Skip to content

Cyclophosphamide in Myalgic Encephalopathy/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)

Cyclophosphamide in Myalgic Encephalopathy/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). Part A: an Open Label Phase-II Study With Six Intravenous Cyclophosphamide Infusions Four Weeks Apart, and Follow-up for 12 Months

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02444091
Acronym
CycloME
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-05-14
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2019-12-06
Last updated
2021-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)

Keywords

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), Cyclophosphamide, Immunomodulatory treatment, CFS

Brief summary

Significant clinical improvements of ME/CFS symptoms were observed in two patients with long-standing ME/CFS who received adjuvant chemotherapy including cyclophosphamide for breast cancer, also in one ME/CFS patient who received chemotherapy including iphosphamide for Hodgkin lymphoma. Three pilot ME/CFS patients were thereafter treated with six intravenous infusions four weeks apart, in two of these with a significant clinical response. The hypothesis is that a subset of ME/CFS patients have an activated immune system, and that ME/CFS symptoms may be alleviated by treatment with cyclophosphamide as intravenous pulse infusions four weeks apart, six infusions in total. The purpose of the present study is to treat ME/CFS patients with cyclophosphamide as intravenous pulse infusions four weeks apart, six infusions in total. The effects on ME/CFS symptoms and tolerability/side effects during 12 months follow-up will be registered, and additional tests will be performed to objectively register changes in physical ability during follow-up. Studies to investigate possible large vessel endothelial dysfunction and skin microvascular dysfunction will be performed before start of intervention and during follow-up.

Interventions

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide intravenous infusions four weeks apart, in total six infusions. First infusion: cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2. Infusions 2 to 6: cyclophosphamide 700 mg/m2 . Follow-up for 12 months.

Sponsors

The Kavli Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Oslo University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Haukeland University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with ME/CFS according to Canadian criteria (2003) * Duration of ME/CFS at least 2 years * Mild/Moderate, Moderate, Moderate/Severe and Severe ME/CFS may be included * Age 18-65 years * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with fatigue who do not comply by the diagnostic Canadian criteria (2003) for ME/CFS * Duration of ME/CFS less than 2 years * Mild ME/CFS * Very severe ME/CFS (bedridden requiring help for all tasks) * Patients where the workup uncovers other pathology as possible cause of symptoms * Pregnancy or breast feeding * Previous malignant disease (except basal cell carcinoma of skin and cervical carcinoma in situ/dysplasia) * Previous long-term systemic treatment with immunosuppressive agents (e.g. azathioprine, ciclosporin, mycophenolate mofetil). Except steroid treatment for e.g. obstructive lung disease or autoimmune diseases such as e.g. ulcerative colitis * Serious endogenous depression * Lack of ability to complete the study including follow-up * Reduced renal function (creatinine \> 1.5 x UNL) * Reduced liver function (bilirubin or transaminases \> 1.5 x UNL) * Known hypersensitivity to cyclophosphamide or metabolites * Reduced bone marrow function * Ongoing cystitis or urinary tract obstruction * Known HIV positivity, previous hepatitis B or hepatitis C, or reason to suspect other ongoing and clinically relevant infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatigue score, selfreportedWithin 12 months follow-upSelfreported Fatigue score is registered every second week, always compared to baseline, as the mean of the four symptoms: Post-exertional malaise, Fatigue, Need for rest, Daily functioning (scale 0-6, in which 3 is unchanged from baseline). Mean Fatigue scores for the time intervals 0-3, 3-6, 6-9 and 9-12 months are recorded for each patient. Changes in selfreported Fatigue scores from baseline to the mean values in each of the time intervals 0-3, 3-6, 6-9 and 9-12 months follow up, will constitute the primary endpoint. Responses for the primary endpoint will be recorded separately for the group of (at least) 25 ME/CFS patients not given rituximab previously, for the group with previous rituximab intervention for ME/CFS with no clinical response and for the group with previous rituximab intervention with clinical response but later relapse, and also for all 40 included patients together.
Overall responseWithin 12 months follow-upOverall response is recorded as the effect on ME/CFS symptoms during 12 months follow-up. The overall response is not predefined to a specific time interval during follow-up, but is defined as mean Fatigue score at least 4.5 for at least 6 consecutive weeks for moderate response, and mean Fatigue score at least 5.0 for at least 6 consecutive weeks for major response. Single response periods and the sum of response periods during 12 months follow-up will be recorded. Overall response will be recorded separately for the group of (at least) 25 ME/CFS patients not given rituximab previously, for the group with previous rituximab intervention for ME/CFS with no clinical response and for the group with previous rituximab intervention with clinical response but later relapse, and also for all 40 included patients together.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiopulmonary exercise tests for two following daysAt baseline, and repeated at 7-9 months, and 11-12 monthsFor patients who can tolerate exercise, cardiopulmonary exercise tests will be performed for two consecutive days, at baseline, and repeated in the time intervals 7-9 months, and 11-12 months. A programmed ramp-protocol is used. Oxygen-uptake and work load (Watt) day 2, at maximum effort and at anaerobic threshold, will be recorded and used for comparison to oxygen-uptake and work load with repeated tests after 7-9 and 11-12 months. Changes from baseline to repeated exercise tests after 7-9 and 11-12 months will be analyzed.
Self-recorded Function levelAt baseline, and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-upSelf-recorded Function level (scale 0-100, compared to healthy state, according to a set of examples) are registered every second week. Mean Function level for the time intervals 0-3, 3-6, 6-9, 9-12 months are calculated. The changes in selfreported Function level, from baseline to the mean value during each of the the time intervals 0-3, 3-6, 6-9, 9-12 months constitute secondary endpoints. Changes in Self-reported Function level will be recorded separately for the group of (at least) 25 ME/CFS patients not given rituximab previously, for the group with previous rituximab intervention for ME/CFS with no clinical response and for the group with previous rituximab intervention with clinical response but later relapse, and also for all 40 included patients together.
Fatigue Severity ScaleBaseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 monthsFatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is completed by patients at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12 months. The changes in FSS from baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months constitute secondary endpoints. Changes in Fatigue severity scale will be recorded separately for the group of (at least) 25 ME/CFS patients not given rituximab previously, for the group with previous rituximab intervention for ME/CFS with no clinical response and for the group with previous rituximab intervention with clinical response but later relapse, and also for all 40 included patients together.
Short Form-36 (SF-36)Recorded at baseline, and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up.SF-36 (ver 1.2) is completed by patients at baseline, and at 3, 6, 9, 12 months follow-up. Changes in Physical health summary score, Physical function, and Mean of five subdimensions (Physical function, Bodily pain, Vitality, Social function, General health) from baseline to each of the time points 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up are recorded and constitute secondary endpoints. Secondary endpoints will be recorded separately for the group of (at least) 25 ME/CFS patients not given rituximab previously, for the group with previous rituximab intervention for ME/CFS with no clinical response and for the group with previous rituximab intervention with clinical response but later relapse, and also for all 40 included patients together.
Sustained clinical response at 12 monthsAssessment at end of follow-up (12 months)The fraction of patients with sustained clinical response (defined as Fatigue score of at least 4.5) at 12 months, constitute a secondary endpoint. Sustained clinical response at 12 months will be recorded separately for the group of (at least) 25 ME/CFS patients not given rituximab previously, for the group with previous rituximab intervention for ME/CFS with no clinical response, and for the group with previous rituximab intervention with clinical response but later relapse, and for all included patients together.
Safety and tolerabilityContinuously within the study period of 12 monthsSafety will be assessed by interim history, physical examination, and laboratory assessments every four weeks the first six months, thereafter at 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up. Adverse events will be graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (NCI-CTCAE, version 4.0). Number of patients with any grade, or severe (≥ grade 3 NCI-CTCAE version 4.0) toxicity will be reported, as a measure of tolerability and safety. Adverse Events may include include hair loss, vomiting, diarrhea, jaundice, leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, infections, allergic reactions and hemorrhagic cystitis, disturbed ovarian function. The investigators will also collect information on possible toxicity after the formal 12 months study period.
Longest continuous response durationWithin 12 months follow-upThe longest duration of continuous self-reported Fatigue score ≥ 4,5 (for at least 6 consecutive weeks) within 12 months follow-up. The longest response duration will be recorded separately for the group of (at least) 25 ME/CFS patients not given rituximab previously, for the group with previous rituximab intervention for ME/CFS with no clinical response and for the group with previous rituximab intervention with clinical response but later relapse, and also for all 40 included patients together.
Physical activity (Sensewear armband)Recorded at baseline, at 7-9 months, and at 11-12 monthsThe patients' physical activity level, in a home setting for 7 consecutive days, is recorded using Sensewear armbands, with registration at baseline and repeated in the time interval 7-9 months follow-up, and in the interval 11-12 months. Changes from baseline to analysis during the time intervals 7-9 months and 11-12 months, for mean number of steps per 24h, maximum number of steps per 24h, mean duration per 24h with activity level at least 3.5 METs, max duration per 24h with activity level at least 3.5 METs, are recorded. Changes in Physical activity will be recorded separately for the group of (at least) 25 ME/CFS patients not given rituximab previously, for the group with previous rituximab intervention for ME/CFS with no clinical response and for the group with previous rituximab intervention with clinical response but later relapse, and also for all 40 included patients together.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026