Skip to content

XNKQ Acupuncture Compared to Control Interventions Measured With EEG and fMRI

Cerebral Response of Healthy Subjects to a Somatosensory Stimulation With XNKQ Acupuncture Compared to Control Interventions Measured With EEG and fMRI

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02453906
Enrollment
29
Registered
2015-05-27
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2016-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

The investigators will use EEG, structural MRI, and resting-state functional connectivity MRI to assess neuronal responses in 28 healthy subjects to different somatosensory stimulations.

Detailed description

To develop a better understanding of the cerebral response to a complex somatosensory intervention with XNKQ acupuncture and to build a foundation for future studies with stroke patients our study aims to evaluate changes of brain activity and brain structure in healthy subjects after XNKQ acupuncture in comparison to three control interventions. We will use EEG, structural MRI, and resting-state functional connectivity MRI to assess neuronal responses in 28 healthy subjects to a) strong manual needle-stimulation of the acupuncture points DU26, PC6 and SP6 (XNKQ acupuncture), b) insertion of needles on the acupuncture points DU26, PC6 and SP6 without stimulation (control 1), c) strong manual needle stimulation of three non-acupuncture points (control 2), and d) insertion of needles on three non-acupuncture points without stimulation (control 3). With this, our study aims to create results which inform future studies in patients and might be helpful for the rehabilitation of deficits after stroke.

Interventions

OTHERXNKQ

stimulation at 5 acupuncture points according to XNKQ acupuncture

no stimulation at 5 acupuncture points according to XNKQ acupuncture

stimulation at 5 control points

no stimulation at 5 control points

Sponsors

Claudia M. Witt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy subjects (18 to 40 years of age) health status confirmed by a comprehensive neurological examination * Right-handed (evaluated by the Edinburgh inventory) * Informed consent * No acupuncture treatment in the last 12 months * No medical knowledge about acupuncture

Exclusion criteria

* History of neurological and/or psychiatric diseases * History of brain injury * Cognitive handicap and severe speech disorder * alcohol or drug abuse * History of neurosurgical intervention * Chronic disease (e.g., asthma, diabetes mellitus etc.) with regular use of medications * Usage of acute medication * Pregnancy (tested by urine pregnancy test before the measurement) or planned pregnancy * Any contraindication for acupuncture (e.g., anti-coagulation therapy) * Any

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in brain background rhythms (mu-alpha and beta activity) [assessed using EEG and MRI] after one intervention (baseline vs. post stimulation) in comparison between the four different interventions.60 minutes
Changes in resting state functional connectivity [assessed using EEG and MRI] after one intervention (baseline vs. post-stimulation) in comparison between the four different interventions60 minutes

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026