Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effect of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) on Cardiac Repolarization in Patients With Selected Solid Tumors

Evaluation of the Effect of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) on Cardiac Repolarization (QTc Duration) in Patients With Selected Solid Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02451007
Enrollment
39
Registered
2015-05-21
Start date
2015-08-12
Completion date
2016-08-19
Last updated
2019-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Solid Tumors

Brief summary

Study to assess the potential effects of lurbinectedin (PM01183) at a therapeutic dose on the duration of the QTc interval, measured by electrocardiograms (ECGs), to characterize the PM01183 plasma concentration/QTc relationship, and to explore related ECG parameters in patients with selected solid tumors.

Interventions

Sponsors

PharmaMar
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Voluntarily signed and dated informed consent * Normal cardiac conduction and function (centrally read) * Blood pressure between 90 and 150 mmHg systolic, inclusive, and not higher than 90 mmHg diastolic. * Specific serum electrolyte levels

Exclusion criteria

* Age \> 65 years * Performance status = 2 \[Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)\] * Heart rhythm disturbances * Significant ischemic coronary disease, heart failure, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina within the last six months. * Prior exposure to anthracyclines at a cumulative dose of doxorubicin (or equivalent) \> 450 mg/m²

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Scheduled post-baseline ECG time points were taken 5-10 min before their time-matched PK samples: i.e., 5 min before EOI, 30 min, 1, 3, 24, 72 and 168 hours after EOI of Cycle 1, and 5 min before EOI, 30 min, 1, 3 and 168 hours after EOI of Cycle 2.ΔQTCF (Change in QTcF); EOI (end of infusion); LSM (Least Square Means); PK (Pharmacokinetic(s)). On Day 1 (D1) of Cycle 1 (C1), LSM ΔQTcF should have low difference values, without any clear trend to change with time. Therefore, the upper bound (UB) of the (two-sided) 90%Confidence Interval (CI) at all time points had to be less than the protocol-specified cut-off of 20 ms at each time point. If so, non-inferiority of any ECG time point to baseline with respect of QTc prolongation could be concluded

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Plasma Concentration)Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.
Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Predicted ΔQTcF)Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.
Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Intercept)Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.

Countries

Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was nested into a multicenter clinical trial with a competitive recruitment. From August 2015 to June 2016, a total of 39 evaluable patients at 12 sites in USA and Spain were included in this QT evaluation study with baseline and one or more postbaseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) assessments available.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)
lurbinectedin (PM01183) is presented as a lyophilized powder for concentrate for solution for infusion with strength of 4 mg / vial. Lurbinectedin was administered at a dose of 3.2 mg/m² given as a 1-hour i.v. every three weeks (q3wk) (three weeks = one treatment cycle). QTc interval duration was assessed when the patient was treated with lurbinectedin for the first time.
39
Total39

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDisease Progression2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants
Age, Continuous56 years
Region of Enrollment
Spain
25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
13 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)

ΔQTCF (Change in QTcF); EOI (end of infusion); LSM (Least Square Means); PK (Pharmacokinetic(s)). On Day 1 (D1) of Cycle 1 (C1), LSM ΔQTcF should have low difference values, without any clear trend to change with time. Therefore, the upper bound (UB) of the (two-sided) 90%Confidence Interval (CI) at all time points had to be less than the protocol-specified cut-off of 20 ms at each time point. If so, non-inferiority of any ECG time point to baseline with respect of QTc prolongation could be concluded

Time frame: Scheduled post-baseline ECG time points were taken 5-10 min before their time-matched PK samples: i.e., 5 min before EOI, 30 min, 1, 3, 24, 72 and 168 hours after EOI of Cycle 1, and 5 min before EOI, 30 min, 1, 3 and 168 hours after EOI of Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 1 - 5 min before EOI3.32 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 1 - 30 min after EOI1.76 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 1 - 1 hour after EOI1.84 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 1 - 3 hour after EOI1.32 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 1 - 24 hour after EOI-8.24 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 1 - 72 hour after EOI-12.4 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 2 - Before start of infusion-0.46 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 2 - 5 min before EOI2.25 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 2 - 30 min after EOI2.32 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 2 - 1 hour after EOI2.73 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 2 - 3 hour after EOI5.39 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 2 - 168 hour after EOI-4.22 ms (Milliseconds)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)Cycle 1 - 168 hour after EOI-5.20 ms (Milliseconds)
Secondary

Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Intercept)

ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.

Time frame: Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Intercept)-6.40 Unitless
Secondary

Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Plasma Concentration)

ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.

Time frame: Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Plasma Concentration)2.06 Microgram/milliliter (μg/mL)
Secondary

Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Predicted ΔQTcF)

ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.

Time frame: Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group A - Lurbinectedin (PM01183)Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Predicted ΔQTcF)2.94 Milliseconds (ms)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026