Skip to content

Precision Dosing of Infliximab Versus Conventional Dosing of Infliximab

Precision Dosing Versus Conventional Dosing of Infliximab Maintenance Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study in Patients With IBD in Clinical Remission

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02453776
Acronym
PRECISION
Enrollment
80
Registered
2015-05-27
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Keywords

Crohns Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Infliximab, Sustained, Remission, Inflammatory bowel disease, IBD

Brief summary

Infliximab (IFX) is highly effective in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a large proportion of patients will eventually lose response to IFX. Therefore, strategies to improve the outcome of maintenance treatment with IFX are required. Retrospective analyses suggest that adjusting IFX treatment in order to achieve IFX trough levels (TL) above a well-defined therapeutic threshold will improve the outcome of IFX treatment.

Detailed description

Aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of precision dosing IFX maintenance treatment in comparison with standard IFX maintenance treatment in IBD patients in clinical remission. This study will be an open, randomized, controlled trial. Inclusion criteria: Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) based on endoscopy and pathology, receiving scheduled IFX therapy for ≥14 weeks, in clinical remission based on a Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) score ≤4 or a Partial Mayo (PM) score ≤2, for CD and UC, respectively. Exclusion criteria: Dilatation or resectional surgury in the past year and patients with a stoma/pouch. Patients in the intervention arm will receive individualized treatment with variable IFX dosing AND/OR intervals guided by a Bayesian pharmacokinetic model, aiming to achieve an IFX TL of 3 µg/ml. Patients in the control group will continue to receive the same IFX treatment regimen that was given prior to inclusion without dose adaptation. In the control group, treatment adjustments will only be made in case of signs of active disease, in accordance to current routine care but these patients will be considered as failures to their treatment. Primary endpoint: Proportion of patients with sustained clinical remission (based on HBI or PM). Secondary endpoints include: annual costs of IFX treatment per patient, total annual medical costs, side effects, (sustained) biochemical remission, adverse events, quality of life, IFX trough level and IFX antibodies (with an assay allowing presence of drug). Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participation will result in additional blood sampling, since IFX serum concentration will be measured every 8 weeks. All other laboratory tests can be considered as routine care. Patients in the intervention group with IFX TLs \>3 will receive treatment de-escalation (interval elongation and/or dose reduction) as indicated by the Baysian model. Current evidence indicates that an IFX TL of 3 suffices. Patients in the intervention group with TLs \<3 will receive treatment escalation (interval shortening and/or dose increase). We hypothesize that this will result in a higher chance of remaining in clinical remission.

Interventions

DRUGPRECISION dosing Infliximab

Patients in the PRECISION dosing arm will recieve model based dosing, whereas proactive adjustments in treatment can be made by measuring the Infliximab concentration.

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of CD or UC based on endoscopy and pathology * 18 years or older * Clinical remission, based on a Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) score ≤4 or a Partial Mayo (PM) score ≤2, for CD and UC * Scheduled IFX maintenance treatment, regardless of interval/dosing

Exclusion criteria

\- Dilatation or resectional surgery because of stenotic IBD in the past year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained clinical remission for the precision dosing group vs. the conventional IFX maintenance dosing group52 weeksSustained clinical remission based on HBI (Crohn's disease) or PM score (Ulcerative Colitis)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of IFX treatment between the two groups52 weeksComparing costs for treatment with IFX between the two groups
Proportion of patients with antibodies against IFX52 weeks
Quality of life52 weeksWith a QoL questionnaire
Biochemical disease activity (CRP >5mg/L and fecal calprotectin ≥50% compared to baseline, to a value of >250 ug/g)26 weeks, 52 weeksA rise in fecal calprotectin of ≥50% compared to baseline, to a value of \>250 ug/g and/or serum CRP of \>5mg/L

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026