Skip to content

Compare Efficacy and Safety of Raltitrexed-based and 5fu-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02453490
Enrollment
360
Registered
2015-05-25
Start date
2015-10-11
Completion date
2019-09-11
Last updated
2020-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastasis

Keywords

Colorectal Cancer, liver metastasis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Brief summary

This study is a multicenter ,randomization, open control study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Raltitrexed-based chemotherapy and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in the peri-operative treatment of patients with Liver Metastasis From colorectal cancer (CRC).

Detailed description

The contrast analysis is separately done on Raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin;Raltitrexed plus irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan.To investigate the objective response rate,the R0 resection rate, the early tumor shrinkage (ETS)and depth of response(DPR) and the safety profile.

Interventions

DRUGRaltitrexed-based chemotherapy

Raltitrexed: 2.0mg,iv,15min,d1,Oxaliplatin:85mg/m2 iv,d1, q2w

DRUG5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy

5-fluorouracil:400mg/m2,ivp,2h,d1,1200mg/m2/d\*2d(2400mg/m2,iv46-48h); Oxaliplatin:85mg/m2 iv,d1,q2w

Sponsors

Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Histologically confirmed chinese colorectal cancer patients and imaging detection confirmed liver metastasis 2. previously no treatment for liver metastasis or Primary tumor had been removed and last additional chemotherapy over one year 3. Age of≥18 and ≤75 4. Adequate organ functions, as determined by normal bone marrow function (absolute neutrophil count2 x 109/L, platelets 100 x 109/L, White blood cells 4 x 109/L), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2.5 x ULN, serum transaminases ≤2. 5x ULN) 5. ECOG≤1 6. Life Expectancy\>6months 7. Signed written informed consent 8. Expected adequacy of follow-up

Exclusion criteria

1. Lesion is too small to assess by imaging 2. Extrahepatic metastases 3. Any anticancer chemotherapy in development within 4 weeks prior to study entry 4. Concurrent uncontrolled illness such as infection 5. Be allergic to medicines in the study 6. Pregnant or nursing patients 7. Fertile women (\< 2 years after last menstruation) and men of childbearing potential not willing to use effective means of contraception. 8. Not willing or incapable to comply with all study visits and assessments 9. Evidence of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding or laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that puts the patient at high risk for treatment-related complications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Objective response rate38 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
R0 resection rate of liver38 months

Other

MeasureTime frame
The side effects of the treatment38 months
The early tumor shrinkage (ETS)and depth of response(DPR)38 months

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026