Skip to content

A Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus ER Dosing in Obese Kidney Transplant Recipients

A Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus ER Dosing in Obese Kidney Transplant Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02444143
Acronym
Tacrolimus ER
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-05-14
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2017-06-09
Last updated
2018-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplantation

Keywords

Kidney, Immunosuppression, Transplant

Brief summary

Tacrolimus extended release (Astagraf) has recently been approved by the FDA as a once a day dosing regimen. This formulation has the potential to improve compliance. Current dosing recommendation for the extended release formulation in renal transplant is 0.15 mg/kg/day administered once daily in the morning. There are no specifications on appropriate dosing in obese patients or on whether to use actual, ideal or and adjusted weight. It will be advantageous to understand the pharmacokinetics of this medication in the obese to determine the appropriate dosing regimen. In this study, obese patients will be randomized to receive tacrolimus extended release 0.15 mg/kg/day based on either ideal body weight (IBW) or adjusted body weight (aBW).

Detailed description

Tacrolimus exhibits significant inter- and intra-individual variability of its absorption and metabolism. Because of this variability, standard dosing is not an accurate predictor of drug exposure. In clinical use, tacrolimus whole blood trough concentrations are measured to ensure efficacy and safety. Furthermore, the relatively low bioavailability of tacrolimus is thought to be a result of the combination of poor water-solubility, pre-systemic metabolism of tacrolimus in the gastrointestinal tract and activity of the P-glycoprotein efflux pump found in the enterocytes of the GI tract. Tacrolimus is extensively metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 system (CYP3A). The plasma protein binding of tacrolimus is approximately 99%. Tacrolimus is bound mainly to albumin and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. The distribution of tacrolimus between blood and plasma depends on several factors including hematocrit, temperature at the time of plasma separation, drug concentration, and plasma protein concentration. Pharmacodynamic studies have revealed that, depending on time following transplantation, maintaining whole blood trough levels between 5 and 20 ng/mL provides adequate protection against acute rejection and limits the occurrence of adverse events. The management of tacrolimus blood levels is complicated by variable intra- and inter-patient absorption, interaction with food and concomitant medications, and the relatively low bioavailability of tacrolimus from the Prograf formulation (17 ± 10% in adult kidney transplant patients). Previous studies examining immunosuppressants have shown that drug levels in the immediate post-transplant period are a major determinant of subsequent acute cellular rejection. It is known that tacrolimus (TAC) \< 10 ng/mL is associated with increased rates of acute cellular rejection by one month post-transplant. There is controversy regarding the appropriate dosing weight to use for immunosuppressants (IS). Weights use range from ideal body weight (IBW) to total body weight (TBW) depending on the institution and drug being dosed. This becomes particularly important in the obese population when there are significant differences between IBW and TBW. Our institution has always used IBW for the dosing of all IS due to concerns for nephrotoxicity with initial high blood levels of tacrolimus. The concern in obese patients is that the investigators are underdosing this population that could be at higher risk for rejection due to higher circulating concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The introduction of the novel use of a robotic transplantation procedure at our institution for this patient population has led to increasing numbers of transplant in obese recipients; therefore, the investigators decided to re-evaluate our dosing protocol. Data from an internal study at UIC show that our use of IBW for tacrolimus dosing is not sufficient for the obese population (body mass index \[BMI\] ≥30). The dose used through month 3 was closer to 0.1 mg/kg/day when total body weight was utilized. However, the use of an adjusted body weight (aBW) is common for medication dosing in obese patients. Adjusted body weight is calculated if the TBW is greater than 30% of the calculated IBW. aBW = IBW + 0.4(TBW - IBW). There is limited data available supporting the use of either IBW or aBW in dosing tacrolimus within obese patients as these patients are typically excluded from most clinical trials, particularly the pharmacokinetic trials. In addition, no literature is available comparing the two dosing weights to determine which leads to therapeutic concentrations most effectively. Summary and Present Study Tacrolimus extended release (Astagraf) has recently been approved by the FDA as a once a day dosing regimen. This formulation has the potential to improve compliance. Current dosing recommendation for the extended release formulation in renal transplant is 0.15 mg/kg/day administered once daily in the morning. There are no specifications on appropriate dosing in obese patients or on whether to use actual, ideal or and adjusted weight. It will be advantageous to understand the pharmacokinetics of this medication in the obese to determine the appropriate dosing regimen. In this study, obese patients will be randomized to receive tacrolimus extended release 0.15 mg/kg/day based on either ideal body weight (IBW) or adjusted body weight (aBW).

Interventions

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Illinois at Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject is a recipient of a living donor or deceased donor kidney only transplant 2. Subject is \> 18 years of age 3. BMI≥30 on POD 0

Exclusion criteria

1. Multi-organ transplant 2. Subjects taking tacrolimus pre-transplant (i.e. positive crossmatch transplants or re-transplants) 3. Patients undergoing simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy at the time of transplant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBWDays 1-14Difference in tacrolimus exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC-0-24)) in obese patients who received an initial TAC -ER dose of 0.15 mg/kg using aBW versus IBW

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Time to Therapeutic LevelDays 1 to 7Difference in the time to a therapeutic tacrolimus trough level in the aBW group compared to the IBW group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ideal Body Weight- Tacrolimus Extended Release
tacrolimus extended release (Astagraf) 0.15 mg/kg/day based on Ideal Body Weight (IBW)
10
Adjusted Body Weight-Tacrolimus Extended Release
tacrolimus extended release (Astagraf) 0.15 mg/kg/day based on adjusted Body Weight (aBW)
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAdjusted Body Weight-Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseIdeal Body Weight- Tacrolimus Extended Release
Adjusted Body Weight92.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
97.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
86.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.5
Age, Continuous54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.45
47.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Body Mass Index at Transplant40.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
43.4 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
38.2 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
Body Mass Index greater than or equal to 30 on Post Operative Day 020 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Cause of End Stage Renal Disease
diabetes mellitus (DM)
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Cause of End Stage Renal Disease
DM + HTN
7 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Cause of End Stage Renal Disease
hypertension (HTN)
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Cause of End Stage Renal Disease
Other
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Donor Type
Deceased
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Donor Type
Living-related
8 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Donor Type
Living-unrelated
7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Duration of Pre-transplant dialysis50.8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.7
55.8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.8
45.8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Hospital stay in days6.75 days6.5 days7 days
Ideal Body Weight69.75 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.55
71.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
68 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants10 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Weight at Transplant126.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.35
136.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.5
116.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1010 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBW

Difference in tacrolimus exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC-0-24)) in obese patients who received an initial TAC -ER dose of 0.15 mg/kg using aBW versus IBW

Time frame: Days 1-14

Population: This study randomized de novo kidney transplant recipients who were at least 18 years of age and obese as evidenced by a BMI ≥ 30 on the day of transplantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ideal Body Weight- Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseDifference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBWday 7 AUC 0-24268.3 ng•h/mLStandard Deviation 59.9
Ideal Body Weight- Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseDifference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBWday 14 AUC 0-24355.0 ng•h/mLStandard Deviation 75.4
Ideal Body Weight- Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseDifference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBWday 1 AUC 0-24115.2 ng•h/mLStandard Deviation 51.3
Adjusted Body Weight-Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseDifference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBWday 7 AUC 0-24269.3 ng•h/mLStandard Deviation 101.1
Adjusted Body Weight-Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseDifference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBWday 1 AUC 0-2490.0 ng•h/mLStandard Deviation 51.2
Adjusted Body Weight-Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseDifference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBWday 14 AUC 0-24267.3 ng•h/mLStandard Deviation 101.3
p-value: 0.29t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Difference in Time to Therapeutic Level

Difference in the time to a therapeutic tacrolimus trough level in the aBW group compared to the IBW group.

Time frame: Days 1 to 7

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ideal Body Weight- Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseDifference in Time to Therapeutic Level4.9 daysStandard Deviation 3.1
Adjusted Body Weight-Tacrolimus Extended ReleaseDifference in Time to Therapeutic Level5.1 daysStandard Deviation 4
p-value: 0.9t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026