Skip to content

Trial of Verapamil in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Verapamil in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02454608
Enrollment
29
Registered
2015-05-27
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2018-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasal Polyps, Sinusitis

Brief summary

Verapamil is an L-type calcium channel blocker(CCB) which has been shown to reduce inflammation in a variety of tissues. Verapamil has also been shown to improve eosinophilic inflammation in an animal model of asthma and also functions as a P-glycoprotein(P-gp) inhibitor. A major subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS) is characterized by eosinophilic inflammation as well as P-gp overexpression. The goal of this study is to therefore see whether Verapamil may be used to treat CRS.

Detailed description

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) impacts more than 30 million Americans resulting in $6.9 to $9.9 billion in annual healthcare expenditures and $12.8 billion in productivity costs. The prevalence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps(CRSwNP) in Europe has been estimated to be 2-4.3% and is thought to be similar in the United States. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment although novel therapies are being developed based on an evolving understanding of the inflammatory pathways involved in disease pathogenesis. CRSwNP is characterized by the presence of edematous polypoid mucosa and predominantly eosinophilic inflammation. Recent evidence has focused on the sinonasal epithelial cell as a primary driver of the local dysregulated immune response through secretion of type 2 helper T-cell(Th2) promoting cytokines. While these studies suggest that epithelial cells are capable of orchestrating a local immune response, the mechanisms responsible for regulating cytokine secretion are poorly understood and may be influenced by the efflux function of epithelial P-glycoprotein(P-gp). P-gp is a 170 kiloDalton membrane protein which belongs to sub-family B of the adenosine triphosphate(ATP)-binding cassette(ABC) transporter superfamily. P-gp utilizes ATP hydrolysis to transport a wide range of substrates across the plasma membrane. P-gp mediated transport has been observed in the regulation of cytokine secretion in both human T-cells as well as sinonasal epithelial cells implicating a potential immunomodulatory role. Studies by our group have demonstrated that P-gp is overexpressed in the mucosa of patients with Th2 skewed CRS endotypes including CRSwNP and is capable of regulating the secretion of Th2 polarizing cytokines. Together, these findings suggest that P-gp participates in the non-canonical regulation of cytokine secretion within CRSwNP and may thereby represent a druggable target. Verapamil Hydrochloride(HCl) was one of the first inhibitors of P-gp to be identified in 1982 and also functions as a calcium channel blocker(CCB). Verapamil has since been categorized as a first generation P-gp inhibitor as more potent and selective 2nd and 3rd generation molecules were subsequently developed for use as chemotherapy sensitizers. Several studies, including those by our group, have reported that Verapamil is capable of modulating inflammatory responses in human T-cells, animal models of asthma, and nasal polyps. Using an organotypic explant model, we have previously shown that Verapamil has similar effects to dexamethasone in its ability to abrogate Interleukin(IL)-5, IL-6, and Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin secretion. While Verapamil is cardioactive, it is considered the first-line prophylactic drug for cluster headache and is usually well tolerated by otherwise healthy patients. In light of our prior studies demonstrating the immunomodulatory role of P-gp in promoting Th2 skewing cytokine secretion in CRSwNP, we hypothesized that low dose Verapamil HCl monotherapy would be safe and effective in the treatment of CRSwNP.

Interventions

DRUGVerapamil HCl

Verapamil represents a calcium channel blocker which binds to the alpha subunit of L-type voltage dependent calcium (Cav1) channels thereby blocking the influx of calcium ions into the host cell. While Verapamil is classically used to promote the relaxation of cardiac and smooth muscle cells, recent evidence has suggested that it may also function as an immunomodulator in astrocytes, hepatocytes, and T-cells. Further research has demonstrated that Verapamil is capable of specifically reducing Th2 associated inflammation in asthma. These findings raise the provocative question as to whether Verapamil could also be effective in reducing inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

OTHERPlacebo

Capsule with the same characteristics (size, color, smell) as Verapamil HCl.

Sponsors

Benjamin Bleier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients presenting to the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Sinus Center 2. Age 18-80 yrs old 3. Diagnosed with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps according to the EPOS 2012 consensus criteria

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with the following comorbidities: * GI Hypomotility * Heart Failure * Liver Failure * Kidney Disease * Muscular Dystrophy * Pregnant or Nursing Females * Steroid Dependency 2. Patients taking the following medications: * Aspirin * Beta-blockers * Cimetidine(Tagamet) * Clarithromycin(Biaxin) * Cyclosporin * Digoxin * Disopyramide(Norpace) * Diuretics * Erythromycin * Flecainide * HIV Protease Inhibitors(Indinavir, Nelfinavir, Ritonavir) * Quinidine * Lithium * Pioglitazone * Rifampin * St Johns Wort 3. Patients with cardiac or conduction abnormality picked up by screening EKG

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)baseline to week 8Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 110 A higher score indicates a worse outcome
Subjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)baseline to week 8Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 100 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Sinonasal Symptoms on Lund-Kennedy Score(LKS)baseline to week 8Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 12 Higher value represents worse outcome.
Objective Sinonasal Symptoms on Lund-McKay Score(LMS)Week 8Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 24 Higher value represents worse outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Systolic Blood PressureMean change between baseline and week 8 measurements
Diastolic Blood PressureMean change between baseline and week 8 measurements
Heart RateMean change between baseline and week 8 measurements.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Verapamil HCl, capsules for oral administration, 80mg, TID, for 8 weeks Verapamil HCl: Verapamil represents a calcium channel blocker which binds to the alpha subunit of L-type voltage dependent calcium (Cav1) channels thereby blocking the influx of calcium ions into the host cell. While Verapamil is classically used to promote the relaxation of cardiac and smooth muscle cells, recent evidence has suggested that it may also function as an immunomodulator in astrocytes, hepatocytes, and T-cells. Further research has demonstrated that Verapamil is capable of specifically reducing Th2 associated inflammation in asthma. These findings raise the provocative question as to whether Verapamil could also be effective in reducing inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
10
Control
Placebo, capsules for oral administration, TID, for 8 weeks Placebo: Capsule with the same characteristics (size, color, smell) as Verapamil HCl.
10
Open Label
Verapamil HCl, capsules for oral administration, 80mg, TID, for 1 year Verapamil HCl: Verapamil represents a calcium channel blocker which binds to the alpha subunit of L-type voltage dependent calcium (Cav1) channels thereby blocking the influx of calcium ions into the host cell. While Verapamil is classically used to promote the relaxation of cardiac and smooth muscle cells, recent evidence has suggested that it may also function as an immunomodulator in astrocytes, hepatocytes, and T-cells. Further research has demonstrated that Verapamil is capable of specifically reducing Th2 associated inflammation in asthma. These findings raise the provocative question as to whether Verapamil could also be effective in reducing inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
29
Total49

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-Blind PeriodLack of Efficacy020
Open Label PeriodLost to Follow-up0011
Open Label PeriodWithdrawal by Subject008

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatmentTotalOpen LabelControl
Age, Continuous49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants39 Participants24 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants49 participants29 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants18 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants31 Participants19 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 105 / 1018 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 100 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Subjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)

Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 100 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline to week 56

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)Medicine Completers, baseline64.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.5
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)Medicine Completers, week 5635.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.2
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)Surgical Completers, baseline90.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.8
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)Surgical Completers, week 1216.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.7
Primary

Subjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)

Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 100 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline to week 8

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)-44.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.66
ControlSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)-6.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.66
p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Subjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)

Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 110 A higher score indicates a worse outcome

Time frame: baseline to week 56

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)Medicine Completers, baseline31.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.24
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)Medicine Completers, week 5624.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.17
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)Surgical Completers, baseline72.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.58
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)Surgical Completers, week 128.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.08
Primary

Subjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)

Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 110 A higher score indicates a worse outcome

Time frame: baseline to week 8

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)-27.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.52
ControlSubjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22(SNOT-22)0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.52
p-value: 0.01Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Objective Sinonasal Symptoms on Lund-Kennedy Score(LKS)

Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 12 Higher value represents worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline to week 8

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentObjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Lund-Kennedy Score(LKS)-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
ControlObjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Lund-Kennedy Score(LKS)-0.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
p-value: 0.25Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Objective Sinonasal Symptoms on Lund-McKay Score(LMS)

Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 24 Higher value represents worse outcome.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentObjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Lund-McKay Score(LMS)12.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
ControlObjective Sinonasal Symptoms on Lund-McKay Score(LMS)17.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
p-value: 0.02t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Diastolic Blood Pressure

Time frame: Mean change between baseline and week 8 measurements

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentDiastolic Blood Pressure-0.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.26
ControlDiastolic Blood Pressure1 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.85
p-value: 0.7t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Heart Rate

Time frame: Mean change between baseline and week 8 measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentHeart Rate-1.4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.16
ControlHeart Rate4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 30.37
p-value: 0.6t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Systolic Blood Pressure

Time frame: Mean change between baseline and week 8 measurements

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentSystolic Blood Pressure-4.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.2
ControlSystolic Blood Pressure-6.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 19.48
p-value: 0.78t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026