Skip to content

Unilateral vs. Bilateral Approaches to Hybrid Stroke Rehabilitation

Unilateral vs. Bilateral Approaches to Hybrid Stroke Rehabilitation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02451280
Enrollment
72
Registered
2015-05-21
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2016-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

stroke rehabilitation, robot-assisted therapy, hybrid therapy

Brief summary

The aim of the project is to compare the effects of unilateral hybrid therapy \[unilateral robot-assisted therapy (RT)\] + unilateral arm training (UAT)\] and bilateral hybrid therapy \[bilateral RT + bilateral arm training (BAT)\] on motor function, daily function, mobility, life quality, and motor control strategy in stroke patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUnilateral Hybrid Intervention

For the unilateral RT training, participants will practice with their affected arms following a unilateral training protocol of BMT for 45 minutes (Yang, et al., 2012). For the UAT training, participants will receive training of the affected UL in functional tasks with behavioral shaping for 45 minutes (Lin, Wu, et al., 2009).

PROCEDUREBilateral Hybrid Intervention

For the bilateral RT training, patients will focus on training involving both arms using the BMT robot for 45 minutes. During the 45 minutes BAT training, participants will receive training in tasks focusing on bilateral symmetric or alternating movements of both ULs.

The RT intervention will be matched in duration and intensity with the hybrid interventions. Participants in the RT group will practice on the BMT with bilateral protocols for 90 minutes. The tasks will be tailored according to the level

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ≥3 months onset from a first-ever unilateral stroke; 2. minimal motor criteria to receive CIT (i.e., ≥10º wrist extension and ≥ 10º extension at the thumb and any two other digits); 3. an initial FMA-UE score of 10 to 56, indicating mild to moderate and moderate to severe upper extremity motor impairment; 4. no excessive spasticity in any of the joints of the affected arm (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers); 5. able to follow instructions and perform the study tasks (Mini Mental State Examination ≥ 22); 6. without upper extremity fracture within 3 months; 7. no participation in any rehabilitation experiments or drug studies during the study period; and (8) willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. acute inflammatory disease; 2. major health problems or poor physical condition that might limit participation; and (3) attend any other study in recent 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change scores of Fugl-Meyer assessment(FMA)baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 18 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change scores of Box and block test (BBT)baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 18 weeks
Change scores of Action research arm test (ARAT)baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Change scores of Medical Research Council scale (MRC)baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Change scores of Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Change scores of Myotonbaseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI)baseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of Functional independent measure (FIM)baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Change scores of Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0 version)baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 18 weeks
Change scores of EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D)baseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of Hand strengthbaseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)baseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of ABILHAND Questionnairebaseline, 6 weeks, 18 weeks
Change scores of 10-meter walking testbaseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of Nottingham Extended ADL Questionnaire (NEADL)baseline, 6 weeks, 18 weeks
Change scores of Adelaide Activities Profile (AAP)baseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of Accelerometerbaseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of kinematic analysisbaseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of Adverse effectsbaseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Change scores of Algometerbaseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA)baseline, 6 weeks
Change scores of Motor activity log (MAL)baseline, 6 weeks, 18 weeks

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactChing-Yi Wu, ScD
cywu@mail.cgu.edu.tw886-3-2118800

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026