Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab Compared to Placebo in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02446912
Enrollment
460
Registered
2015-05-18
Start date
2015-06-09
Completion date
2018-07-17
Last updated
2023-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, multicentre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) while receiving standard of care (SOC) treatment. The study will be performed in adult subjects aged 18 to 70 years of age.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAnifrolumab

Anifrolumab IV administration every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 48 for a total of 13 doses

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo IV administration every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 48

Sponsors

PRA Health Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 through 70 years at the time of screening 2. Diagnosis of paediatric or adult SLE with a diagnosis of SLE according to the ACR 1982 revised criteria ≥24 weeks prior to signing the Informed Consent form (ICF) 3. Currently receiving at least 1 of the following: 1. Where prednisone is the single standard of care medication (ie, the subject is not concurrently receiving any medication listed in inclusion criterion 3(c)), a dose of oral prednisone ≥7.5 mg/day but ≤40 mg/day (or prednisone equivalent) for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to Day 1. In addition, the dose of oral prednisone or prednisone equivalent the subject is taking must be stable for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to randomisation. 2. Where prednisone is not the single standard of care medication (ie, the subject is concurrently receiving at least one medication listed in inclusion criterion 3(c)), a dose of oral prednisone (≤40 mg/day) (or prednisone equivalent) for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to signing of the ICF. In addition, the dose of oral prednisone or prednisone equivalent the subject is taking must be stable for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to randomisation. 3. Any of the following medications administered for a minimum of 12 weeks prior to signing the informed consent, and at a stable dose for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to signing the informed consent through Day 1: (i) Azathioprine ≤200 mg/day (ii) Antimalarial (eg, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, quinacrine) (iii) Mycophenolate mofetil ≤2 g/day or mycophenolic acid ≤1.44 g/day (iv) Oral, subcutaneous (SC), or intramuscular methotrexate ≤25 mg/week (v) Mizoribine ≤150 mg/day 4. Fulfils at least 4 of the 11 ACR modified 1982 classification criteria for SLE, at least 1 of which must be: 1. Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test at screening by immunofluorescent assay (IFA) at the central laboratory with titre ≥1:80; OR 2. Anti-dsDNA antibodies at screening elevated to above normal (including indeterminante), as per the central laboratory; OR 3. Anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibody at screening elevated to above normal as per the central laboratory. 5. At Screening, Disease Activity Adjudication Group confirmation of: SLEDAI-2K Criteria: SLEDAI-2K score ≥6 points and Clinical SLEDAI-2K score ≥4 points. The Clinical SLEDAI-2K is the SLEDAI-2K assessment score without the inclusion of points attributable to any urine or laboratory results including immunologic measures. 6. Must not have active or latent TB on either chest radiograph or by quantiferon gold test 7. Day 1 Clinical SLEDAI-2K score ≥4 points 8. OCS dose stable for at least 2 weeks prior to randomisation 9. Stable SLE SOC treatment at the time of randomisation 10. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum β-hCG test and negative urine pregnancy test at randomisation (Day 1) prior to administration of investigational product

Exclusion criteria

1. Receipt of any investigational product (small molecule or biologic agent) within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to signing of the ICF, whichever is greater 2. Receipt of any of the following: (a) Intra-articular, intramuscular or IV glucocorticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to Day 1 3. History of, or current diagnosis of, a clinically significant non SLE-related vasculitis syndrome. 4. Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE 5. Active severe SLE-driven renal disease 6. Diagnosis (within 1 year of signing the ICF) of mixed connective tissue disease or any history of overlap syndromes of SLE or SSc. 7. History of, or current, inflammatory joint or skin disease other than SLE 8. History of any non-SLE disease that has required treatment with oral or parenteral corticosteroids for more than 2 weeks within the last 24 weeks prior to signing the ICF 9. Known history of a primary immunodeficiency, splenectomy, or any underlying condition that predisposes the subject to infection, or a positive result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection confirmed by central laboratory at screening. Subjects refusing HIV testing during the screening period will not be eligible for study participation 10. Confirmed positive test for hepatitis B or hepatitis C 11. Any severe herpes infection at any time prior to Week 0 (Day 1) 12. Opportunistic infection requiring hospitalisation or intravenous antimicrobial treatment within 3 years prior to randomization 13. History of cancer, apart from: 1. Squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated 2. Cervical cancer in situ that has been successfully treated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)Week 52SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue scale (VAS) No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)Week 52Maintained OCS reduction was defined by meeting all the following criteria: Achieve an OCS dose of ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by Week 40 Maintain an OCS dose ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Week 40 to Week 52 No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.
Number of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)Week 1250% reduction in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score compared to baseline was defined by meeting all of the following criteria: Achieve ≥50% reduction of CLASI activity score at Week 12 compared to baseline No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold before assessment.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)Week 24SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified threshold.
Annualized Flare RateBaseline to Week 52A flare was defined as either 1 or more new British Isle Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG-2004 assessment.
Number of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)Week 52A BICLA responder was achieved if all of the following criteria was met: All criteria related to SRI(4) (please see primary endpoint) plus: Reduction of all baseline BILAG-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 1 or more new BILAG-2004 B item No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AE)Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE). The reported value is inclusive of serious and non-serious AEs.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)An AESI is an AE of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor/Sponsor's delegate. An AESI may be serious or nonserious. The events of interest are serious infections, including non opportunistic serious infections, opportunistic infections, anaphylaxis, malignancy, herpes zoster, TB (including latent TB), influenza, vasculitis (non-SLE), and MACE (including stroke, MI, or cardiovascular death). AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)Week 52SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical ExaminationsBaseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)Physical examinations included height and weight. Participants were weighed at each study visit and any medically significant changes were reported. Physical examination values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) ScoresBaseline to Week 52ECGs documented the date, time, heart rate, QRS duration, PR interval, RR interval, QT, and corrected QT interval, which were calculated using the Fridericia formula. The investigator judged the overall interpretation as normal or abnormal, and if abnormal it was decided as to whether or not the abnormality was clinically significant or not clinically significant.
Number of Participants With Mild To Moderate Lupus Flare Evaluated by Modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare IndexBaseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)The modified SELENA flare index was completed by the Investigator or delegated/qualified physician. Assessment of flares were scored in comparison to the participant's previous visit and should only include findings which, in the opinion of the Investigator, are due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity within that timeframe. Flare was defined as any 1 criterion present in either the Mild/Moderate Flare or Severe Flare categories. Number of flares were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory TestsBaseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)Laboratory tests were collected at central clinical laboratories and included hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis tests. Laboratory values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Baseline to Week 52The C-SSRS is an assessment tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. Number of participants with suicidal ideation or behavior was defined as the number of participants who answered yes at any time during the treatment period (Baseline to Week 52) to one of the 10 categories: Category 1: Wish to be dead Category 2: Non-specific active suicidal thoughts Category 3: Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act Category 4: Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan Category 5: Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent Category 6: Preparatory acts or behavior Category 7: Aborted attempt Category 8: Interrupted attempt Category 9: Actual attempt (non-fatal) Category 10: Completed suicide
Change From Baseline in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQ-8) ScoreBaseline to Week 52PHQ-8 is a 8-item self-report scale, all items are rated on a score of 0-3, for a total range of 0-24. PHQ-8 assesses symptoms of depression over the previous 2 weeks. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms.
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital SignsBaseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)Vital signs included oral temperature, blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and respiratory rate. Vital signs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Romania, South Korea, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the trial at 123 sites in 18 countries worldwide.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anifrolumab 150 mg
Anifrolumab (150 mg) administered via an intravenous infusion (IV) every 4 weeks for up to 48 weeks (13 doses)
93
Anifrolumab 300 mg
Anifrolumab (300 mg) administered via an intravenous infusion (IV) every 4 weeks for up to 48 weeks (13 doses)
180
Placebo
Matching placebo administered via an intravenous infusion (IV) every 4 weeks for up to 48 weeks (13 doses)
184
Total457

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event3135
Overall StudyCondition under investigation worsened011
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy147
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up002
Overall StudyMiscellaneous224
Overall StudySevere non-compliance to protocol101
Overall StudyStudy-specific withdrawal criteria100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject101515

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnifrolumab 150 mgAnifrolumab 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous40.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.05
42.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.99
41.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
41.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.11
Age, Customized
< 18
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 18 to < 65
90 Participants169 Participants178 Participants437 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65
3 Participants11 Participants6 Participants20 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)27.31 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.81
28.25 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.899
28.09 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.145
28.00 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.976
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants32 Participants35 Participants87 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants148 Participants149 Participants370 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height164.02 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.208
162.99 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.829
163.10 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.03
163.24 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.98
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants11 Participants5 Participants24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants29 Participants23 Participants66 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants15 Participants18 Participants40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
64 Participants125 Participants137 Participants326 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
86 Participants165 Participants171 Participants422 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants15 Participants13 Participants35 Participants
Weight73.57 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.469
75.36 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.343
74.69 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.332
74.72 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.731

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 931 / 1801 / 184
other
Total, other adverse events
78 / 93157 / 180141 / 184
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 9327 / 18035 / 184

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue scale (VAS) No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)35 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)65 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)74 Participants
p-value: 0.41295% CI: [-14.2, 5.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
95% CI: [-14.7, 9.6]
Secondary

Annualized Flare Rate

A flare was defined as either 1 or more new British Isle Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG-2004 assessment.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received investigational product with non-missing baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Anifrolumab 150 mgAnnualized Flare Rate0.62 Annualized flare rate ratio
Anifrolumab 300 mgAnnualized Flare Rate0.60 Annualized flare rate ratio
PlaceboAnnualized Flare Rate0.72 Annualized flare rate ratio
p-value: 0.25895% CI: [0.6, 1.14]Negative binomial regression
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQ-8) Score

PHQ-8 is a 8-item self-report scale, all items are rated on a score of 0-3, for a total range of 0-24. PHQ-8 assesses symptoms of depression over the previous 2 weeks. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: All participants who received study drug with non-missing baseline and week 52 measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anifrolumab 150 mgChange From Baseline in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQ-8) Score-2.1 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.43
Anifrolumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQ-8) Score-2.7 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQ-8) Score-1.7 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AE)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE). The reported value is inclusive of serious and non-serious AEs.

Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AE)80 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AE)161 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AE)145 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

An AESI is an AE of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor/Sponsor's delegate. An AESI may be serious or nonserious. The events of interest are serious infections, including non opportunistic serious infections, opportunistic infections, anaphylaxis, malignancy, herpes zoster, TB (including latent TB), influenza, vasculitis (non-SLE), and MACE (including stroke, MI, or cardiovascular death). AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)11 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)23 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

Maintained OCS reduction was defined by meeting all the following criteria: Achieve an OCS dose of ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by Week 40 Maintain an OCS dose ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Week 40 to Week 52 No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All participants who received investigational product, who had a baseline OCS ≥10 mg/day, and had non-missing baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)17 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)42 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)33 Participants
p-value: 0.1895% CI: [-4.1, 21.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All participants who received investigational product with non-missing baseline measurements, and high IFN test results.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)30 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)53 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)59 Participants
p-value: 0.54995% CI: [-14.4, 7.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified threshold.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)34 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)74 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)75 Participants
p-value: 0.90595% CI: [-9.4, 10.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

A BICLA responder was achieved if all of the following criteria was met: All criteria related to SRI(4) (please see primary endpoint) plus: Reduction of all baseline BILAG-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 1 or more new BILAG-2004 B item No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)27 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)67 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)49 Participants
95% CI: [0.6, 19.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

50% reduction in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score compared to baseline was defined by meeting all of the following criteria: Achieve ≥50% reduction of CLASI activity score at Week 12 compared to baseline No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold before assessment.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who received investigational product, had a baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10, and had non-missing baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)15 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)24 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)14 Participants
p-value: 0.05495% CI: [-0.3, 34.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Scores

ECGs documented the date, time, heart rate, QRS duration, PR interval, RR interval, QT, and corrected QT interval, which were calculated using the Fridericia formula. The investigator judged the overall interpretation as normal or abnormal, and if abnormal it was decided as to whether or not the abnormality was clinically significant or not clinically significant.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Scores0 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Scores0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Scores0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Tests

Laboratory tests were collected at central clinical laboratories and included hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis tests. Laboratory values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Tests44 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Tests71 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Tests87 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations

Physical examinations included height and weight. Participants were weighed at each study visit and any medically significant changes were reported. Physical examination values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations3 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs

Vital signs included oral temperature, blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and respiratory rate. Vital signs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs14 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs36 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs46 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mild To Moderate Lupus Flare Evaluated by Modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare Index

The modified SELENA flare index was completed by the Investigator or delegated/qualified physician. Assessment of flares were scored in comparison to the participant's previous visit and should only include findings which, in the opinion of the Investigator, are due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity within that timeframe. Flare was defined as any 1 criterion present in either the Mild/Moderate Flare or Severe Flare categories. Number of flares were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose \[Week 48\]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Mild To Moderate Lupus Flare Evaluated by Modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare Index38 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With Mild To Moderate Lupus Flare Evaluated by Modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare Index58 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Mild To Moderate Lupus Flare Evaluated by Modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare Index67 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

The C-SSRS is an assessment tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. Number of participants with suicidal ideation or behavior was defined as the number of participants who answered yes at any time during the treatment period (Baseline to Week 52) to one of the 10 categories: Category 1: Wish to be dead Category 2: Non-specific active suicidal thoughts Category 3: Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act Category 4: Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan Category 5: Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent Category 6: Preparatory acts or behavior Category 7: Aborted attempt Category 8: Interrupted attempt Category 9: Actual attempt (non-fatal) Category 10: Completed suicide

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation1 Participants
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behaviour0 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation2 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behaviour0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behaviour1 Participants
Post Hoc

Number of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)

Maintained OCS reduction was defined by meeting all of the following criteria: Achieve an OCS dose of ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by Week 40 Maintain an OCS dose ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Week 40 to Week 52 No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold. Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medication confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All participants who received investigational product, who had a baseline OCS ≥10 mg/day, and had non-missing baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)24 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)50 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)33 Participants
p-value: 0.01395% CI: [3.5, 29.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Number of Participants Who Achieved an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)

SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity. Worsening defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold. Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medications confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All participants who received investigational product with non-missing baseline measurements, and high IFN test results.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)40 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)71 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)63 Participants
p-value: 0.26195% CI: [-4.8, 17.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)

SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity. Worsening defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc allowed threshold. Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medications confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)45 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)84 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)79 Participants
p-value: 0.45595% CI: [-6.3, 14.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
95% CI: [-6.7, 17.8]
Post Hoc

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)

SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity. Worsening defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc allowed threshold. Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medications confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)40 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)83 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)79 Participants
p-value: 0.51595% CI: [-6.7, 13.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Number of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)

A BICLA responder was achieved if all of the following criteria was met: All criteria related to SRI(4) (please see primary endpoint) plus: Reduction of all baseline BILAG-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 1 or more new BILAG-2004 B item No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment. Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medications confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set - all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigation product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)35 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)83 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)54 Participants
95% CI: [6.7, 26.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Number of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)

50% reduction in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score compared to baseline was defined by meeting all the following criteria: Achieve ≥50% reduction of CLASI activity score at Week 12 compared to baseline No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment. Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medication confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All participants who received investigational product, had a baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10, and had non-missing baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anifrolumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)16 Participants
Anifrolumab 300 mgNumber of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)25 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Post-Hoc Analysis With Revised Restricted Medication Rules)14 Participants
p-value: 0.03495% CI: [1.4, 36]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 10, 2026