Skip to content

Comparison of Efficacy and Frequency of Adverse Events of 1st Line Palliative Chemotherapy EOX and mDCF Regimens in Advanced HER2-negative Gastric Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02445209
Enrollment
56
Registered
2015-05-15
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2015-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HER2 Negative Gastric Cancer

Keywords

HER2-negative gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, first-line palliative chemotherapy, EOX, mDCF, efficacy, safety

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare efficacy and safety of palliative chemotherapy EOX and mDCF regimens in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma

Detailed description

The main purposes: to determine the overall survival (OS) of patients who have locally advanced inoperable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with first-line EOX (epirubicin + oxaliplatin + capecitabine) or mDCF (docetaxel + cisplatin + leucovorin + 5fluorouracil) palliative chemotherapy regimens The secondary purposes: to determine safety (as assessed by adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0) and the progression-free survival (PFS)

Interventions

OTHEREOX

combined chemotherapy regimen: epirubicin + oxaliplatin + capecitabine

OTHERmDCF

combined chemotherapy regimen: docetaxel + leucovorin + 5fluorouracil + cisplatin

Sponsors

Jagiellonian University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ≥ 18 years * histologically confirmed inoperable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction; * ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2; * adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function; * measurable or nonmeasurable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Patients with intraoperatively confirmed intraperitoneal metastases but without detectable disease in radiological studies were also eligible

Exclusion criteria

* HER2- positive tumors defined as either IHC 3+ or IHC 2+, the latter in combination with FISH+ * previous chemotherapy for metastatic or locally advanced disease * surgery \<3 weeks before the onset of the study treatment * congestive heart failure * significant dysphagia that would preclude oral administration of capecitabine * concurrent malignant disease, except for adequately treated tumors with high likelihood of being cured (e.g. basal cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical cancer) * clinical evidence of brain metastases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival3 yearstime from randomization until death from any cause

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety as assessed by adverse events according to CTCAE v4.03 yearsoccurrence of adverse events according to CTCAE v4.0
Progression-free Survival3 yearstime from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026