Skip to content

A Trial of Bedside Placement of Nasal Jejunal Tube Confirmed by Ultrasound Compared to Placement by Endoscope in Patients With SAP

Study to Compare the Placement Method of Nasal Jejunal Tube in Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Bedside Placement With Ultrasound Confirmation Versus Placement Endoscopically

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02456155
Acronym
SAP
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-05-28
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bedside Placement of Nasal Jejunal Tube

Keywords

bedside placement, nasal jejunal tube, ultrasound, severe acute pancreatitis, endoscope, efficacy, safety

Brief summary

The investigators assessed the utility of ultrasonography in confirming the position of nasal jejunal tube after bedside placement when compared with endoscopic placement in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Primary endpoint: Success rate. Secondary Endpoint: Adverse effects, Change of intra-abdominal pressure (1h before, 1h after and 3 days after placement), Tolerance of enteral nutrition, Time to approach the target calories.

Detailed description

We set this randomised trial to assess the safety and utility of ultrasonography in confirming the position of nasal jejunal tube after bedside placement when compared with endoscopic placement in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Primary endpoint: Success rate. Secondary Endpoint: Adverse effects, Change of intra-abdominal pressure (1h before, 1h after and 3 days after placement), Tolerance of enteral nutrition, Time to approach the target calories.

Interventions

PROCEDUREplacing nasal jejunal tube with ultrasound

bedside placing nasal jejunal tube with ultrasound confirmation versus placing endoscopically

PROCEDUREplacing nasal jejunal tube endoscopically

Sponsors

Li Gang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* acute pancreatitis patients who need enteral nutrition; * patients in acute phase of pancreatitis (within 2 weeks from onset); * the severity of pancreatitis is equal to or above moderate (according to the revised classification of pancreatitis).

Exclusion criteria

* diagnosed with IAH(Intra-abdominal pressure) IV grade, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS); * patients who have circulatory failure; * patients who have gastrointestinal bleeding; * patients who have specific diseases such as chronic digestive diseases and autoimmune diseases; * patients in pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate24 hoursSuccess rate is defined as the right position of nasal jejunal tube confirmed by X-ray.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse effects24 hoursgastrointestinal perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, tie of the tube, blocking of the tube
Change of intra-abdominal pressure3 daysthe intra-abdominal pressure at 1h before, 1h after and 3 days after placement
Tolerance of enteral nutrition3 daysnausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain
Time interval to approach the target calories7 daysThe exact time interval from the placement of the tube to the time that the patient can tolerate the target enteral nutrition.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactGang Li, MD.
nju8icu@126.com+86-025-80861655

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026