Skip to content

Drug Coated Balloon Compared to Bare Metal Stent for de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Randomized Controlled Trial of Drug Coated Balloon Compared to Bare Metal Stent Using FFR-guidance for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02456402
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-05-28
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2019-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stable Angina, Unstable Angina

Brief summary

This randomized trial will assess the efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) compared to Bare Metal Stent (BMS) using Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) guidance for de novo coronary artery lesions in patients unable to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy and at high risk of bleeding. Patients will be randomized after balloon angioplasty to receive either DCB or BMS. Endpoints are late luminal loss at 9 months, and major adverse cardiac events including arterial thrombosis at 1, 9 and 12 months.

Detailed description

Although the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) has reduced in-stent restenosis when compared to bare metal stents (BMS) and decreased the incidence of adverse clinical events (1-2), DES therapy is limited by delayed arterial healing, late acquired malapposition and neo-atherosclerosis leading to an increased risk of late stent thrombosis and late restenosis (3-4). Conceptually, a permanent stent inhibits advantageous vascular remodeling and durable polymer provokes excessive inflammation (5). Non-stent based local drug delivery using paclitaxel-coated balloon has emerged as a new clinical treatment alternative by maintaining the anti-proliferative properties of DES (6). There is limited data on the efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) treatment for de novo coronary lesions when compared to BMS. To avoid the risk of abrupt closure of target lesion after balloon angioplasty, a reliable predictor of coronary flow is necessary especially in de novo lesions of major coronary arteries. Therefore, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) after angioplasty as a good indicator of immediate functional improvement and reduced restenosis (7), the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of DCB treatment compared to BMS in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. Patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with \> 50% stenosis in a single vessel and at high risk of bleeding with the inability to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) will be included in this trial. Patients will undergo balloon angioplasty and if the FFR post balloon angioplasty is \> 0.80, they will be randomized to receive either DCB or BMS. Patients will receive Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) analysis at 9 months follow-up. Endpoints are late luminal loss at 9 months and major adverse events including arterial thrombosis at 1, 9 and 12 months and these endpoints will be compared between DCB and BMS groups.

Interventions

If post balloon angioplasty FFR is more than 0.80, either DCB treatment or BMS implantation will be carried out based on randomization of 1:1. DCB (SeQuent Please paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter, B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) will be applied at the predilated lesions. PCB will be delivered rapidly and inflated for 60 seconds with nominal pressure.

BMS (Vision®) will be applied at the predilated lesions after angiographic confirmation of the target lesion.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ulsan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable Angina and Unstable angina * single de novo coronary artery lesions in a single vessel with \> 50% diameter stenosis with a reference diameter \> 2.75mm * Patients at high risk of bleeding and whom cannot tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy for \> 1 month are inclusion criteria for the study and are listed here: * Unexplained anemia * Atrial fibrillation with CHADSVASC \> or equal to 1 * Patients awaiting for non cardiac surgery within a year * History of massive hemorrhage requiring transfusion * History of upper GI bleeding * Malignancy * Poor compliance with medication

Exclusion criteria

* STEMI/NSTEMI within the preceding 72 hours * Multivessel disease, chronic total occlusion, long lesions and left main disease * heart failure with ejection fraction \< 35% and/or cardiogenic shock * Previous history of or planned coronary artery bypass grafting * life expectancy of less than 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Late luminal loss9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, recurrent ischemic symptoms)Post procedure (up to 1 hour), 1 month, 9 months and 12 months
Arterial thrombosisPost procedure (up to 1 hour), 1 month, 9 months and 12 monthsAny stent thrombosis - acute, subacute/late stent thrombosis
Fractional Flow ReservePost procedure (up to 1 hour) and 9 monthsFFR is the ratio of the pressure measured at the distal portion of the target lesion and the aortic ostium at maximal hyperemia

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026