Skip to content

FLASH [Fluorescent Light Activated Synthetic Hypericin] Clinical Study: Topical SGX301 (Synthetic Hypericin) for the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (Mycosis Fungoides)

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy of Topical SGX301 (Synthetic Hypericin) and Fluorescent Bulb-Light Irradiation for the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02448381
Enrollment
169
Registered
2015-05-19
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2022-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

CTCL, Mycosis fungoides, Hypericin, SGX301, MF

Brief summary

To evaluate the use of SGX301, a topical photosensitizing agent, to treat patients with patch/plaque phase cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides).

Interventions

DRUGSGX301 (synthetic hypericin)

0.25% SGX301 in USP Hydrophilic Ointment applied twice per week, covered by opaque bandage for 12-24 hours, then treated with an initial dose of 5 J/cm\^2 fluorescent light.

DRUGPlacebo

USP Hydrophilic Ointment applied twice per week, covered by opaque bandage for 12-24 hours, then treated with an initial dose of 5 J/cm\^2 fluorescent light.

Sponsors

Soligenix
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have a clinical diagnosis of CTCL (mycosis fungoides), Stage IA, Stage IB, or Stage IIA. * Subjects must have a minimum of three (3) evaluable, discrete lesions. * Subjects must be willing to refrain from sunbathing for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* History of sun hypersensitivity and photosensitive dermatoses including porphyria, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum, polymorphous light eruptions or radiation therapy within 30 days of enrolling. * Pregnancy or mothers who are breast feeding. * Males and females not willing to use effective contraception. * Unhealed sunburn. * Subjects receiving topical steroids or other topical treatments for CTCL within 2 weeks. * Subjects receiving systemic steroids, nitrogen mustard, psoralen UVA radiation therapy (PUVA), narrow band UVB light therapy (NB-UVB) or carmustine (BCNU) or other systemic therapies for CTCL within 3 weeks of enrollment. * Subjects with significant history of systemic immunosuppression due to drugs or infection with HIV or HTLV 1. * Subjects taking other investigational drugs or drugs of abuse within 30 days of entry into this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Defined as a ≥50% Improvement in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score When Compared to Patients Receiving Placebo8 weeksThe percentage of patients achieving a treatment response in each of the 2 treatment groups. A treatment response was defined as a ≥50% improvement in CAILS score at Week 8 when compared to the CAILS score at baseline. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score measures: Erythema (or redness) on a scale of 0 (no redness) to 8 (very red), Scaling on a scale of 0 (no scaling) to 8 (all of the lesion is covered by a very rough surface), Plaque Elevation on a scale of 0 (no evidence of plaque above normal skin level) to 3 (plaque shows marked elevation above normal skin level) and Surface Area on a scale of 0 (no lesion/surface area is 0 cm\^2) to 18 (the lesion is larger than 300 cm\^2). A lower score means a better outcome. The overall CAILS score was calculated by adding the total score as described above for each of the 3 lesions. The overall CAILS score has a range of 0 to 111. A lower score means a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score (Cycle 1 and 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)16 weeksThe percentage of patients achieving a treatment response at Week 16 that received SGX301 for both Cycle 1 and 2 compared to the response rate in patients that received Placebo in Cycle 1. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score was measured as previously described.
Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response of 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score in Patients Who Received 3 Cycles of SGX30124 weeksThe percentage of patients achieving a treatment response at Week 24 compared at Week 16 in SGX301 treatment group. A treatment response was defined as a ≥50% improvement in CAILS score when compared to the CAILS score at baseline. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score was measured as previously described.
Patch Lesion Response Rates With Extended Treatment (Cycle 1 & 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)16 weeksThe proportion of patch lesions achieving a treatment response at Week 16 in the SGX301 treatment group compared to Week 8 in the Placebo treatment group. A treatment response was defined as a ≥50% improvement in CAILS score when compared to the CAILS score at baseline for individual lesions. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score was measured as previously described.
Plaque Lesion Response Rates With Extended Treatment (Cycle 1 & 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)16 weeksThe proportion of plaque lesions achieving a treatment response at Week 16 in the SGX301 treatment group compared to Week 8 in the Placebo treatment group. A treatment response was defined as a ≥50% improvement in CAILS score when compared to the CAILS score at baseline for individual lesions. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score was measured as previously described.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SGX301
Three treatment cycles, each six (6) weeks followed by a two (2) week rest period. Treatment uses 0.25% SGX301 in USP Hydrophilic Ointment (or placebo) applied twice per week followed by fluorescent light therapy. Cycle 1: Patients randomized 2:1 to active/placebo will have three (3) index lesions treated and evaluated. Cycle 2: All patients will have three (3) index lesions treated and evaluated with active SGX301 ointment. Cycle 3: All patients will be given the opportunity to enter an open-label cycle of active SGX301 ointment treatment for all lesions (index and non-index). SGX301 (synthetic hypericin): 0.25% SGX301 in USP Hydrophilic Ointment applied twice per week, covered by opaque bandage for 12-24 hours, then treated with an initial dose of 5 J/cm\^2 fluorescent light.
116
Placebo
Placebo ointment is indistinguishable from ointment containing active SGX301 and is only used in Cycle 1. Treatment paradigm (ointment application and fluorescent light therapy) is identical. Placebo: USP Hydrophilic Ointment applied twice per week, covered by opaque bandage for 12-24 hours, then treated with an initial dose of 5 J/cm\^2 fluorescent light.
50
Total166

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up169
Overall StudyNoncompliance with Study Procedures20
Overall StudyPhysician Decision11
Overall StudyPregnancy10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject139

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSGX301Placebo
Age, Continuous58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.94
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.26
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants10 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
148 Participants103 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
39 Participants27 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
120 Participants84 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants47 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
96 Participants69 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1160 / 500 / 1550 / 1100 / 161
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 11626 / 5066 / 15549 / 110108 / 161
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1161 / 500 / 1553 / 1104 / 161

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Defined as a ≥50% Improvement in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score When Compared to Patients Receiving Placebo

The percentage of patients achieving a treatment response in each of the 2 treatment groups. A treatment response was defined as a ≥50% improvement in CAILS score at Week 8 when compared to the CAILS score at baseline. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score measures: Erythema (or redness) on a scale of 0 (no redness) to 8 (very red), Scaling on a scale of 0 (no scaling) to 8 (all of the lesion is covered by a very rough surface), Plaque Elevation on a scale of 0 (no evidence of plaque above normal skin level) to 3 (plaque shows marked elevation above normal skin level) and Surface Area on a scale of 0 (no lesion/surface area is 0 cm\^2) to 18 (the lesion is larger than 300 cm\^2). A lower score means a better outcome. The overall CAILS score was calculated by adding the total score as described above for each of the 3 lesions. The overall CAILS score has a range of 0 to 111. A lower score means a better outcome.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: The analysis population was defined as all participants that were treated with at least one dose of treatment (SGX301 or Placebo)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SGX301Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Defined as a ≥50% Improvement in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score When Compared to Patients Receiving PlaceboNon-responder97 Participants
SGX301Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Defined as a ≥50% Improvement in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score When Compared to Patients Receiving PlaceboResponder19 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Defined as a ≥50% Improvement in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score When Compared to Patients Receiving PlaceboResponder2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Defined as a ≥50% Improvement in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score When Compared to Patients Receiving PlaceboNon-responder48 Participants
p-value: 0.04Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score (Cycle 1 and 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)

The percentage of patients achieving a treatment response at Week 16 that received SGX301 for both Cycle 1 and 2 compared to the response rate in patients that received Placebo in Cycle 1. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score was measured as previously described.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: The analysis population was defined as all participants that were treated with at least one dose of treatment (SGX301) in Cycle 2

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SGX301Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score (Cycle 1 and 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)Responder44 Participants
SGX301Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score (Cycle 1 and 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)Non-responder66 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score (Cycle 1 and 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)Responder2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response in 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score (Cycle 1 and 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)Non-responder48 Participants
p-value: <0.0001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response of 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score in Patients Who Received 3 Cycles of SGX301

The percentage of patients achieving a treatment response at Week 24 compared at Week 16 in SGX301 treatment group. A treatment response was defined as a ≥50% improvement in CAILS score when compared to the CAILS score at baseline. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score was measured as previously described.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The analysis population was defined as all participants that were treated with at least one dose of treatment (SGX301) in Cycle 2

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SGX301Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response of 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score in Patients Who Received 3 Cycles of SGX301Responder38 Participants
SGX301Number of Responders and Non-Responders With a Treatment Response of 3 Treated Lesions as Measured by the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) Score in Patients Who Received 3 Cycles of SGX301Non-responder40 Participants
p-value: 0.046McNemar
Secondary

Patch Lesion Response Rates With Extended Treatment (Cycle 1 & 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)

The proportion of patch lesions achieving a treatment response at Week 16 in the SGX301 treatment group compared to Week 8 in the Placebo treatment group. A treatment response was defined as a ≥50% improvement in CAILS score when compared to the CAILS score at baseline for individual lesions. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score was measured as previously described.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: The analysis population was defined as all participants that were treated with at least one dose of treatment (SGX301) in Cycle 2

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SGX301Patch Lesion Response Rates With Extended Treatment (Cycle 1 & 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)65 lesions with response
PlaceboPatch Lesion Response Rates With Extended Treatment (Cycle 1 & 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)14 lesions with response
p-value: =0.0009Fisher Exact
Secondary

Plaque Lesion Response Rates With Extended Treatment (Cycle 1 & 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)

The proportion of plaque lesions achieving a treatment response at Week 16 in the SGX301 treatment group compared to Week 8 in the Placebo treatment group. A treatment response was defined as a ≥50% improvement in CAILS score when compared to the CAILS score at baseline for individual lesions. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity (CAILS) score was measured as previously described.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: The analysis population was defined as all lesions that were treated with at least one dose of treatment (SGX301) in Cycle 2

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SGX301Plaque Lesion Response Rates With Extended Treatment (Cycle 1 & 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)64 lesions with response
PlaceboPlaque Lesion Response Rates With Extended Treatment (Cycle 1 & 2 SGX301 vs Cycle 1 Placebo)7 lesions with response
p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026