and efforts to promote exercise interventions are typically confounded by comorbidity (e.g. arthritis, peripheral arterial disease, diabetes, depression), geriatric syndromes (e.g., falls, frailty, incontinence, dementia, poor sleep, malnutrition, auditory and vision impairments), as well as pain, anxiety, and logistic limitations. Even major exercise-training trials that provided strong reinforcements to ensure requisite behavioral changes yielded only poor exercise adherence. There is high conceptual rationale for a therapy that intrinsically improves skeletal muscle performance in HF as a vital means to improve physical function and moderate effects of disease itself as well as to frailties and enfeeblement associated with the disease. This will potentially improve efficacy and quality of care, and also potentially mitigate the skyrocketing costs associated with aggregate HF management. Studies have demonstrated nitrate therapy increases adenosine triphospate (ATP) synthesis in skeletal muscle mitochondria concomitant with reduced whole-body oxygen cost during steady state exercise. Our own work has demonstrated safety and efficacy of an FDA-IND approved sodium nitrite (10 mg) capsule, and its utility to upregulate the SIRT3-AMP pathway of skeletal muscle of younger HF patients. It now seems exceptionally logical and opportune to apply these insights to older HF patients and to delineate mechanisms of disease and aging that respond to nitrite therapy. Overall aims: 1. To demonstrate that oral nitrite pills provide skeletal muscle physiological benefit in old HFrEF and HFpEF patients: * To show that oral supplements are manifest as increased plasma nitrite. * To show that increased plasma nitrite is associated with improved skeletal muscle (mitochondrial respirometry) and platelet (Seahorse XF) metabolism. * To demonstrate that improved metabolism is associated with shifts in skeletal muscle anabolic gene expression (Fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 5 \[FNDC5\], peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator \[PGC1α\], Sirtuin 3) as well as reduced catabolic gene expression (ubiquitin, muscle RING-Finger Protein \[MuRF\], Atrogin1\]) and inflammation (Tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNFα\], Interleukin 1beta (IL-1β), Interleukin six (IL-6). 2. To demonstrate that improved skeletal physiology achieved using oral nitrate pills is associated with improved clinical indices in old HFrEF and HFpEF patients: * To show that oral nitrite supplements increase efficiency of work, i.e., reduced oxygen uptake (VO2) required for the same work intensity.

Interventions

DRUG14 N Sodium Nitrite

oral formulation of sodium nitrite 40 mg three times daily for 4 weeks

Sponsors

Gladwin, Mark, MD
Lead SponsorINDIV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Healthy Controls vs Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) vs Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) on four weeks of nitrite treatment tid.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria HF Population * New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III for the previous three months despite a minimum of 6 weeks of treatment. Echo criteria will be confirmed as part of the initial study assessment. * Age ≥70 years * HFrEF patients left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% * HFpEF patients LVEF\>40%, may include E/E' \>8, left atrial size\>40 mL/m2 * Optimal therapy according to American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology(ACC) and Heart Failure Society of America (HFSa) HFrEF guidelines, including treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and beta-blocker therapy (for at least 6 weeks), or have documented reason for variation, including medication intolerance, contraindication, patient preference, or personal physician's judgment. * Patients using aspirin (ASA) will be eligible, but asked to hold the medication for 48 hours prior to biopsy. This technique has previously been used with consistent safety. Patients will also be asked to avoid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) for 48 hours prior to the biopsy. * Patients using anti-thrombin and anti-platelet therapy will plan to modify prior to muscle biopsies individually in coordination with the participant's primary cardiologist. Inclusion Criteria Age-Matched Control Population * Age ≥70 years * Absence of any type of cardiovascular disease. * Absence of diabetes or other chronic disease processes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTObtained via analysis of skeletal muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis, Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess pertinent gene expression within the pathways of ubiquitin \[muscle ring finger protein 1 (MuRF), Atrogin1, Forkhead Box 03 (FoxO)\], additionally Fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 5, the precursor of irisin (FNDC5), Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma co activator 1-alpha (PGC1α), and Sirtuin 3 were assessed.
Skeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionBaseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTObtained via analysis of skeletal muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis, Mitochondrial function was assessed using respirometry (State 3.12).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measures of Physical Function- Gait SpeedBaseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST4 meter gait speed assessed as part of the short performance physical battery (SPPB). This assessment evaluates how long it take a person can cover four meters at their usual walking speed from a stop when a person says go. This was completed twice to find the fastest speed was used as the variable.
Measures of Physical Function- HandgripBaseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTHandgrip is used as a measure of upper body strength. three trials on each hand were completed with the patient seated and the arm at a right angle. For the purposes of this analysis all trials were averaged together.
Measures of Physical Function- BalanceBaseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTBalance was assessed as part of the short performance physical battery (SPPB). This assessment evaluates three components of static stand (stands with their feet together), semi tandem (stand with the heal of one foot beside the toe of the other foot), Tandem (stands with one foot directly in front of the other). Each test is held for as many seconds as they can up to ten seconds. Static and semi tandem if held for 10 second counts as 1 point if not held it is 0 points, tandem stand if held for 10 second is 2 points, if held for 3 to9.99 it is 1 point, otherwise 0 points. Total points are added up for all balance tests for a composite score with the higher the score the better and maximum being 4, minimum 0.
Serology-platelet BioenergeticsBaseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTPlatelet bioenergetics (using Seahorse XF analysis), i.e., including glycolytic(OLIGO) as well as basal and maximal respiratory rates and extracellular acidification rate.
Serology-Inflammatory MarkerBaseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTInflammatory marker (C-reactive protein \[CRP\])
Serology-plasma Nitrite and NitrateBaseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTplasma nitrite and plasma nitrate levels pre and post 4 week intervention
Serology-platelet Bioenergetics-1Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTPlatelet bioenergetics (using Seahorse XF analysis), i.e., extracellular acidification rate.
Quality of Life Assessment- In Heart FailureBaseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)- is a standard tool to assess the quality of life of the heart failure patients. An overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains with the higher the score (0-100) the better the health status.
Measures of Physical Function- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POSTContinuous metabolic gas collection or a cardiopulmonary exercise test occurred during a constant speed-steady state treadmill walking protocol (1.5mph at a 0% grade) for 5 minutes. During the final minute of the walking protocol oxygen consumption (VO2) was assessed to determined if the patient reached steady state VO2. Steady state VO2 was assessed by a less than 5% change in VO2 for a 30 second period of time. The 30 second average time is represented below in units of measure ml/kg/min. This is to show change in efficiency of performance of the constant speed test a decrease in VO2 from pre to post indicates greater efficiency.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healthy Control
12 healthy adults, age 70 or older to receive 14 Nitrogen (14N) sodium nitrite, 40 mg tid 14 N Sodium Nitrite: oral formulation of sodium nitrite 40 mg three times daily for 4 weeks
12
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
7 adults with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction age 70 or older to receive 14N sodium nitrite, 20 or 40 mg tid depending on dose stratification for safety 14 N Sodium Nitrite: oral formulation of sodium nitrite 40 mg three times daily for 4 weeks
7
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction(HFrEF)
2 adults with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction aged 70 or older to receive 14N sodium nitrite, 20 or 40 mg tid depending on dose stratification for safety 14 N Sodium Nitrite: oral formulation of sodium nitrite 40 mg three times daily for 4 weeks
2
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealthy ControlHeart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction(HFrEF)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants7 Participants2 Participants21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants7 Participants2 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants7 Participants2 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants0 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants3 Participants2 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 70 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 126 / 71 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 70 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Skeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial Function

Obtained via analysis of skeletal muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis, Mitochondrial function was assessed using respirometry (State 3.12).

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: 2 Controls, 1 HFpEF and 1 HFrEF have no data for mitochondrial function due to no FCCP response or potential cytochrome c response. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionMitochondrial function- Fiber 1 State 3.12 PRE108.88 nmol O / sec/ mgStandard Deviation 51.69
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionMitochondrial function- Fiber 1 State 3.12 POST123.59 nmol O / sec/ mgStandard Deviation 35.82
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionMitochondrial function- Fiber 2 State 3.12 PRE122.84 nmol O / sec/ mgStandard Deviation 29.92
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionMitochondrial function- Fiber 2 State 3.12 POST124.68 nmol O / sec/ mgStandard Deviation 70.04
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionMitochondrial function- Fiber 2 State 3.12 POST120.44 nmol O / sec/ mgStandard Deviation 26.74
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionMitochondrial function- Fiber 1 State 3.12 PRE122.99 nmol O / sec/ mgStandard Deviation 46.75
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionMitochondrial function- Fiber 2 State 3.12 PRE229.03 nmol O / sec/ mgStandard Deviation 82.63
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics - Mitochondrial FunctionMitochondrial function- Fiber 1 State 3.12 POST169.77 nmol O / sec/ mgStandard Deviation 69.33
Primary

Skeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Obtained via analysis of skeletal muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis, Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess pertinent gene expression within the pathways of ubiquitin \[muscle ring finger protein 1 (MuRF), Atrogin1, Forkhead Box 03 (FoxO)\], additionally Fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 5, the precursor of irisin (FNDC5), Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma co activator 1-alpha (PGC1α), and Sirtuin 3 were assessed.

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: Health Control- 2 and 1 HFrEF participants have missing data for the gene analysis due to muscle samples not providing a clean reference value for inclusion of data analysis.. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- FNDC5-POST11.79 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.48
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-Atrogin1-PRE13.41 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.13
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-Sirtuin 3-POST9.10 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.18
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-Atrogin1-POST13.30 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.25
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR -FNDC5 -PRE12.04 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.45
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-MuRF-PRE11.64 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.25
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- FoX O-POST10.74 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.3
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- Sirtuin 3-PRE9.25 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.23
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- PGC1α-PRE10.03 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.14
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-MuRF-POST11.46 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.21
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- PGC1α-POST9.96 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.22
Healthy ControlSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- FoX O-PRE10.93 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.27
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- PGC1α-POST9.70 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.48
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR -FNDC5 -PRE11.91 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.53
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- FNDC5-POST11.76 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.34
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- Sirtuin 3-PRE9.12 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.1
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-Sirtuin 3-POST9.07 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.14
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-MuRF-PRE11.90 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.22
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-MuRF-POST11.57 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.46
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-Atrogin1-PRE13.55 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.38
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR-Atrogin1-POST13.12 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.48
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- FoX O-PRE10.95 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.44
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- FoX O-POST10.81 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.61
HFpEFSkeletal Muscle Bioenergetics- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)PCR- PGC1α-PRE10.06 Relative ExpressionStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Measures of Physical Function- Balance

Balance was assessed as part of the short performance physical battery (SPPB). This assessment evaluates three components of static stand (stands with their feet together), semi tandem (stand with the heal of one foot beside the toe of the other foot), Tandem (stands with one foot directly in front of the other). Each test is held for as many seconds as they can up to ten seconds. Static and semi tandem if held for 10 second counts as 1 point if not held it is 0 points, tandem stand if held for 10 second is 2 points, if held for 3 to9.99 it is 1 point, otherwise 0 points. Total points are added up for all balance tests for a composite score with the higher the score the better and maximum being 4, minimum 0.

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: All patients that have both pre and post data were assessed for all three groups. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlMeasures of Physical Function- BalanceSPPB (Balance) - PRE3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Healthy ControlMeasures of Physical Function- BalanceSPPB (Balance)-POST3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
HFpEFMeasures of Physical Function- BalanceSPPB (Balance) - PRE3.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
HFpEFMeasures of Physical Function- BalanceSPPB (Balance)-POST3.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
HFrEFMeasures of Physical Function- BalanceSPPB (Balance) - PRE1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFMeasures of Physical Function- BalanceSPPB (Balance)-POST3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Measures of Physical Function- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)

Continuous metabolic gas collection or a cardiopulmonary exercise test occurred during a constant speed-steady state treadmill walking protocol (1.5mph at a 0% grade) for 5 minutes. During the final minute of the walking protocol oxygen consumption (VO2) was assessed to determined if the patient reached steady state VO2. Steady state VO2 was assessed by a less than 5% change in VO2 for a 30 second period of time. The 30 second average time is represented below in units of measure ml/kg/min. This is to show change in efficiency of performance of the constant speed test a decrease in VO2 from pre to post indicates greater efficiency.

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: All patients that have both pre and post data were assessed for all three groups. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlMeasures of Physical Function- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)Post11.27 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 2.76
Healthy ControlMeasures of Physical Function- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)Pre13.29 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.14
HFpEFMeasures of Physical Function- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)Pre11.55 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.66
HFpEFMeasures of Physical Function- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)Post11.79 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 2.75
HFrEFMeasures of Physical Function- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)Pre10.05 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFMeasures of Physical Function- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)Post10.50 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Measures of Physical Function- Gait Speed

4 meter gait speed assessed as part of the short performance physical battery (SPPB). This assessment evaluates how long it take a person can cover four meters at their usual walking speed from a stop when a person says go. This was completed twice to find the fastest speed was used as the variable.

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: All patients that have both pre and post data were assessed for all three groups. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlMeasures of Physical Function- Gait SpeedGait Speed- Pre4.32 secondsStandard Deviation 0.78
Healthy ControlMeasures of Physical Function- Gait SpeedGait Speed- Post4.36 secondsStandard Deviation 0.74
HFpEFMeasures of Physical Function- Gait SpeedGait Speed- Pre5.6 secondsStandard Deviation 2.24
HFpEFMeasures of Physical Function- Gait SpeedGait Speed- Post5.36 secondsStandard Deviation 1.81
HFrEFMeasures of Physical Function- Gait SpeedGait Speed- Pre4.22 secondsStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFMeasures of Physical Function- Gait SpeedGait Speed- Post4.06 secondsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Measures of Physical Function- Handgrip

Handgrip is used as a measure of upper body strength. three trials on each hand were completed with the patient seated and the arm at a right angle. For the purposes of this analysis all trials were averaged together.

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: All patients that have both pre and post data were assessed for all three groups. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlMeasures of Physical Function- HandgripHandgrip- PRE26.53 kgStandard Deviation 7.69
Healthy ControlMeasures of Physical Function- HandgripHandgrip-POST26.5 kgStandard Deviation 8.61
HFpEFMeasures of Physical Function- HandgripHandgrip- PRE27.02 kgStandard Deviation 5.15
HFpEFMeasures of Physical Function- HandgripHandgrip-POST26.02 kgStandard Deviation 4.23
HFrEFMeasures of Physical Function- HandgripHandgrip- PRE25.25 kgStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFMeasures of Physical Function- HandgripHandgrip-POST25.41 kgStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Quality of Life Assessment- In Heart Failure

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)- is a standard tool to assess the quality of life of the heart failure patients. An overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains with the higher the score (0-100) the better the health status.

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)- is a standard tool to assess the quality of life of the heart failure patients. Control patients were not assessed via KCCQ given it is not a valid tool for healthy. All HF patients that completed pre and post assessment were analyzed. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HFpEFQuality of Life Assessment- In Heart FailureKCCQ- PRE83.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.54
HFpEFQuality of Life Assessment- In Heart FailureKCCQ-POST86.13 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.04
HFrEFQuality of Life Assessment- In Heart FailureKCCQ- PRE94.79 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFQuality of Life Assessment- In Heart FailureKCCQ-POST84.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Serology-Inflammatory Marker

Inflammatory marker (C-reactive protein \[CRP\])

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: Patients that completed pre post testing in each of the three arms were include in analysis. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlSerology-Inflammatory MarkerCRP-PRE1.37 mg/LStandard Deviation 1.4
Healthy ControlSerology-Inflammatory MarkerCRP-POST0.97 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.91
HFpEFSerology-Inflammatory MarkerCRP-PRE0.58 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.52
HFpEFSerology-Inflammatory MarkerCRP-POST1.26 mg/LStandard Deviation 1.14
HFrEFSerology-Inflammatory MarkerCRP-PRE27.57 mg/LStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-Inflammatory MarkerCRP-POST5.43 mg/LStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Serology-plasma Nitrite and Nitrate

plasma nitrite and plasma nitrate levels pre and post 4 week intervention

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: On analysis of data for this report it was found that three control samples had been missed on initial running of nitrate/nitrite bring the N=7 for that assessment. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrite- PRE2.43 µmStandard Deviation 2.96
Healthy ControlSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrite- POST0.50 µmStandard Deviation 0.33
Healthy ControlSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrate- PRE61.01 µmStandard Deviation 15.64
Healthy ControlSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrate- POST75.30 µmStandard Deviation 15.64
HFpEFSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrate- POST44.2 µmStandard Deviation 5.97
HFpEFSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrite- PRE0.11 µmStandard Deviation 0.04
HFpEFSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrate- PRE34.91 µmStandard Deviation 10.44
HFpEFSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrite- POST0.35 µmStandard Deviation 0.15
HFrEFSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrate- POST67.68 µmStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrite- POST0.11 µmStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrate- PRE39.81 µmStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-plasma Nitrite and NitratePlasma Nitrite- PRE0.04 µmStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Serology-platelet Bioenergetics

Platelet bioenergetics (using Seahorse XF analysis), i.e., including glycolytic(OLIGO) as well as basal and maximal respiratory rates and extracellular acidification rate.

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: Patients that completed pre post testing in each of the three arms were include in analysis. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlSerology-platelet BioenergeticsBasal respiratory rates-PRE122.77 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 35.21
Healthy ControlSerology-platelet BioenergeticsOLIGO OCR- POST27.28 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 8.15
Healthy ControlSerology-platelet BioenergeticsOLIGO OCR- PRE29.38 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 14.05
Healthy ControlSerology-platelet Bioenergeticsmaximal respiratory rates- POST185.52 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 52.83
Healthy ControlSerology-platelet Bioenergeticsmaximal respiratory rates- PRE181.08 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 56.28
Healthy ControlSerology-platelet BioenergeticsBasal respiratory rates-POST120.44 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 31.05
HFpEFSerology-platelet Bioenergeticsmaximal respiratory rates- POST144.99 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 50.01
HFpEFSerology-platelet BioenergeticsBasal respiratory rates-PRE110.17 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 22.89
HFpEFSerology-platelet BioenergeticsBasal respiratory rates-POST120.90 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 29.67
HFpEFSerology-platelet BioenergeticsOLIGO OCR- PRE34.59 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 22.8
HFpEFSerology-platelet BioenergeticsOLIGO OCR- POST29.81 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 11.3
HFpEFSerology-platelet Bioenergeticsmaximal respiratory rates- PRE157.00 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 46.64
HFrEFSerology-platelet Bioenergeticsmaximal respiratory rates- PRE188.09 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-platelet BioenergeticsOLIGO OCR- POST11.25 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-platelet BioenergeticsBasal respiratory rates-PRE148.71 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-platelet Bioenergeticsmaximal respiratory rates- POST89.31 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-platelet BioenergeticsOLIGO OCR- PRE29.49 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-platelet BioenergeticsBasal respiratory rates-POST119.78 pmol/minuteStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Serology-platelet Bioenergetics-1

Platelet bioenergetics (using Seahorse XF analysis), i.e., extracellular acidification rate.

Time frame: Baseline; PRE and 4 weeks; POST

Population: Patients that completed pre post testing in each of the three arms were include in analysis. 6 subjects withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlSerology-platelet Bioenergetics-1extracellular acidification rate -PRE3.78 mpH/minStandard Deviation 3.06
Healthy ControlSerology-platelet Bioenergetics-1extracellular acidification rate -POST3.67 mpH/minStandard Deviation 2.61
HFpEFSerology-platelet Bioenergetics-1extracellular acidification rate -PRE3.22 mpH/minStandard Deviation 3.02
HFpEFSerology-platelet Bioenergetics-1extracellular acidification rate -POST3.96 mpH/minStandard Deviation 3.68
HFrEFSerology-platelet Bioenergetics-1extracellular acidification rate -PRE7.34 mpH/minStandard Deviation 0
HFrEFSerology-platelet Bioenergetics-1extracellular acidification rate -POST0.66 mpH/minStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026