Skip to content

Rapid Normalization of Vitamin D in Critically Ill Children: A Phase II Dose Evaluation Randomized Controlled Trial

Rapid Normalization of Vitamin D in Critically Ill Children: A Phase II Dose Evaluation Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02452762
Acronym
VITdAL-PICU
Enrollment
67
Registered
2015-05-25
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2021-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypovitaminosis D

Brief summary

Documented roles for vitamin D in calcium homeostasis, cardiovascular and respiratory health, inflammation, innate immunity, and neuromuscular function have led to the hypothesis that deficiency might represent a modifiable risk factor for outcomes in critical illness. In recent years, dozens of adult studies have reported both high deficiency rates, and associations between lower vitamin D levels and organ dysfunction, health resource utilization, and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). More recently, similar observations have been made in critically ill pediatric populations. The cumulative body of basic science and clinical literature demonstrates that deficiency is common in critical illness and rapid normalization of vitamin D status could improve clinical outcomes and/or reduce health care costs. However, before conducting a phase III trial to determine whether restoration of vitamin D status improves outcomes in the PICU, the appropriate dosing regimen must be identified. Consequently, the investigators propose a phase II, double blind randomized controlled trial to determine a loading therapy dosing regimen that can safely and rapidly normalize vitamin D status in critically ill children.

Detailed description

Background & Rationale: Documented roles for vitamin D in calcium homeostasis, cardiovascular and respiratory health, inflammation, innate immunity, and neuromuscular function have led to the hypothesis that deficiency might represent a modifiable risk factor for outcomes in critical illness. In recent years, dozens of adult studies have reported both high deficiency rates, and associations between lower vitamin D levels and organ dysfunction, health resource utilization, and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). More recently, similar observations have been made in critically ill pediatric populations. The cumulative body of basic science and clinical literature demonstrates that deficiency is common in critical illness and rapid normalization of vitamin D status could improve clinical outcomes and/or reduce health care costs. However, before conducting a phase III trial to determine whether restoration of vitamin D status improves outcomes in the PICU, the appropriate dosing regimen must be identified. Consequently, the investigators propose a phase II, double blind randomized controlled trial to determine a loading therapy dosing regimen that can safely and rapidly normalize vitamin D status in critically ill children. Objectives: Primary Objective: Determine whether a weight-based loading protocol can rapidly normalize blood vitamin D levels in critically ill children Secondary Objectives: (1) Evaluate whether a weight-based loading protocol, when compared with usual care, results in a greater occurrence of vitamin D related adverse events (hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria); and (2) determine the barriers to and feasibility of a multicenter phase III randomized control trial evaluating whether rapid vitamin D normalization improves clinical outcome and/or reduces health care spending in critically ill children. Eligibility Criteria: The inclusion criteria for this study are: (i) Admitted to ICU, (ii) Corrected gestational age \> 37 weeks to age \< 18 years, (iii) Expected ICU admission in excess of 48 hours and expected access for blood work at Day 7 of hospital admission, and (iv) Blood 25(OH)D less than 50 nmol/L (regardless of prior approach to supplementation). Exclusion criteria are: (i) Significant gastrointestinal disorder preventing enteral drug administration (e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis); (ii) Hypercalcemia (excluding transient abnormalities and those related to parenteral calcium administration for hypocalcemia); (iii) Confirmed or suspected William's syndrome; (iv) Patient known to have nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis; (v) Imminent plan for withdrawal of care or transfer to another ICU; (vi) Physician refusal; (vii) Previous enrollment in the study; (viii) Patient known to have granulomatous disease (tuberculosis or sarcoidosis), (ix) Severe liver dysfunction/liver failure; (x) Patient know to have hypersensitivity or allergy to vitamin D or any of the non-medicinal ingredients of the formulation; (xi) Patient on thiazide diuretics who is also receiving regular ongoing calcium supplementation above the daily recommended intake (for reasons other than hypocalcemia); (xii) Adolescent female of child-bearing age with a positive serum pregnancy test; or (xiii) Patient on digoxin-therapy Patients meeting inclusion criteria #1-3 and with no exclusion criteria will be approached regarding participation. If consent is given, 25OHD will be determined and those under 50 nmol/L will be randomized. Participants will be stratified by age in two categories (above 30 days of age or below/equal to 30 days of age). Randomization/allocation concealment will be performed using a web-based randomization system. Interventions: All participants may also receive standard vitamin D dosing (e.g. 400 IU/day). Sixty-seven patients will be randomized 2:1 to the intervention (Enteral loading arm) 1. Enteral loading arm: 10000 IU/kg of cholecalciferol (max 400000 IU) 2. Placebo arm: For blinding purposes, this arm will receive a placebo solution Data Collection: Blood and urine will be collected on days 0 (enrolment day), 1, 2, 3, 7, hospital discharge, and after interventions or triggers known to influence vitamin D status (e.g. cardiopulmonary bypass, hospital stay \>30 days). Information on demographics, hospital course, adverse events, and health resource utilization will be entered into an electronic case report form. Sample Size: Randomization of 40 children into the loading arm will provide sufficient power to estimate the proportion achieving target 25OHD with a confidence interval of ±15%. Assuming a 5% non-compliance/drop-out rate in each arm, randomization of 60 patients (total) may be required to achieve the desired power. The dosing regimen for this study was changed from a double dose to a single dose after the first seven patients were enrolled. As a result, the sample size was increased to 67 patients. All patients (n=67) will be included in the final intention to treat analysis. The 60 patients who received a single dose will be included in the per protocol analysis. Significance: Critical illness occurs in tens of thousands of children each year in North America and can result in death, significant suffering, prolonged periods of rehabilitation, and chronic illness. High vitamin D deficiency rates in PICUs and the recognized interaction between vitamin D status and the health of multiple organ systems suggest that vitamin D could represent an inexpensive, safe means of improving outcomes and reducing health care spending. Unfortunately, approved daily dosing regimens require months to restore vitamin D levels and there have been no studies of loading therapy in pediatric critical illness. Consequently, despite significant literature suggesting vitamin D deficiency to be a modifiable risk factor, there is no evidence to inform physicians on the true benefits or risks of loading therapy. The proposed phase II clinical trial will determine how to provide cholecalciferol loads to facilitate rapid normalization of vitamin D levels, and provide initial information on toxicity.

Interventions

DRUGVitamin D3
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(i) Admitted to ICU; (ii) Corrected gestational age \> 37 weeks to age \< 18 years; (iii) Expected ICU admission in excess of 48 hours and expected access for blood work at Day 7 of hospital admission; (iv) Blood 25OHD less than 50 nmol/L (regardless of prior approach to supplementation)

Exclusion criteria

(i) Significant gastrointestinal disorder preventing enteral drug administration (e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis); (ii) Hypercalcemia (excluding transient abnormalities and those related to parenteral calcium administration for hypocalcemia); (iii) Confirmed or suspected William's syndrome; (iv) Patient known to have nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis; (v) Imminent plan for withdrawal of care or transfer to another ICU; (vi) Physician refusal; (vii) Previous enrollment in the study; (viii) Patient known to have granulomatous disease (tuberculosis or sarcoidosis), (ix) Severe liver dysfunction/liver failure; (x) Patient know to have hypersensitivity or allergy to vitamin D or any of the non-medicinal ingredients of the formulation; (xi) Patient on thiazide diuretics who is also receiving regular ongoing calcium supplementation above the daily recommended intake (for reasons other than hypocalcemia); (xii) Adolescent female of child-bearing age with a positive serum pregnancy test; or (xiii) Patient on digoxin-therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vitamin D Status7 daysThe percentage of critically ill children who achieve a blood 25OHD concentration above 75 nmol/L by day 7

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Accrual Rate2 yearsThe investigators will determine the feasibility of a subsequent multicentre phase III interventional study through an evaluation of patient accrual rate. The expected patient accrual rate is 88 patients over a 2-year period (2-5 patients per month per centre; low estimate 60 patients (0-2 per month per centre). The study will be considered feasible if the patient accrual rate is achieved
Vitamin D Related Adverse EventsOn days 1, 2, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)A measurable difference in clinically significant adverse events between the loading dose and placebo arms in unlikely in a phase II study. Therefore, the investigators will evaluate for potential toxicity using two well accepted surrogate outcome measures: (1) Hypercalcemia - The investigators will define hypercalcemia as an ionized calcium level above 1.40 mmol/L (children under 8 weeks as \> 1.45 mmol/l); and (2) Hypercalciuria - Hypercalciuria will be defined as an elevated calcium:creatinine ratio above age-based normal values
Vitamin D Axis Function - CalciumOn day 0, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood calcium levels (i.e. calcium metabolism). Calcium levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.
Vitamin D Axis Function - 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin DOn day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood 1,25OHD levels. 1,25 levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.
Immune Function - CathelicidinOn day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)Immune function will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood cathelicidin levels. Cathelicidin levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

Countries

Austria, Canada, Chile

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eligible participants were recruited from participating PICUs and one Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) between January 2016 to August 2017

Pre-assignment details

This study did not involve a wash out or run-in period. The trial intervention initially involved two doses of study drug (placebo or cholecalciferol): i) At time of enrollment, and i) a day 3 dose dependent on the 25(OH)D concentration achieved. However, after randomization of the first 12 patients the intervention was adjusted to a single-dose protocol. Seven children who were enrolled under the two-dose protocol received \>1 loading dose of cholecalciferol and were excluded from the analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enteral Loading Arm
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) - Single dose at enrolment of 10000 IU/kg of cholecalciferol (max 400000 IU) Vitamin D3
40
Placebo Arm
Patients will receive a placebo solution equivalent in volume to the dose of cholecalciferol administered to patients in the enteral loading arm. Placebo
19
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyReceived >1 loading dose of cholecalciferol and analyzed separately43
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Age, Continuous13.4 Months11.8 Months12.8 Months
ICU Admission season, frequency
Fall
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
ICU Admission season, frequency
Spring
9 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
ICU Admission season, frequency
Summer
12 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
ICU Admission season, frequency
Winter
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
ICU type, frequency
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
ICU type, frequency
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
37 Participants17 Participants54 Participants
Mechanical ventilation required, frequency32 Participants16 Participants48 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Received catecholamines, frequency20 Participants9 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
33 participants16 participants49 participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
6 participants2 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants9 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants10 Participants34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 402 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 404 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Vitamin D Status

The percentage of critically ill children who achieve a blood 25OHD concentration above 75 nmol/L by day 7

Time frame: 7 days

Population: A blood sample for the primary outcome analysis was available for 56 participants, 38 in the treatment arm and 18 in the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Status81.6 Percentage of participants in study arm
Placebo ArmVitamin D Status5.6 Percentage of participants in study arm
Secondary

Immune Function - Cathelicidin

Immune function will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood cathelicidin levels. Cathelicidin levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

Time frame: On day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome. Due to insufficient funding and insufficient blood sample volume after analysis of the primary outcome, we were unable to complete this analysis.

Secondary

Patient Accrual Rate

The investigators will determine the feasibility of a subsequent multicentre phase III interventional study through an evaluation of patient accrual rate. The expected patient accrual rate is 88 patients over a 2-year period (2-5 patients per month per centre; low estimate 60 patients (0-2 per month per centre). The study will be considered feasible if the patient accrual rate is achieved

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of patients per enrolled per month per centre

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enteral Loading ArmPatient Accrual Rate3.35 Number of patients enrolled per month
Secondary

Vitamin D Axis Function - 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D

Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood 1,25OHD levels. 1,25 levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

Time frame: On day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome. Due to insufficient funding and insufficient blood sample volume after analysis of the primary outcome, we were unable to complete this analysis.

Secondary

Vitamin D Axis Function - Calcium

Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood calcium levels (i.e. calcium metabolism). Calcium levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

Time frame: On day 0, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 0 - Lowest1.17 mmol/mmol
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 7 - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.17 mmol/mmol
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 3 - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.16 mmol/mmol
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 7 - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.22 mmol/mmol
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumHospital discharge - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.24 mmol/mmol
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 0 - Highest1.22 mmol/mmol
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumHospital discharge - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.26 mmol/mmol
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 3 - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.21 mmol/mmol
Placebo ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumHospital discharge - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.24 mmol/mmol
Placebo ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 0 - Lowest1.18 mmol/mmol
Placebo ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 0 - Highest1.21 mmol/mmol
Placebo ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 3 - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.12 mmol/mmol
Placebo ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 3 - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.27 mmol/mmol
Placebo ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 7 - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.17 mmol/mmol
Placebo ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumHospital discharge - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.20 mmol/mmol
Placebo ArmVitamin D Axis Function - CalciumDay 7 - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.18 mmol/mmol
Secondary

Vitamin D Related Adverse Events

A measurable difference in clinically significant adverse events between the loading dose and placebo arms in unlikely in a phase II study. Therefore, the investigators will evaluate for potential toxicity using two well accepted surrogate outcome measures: (1) Hypercalcemia - The investigators will define hypercalcemia as an ionized calcium level above 1.40 mmol/L (children under 8 weeks as \> 1.45 mmol/l); and (2) Hypercalciuria - Hypercalciuria will be defined as an elevated calcium:creatinine ratio above age-based normal values

Time frame: On days 1, 2, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Related Adverse EventsHypercalcemia0 Participants
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Related Adverse EventsHypdercalciuria6 Participants
Enteral Loading ArmVitamin D Related Adverse EventsNo Hypercalcemia or Hypercaliuria34 Participants
Placebo ArmVitamin D Related Adverse EventsHypercalcemia0 Participants
Placebo ArmVitamin D Related Adverse EventsHypdercalciuria4 Participants
Placebo ArmVitamin D Related Adverse EventsNo Hypercalcemia or Hypercaliuria15 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026