Skip to content

Study to Document the Effectiveness of Dysport in Patients Suffering From Upper Limb Spasticity (ULS) After Stroke

Observational Prospective Study to Document the Effectiveness of Dysport in Patients Suffering From Upper Limb Spasticity (ULS) After Stroke, Under Conditions of Routine Clinical Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02444494
Acronym
PSAS REGISTRY
Enrollment
108
Registered
2015-05-14
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2018-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Stroke Arm Spasticity

Brief summary

The objective of this non-interventional study is to evaluate clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of Dysport within the reimbursement scheme called drug programme funded by Polish National Health Fund (NHF) for patients with post stroke ULS. The study is designed to collect data in patients scheduled to receive Dysport treatment in a drug programme, based on routine treatment of subject with ULS.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 18 years of age. * A history of ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke before minimum 3 months prior to the inclusion into drug programme, documented by discharge from the hospital. * Post-stroke spasticity of confirmed upper extremity moderate or higher (the result of the modified Ashworth scale - MAS ≥ 2) in at least one muscle group. * Classification of the patient into the programme occurs when a patient has a designated date of commencement of medical rehabilitation confirmed by the providing rehabilitation services. * Drug administration needs to take place no earlier than three weeks before the start of medical rehabilitation. * Written informed consent given by patient before any occurrence of study related procedure. * Patient has been already included in a NHF Dysport programme.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe dysphagia and respiratory disorders. * Pregnancy * Myasthenia gravis and myasthenic syndrome - based on neurological examination (additional tests only in justified cases). * Generalized symptoms of infection * The presence of inflammation within the planned sites of administration. * Fixed contractures in the soft tissues and joints. * Dementia medium or deep cycle (score on mini mental state examination (MMSE) equal to or less than 18 points).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Investigator and patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I)Change from baseline (visit 1) to visit 3 (visits occur every 3-4 months, during approximately 9 months of observation)Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale: 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global assessment of spasticity by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)Visits 1, 2 and 3 (visits occur every 3-4 months, during approximately 9 months of observation)MAS - spasticity scores at each joint: shoulder, elbow, wrist, finger, thumb
Measurement of upper limb muscle weakness by Medical Research Council (modified MRC) scale for muscle strengthVisits 1, 2 and 3 (visits occur every 3-4 months, during approximately 9 months of observation)
To document cost of treatment with Dysport in these patientsVisits 1, 2 and 3 (visits occur every 3-4 months, during approximately 9 months of observation)Direct costs associated with the administration of Dysport will include the dose of Dysport, interval between reinjections, cost of healthcare resources: needles, syringes, identification techniques of the muscles.

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026