Skip to content

Quality of Life After Stroke Using a Telemedicine-based Stroke Network

Assessing the Impact of Care in A Telemedicine-based Stroke Network Using Patient-Centered Health Related Quality of Life Outcomes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02447094
Acronym
STROKE TeleQOL
Enrollment
300
Registered
2015-05-18
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

ischemic, tPA, tele-medicine, robot, tele-stroke

Brief summary

To study the effect of a telemedicine model of stroke care on patient-based outcomes.

Detailed description

Approximately 750,000 patients suffer from ischemic stroke (AIS) annually in the United States. AIS is a a leading cause of long-term disability and the third-leading cause of mortality. Effective therapies exist to ameliorate the disability associated with AIS, but implementation of these therapies is time-sensitive. Currently, there is a shortage in health care professionals with expertise in the treatment of stroke and such expertise tends to be concentrated in large community-based or academic medical centers. To respond to this shortage, stroke networks are being organized in a hub-and-spoke model to facilitate the rapid delivery of time-sensitive interventions such as intravenous (i.v.) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or rapid evaluation for AIS. Some networks are also using telemedicine to facilitate this approach and bring the needed expertise via robotic tele-presence (RTP). Though the accuracy of stroke diagnosis and i.v. tPA utilization may be higher in RTP based networks, the impact of this model on patient's outcomes has been difficult to elucidate. To this end, meaningful validated outcome assessments are crucial to understand the impact of stroke interventions including telemedicine or RTP based networks. The objective of this study is to translate evidence-based practice of healthcare, patient-centered outcome assessments, and patient-family perceptions of delivery of care into meaningful data. This will aid in the validation of the role of interventions such as hub-and-spoke RTP based models in stroke care.

Interventions

DRUGAlteplase

Intravenous (i.v.) tPA per the standard of care

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS) * Age \>17 years

Exclusion criteria

* Hemorrhagic strokes (ICH or SAH) * Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) * Trauma * Inability to obtain informed consent * Participation in another study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HRQoL6 monthsHealth Related Quality of Life

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mRS6 monthsModified Rankin Scale

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026