Skip to content

A Clinical Proof-of-principle Trial in Adult Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Investigating the Effect of NNC0114-0006 and Liraglutide on Preservation of Beta-cell Function

A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Multi-centre Clinical Proof-of-principle Trial in Adult Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Investigating the Effect of NNC0114-0006 and Liraglutide on Preservation of Beta-cell Function

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02443155
Enrollment
308
Registered
2015-05-13
Start date
2015-11-10
Completion date
2019-02-27
Last updated
2021-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Brief summary

This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to assess the clinical proof-of-principle of NNC0114-0006 and liraglutide on preservation of beta-cell function in adult subjects with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Interventions

NNC0114-0006 12 mg/kg administered i.v (intravenously) every 6 weeks. Subjects will continue their pre-trial insulin treatment

DRUGliraglutide

Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered s.c. (subcutaneously) daily. Subjects will continue their pre-trial insulin treatment

DRUGplacebo

Placebo administered s.c (subcutaneously) or i.v ( intravenously). Subjects will continue their pre-trial insulin treatment

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial * T1DM (type 1 diabetes mellitus) (as diagnosed clinically) for not more than 20 weeks prior to screening - Male or female, aged 18-45 (both inclusive) at the time of signing the informed consent form * Non-fasting peak C-peptide higher or equal to 0.2 nmol/l at visit 2 * BMI (body mass index) higher or equal to 18.5 kg/m\^2 * Presence of one or more islet specific auto antibodies (glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), islet antigen-2 (IA2) or zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)) at screening * Insulin dependence unless in temporary spontaneous remission (honeymoon period)

Exclusion criteria

* Daily insulin usage above 1 U/kg per day at screening or use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) * History of recurrent (e.g. several times a year) of severe (e.g. pneumonia) or chronic infections or conditions predisposing to chronic infections (e.g., bronchiectasis and chronic osteomyelitis) * History of severe systemic fungal infection within the past 12 months prior to screening unless treated and resolved with appropriate documented therapy * Vaccination within 4 weeks before randomisation, Visit 3 (V3) * Receipt of any other concomitant medications or herbal products that can influence the immune system within 90 days prior to screening (V1) * History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) * Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 (MEN2) or Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma (MTC) * Any past or current diagnosis of malignant neoplasms * Known impairment of the immune system, except for T1DM, coeliac disease, alopecia, autoimmune antibodies not considered clinical important (e.g. thyroid antibodies without any clinically important thyroid disease), and vitiligo

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0 - 4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h) of a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) stimulated C-peptide at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of C-peptide was measured as Nano moles\*hour per liter (nmol\*h/L).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cmax of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0-4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of a MMTT stimulated C-peptide at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. Cmax of C-peptide was measured as nanomoles per liter (nmol/L).
AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0 - 4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of glucose was measured as Milli moles\*hour per liter (mmol\*h/L).
AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0-2 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2h) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of glucose is measured as 'mmol\*h/L'.
Cmax of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0-4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. Cmax of C-peptide was measured as 'mmol/L'.
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 0-54; Week 54-80An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participants administered a product, and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event was defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the adverse event occurs on or after the first day of trial product administration. Number of treatment emergent adverse events from first dose of trial product to week 54 and week 80 are presented. Results are based on the on-treatment and on-observation period. On-treatment period: From the day of first trial product administration to the day of the visit at week 54. On-observation: From the day after the visit at week 54 to the day of the last visit.
Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0-54; Week 54-80Hyperglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration. Number of treatment emergent episodes of hyperglycaemic episodes from first dose of trial product to week 54 and from week 54 to week 80 are presented. Results are based on the on-treatment and on-observation period. On-treatment period: From the day of first trial product administration to the day of the visit at week 54. On-observation: From the day after the visit at week 54 to the day of the last visit.
Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeeks 0-54; Weeks 54-80Diabetic ketoacidosis episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration. Number of treatment emergent episodes of hyperglycaemic episodes from first dose of trial product to week 54 and from week 54 to week 80 are presented. Results are based on the on-treatment and on-observation period. On-treatment period: From the day of first trial product administration to the day of the visit at week 54. On-observation: From the day after the visit at week 54 to the day of the last visit.
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Injection/Infusion Site Reactions Caused by NNC0114-0006/Liraglutide/Placebo Injection/InfusionWeek 0-54Injection/infusion site reactions episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration. Number of participants experiencing treatment emergent episodes of injection/infusion site reactions episodes from first dose of trial product to week 54 (treatment period) is presented.
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Weeks 0-54; Weeks 54-80Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 1 day after the date of last contact. Number of treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification from first dose of trial product to week 54 and from week 54 to week 80 are presented. Results presented hypoglycaemia episodes were recorded as per ADA definition: Severe hypoglycaemia, Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia, Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia, Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia and Pseudo-hypoglycaemia.
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsWeeks 0-54; Weeks 54-80Hypoglycaemia episodes were recorded as per Novo Nordisk definition: Symptomatic BG-confirmed: An episode that is blood glucose (BG) confirmed by plasma glucose (PG) value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Asymptomatic BG-confirmed: An episode that is BG-confirmed by PG value \<3.1 mmol/L without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic: An episode that is severe according to the ISPAD classification or BG-confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. BG-confirmed: An episode that is BG-confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Severe or BG-confirmed: An episode that is severe according to the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) classification or BG-confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Change in Body Weight (kg)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in body weight is measured at week 54 and week 80 respective to baseline. Body weight was measured in unit 'Kg'.
Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline, week 54 and week 80Number of participants evaluated for diabetic retinopathy at baseline (Day -28 to -14), week 54 and week 80 are presented as 'yes', 'no' or 'unknown'.
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to Baseline(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)The eGFR was measured using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula. Change in eGFR (measured in milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters) from baseline (week 0) at week 54 and week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in erythrocytes (measured in 10\^12 cells per liter) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Haematocrit(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in haematocrit (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in haemoglobin (measured in millimoles per liter 'mmol/L') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Leukocytes(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in leukocytes (measured in 10\^9 cells/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in mean Corpuscular hemoglobin (measured in femtomole 'fmol') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (measured in gram per liter 'g/L') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Volume(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in Mean Corpuscular volume (measured in femtoliter 'fL') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in ALAT (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Thrombocytes(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in thrombocytes (measured in 10\^9 cells per liter) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Eosinophil(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in eosinophil (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Neutrophils(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in neutrophils (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Basophils(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in basophils (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Albumin(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in albumin (measured in gram per deciliter \[g/dL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Lymphocytes(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in lymphocytes (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Haematology: Monocytes(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in monocytes (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Amylase(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in amylase (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in ALP (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in ASAT (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Total Bilirubin(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in Total bilirubin (measured in micromole per liter \[umol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Calcium Corrected(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in calcium corrected (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Chloride(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in chloride (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Creatine Kinase(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in creatine kinase (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in creatinine (measured in micromole per liter \[umol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in GGT (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein Serum(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in C-reactive protein serum (measured in milligrams per liter \[mg/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Lactate Dehydrogenase(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in Lactate Dehydrogenase (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Lipase(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in lipase (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Magnesium(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in magnesium (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Phosphate(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in phosphate (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Potassium(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in potassium (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Sodium(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in sodium (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Total Protein(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in total protein (measured in gram per liter \[g/dL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen Serum(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in blood urea nitrogen serum (measured in milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Biochemistry: Uric Acid(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in Uric Acid (measured in milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in INR (measured in ratio\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in D-Dimer(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in D-Dimer (measured in mg/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in total free fatty acids (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in HDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in LDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in Triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in IgE (measured in kilo international units per liter \[kIU/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0, week 54 and week 80Urinalysis was performed by urine dipsticks for protein, glucose, erythrocytes, ketones leukocytes, nitrite, pH and specific gravity and categorised as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinially significant (CS). Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0), week 54 and 80 are presented.
Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 0, week 54 and week 80IL-6 levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.
Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 0, week 54 and week 80IL-10 levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.
Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 0, week 54 and week 80IL-17 levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.
Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 0, week 54 and week 80IFN gamma levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.
Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 0, week 54 and week 80TNF-alpha levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.
Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in TSH (measured in milli international units per liter \[mIU/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Hormone Level: Calcitonin(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in Calcitonin (measured in nanogram per liter \[ng/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.
Change in Pulse(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in pulse is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80
Change in Body TemperatureWeek 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in body temperature is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.
Change in Respiratory Rate(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in respiratory rate is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.
Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0, week 54 and week 80The ECG was assessed by the investigator at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80 and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline, week 54 and week 80 are presented.
Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0, week 54 and week 80Dilated fundoscopy or fundus photography was performed by the investigator at week 0, week 54 and week 80. The results of the examination were interpreted for each eye (left/right) are categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each category at week 0, week 54 and week 80 are presented.
Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0, week 54 and week 80Physical examination parameters are categorised as general appearance; head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; respiratory system;cardiovascular system; gastrointestinal system including mouth; musculoskeletal system; central and peripheral nervous system; skin; lymph node palpation and thyroid gland. Investigator assessed the participants with normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings at week 0, week 54 and week 80 are presented.
Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0, week 54 and week 80This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide treatment arm and NNC0114-0006 treatment arm. Participants was assessed for anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodies. Participant who reported anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodies were further analyzed for cross-reactivity. Number of participants who measured with anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodies at week 54 and week 80 are presented.
Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0, week 54 and week 80This outcome measure is applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide treatment arm and Liraglutide treatment arm. Participants was assessed for anti-liraglutide antibodies. Participant who reported anti-liraglutide antibodies were further analyzed for cross-reactivity. Number of participants who measured with anti-liraglutide antibodies at week 54 and week 80 are presented.
Change in Insulin Dose(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)The total daily insulin dose was derived as the average of the doses reported on the three days prior to the visit. Change in daily total insulin dose from baseline (week 0) after 54 weeks of treatment and week 80 are presented.
Change in Number of Insulin Injections(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)The number of insulin injections was derived as the average of the reported number on the three days prior to the visit. The change in number of insulin injections per day (count) from baseline (week 0) after 54 weeks of treatment and week 80 are presented.
Number of Weeks Off Bolus Insulin(Week 0 to week 54) and (week 0 to week 80)The number of weeks off bolus insulin after 54 weeks of treatment and week 80 are presented.
Change in HbA1c(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in fasting plasma glucose is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.
Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to Baseline(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in fasting C-peptide (measured in nanomole per liter \[nmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to Baseline(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change in fasting glucagon (measured in picogram per milliliter \[pg/mL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.
7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54 and Week 80Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, bedtime. 7-point SMPG profile values are presented for week 54 and week 80.
Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 54 and week 80 in 7-point SMPG postprandial glucose /prandial increment (breakfast, lunch and dinner) value are presented.
Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, bedtime. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 54 and week 80 in 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) postprandial glucose /prandial increment (average over the three meals) value is presented.
Change in Mean of 7-point Profiles(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, bedtime. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 54 and week 80 in mean of 7-point profiles value is presented.
Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 54 and week 80Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Before breakfast 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profile values are presented at week 54 and week 80.
Area Under the NNC0114-0006 Concentration-time Curve Over a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau, NNC0114-0006)Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 54AUCtau, NNC0114-0006 was derived as the area under the concentration-time curve using the linear trapezoidal technique based on observed values and actual measurement times between 0 and 6 weeks (after the last dose). This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.
Terminal Half-life (t½) After Last Dose of NNC0114-0006Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 80Terminal half life was calculated as log(2)/λz. The terminal rate constant λz was determined through linear regression with the logarithm to concentration as the response variable and actual measurement time as the explanatory variable. Valid observations from the terminal part of the curve, which is approximately linear, were used for the determination. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.
Apparent Volume of Distribution of NNC0114-0006 at Steadystate (Vss, NNC0114-0006)Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 80The apparent volume of distribution of NNC0114-0006 at steady-state was calculated as mean residence time of (MRT) of NNC0114-0006 multiplied by clearance of NNC0114-0006 at steady state. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.
Clearance of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (CLss, NNC0114-0006)Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 54Clearance of NNC0114-0006 at steady state was calculated as dose/AUCtau, NNC0114-0006. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.
Mean Residence Time of NNC0114-0006 (MRT, NNC0114-0006)Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 80This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms. Mean residence time of NNC0114-0006 is presented.
Accumulation Ratio of NNC114-0006 (RA,AUC, NNC0114-0006)Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during (week 0 to week 6) and (week 48 to week 54)Accumulation ratio of NNC114-0006 was defined as AUC48-54 weeks/AUC0-6 weeks. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.
Observed NNC0114-0006 Concentration Prior to Dosing of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (Ctrough, NNC0114-0006)Week 48 (predose)Ctrough of NNC0114-0006 was defined as concentration prior to dosing of NNC0114-0006 at steady state. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.
Observed NNC0114-0006 Concentration 1 Hour After Dosing of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (C1h, NNC0114-0006)Week 48 (1 hour post-dose)C1h, NNC0114-0006 was defined as concentration of NNC0114-0006 at 1 hour after dosing of NNC0114-0006 at steady state. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.
Liraglutide Concentration at Steady State (C Liraglutide)Week 54 (post-dose)C liraglutide was defined as the liraglutide concentration at steady state. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and Liraglutide treatment arms.
Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0, week 54 and week 80B cell panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table CD refer to Cluster of Differentiation; IgMNeg refers to Immunoglobulin M negative; IgDNeg refers to Immunoglobulin D negative.
Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0, week 54 and week 80NK cell panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table ADCC refer to Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; CD refer to Cluster of Differentiation.
Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0, week 54 and week 80T cell panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table CD refer to Cluster of Differentiation; TEMRA refers to terminally differentiated effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA; CCR refers to C-C chemokine receptor; TREG refers to Regulatory T cells.
Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0, week 54 and week 80TfH cell panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table CTFH refer to Circulating T follicular helper; ICOS refers to inducible T-cell co-stimulator; PD refers to Programmed cell death protein; CCR refers to C-C chemokine receptor; CXCR refers to C-X-C chemokine receptor; CD refer to Cluster of Differentiation; CM refers to central memory; EM refers to effector memory, TIGIT refers to T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains.
Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0, week 54 and week 80Myeloid panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table HLA refers to Human Leukocyte Antigen; MDSC refers to myeloid-derived suppressor cell; DC refers to Dendritic cells; MYDC refers to Myeloid Dendritic Cells; IMMYE\_MDSC refers to Immature myeloid cells & a subset of myeloid suppressor cells within the CD14-HLA class II- myeloid cell population.
Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0, week 54 and week 80Participants were analyzed for autoantibodies against Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and were categorized as negative and positive.
AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0-2 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2h) of a MMTT stimulated C-peptide at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of C-peptide was measured as 'nmol\*h/L'.
Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0, week 54 and week 80Participants were analyzed for autoantibodies against Islet antigen-2 (IA2) and were categorized as negative and positive.
Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0, week 54 and week 80Participants were analyzed for autoantibodies against Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and were categorized as negative and positive.
Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 0, week 54 and week 80IL-21 is evaluated at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80.
Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 0, week 54 and week 80Serum vitamin D is evaluated at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80.
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains (Bodily Pain, General Health, Mental Health, Physical Functioning, Role Emotion, Physical Health, Social Functioning and Vitality) on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 54 and week 80 in SF-36 score is presented.The MCS measure is derived from domain scales of vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The PCS measure is derived from domain scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicate an improvement since baseline.
Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB) questionnaire measured diabetes-specific health beliefs on 2 categories: Total Score for Perceived Barriers and Perceived Benefits. The measurement of perceived benefits of, and barriers to, treatment was achieved by creating a pool 28 statements each with a 7-point scale ranging from strongly agree (6) to strongly disagree (0). ETBB benefits score was calculated using the responses from questions 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, and 12 and ETBB barriers score was calculated using the responses from questions 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 11. Both was calculated as the sum of responses divided by number of responses received multiplied by the maximum number of responses. Based on the responses used the maximum responses available was 6. The higher score indicates more perceived benefits or more perceived barrier.
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)(Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)Change from baseline (week 0) in DTSQ is evaluated at week 54 and 80. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher score indicates a higher level of glycaemia/treatment satisfaction.
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0 - 4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h) of a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) stimulated C-peptide at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of C-peptide was measured as Nano moles\*hour per liter (nmol\*h/L).
AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0-2 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2h) of a MMTT stimulated C-peptide at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of C-peptide was measured as 'nmol\*h/L'.
Cmax of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0-4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of a MMTT stimulated C-peptide at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. Cmax of C-peptide was measured as nanomoles per liter (nmol/L).
AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0 - 4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of glucose was measured as Milli moles\*hour per liter (mmol\*h/L).
AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0-2 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2h) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of glucose was measured as 'mmol\*h/L'.
Cmax of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0-4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. Cmax of C-peptide was measured as 'mmol/L'.
Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0, week 54 and week 80Participants were analyzed for autoantibodies against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8) and were categorized as negative and positive.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 94 sites in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US).

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 manner to one of the four treatment groups. One participant was randomised to liraglutide arm but was withdrawn from the trial before exposure to trial products as per investigator's decision.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)
Participants received 12 mg/kg dose of NNC0114-0006 every 6 weeks, intravenously for 54 weeks. Participants took 0.6 mg of liraglutide, once daily, subcutaneously, for first two weeks, 1.2 mg for next 2 weeks and 1.8 mg for rest of the treatment period. Participants received treatment for 54 weeks followed by an off-treatment observation period of 26 weeks. Participants continued their pre-trial insulin treatment throughout the trial.
77
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)
Participants received 12 mg/kg dose of NNC0114-0006 every 6 weeks, intravenously for 54 weeks. Participants took liraglutide placebo once daily, subcutaneously, with the volume of placebo equivalent to the volume liraglutide 0.6 mg, 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg. Participants received treatment for 54 weeks followed by an off-treatment observation period of 26 weeks. Participants continued their pre-trial insulin treatment throughout the trial.
77
Liraglutide (Experimental)
Participants received NNC0114-0006 placebo (volume equivalent to NNC0114-0006 dose of 12 mg/kg) every 6 weeks, intravenously for 54 weeks. Participants took 0.6 mg of liraglutide, once daily, subcutaneously, for first two weeks, 1.2 mg for next 2 weeks and 1.8 mg for rest of the treatment period. Participants received treatment for 54 weeks followed by an off-treatment observation period of 26 weeks. Participants continued their pre-trial insulin treatment throughout the trial.
76
Placebo (Placebo)
Participants received NNC0114-0006 placebo (volume equivalent to NNC0114-0006 dose of 12 mg/kg) every 6 weeks, intravenously for 54 weeks. In addition to that, participants took liraglutide placebo once daily subcutaneously, with the volume of placebo equivalent to the volume liraglutide 0.6 mg, 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg. Participants received treatment for 54 weeks followed by an off-treatment observation period of 26 weeks. Participants continued their pre-trial insulin treatment throughout the trial.
77
Total307

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event3412
Overall StudyDeath0010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1201
Overall StudyPregnancy3112
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1011
Overall StudyUnclassified0021
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4739

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Liraglutide (Experimental)Placebo (Placebo)Total
Age, Continuous28.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
28.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
29.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
28.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants74 Participants74 Participants76 Participants297 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants4 Participants2 Participants0 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
73 Participants70 Participants73 Participants76 Participants292 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants32 Participants25 Participants28 Participants106 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants45 Participants51 Participants49 Participants201 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 770 / 771 / 760 / 77
other
Total, other adverse events
57 / 7755 / 7762 / 7654 / 77
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 775 / 779 / 7611 / 77

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline

Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h) of a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) stimulated C-peptide at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of C-peptide was measured as Nano moles\*hour per liter (nmol\*h/L).

Time frame: 0 - 4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.934 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 61.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.783 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.709 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 104.8
Placebo (Placebo)Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.660 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 86.3
Comparison: Ratio of week 54 to baseline are analysed using mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix. Treatment, stratum and sex as factors and log baseline value and age as covariates, including the interaction between visit and all variables.p-value: =0.001795% CI: [1.16, 1.89]Mixed model repeated measurements
Comparison: Ratio of week 54 to baseline are analysed using MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix. Treatment, stratum and sex as factors and log baseline value and age as covariates, including the interaction between visit and all variables.p-value: =0.092795% CI: [0.97, 1.57]Mixed model repeated measurements
Comparison: Ratio of week 54 to baseline are analysed using MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix. Treatment, stratum and sex as factors and log baseline value and age as covariates, including the interaction between visit and all variables.p-value: =0.37895% CI: [0.87, 1.42]Mixed model repeated measurements
Comparison: Ratio of week 54 to baseline are analysed using MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix. Treatment, stratum and sex as factors and log baseline value and age as covariates, including the interaction between visit and all variables.p-value: =0.137795% CI: [0.94, 1.53]Mixed model repeated measurements
Comparison: Ratio of week 54 to baseline are analysed using MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix. Treatment, stratum and sex as factors and log baseline value and age as covariates, including the interaction between visit and all variables.p-value: =0.021495% CI: [1.04, 1.69]Mixed model repeated measurements
Comparison: Ratio of week 54 to baseline are analysed using MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix. Treatment, stratum and sex as factors and log baseline value and age as covariates, including the interaction between visit and all variables.p-value: =0.418795% CI: [0.87, 1.41]Mixed model repeated measurements
Secondary

7-point SMPG Profiles

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, bedtime. 7-point SMPG profile values are presented for week 54 and week 80.

Time frame: Week 54 and Week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of dinner7.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before lunch5.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of breakfast8.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of dinner8.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of breakfast8.9 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before dinner6.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Bedtime7.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before dinner6.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of lunch8.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before breakfast6.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of lunch7.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before breakfast6.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before lunch6.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Bedtime7.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before breakfast6.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of lunch7.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before dinner6.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of dinner7.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of breakfast7.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before lunch6.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of lunch7.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before dinner6.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Bedtime6.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of dinner7.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Bedtime7.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before breakfast6.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before lunch6.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of breakfast7.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Bedtime7.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of breakfast7.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before lunch6.9 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Bedtime7.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of dinner9.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 5
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before dinner7.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of breakfast8.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of lunch7.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before breakfast7.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before dinner6.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before breakfast6.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before lunch6.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of lunch8.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of dinner7.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Bedtime7.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before lunch6.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.6
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before breakfast6.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of breakfast7.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of lunch7.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Before dinner6.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: 90 minutes after start of dinner6.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 54: Bedtime7.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before breakfast6.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of breakfast7.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before lunch6.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.8
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of lunch8.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: 90 minutes after start of dinner7.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)7-point SMPG ProfilesWeek 80: Before dinner6.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Accumulation Ratio of NNC114-0006 (RA,AUC, NNC0114-0006)

Accumulation ratio of NNC114-0006 was defined as AUC48-54 weeks/AUC0-6 weeks. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during (week 0 to week 6) and (week 48 to week 54)

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Accumulation Ratio of NNC114-0006 (RA,AUC, NNC0114-0006)1.24 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Accumulation Ratio of NNC114-0006 (RA,AUC, NNC0114-0006)1.26 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.4
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution of NNC0114-0006 at Steadystate (Vss, NNC0114-0006)

The apparent volume of distribution of NNC0114-0006 at steady-state was calculated as mean residence time of (MRT) of NNC0114-0006 multiplied by clearance of NNC0114-0006 at steady state. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 80

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Apparent Volume of Distribution of NNC0114-0006 at Steadystate (Vss, NNC0114-0006)83.7 Milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Apparent Volume of Distribution of NNC0114-0006 at Steadystate (Vss, NNC0114-0006)79.3 Milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.6
Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline

Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h) of a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) stimulated C-peptide at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of C-peptide was measured as Nano moles\*hour per liter (nmol\*h/L).

Time frame: 0 - 4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.566 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.598 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 70.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.373 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 115.8
Placebo (Placebo)Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-4h of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Stimulated C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.571 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 100.9
Secondary

Area Under the NNC0114-0006 Concentration-time Curve Over a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau, NNC0114-0006)

AUCtau, NNC0114-0006 was derived as the area under the concentration-time curve using the linear trapezoidal technique based on observed values and actual measurement times between 0 and 6 weeks (after the last dose). This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 54

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Area Under the NNC0114-0006 Concentration-time Curve Over a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau, NNC0114-0006)3969 day*microgram per milliliter (day*ug/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Area Under the NNC0114-0006 Concentration-time Curve Over a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau, NNC0114-0006)4115 day*microgram per milliliter (day*ug/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.1
Secondary

AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline

Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2h) of a MMTT stimulated C-peptide at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of C-peptide was measured as 'nmol\*h/L'.

Time frame: 0-2 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.961 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 65.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.824 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 53
Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.646 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 97.4
Placebo (Placebo)AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.655 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 87.3
Secondary

AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline

Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2h) of a MMTT stimulated C-peptide at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of C-peptide was measured as 'nmol\*h/L'.

Time frame: 0-2 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.590 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 74.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.619 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.370 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 111.5
Placebo (Placebo)AUC0-2h of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.540 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 120.6
Secondary

AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline

Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2h) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of glucose is measured as 'mmol\*h/L'.

Time frame: 0-2 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.939 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline1.066 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.978 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.9
Placebo (Placebo)AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline1.057 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.3
Secondary

AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline

Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2h) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of glucose was measured as 'mmol\*h/L'.

Time frame: 0-2 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.119 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.086 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.070 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.5
Placebo (Placebo)AUC0-2h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.166 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.7
Secondary

AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline

Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of glucose was measured as Milli moles\*hour per liter (mmol\*h/L).

Time frame: 0 - 4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.904 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline1.078 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.993 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.2
Placebo (Placebo)AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline1.089 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.7
Secondary

AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline

Area under the concentration-time curve, from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. AUC of glucose was measured as Milli moles\*hour per liter (mmol\*h/L).

Time frame: 0 - 4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.129 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.115 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.136 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39
Placebo (Placebo)AUC0-4h of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.221 Ratio of AUCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.6
Secondary

Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)

Participants were analyzed for autoantibodies against Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and were categorized as negative and positive.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0Negative3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0Positive74 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 54Negative5 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 54Positive62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 80Negative4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 80Positive61 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 80Positive62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 54Positive61 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0Negative1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 54Negative4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0Positive76 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 80Negative2 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0Positive71 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 54Negative4 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 54Positive64 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 80Positive63 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 80Negative5 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0Negative5 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 80Negative1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 80Positive61 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0Positive74 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 54Positive63 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 0Negative3 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)Week 54Negative3 Participants
Secondary

Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)

Participants were analyzed for autoantibodies against Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and were categorized as negative and positive.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0Negative35 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0Positive42 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 54Negative30 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 54Positive38 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 80Negative18 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 80Positive48 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 80Positive40 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 54Positive37 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0Negative28 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 54Negative28 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0Positive48 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 80Negative24 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0Positive49 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 54Negative22 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 54Positive46 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 80Positive55 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 80Negative13 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0Negative26 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 80Negative15 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 80Positive47 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0Positive40 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 54Positive55 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 0Negative36 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Insulin Autoantibodies (IAA)Week 54Negative11 Participants
Secondary

Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)

Participants were analyzed for autoantibodies against Islet antigen-2 (IA2) and were categorized as negative and positive.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 54Positive33 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 54Negative35 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0Positive39 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 80Positive33 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 80Negative32 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0Negative38 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0Positive40 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0Negative37 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 80Positive26 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 80Negative38 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 54Negative33 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 54Positive32 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0Positive45 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0Negative31 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 80Negative29 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 54Positive40 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 80Positive39 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 54Negative28 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 80Positive27 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0Positive32 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 0Negative45 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 54Negative38 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 54Positive28 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Islet Antigen-2 (IA2)Week 80Negative35 Participants
Secondary

Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)

Participants were analyzed for autoantibodies against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8) and were categorized as negative and positive.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0Negative29 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0Positive48 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 54Negative26 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 54Positive42 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 80Negative23 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 80Positive42 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 80Positive34 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 54Positive37 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0Negative30 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 54Negative28 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0Positive47 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 80Negative30 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0Positive46 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 54Negative27 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 54Positive41 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 80Positive37 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 80Negative31 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0Negative30 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 80Negative33 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 80Positive29 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0Positive41 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 54Positive33 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 0Negative36 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Autoantibodies Against Zinc-transporter 8 (ZnT8)Week 54Negative33 Participants
Secondary

Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Before breakfast 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profile values are presented at week 54 and week 80.

Time frame: Week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 546.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 806.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 806.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 546.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 807.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 546.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Placebo (Placebo)Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 546.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Before Breakfast 7- Points Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG)Week 806.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, bedtime. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 54 and week 80 in 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) postprandial glucose /prandial increment (average over the three meals) value is presented.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)Change from week 0 to week 540.9 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)Change from week 0 to week 800.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)Change from week 0 to week 800.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)Change from week 0 to week 540.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)Change from week 0 to week 540.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)Change from week 0 to week 800.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)Change from week 0 to week 54-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment (Average Over the Three Meals)Change from week 0 to week 80-0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 54 and week 80 in 7-point SMPG postprandial glucose /prandial increment (breakfast, lunch and dinner) value are presented.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Breakfast1.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Breakfast1.9 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Lunch0.9 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Lunch0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Dinner0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Dinner0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Dinner0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Lunch0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Breakfast0.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Lunch0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Breakfast0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Dinner1.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Breakfast-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Lunch1.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Lunch1.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Dinner-0.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Dinner-0.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Breakfast-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Dinner-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Dinner-0.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Breakfast-0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 80: Lunch0.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Breakfast-0.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in 7- Points Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Postprandial Glucose /Prandial Increment: Breakfast, Lunch, DinnerChange from week 0 to week 54: Lunch0.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)

Change in ALAT (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)Change from week 0 to week 540.96 ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)Change from week 0 to week 800.95 ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)Change from week 0 to week 800.98 ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)Change from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)Change from week 0 to week 540.97 ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)Change from week 0 to week 801.06 ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)Change from week 0 to week 540.90 ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)Change from week 0 to week 800.92 ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.6
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Albumin

Change in albumin (measured in gram per deciliter \[g/dL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of albuminStandard Deviation 6.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of albuminStandard Deviation 7.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of albuminStandard Deviation 6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminChange from week 0 to week 801.01 ratio of albuminStandard Deviation 6.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of albuminStandard Deviation 6.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminChange from week 0 to week 541.02 ratio of albuminStandard Deviation 7.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of albuminStandard Deviation 6.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of albuminStandard Deviation 7.5
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)

Change in ALP (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Change from week 0 to week 541.03 Ratio of ALPGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Change from week 0 to week 801.07 Ratio of ALPGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Change from week 0 to week 801.05 Ratio of ALPGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Change from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of ALPGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Change from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of ALPGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Change from week 0 to week 801.04 Ratio of ALPGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Change from week 0 to week 541.03 Ratio of ALPGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Change from week 0 to week 801.04 Ratio of ALPGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.7
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Amylase

Change in amylase (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseChange from week 0 to week 541.07 ratio of AmylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseChange from week 0 to week 801.04 ratio of AmylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of AmylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseChange from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of AmylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseChange from week 0 to week 541.04 ratio of AmylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseChange from week 0 to week 801.03 ratio of AmylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of AmylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseChange from week 0 to week 801.04 ratio of AmylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.1
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)

Change in ASAT (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)Change from week 0 to week 800.98 Ratio of ASTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)Change from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of ASTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)Change from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of ASTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)Change from week 0 to week 800.98 Ratio of ASTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)Change from week 0 to week 801.09 Ratio of ASTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)Change from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of ASTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)Change from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of ASTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)Change from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of ASTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.1
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen Serum

Change in blood urea nitrogen serum (measured in milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen SerumChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of Blood Urea Nitrogen serumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen SerumChange from week 0 to week 800.97 Ratio of Blood Urea Nitrogen serumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen SerumChange from week 0 to week 800.97 Ratio of Blood Urea Nitrogen serumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen SerumChange from week 0 to week 541.05 Ratio of Blood Urea Nitrogen serumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen SerumChange from week 0 to week 800.98 Ratio of Blood Urea Nitrogen serumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen SerumChange from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of Blood Urea Nitrogen serumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen SerumChange from week 0 to week 800.97 Ratio of Blood Urea Nitrogen serumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen SerumChange from week 0 to week 540.94 Ratio of Blood Urea Nitrogen serumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.3
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Calcium Corrected

Change in calcium corrected (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Calcium CorrectedChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of calciumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Calcium CorrectedChange from week 0 to week 800.96 ratio of calciumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Calcium CorrectedChange from week 0 to week 800.97 ratio of calciumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Calcium CorrectedChange from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of calciumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Calcium CorrectedChange from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of calciumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Calcium CorrectedChange from week 0 to week 800.98 ratio of calciumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Calcium CorrectedChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of calciumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 4.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Calcium CorrectedChange from week 0 to week 800.98 ratio of calciumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 4
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Chloride

Change in chloride (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: ChlorideChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of chlorideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: ChlorideChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of chlorideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: ChlorideChange from week 0 to week 801.01 ratio of chlorideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: ChlorideChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of chlorideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: ChlorideChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of chlorideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: ChlorideChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of chlorideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: ChlorideChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of chlorideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: ChlorideChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of chlorideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein Serum

Change in C-reactive protein serum (measured in milligrams per liter \[mg/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein SerumChange from week 0 to week 540.92 Ratio of C-reactive proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 141.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein SerumChange from week 0 to week 801.08 Ratio of C-reactive proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 103.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein SerumChange from week 0 to week 800.94 Ratio of C-reactive proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 81
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein SerumChange from week 0 to week 541.04 Ratio of C-reactive proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 93
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein SerumChange from week 0 to week 540.89 Ratio of C-reactive proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 87.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein SerumChange from week 0 to week 801.25 Ratio of C-reactive proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 134.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein SerumChange from week 0 to week 541.06 Ratio of C-reactive proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 78
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: C-reactive Protein SerumChange from week 0 to week 801.06 Ratio of C-reactive proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 70.1
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Creatine Kinase

Change in creatine kinase (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Creatine KinaseChange from week 0 to week 541.16 Ratio of Creatine KinaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 86.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Creatine KinaseChange from week 0 to week 801.11 Ratio of Creatine KinaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Creatine KinaseChange from week 0 to week 541.17 Ratio of Creatine KinaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 64.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Creatine KinaseChange from week 0 to week 801.09 Ratio of Creatine KinaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Creatine KinaseChange from week 0 to week 801.24 Ratio of Creatine KinaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 87.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Creatine KinaseChange from week 0 to week 541.08 Ratio of Creatine KinaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 140.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Creatine KinaseChange from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of Creatine KinaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 72.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Creatine KinaseChange from week 0 to week 801.13 Ratio of Creatine KinaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 76.5
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine

Change in creatinine (measured in micromole per liter \[umol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineChange from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of CreatinineGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of CreatinineGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineChange from week 0 to week 801.05 Ratio of CreatinineGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineChange from week 0 to week 541.05 Ratio of CreatinineGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineChange from week 0 to week 541.04 Ratio of CreatinineGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineChange from week 0 to week 801.05 Ratio of CreatinineGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineChange from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of CreatinineGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of CreatinineGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.3
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)

Change in GGT (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)Change from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of GGTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)Change from week 0 to week 801.05 Ratio of GGTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)Change from week 0 to week 801.13 Ratio of GGTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)Change from week 0 to week 541.08 Ratio of GGTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)Change from week 0 to week 541.03 Ratio of GGTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)Change from week 0 to week 801.10 Ratio of GGTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)Change from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of GGTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)Change from week 0 to week 801.00 Ratio of GGTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.8
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Lactate Dehydrogenase

Change in Lactate Dehydrogenase (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Lactate DehydrogenaseChange from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of Lactate DehydrogenaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Lactate DehydrogenaseChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of Lactate DehydrogenaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Lactate DehydrogenaseChange from week 0 to week 801.04 Ratio of Lactate DehydrogenaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Lactate DehydrogenaseChange from week 0 to week 541.03 Ratio of Lactate DehydrogenaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Lactate DehydrogenaseChange from week 0 to week 541.04 Ratio of Lactate DehydrogenaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Lactate DehydrogenaseChange from week 0 to week 801.09 Ratio of Lactate DehydrogenaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Lactate DehydrogenaseChange from week 0 to week 541.03 Ratio of Lactate DehydrogenaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Lactate DehydrogenaseChange from week 0 to week 801.03 Ratio of Lactate DehydrogenaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Lipase

Change in lipase (measured in units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: LipaseChange from week 0 to week 541.49 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: LipaseChange from week 0 to week 801.05 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: LipaseChange from week 0 to week 800.94 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: LipaseChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: LipaseChange from week 0 to week 541.34 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: LipaseChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: LipaseChange from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: LipaseChange from week 0 to week 800.96 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.2
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Magnesium

Change in magnesium (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: MagnesiumChange from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of magnesiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: MagnesiumChange from week 0 to week 801.01 Ratio of magnesiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: MagnesiumChange from week 0 to week 801.03 Ratio of magnesiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: MagnesiumChange from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of magnesiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: MagnesiumChange from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of magnesiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: MagnesiumChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of magnesiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: MagnesiumChange from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of magnesiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: MagnesiumChange from week 0 to week 800.98 Ratio of magnesiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.2
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Phosphate

Change in phosphate (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PhosphateChange from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of phosphateGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PhosphateChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of phosphateGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PhosphateChange from week 0 to week 801.01 Ratio of phosphateGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PhosphateChange from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of phosphateGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PhosphateChange from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of phosphateGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PhosphateChange from week 0 to week 801.03 Ratio of phosphateGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: PhosphateChange from week 0 to week 540.96 Ratio of phosphateGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: PhosphateChange from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of phosphateGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.4
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Potassium

Change in potassium (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumChange from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of potassiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumChange from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of potassiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumChange from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of potassiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumChange from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of potassiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumChange from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of potassiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumChange from week 0 to week 800.98 Ratio of potassiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumChange from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of potassiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumChange from week 0 to week 800.98 Ratio of potassiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Sodium

Change in sodium (measured in millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: SodiumChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of sodiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: SodiumChange from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of sodiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: SodiumChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of sodiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: SodiumChange from week 0 to week 801.00 Ratio of sodiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: SodiumChange from week 0 to week 801.00 Ratio of sodiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: SodiumChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of sodiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: SodiumChange from week 0 to week 801.00 Ratio of sodiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: SodiumChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of sodiumGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Total Bilirubin

Change in Total bilirubin (measured in micromole per liter \[umol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinChange from week 0 to week 800.91 ratio of total bilirubinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinChange from week 0 to week 540.81 ratio of total bilirubinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 61.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinChange from week 0 to week 801.04 ratio of total bilirubinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 74.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinChange from week 0 to week 541.10 ratio of total bilirubinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinChange from week 0 to week 800.98 ratio of total bilirubinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of total bilirubinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of total bilirubinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 59.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of total bilirubinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58.7
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Total Protein

Change in total protein (measured in gram per liter \[g/dL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total ProteinChange from week 0 to week 540.99 Ratio of total proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total ProteinChange from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of total proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total ProteinChange from week 0 to week 801.00 Ratio of total proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total ProteinChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of total proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total ProteinChange from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of total proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Total ProteinChange from week 0 to week 801.00 Ratio of total proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Total ProteinChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of total proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Total ProteinChange from week 0 to week 801.00 Ratio of total proteinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.4
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Uric Acid

Change in Uric Acid (measured in milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Uric AcidChange from week 0 to week 540.93 Ratio of uric acidGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Uric AcidChange from week 0 to week 800.95 Ratio of uric acidGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Uric AcidChange from week 0 to week 800.94 Ratio of uric acidGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Uric AcidChange from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of uric acidGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Uric AcidChange from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of uric acidGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biochemistry: Uric AcidChange from week 0 to week 800.96 Ratio of uric acidGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Uric AcidChange from week 0 to week 540.96 Ratio of uric acidGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biochemistry: Uric AcidChange from week 0 to week 800.95 Ratio of uric acidGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.6
Secondary

Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell Panel

B cell panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table CD refer to Cluster of Differentiation; IgMNeg refers to Immunoglobulin M negative; IgDNeg refers to Immunoglobulin D negative.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Memory B-Cells1.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Transitional B-Cells10.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells8.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: CD20Neg B-Cell0.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Transitional B-Cells10.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Transitional B-Cells11.4 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Total B-Cell Population72.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: CD20Neg B-Cell0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Total B-Cell Population71.4 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Total B-Cell Population71.7 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2071.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: CD20Neg B-Cell0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: CD24- B-Cells29.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2071.9 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Class-Switched Memory B Cells5.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Class-Switched Memory B Cells5.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: CD24- B-Cells30.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Naive B-Cells14.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: CD24- B-Cells30.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Naive B-Cells14.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Naive B-Cells15.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells10.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2071.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Memory B-Cells1.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Memory B-Cells1.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells8.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2070.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.4 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2069.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: CD24- B-Cells31.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells9.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells9.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells7.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Total B-Cell Population71.7 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Total B-Cell Population71.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Total B-Cell Population70.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Transitional B-Cells9.9 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Transitional B-Cells10.7 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Transitional B-Cells10.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Memory B-Cells1.4 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Memory B-Cells1.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Memory B-Cells1.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Naive B-Cells14.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Naive B-Cells14.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Naive B-Cells14.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.4 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2071.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: CD20Neg B-Cell0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: CD20Neg B-Cell0.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: CD20Neg B-Cell0.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: CD24- B-Cells30.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: CD24- B-Cells31.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Class-Switched Memory B Cells3.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Memory B-Cells1.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2072.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Naive B-Cells12.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: CD20Neg B-Cell0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: CD20Neg B-Cell0.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells9.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2072.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: CD20Neg B-Cell0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Total B-Cell Population72.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Total B-Cell Population72.7 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: CD24- B-Cells31.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Total B-Cell Population73.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Naive B-Cells13.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2072.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Transitional B-Cells9.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells8.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: CD24- B-Cells33.4 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Transitional B-Cells9.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Naive B-Cells13.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Memory B-Cells1.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.4 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Transitional B-Cells8.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Memory B-Cells1.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells8.7 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: CD24- B-Cells31.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Memory B-Cells1.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Memory B-Cells1.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells10.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: CD24- B-Cells28.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Memory B-Cells1.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Naive B-Cells13.3 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Naive B-Cells13.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Naive B-Cells12.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: IgMNeg IgDNeg Switched Memory B-cells0.1 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2065.9 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.9 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: CD24- B-Cells30.7 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Antibody-Secreting Cells0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: CD20Neg B-Cell0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2069.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: CD20Neg B-Cell0.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Class-Switched Memory B Cells4.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Total B-Cell Population72.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: CD20Neg B-Cell0.7 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Total B-Cell Population66.5 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Total B-Cell Population70.4 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 13
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells8.9 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: CD24- B-Cells32.0 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: Transitional B-Cells9.6 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 0: B-Cells Positive For Both CD19 & CD2072.2 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Transitional B-Cells9.8 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 54: Non-Class Switched Memory B-Cells8.9 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- B Cell PanelWeek 80: Transitional B-Cells8.9 Percentage of B cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.1
Secondary

Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell Panel

Myeloid panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table HLA refers to Human Leukocyte Antigen; MDSC refers to myeloid-derived suppressor cell; DC refers to Dendritic cells; MYDC refers to Myeloid Dendritic Cells; IMMYE\_MDSC refers to Immature myeloid cells & a subset of myeloid suppressor cells within the CD14-HLA class II- myeloid cell population.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Non-Classical Monocytes1.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells95.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD16+ Dendritic Cells12.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total MYDC28.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Non-Classical Monocytes1.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Intermediate Monocyte Subset6.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD16+ Dendritic Cells10.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells1.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Intermediate Monocyte Subset6.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Intermediate Monocyte Subset8.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD16+ Dendritic Cells11.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells1.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: IMMYE_MDSC0.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total MYDC30.4 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total MYDC30.4 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14+ MDSC68.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)13.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Myeloid DC4.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Myeloid DC3.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14+ MDSC64.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 23.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)14.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Myeloid DC3.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells15.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14+ MDSC65.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 22.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells94.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells13.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells14.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid80.4 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells1.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Classical Monocytes89.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Classical Monocytes87.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid80.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)14.4 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Classical Monocytes87.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Non-Classical Monocytes1.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid79.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells94.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Non-Classical Monocytes1.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells95.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells95.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells1.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells0.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells0.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14+ MDSC69.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 22.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14+ MDSC67.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 23.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14+ MDSC62.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid82.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid80.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 12
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid81.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD16+ Dendritic Cells11.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD16+ Dendritic Cells10.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD16+ Dendritic Cells9.4 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: IMMYE_MDSC0.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Intermediate Monocyte Subset9.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Intermediate Monocyte Subset7.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Intermediate Monocyte Subset6.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Non-Classical Monocytes1.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Non-Classical Monocytes1.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Classical Monocytes86.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Classical Monocytes88.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Classical Monocytes88.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells12.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells14.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells13.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Myeloid DC3.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Myeloid DC3.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Myeloid DC4.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total MYDC31.4 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total MYDC31.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total MYDC30.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells94.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)12.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)13.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)12.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Non-Classical Monocytes1.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Classical Monocytes88.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Myeloid DC3.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid80.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14+ MDSC73.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total MYDC31.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 12
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Myeloid DC4.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells95.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Classical Monocytes87.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)11.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total MYDC32.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells14.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells0.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)12.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total MYDC31.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Non-Classical Monocytes1.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14+ MDSC64.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 23.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells0.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells14.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid80.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD16+ Dendritic Cells9.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells94.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Classical Monocytes88.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells13.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Non-Classical Monocytes1.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Intermediate Monocyte Subset8.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14+ MDSC69.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 21.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD16+ Dendritic Cells11.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells0.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Intermediate Monocyte Subset6.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)12.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Myeloid DC3.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells94.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Intermediate Monocyte Subset5.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid80.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD16+ Dendritic Cells12.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14+ MDSC70.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Non-Classical Monocytes1.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Non-Classical Monocytes1.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid83.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells94.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Non-Classical Monocytes1.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Classical Monocytes88.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid81.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells95.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Classical Monocytes89.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells1.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Classical Monocytes89.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14+ MDSC63.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 23.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Percent Of Myeloid Cells94.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells13.4 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells12.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14+ MDSC65.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)12.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Monocytes in Myeloid Cells13.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Myeloid DC3.4 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14-HLA II- Myeloid Cells Total Myeloid81.3 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)12.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Myeloid DC3.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Myeloid DC3.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells0.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Total MYDC31.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total MYDC27.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: CD16+ Dendritic Cells12.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD14+ HLA low Myeloid Cells0.6 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: IMMYE_MDSC0.1 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (PDC)11.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: IMMYE_MDSC0.2 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: CD16+ Dendritic Cells12.0 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Total MYDC31.9 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: Intermediate Monocyte Subset7.7 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 54: Intermediate Monocyte Subset5.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 0: CD16+ Dendritic Cells11.5 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Myeloid Cell PanelWeek 80: Intermediate Monocyte Subset5.8 Percentage of Myeloid cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell Panel

NK cell panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table ADCC refer to Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; CD refer to Cluster of Differentiation.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD56- Cells34.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic58.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells21.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells22.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD56- Cells36.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells18.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC13.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD56High NK Pool4.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC13.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells9.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD56High NK Pool4.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC14.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD57+ MatNK Effectors20.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD57+ MatNK Effectors22.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells9.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD57+ MatNK Effectors21.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells8.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Week 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK29.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset3.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD56- Cells34.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic59.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Week 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Week 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Week 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK28.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK27.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset4.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset4.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD56High NK Pool4.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic58.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total CD16+ CD56- NK6.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: ADCC-Competent NK39.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total CD16+ CD56- NK5.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: ADCC-Competent NK37.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: ADCC-Competent NK37.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 16
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total CD16+ CD56- NK6.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated0.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD56- Cells36.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells23.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated0.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic57.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic56.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: ADCC-Competent NK36.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: ADCC-Competent NK32.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: ADCC-Competent NK33.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD56- Cells36.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD56- Cells37.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD56High NK Pool5.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD56High NK Pool5.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD56High NK Pool5.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD57+ MatNK Effectors20.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD57+ MatNK Effectors18.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD57+ MatNK Effectors18.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC13.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC11.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC11.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells20.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells24.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset4.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset4.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset4.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Week 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Week 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells2.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells9.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells11.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells11.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total CD16+ CD56- NK7.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total CD16+ CD56- NK6.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total CD16+ CD56- NK6.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK29.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Week 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK30.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Week 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK30.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic57.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells25.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated0.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Week 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK30.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total CD16+ CD56- NK6.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: ADCC-Competent NK33.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 14
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: ADCC-Competent NK36.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic57.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total CD16+ CD56- NK6.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic56.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic56.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD56High NK Pool4.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset3.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total CD16+ CD56- NK6.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset3.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset3.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells9.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Week 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells0.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK31.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Week 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells0.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD56- Cells38.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Week 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK31.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells10.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD57+ MatNK Effectors21.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD57+ MatNK Effectors18.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells11.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD57+ MatNK Effectors17.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD56High NK Pool4.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC13.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD56High NK Pool4.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC12.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC10.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD56- Cells37.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells20.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells22.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD56- Cells38.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: ADCC-Competent NK31.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD56- Cells41.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells9.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Week 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC12.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK30.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells1.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: ADCC-Competent NK31.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 14
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset3.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK0.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells22.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total CD16+ CD56- NK7.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: ADCC-Competent NK34.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD56High NK Pool4.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells2.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC11.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Week 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK30.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: ADCC-Competent NK34.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD56- Cells37.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD16- CD56- NK cells2.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16- Terminally Differentiate NK1.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Cytolytic NK Cells2.5 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic53.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 15
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic56.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total CD16+ CD56- NK6.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Mature CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.7 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Week 0: Total CD16- CD56- NK34.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Functional NK Cells; Efficient At ADCC12.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells9.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell3.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Mature CD16+ Terminally Differentiated1.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD57+ MatNK Effectors19.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset4.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells21.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.8 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD56- Cells38.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total CD16+ CD56- NK7.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD57+ MatNK Effectors16.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Rapid Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subset4.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD56High NK Pool5.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Cytolytic NK Cells9.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: CD16+ Highly Functional NK Cells0.6 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: CD56High NK Pool4.9 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Highly Cytolytic Subset Of NK Cells21.4 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.1 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD16+ CD56- NK cells1.2 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Mature NK Cells; Highly Cytolytic56.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 80: CD57+ MatNK Effectors17.3 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- Natural Killer (NK) Cell PanelWeek 54: Week 0: Senescent CD16+CD56hi NK0.0 Percentage of NK cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell Panel

T cell panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table CD refer to Cluster of Differentiation; TEMRA refers to terminally differentiated effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA; CCR refers to C-C chemokine receptor; TREG refers to Regulatory T cells.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells12.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells54.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells20.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 Central Memory1.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells27.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA18.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells4.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells1.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells25.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD8 EM37.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells4.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells5.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells27.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells4.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable T-Cells52.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells2.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD4 TEMRA3.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA17.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells2.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells26.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated CD4 TEMRA9.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Naive CD4 T-Cells55.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells3.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells20.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells3.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG EM30.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells3.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TREG EM0.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells2.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive TREG6.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells4.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG TEMRA7.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells6.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Effector Memory CD81.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive TREG6.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated CD4 TEMRA10.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 Effector Memory15.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive TREG7.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA CD423.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells3.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells3.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells2.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA CD420.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells3.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells6.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells4.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA CD421.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells16.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated CD4 TEMRA10.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Effector Memory CD410.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA CD842.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD8 EM35.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Naive CD4 T-Cells56.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells25.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA CD839.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD4 TEMRA3.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Naive CD8 T-Cells52.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA CD842.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 21.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells54.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD4 TEMRA4.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Effector Memory CD410.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA TREG3.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells20.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells20.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells5.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA TREG3.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Effector Memory CD410.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 Central Memory2.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Central Memory CD82.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA TREG2.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG TEMRA8.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Naive CD8 T-Cells51.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 16
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TREG CM0.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD8 EM38.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells24.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Central Memory CD81.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TREG CM0.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 Central Memory1.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA4.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TREG CM0.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Naive CD8 T-Cells53.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells3.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Central Memory CD81.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TREG EM0.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells1.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Effector Memory CD82.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TREG EM0.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Effector Memory CD81.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 TEMRA29.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells19.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA25.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Naive TREG46.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells19.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 Effector Memory14.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA3.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Naive TREG43.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells3.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells6.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Central Memory CD46.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Naive TREG46.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells16.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells2.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD416.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG3.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 Effector Memory15.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells5.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG3.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable T-Cells55.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells51.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG3.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA2.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Central Memory CD46.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG CM14.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells6.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 TEMRA31.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA18.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG CM15.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells15.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells12.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA25.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG CM15.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Naive CD4 T-Cells57.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Central Memory CD46.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD417.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG EM30.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD415.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells11.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA22.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG EM32.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable T-Cells53.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG TEMRA7.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 TEMRA31.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG TEMRA5.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD414.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG TEMRA7.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 TEMRA33.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG TEMRA7.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells53.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells52.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells50.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells21.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD8 EM34.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells28.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Central Memory CD46.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells14.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells26.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 Central Memory1.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells25.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells14.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable T-Cells55.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Naive CD8 T-Cells52.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD8 EM36.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable T-Cells55.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable T-Cells55.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD8 EM35.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells22.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated CD4 TEMRA9.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD4 TEMRA3.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA4.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA4.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Effector Memory CD81.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Effector Memory CD81.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells24.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA19.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD4 TEMRA2.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA17.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Naive CD4 T-Cells52.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Effector Memory CD81.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells15.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA16.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells2.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells4.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Naive CD4 T-Cells51.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells2.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells3.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells3.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD4 TEMRA2.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Naive CD4 T-Cells50.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Naive CD8 T-Cells52.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells5.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Naive CD8 T-Cells48.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells4.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells22.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells6.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated CD4 TEMRA8.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells6.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells22.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells7.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD415.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells11.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells2.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells12.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells27.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells25.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells5.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells28.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells4.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells2.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells5.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD416.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells3.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG EM33.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells3.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells3.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells4.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive TREG6.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive TREG7.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated CD4 TEMRA8.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA CD421.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells22.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive TREG5.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA CD422.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Effector Memory CD48.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA CD424.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells6.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA CD840.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 21
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells3.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Effector Memory CD49.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA CD840.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 21.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells6.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Effector Memory CD410.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA CD844.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA TREG1.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Central Memory CD81.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA TREG4.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA TREG4.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 Central Memory2.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Central Memory CD81.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TREG CM0.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA1.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TREG CM0.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Central Memory CD81.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TREG CM0.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 Central Memory2.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TREG EM0.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA24.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TREG EM0.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TREG EM0.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 TEMRA30.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Naive TREG42.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Central Memory CD46.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Naive TREG44.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 Effector Memory14.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Naive TREG44.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells10.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG3.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Central Memory CD46.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 Effector Memory14.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG CM15.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA25.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG CM15.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 TEMRA31.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG CM15.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA22.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG EM36.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 Effector Memory16.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG EM32.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells4.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells3.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells2.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA2.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells5.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells16.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells15.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD415.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD416.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells6.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells4.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 Central Memory1.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 Central Memory1.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 Effector Memory13.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 Effector Memory11.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 TEMRA30.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 TEMRA30.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells19.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells19.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells20.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells20.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Naive CD4 T-Cells57.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Naive CD4 T-Cells56.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Naive CD4 T-Cells55.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Naive CD8 T-Cells55.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Naive CD8 T-Cells54.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Naive CD8 T-Cells53.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells6.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells6.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells6.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells12.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells12.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells11.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells27.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells26.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells26.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells2.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells2.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells3.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells3.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells3.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive TREG6.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA CD421.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 21.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA CD423.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 22.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA CD421.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 21.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA CD837.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA CD838.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA CD838.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA TREG2.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA TREG4.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA TREG3.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TREG CM0.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TREG CM0.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TREG CM0.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TREG EM0.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TREG EM0.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TREG EM0.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Naive TREG50.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Naive TREG49.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Naive TREG48.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG4.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG4.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG3.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG CM14.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG CM13.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG CM13.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG EM28.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG TEMRA6.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG TEMRA8.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG TEMRA7.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells54.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells54.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells53.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells25.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells24.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells23.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable T-Cells55.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable T-Cells57.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable T-Cells56.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Effector Memory CD81.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated CD4 TEMRA10.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated CD4 TEMRA9.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated CD4 TEMRA8.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Effector Memory CD81.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA26.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Effector Memory CD81.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells4.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells4.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells2.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA16.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA18.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA18.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA4.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA3.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD8 EM38.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD8 EM38.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells15.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD8 EM37.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA25.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Central Memory CD47.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA26.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Central Memory CD46.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD414.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Central Memory CD46.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells4.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Central Memory CD81.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Central Memory CD81.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Central Memory CD81.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Effector Memory CD411.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Effector Memory CD410.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Effector Memory CD49.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive TREG7.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive TREG5.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG EM28.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG EM30.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells4.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells5.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells4.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells4.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells5.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD4 TEMRA3.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD4 TEMRA3.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD4 TEMRA3.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 Central Memory1.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 Effector Memory13.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 TEMRA29.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells20.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells19.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells19.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells52.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells23.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells54.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG TEMRA7.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG TEMRA8.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG TEMRA7.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG EM30.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG CM15.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells2.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA24.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG CM15.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG CM14.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG3.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total TREG3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD4 TEMRA3.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Central Memory CD46.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells21.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory Regulatory T-Cells1.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Central Memory CD46.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Naive TREG43.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA25.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 Central Memory1.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD416.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Naive TREG45.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Naive TREG47.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Conventional Effector Memory CD4 T-Cells20.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Central Memory CD46.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TREG EM0.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TREG EM0.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells21.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TREG CM0.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TREG CM0.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells16.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Central Memory CD81.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TREG CM0.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA TREG4.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 Effector Memory15.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA TREG4.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA TREG4.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 Effector Memory16.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Central Memory CD81.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA CD843.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 23.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA CD840.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 22.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells21.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Effector Memory CD49.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA CD842.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 23
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 TEMRA30.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Effector Memory CD49.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent TEMRA CD425.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 21.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TEMRA CD423.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 21.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells7.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Effector Memory CD49.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent TEMRA CD422.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 Effector Memory17.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive TREG7.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive TREG7.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells4.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 Central Memory2.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive TREG5.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells4.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent TREG EM0.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive CD8 T-Cells4.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA3.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total TREG EM31.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells3.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells2.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD8 TEMRA32.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total TREG EM32.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent Naive CD4 T-Cells2.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CD8 Central Memory2.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells4.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells26.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells4.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells25.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD8 TEMRA33.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Effector Memory Regulatory T-Cells5.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD8 Effector Memory Cells29.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells12.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells12.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD8 Central Memory Cells12.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CD4 TEMRA3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells2.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells7.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD4 Effector Memory Cells6.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells6.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive CD4 T-Cells3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells3.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells4.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Conventional Central Memory CD4 T-Cells21.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells4.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Senescent CD4 Central Memory Cells2.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Naive CD8 T-Cells46.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD418.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive CD8 T-Cells4.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells3.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells3.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells3.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Mature Naive CD4 T-Cells3.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells5.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA21.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Naive CD8 T-Cells51.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Mature Naive CD8 T-Cells3.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Central Memory CD4 Cells4.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD8 TEMRA26.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells5.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA18.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated Effector Memory CD81.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated CD8 TEMRA1.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Naive CD8 T-Cells50.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD4 TEMRA21.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated CD8 TEMRA0.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated CD8 TEMRA1.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ Effector Memory CD415.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Effector Memory CD81.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated Effector Memory CD80.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated CD4 TEMRA8.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ Naive Regulatory T-Cells7.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA4.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated CD4 TEMRA9.3 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Naive CD4 T-Cells52.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD4 Treg TEMRA4.4 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated CD4 TEMRA9.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable T-Cells55.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Naive CD4 T-Cells54.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR5+ CD8 EM37.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable T-Cells55.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable T-Cells55.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated Central Memory CD83.1 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells23.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ CD8 EM38.8 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells24.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Total Viable CD8 T-Cells26.6 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: CD4 TEMRA2.7 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR5+ Central Memory CD8 Cells18.5 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: Total Viable CD4 T-Cells52.2 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 0: Naive CD4 T-Cells54.9 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR5+ CD8 EM40.0 Percentage of T cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.3
Secondary

Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell Panel

TfH cell panel is evaluated by Immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80. In below table CTFH refer to Circulating T follicular helper; ICOS refers to inducible T-cell co-stimulator; PD refers to Programmed cell death protein; CCR refers to C-C chemokine receptor; CXCR refers to C-X-C chemokine receptor; CD refer to Cluster of Differentiation; CM refers to central memory; EM refers to effector memory, TIGIT refers to T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)5.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory3.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1777.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)5.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1726.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh130.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ Naive TREG8.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1772.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells97.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG8.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TREG EM20.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory3.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh280.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh219.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG8.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells59.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 27.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh281.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells97.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG8.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh132.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh279.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh218.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory4.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh240.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TREG EM19.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory6.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells96.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ Naive CD44.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells97.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh241.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells64.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 28.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh220.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory6.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh244.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total PD1+ TREG16.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells70.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 24.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory6.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0:Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells98.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh1739.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells50.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 30.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh168.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG CM10.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1721.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh1737.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG CM10.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total PD1+ TREG14.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells56.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 31.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh130.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG CM10.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ Naive TREG9.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells98.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh1740.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG EM12.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells60.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 27.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh168.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG EM11.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh10.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total PD1+ TREG14.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA8.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh151.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA9.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells58.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 26.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA10.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TREG EM20.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh151.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ Naive TREG11.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1721.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells63.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 28.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh153.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TEMRA TREG22.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 19
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh166.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TEMRA TREG20.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ Naive CD45.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TEMRA TREG22.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells69.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 23.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ Naive CD43.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TREG CM16.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1775.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TREG CM16.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)5.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG EM12.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TREG CM18.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh10.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA9.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TREG EM21.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TREG EM19.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TREG EM21.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh128.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ Naive CD42.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh129.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh130.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells58.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 25.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1722.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1721.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1724.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG EM11.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh218.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh218.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh219.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh169.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ Naive CD43.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh168.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory4.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh168.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1774.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1772.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 23.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory3.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1774.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh280.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory4.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh281.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh279.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells97.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated cTfh17 Cells1.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total PD1+ TREG15.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells64.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 28.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ Naive TREG9.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells66.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 27.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total PD1+ TREG14.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells45.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 27.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0:Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells54.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 29.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total PD1+ TREG15.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells57.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 30.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells56.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 25.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells65.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 27.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory7.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells65.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 27.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ Naive TREG8.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)5.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)5.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh10.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)5.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG7.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells95.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG7.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated cTfh17 Cells1.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory6.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG9.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells96.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh238.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh237.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells97.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh240.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA9.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh1735.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells93.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 22.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh1731.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG CM11.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG CM9.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ Naive CD43.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh1736.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG CM9.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG EM13.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells97.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh148.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG EM11.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh147.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA13.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh148.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ Naive TREG10.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TEMRA TREG23.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TEMRA TREG19.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TEMRA TREG25.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TREG CM17.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TREG CM16.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory6.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TREG CM18.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells4.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells94.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells97.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells97.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells97.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells96.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells96.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells54.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 27.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA8.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory3.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ Naive CD44.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ Naive CD44.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells64.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 29.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells63.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 30.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells43.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 29.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells53.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 31.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells54.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 31.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells54.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 26.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells63.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 28.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells62.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 29.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)6.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)6.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)6.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG1.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG1.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG1.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG CM10.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG CM9.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG CM8.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG EM13.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG EM12.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG EM10.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA10.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ Naive TREG9.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TEMRA TREG19.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TEMRA TREG18.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TEMRA TREG22.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TREG CM17.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TREG CM16.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TREG CM16.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TREG EM21.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TREG EM21.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TREG EM19.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh132.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 16.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh134.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 19
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh131.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1723.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1726.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1723.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh220.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh220.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh218.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh164.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 17.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh164.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh167.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1773.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 19.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1770.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 21.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1773.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh278.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh278.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh280.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells4.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh153.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh152.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh149.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh1739.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh1740.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh1735.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh244.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh242.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh240.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG8.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG7.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG6.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total PD1+ TREG14.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total PD1+ TREG14.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total PD1+ TREG14.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0:Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory3.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA11.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ Naive CD44.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory7.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ Naive TREG8.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ Naive TREG9.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory7.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory6.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory4.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TREG CM18.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells4.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TREG CM17.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TEMRA TREG22.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA11.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TEMRA TREG21.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TEMRA TREG19.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TH2-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells3.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ Naive TREG10.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ Naive TREG9.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh151.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA9.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG EM12.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh150.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG EM12.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG EM12.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ Naive CD43.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh152.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 12.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ TREG CM10.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG CM10.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh2 Cells98.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh1738.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ TREG CM11.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ TREG TEMRA12.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh1735.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ NAIVE TREG2.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells98.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh1736.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells95.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TIGIT+ cTfh243.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ NAIVE CD4 T-Cells0.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TIGIT+ cTfh241.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 TEMRA0.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh17 Cells97.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TIGIT+ cTfh241.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 9.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells97.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG8.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 EM0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells97.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG8.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: ICOS+ CD4 CM0.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ Naive CD43.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 6.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TOTAL ICOS+ TREG8.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)5.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)6.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CCR7+ cTfh1 Cells97.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Circulating TFH-Cells (cTfh)6.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells66.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 24.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells67.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 25.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ Ctfh2 Cells54.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 28.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory6.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 3.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Th1-Like Circulating T-Follicular Cells1.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells57.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 28.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells56.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 29.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory6.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Total PD1+ TREG14.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ cTfh17 Cells45.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 31.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells66.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 25.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Total PD1+ TREG15.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 7.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells69.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 25
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: CXCR4+ cTfh1 Cells55.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 29.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ Naive TREG8.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Total PD1+ TREG16.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 8.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh280.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh279.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh280.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1774.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0:Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1773.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 20.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh1775.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 18.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated cTfh2 Cells0.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1- ICOS- cTfh165.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1- ICOS- cTfh167.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 14.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Activated PD1+ICOS+ cTfh11.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Potentially Anergic TEMRA CD40.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1- ICOS- cTfh168.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh220.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ Naive CD43.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 4.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh218.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh218.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory4.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1724.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1721.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: Activated cTfh17 Cells0.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: Regulatory T-Follicular Subset0.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh1722.3 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 15.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh132.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory4.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.5 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh131.0 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ICOSNeg cTfh129.7 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 13.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ CD4 Effector Memory4.1 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 2.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TREG EM21.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 54: PD1+ TREG EM21.6 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ CD4 Central Memory7.2 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 5.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: TH17-Like Circulating T-Follicular cells0.4 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 0: PD1+ TREG EM20.9 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 10
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Immune Phenotyping- T Follicular Helper (TfH) Cell PanelWeek 80: PD1+ TREG CM18.8 Percentage of TfH cells (%)Standard Deviation 11.6
Secondary

Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)

Serum vitamin D is evaluated at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 80119 picomole per literStandard Deviation 41
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 0123 picomole per literStandard Deviation 30
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 54117 picomole per literStandard Deviation 31
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 54125 picomole per literStandard Deviation 36
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 0122 picomole per literStandard Deviation 39
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 80124 picomole per literStandard Deviation 49
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 54113 picomole per literStandard Deviation 30
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 0122 picomole per literStandard Deviation 29
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 80121 picomole per literStandard Deviation 38
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 0120 picomole per literStandard Deviation 33
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 80115 picomole per literStandard Deviation 33
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Serum Vitamin D (1,25 Dehydroxy-calciferol)Week 54119 picomole per literStandard Deviation 32
Secondary

Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)

IL-21 is evaluated at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 028.8 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 80540.9 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 495.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 543993.5 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 2145.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 031.1 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 80674.1 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 648.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 544368.2 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 2374.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 5425.0 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 030.9 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 8028.0 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 8.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 030.2 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 8030.7 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Biomarker: Total Interleukin-21 (IL-21)Week 5434.1 picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 68.1
Secondary

Change in Body Temperature

Change in body temperature is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Body TemperatureChange from week 0 to week 54-0.1 Degree celsius (C)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Body TemperatureChange from week 0 to week 80-0.0 Degree celsius (C)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Body TemperatureChange from week 0 to week 800.1 Degree celsius (C)Standard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Body TemperatureChange from week 0 to week 540.0 Degree celsius (C)Standard Deviation 0.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Body TemperatureChange from week 0 to week 800.0 Degree celsius (C)Standard Deviation 0.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Body TemperatureChange from week 0 to week 54-0.1 Degree celsius (C)Standard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Body TemperatureChange from week 0 to week 800.0 Degree celsius (C)Standard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Body TemperatureChange from week 0 to week 54-0.0 Degree celsius (C)Standard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (kg)

Change in body weight is measured at week 54 and week 80 respective to baseline. Body weight was measured in unit 'Kg'.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Body Weight (kg)Change from week 0 to week 801.9 Kilogram (Kg)Standard Deviation 4.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Body Weight (kg)Change from week 0 to week 54-1.8 Kilogram (Kg)Standard Deviation 4.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Body Weight (kg)Change from week 0 to week 541.2 Kilogram (Kg)Standard Deviation 5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Body Weight (kg)Change from week 0 to week 801.6 Kilogram (Kg)Standard Deviation 5.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Body Weight (kg)Change from week 0 to week 800.4 Kilogram (Kg)Standard Deviation 4.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Body Weight (kg)Change from week 0 to week 54-2.5 Kilogram (Kg)Standard Deviation 4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Body Weight (kg)Change from week 0 to week 541.1 Kilogram (Kg)Standard Deviation 6.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Body Weight (kg)Change from week 0 to week 802.8 Kilogram (Kg)Standard Deviation 5.5
Secondary

Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) Gamma

IFN gamma levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 07.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 16.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 804.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 544.6 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 07.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 24
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 804.9 pg/mLStandard Deviation 6.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 547.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 19.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 545.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 6.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 05.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 11.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 8013.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 57.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 04.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 804.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interferon (IFN) GammaWeek 545.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10

IL-10 levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 00.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 540.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 800.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 00.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 540.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 800.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 00.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 540.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 800.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 540.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 800.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines- Interleukin (IL)-10Week 00.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17

IL-17 levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 04.9 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 804.9 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 544.9 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 04.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 804.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 544.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 545.1 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 04.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 804.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 04.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 804.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-17Week 545.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6

IL-6 levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 800.9 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 540.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 00.9 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 540.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 00.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 800.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 01.2 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 1.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 800.9 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 541.0 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 540.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 00.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-6Week 800.9 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Change in Cytokines: TNF-alpha

TNF-alpha levels at baseline (week 0), weeks 54 and 80 are evaluated and presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 542.36 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.75
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 802.43 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.66
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 02.60 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.69
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 542.33 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.59
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 802.36 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.68
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 02.32 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.82
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 02.70 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.73
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 542.56 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.11
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 802.96 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.39
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 542.43 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.65
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 802.75 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.47
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Cytokines: TNF-alphaWeek 03.06 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3.75
Secondary

Change in D-Dimer

Change in D-Dimer (measured in mg/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in D-DimerChange from week 0 to week 540.96 Ratio of D-dimerGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in D-DimerChange from week 0 to week 800.96 Ratio of D-dimerGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in D-DimerChange from week 0 to week 800.92 Ratio of D-dimerGeometric Coefficient of Variation 61.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in D-DimerChange from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of D-dimerGeometric Coefficient of Variation 53.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in D-DimerChange from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of D-dimerGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in D-DimerChange from week 0 to week 801.05 Ratio of D-dimerGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60
Placebo (Placebo)Change in D-DimerChange from week 0 to week 541.15 Ratio of D-dimerGeometric Coefficient of Variation 107.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in D-DimerChange from week 0 to week 801.10 Ratio of D-dimerGeometric Coefficient of Variation 74.3
Secondary

Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)

Change from baseline (week 0) in DTSQ is evaluated at week 54 and 80. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher score indicates a higher level of glycaemia/treatment satisfaction.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Treatment satisfaction1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Treatment satisfaction1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Treatment satisfaction1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Treatment satisfaction0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Treatment satisfaction1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Treatment satisfaction0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Treatment satisfaction0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 54: Treatment satisfaction0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)Week 80: Perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

The ECG was assessed by the investigator at baseline (week 0), week 54 and week 80 and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline, week 54 and week 80 are presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Abnormal, NCS15 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Abnormal, NCS15 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Abnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Normal62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Abnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Normal54 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Normal51 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Abnormal, NCS14 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Abnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Abnormal, NCS17 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Abnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Normal48 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Abnormal, NCS16 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Normal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Abnormal, NCS12 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Abnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Normal48 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Abnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Normal55 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Normal53 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Abnormal, NCS12 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Abnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Abnormal, NCS16 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Abnormal, NCS15 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Normal60 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Abnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Abnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Normal50 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Abnormal, NCS13 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Abnormal, CS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Normal46 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Abnormal, NCS19 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 54Abnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Abnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 0Normal63 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week 80Abnormal, NCS12 Participants
Secondary

Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)

Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB) questionnaire measured diabetes-specific health beliefs on 2 categories: Total Score for Perceived Barriers and Perceived Benefits. The measurement of perceived benefits of, and barriers to, treatment was achieved by creating a pool 28 statements each with a 7-point scale ranging from strongly agree (6) to strongly disagree (0). ETBB benefits score was calculated using the responses from questions 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, and 12 and ETBB barriers score was calculated using the responses from questions 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 11. Both was calculated as the sum of responses divided by number of responses received multiplied by the maximum number of responses. Based on the responses used the maximum responses available was 6. The higher score indicates more perceived benefits or more perceived barrier.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 54: Total Score for Perceived Barriers-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 80: Total Score for Perceived Barriers-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 54: Total Score for Perceived Benefits0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 80: Total Score for Perceived Benefits0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 80: Total Score for Perceived Barriers-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 54: Total Score for Perceived Benefits1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 80: Total Score for Perceived Benefits1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 54: Total Score for Perceived Barriers-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 54: Total Score for Perceived Benefits0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 80: Total Score for Perceived Barriers-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 80: Total Score for Perceived Benefits1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 54: Total Score for Perceived Barriers-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 80: Total Score for Perceived Benefits-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 80: Total Score for Perceived Barriers0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 54: Total Score for Perceived Barriers-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Experience of Treatment Benefits and Barriers (ETBB)Week 54: Total Score for Perceived Benefits-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

Change in Eye-examination

Dilated fundoscopy or fundus photography was performed by the investigator at week 0, week 54 and week 80. The results of the examination were interpreted for each eye (left/right) are categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each category at week 0, week 54 and week 80 are presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal52 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS13 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal55 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS12 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal52 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS11 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal58 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS13 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS18 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal55 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS12 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal54 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal66 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal56 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal55 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS8 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal53 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS8 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS7 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS9 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS9 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS11 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal69 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal59 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS7 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS7 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal60 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS9 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal58 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal70 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal60 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS9 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS8 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS10 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS8 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS9 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS11 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal54 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal67 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal66 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal55 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Left eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, NCS8 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 0: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Left eye ophthalmoscopyNormal51 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 54: Right eye ophthalmoscopyAbnormal, CS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Eye-examinationWeek 80: Right eye ophthalmoscopyNormal51 Participants
Secondary

Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting C-peptide (measured in nanomole per liter \[nmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 76.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 800.58 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 112.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 800.53 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 106.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 540.70 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 540.65 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 102.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 800.42 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 132.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 540.66 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 116.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Fasting C-peptide- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 800.54 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 154.4
Secondary

Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting glucagon (measured in picogram per milliliter \[pg/mL\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 800.89 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 800.85 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 540.95 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 540.96 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 800.96 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Fasting Glucagon- Ratio to BaselineRatio from week 0 to week 800.93 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.8
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Change in fasting plasma glucose is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseChange from week 0 to week 540.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseChange from week 0 to week 801.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseChange from week 0 to week 800.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseChange from week 0 to week 540.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseChange from week 0 to week 54-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseChange from week 0 to week 800.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseChange from week 0 to week 540.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseChange from week 0 to week 801.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Basophils

Change in basophils (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: BasophilsChange from week 0 to week 541.73 Ratio of basophilsStandard Deviation 2.11
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: BasophilsChange from week 0 to week 802.17 Ratio of basophilsStandard Deviation 2.17
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: BasophilsChange from week 0 to week 801.73 Ratio of basophilsStandard Deviation 1.41
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: BasophilsChange from week 0 to week 541.58 Ratio of basophilsStandard Deviation 1.52
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: BasophilsChange from week 0 to week 541.52 Ratio of basophilsStandard Deviation 1.47
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: BasophilsChange from week 0 to week 802.09 Ratio of basophilsStandard Deviation 1.86
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: BasophilsChange from week 0 to week 541.43 Ratio of basophilsStandard Deviation 1.06
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: BasophilsChange from week 0 to week 801.96 Ratio of basophilsStandard Deviation 1.27
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Eosinophil

Change in eosinophil (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: EosinophilChange from week 0 to week 801.31 Ratio of eosinophilsStandard Deviation 1.24
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: EosinophilChange from week 0 to week 541.15 Ratio of eosinophilsStandard Deviation 0.65
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: EosinophilChange from week 0 to week 801.23 Ratio of eosinophilsStandard Deviation 1.03
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: EosinophilChange from week 0 to week 541.30 Ratio of eosinophilsStandard Deviation 1.71
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: EosinophilChange from week 0 to week 543.10 Ratio of eosinophilsStandard Deviation 13.79
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: EosinophilChange from week 0 to week 801.54 Ratio of eosinophilsStandard Deviation 1.78
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: EosinophilChange from week 0 to week 801.36 Ratio of eosinophilsStandard Deviation 1.27
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: EosinophilChange from week 0 to week 541.37 Ratio of eosinophilsStandard Deviation 1.15
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes

Change in erythrocytes (measured in 10\^12 cells per liter) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of erythrocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of erythrocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of erythrocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of erythrocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of erythrocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of erythrocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of erythrocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 5.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of erythrocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Haematocrit

Change in haematocrit (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaematocritChange from week 0 to week 800.98 ratio of haematocritGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaematocritChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of haematocritGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaematocritChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of haematocritGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaematocritChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of haematocritGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaematocritChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of haematocritGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaematocritChange from week 0 to week 800.98 ratio of haematocritGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: HaematocritChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of haematocritGeometric Coefficient of Variation 5.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: HaematocritChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of haematocritGeometric Coefficient of Variation 5.9
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin

Change in haemoglobin (measured in millimoles per liter 'mmol/L') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of haemoglobinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of haemoglobinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 801.02 ratio of haemoglobinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 541.02 ratio of haemoglobinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of haemoglobinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of haemoglobinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of haemoglobinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 5.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 801.01 ratio of haemoglobinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 5.6
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Leukocytes

Change in leukocytes (measured in 10\^9 cells/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LeukocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.96 ratio of leukocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LeukocytesChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of leukocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LeukocytesChange from week 0 to week 800.95 ratio of leukocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LeukocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of leukocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LeukocytesChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of leukocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LeukocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.97 ratio of leukocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: LeukocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of leukocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: LeukocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.02 ratio of leukocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.8
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Lymphocytes

Change in lymphocytes (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LymphocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.01 ratio of lymphocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LymphocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of lymphocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LymphocytesChange from week 0 to week 800.98 ratio of lymphocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LymphocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of lymphocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LymphocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.02 ratio of lymphocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: LymphocytesChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of lymphocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: LymphocytesChange from week 0 to week 800.91 ratio of lymphocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: LymphocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.91 ratio of lymphocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.7
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Change in mean Corpuscular hemoglobin (measured in femtomole 'fmol') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 801.02 ratio of mean Corpuscular hemoglobinStandard Deviation 5.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 541.02 ratio of mean Corpuscular hemoglobinStandard Deviation 3.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 801.01 ratio of mean Corpuscular hemoglobinStandard Deviation 6.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of mean Corpuscular hemoglobinStandard Deviation 4.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of mean Corpuscular hemoglobinStandard Deviation 4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 801.01 ratio of mean Corpuscular hemoglobinStandard Deviation 5.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 801.02 ratio of mean Corpuscular hemoglobinStandard Deviation 4.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of mean Corpuscular hemoglobinStandard Deviation 4.1
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration

Change in mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (measured in gram per liter 'g/L') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin ConcentrationChange from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of MCHCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin ConcentrationChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of MCHCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin ConcentrationChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of MCHCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin ConcentrationChange from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of MCHCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin ConcentrationChange from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of MCHCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin ConcentrationChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of MCHCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin ConcentrationChange from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of MCHCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin ConcentrationChange from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of MCHCGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.29
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Volume

Change in Mean Corpuscular volume (measured in femtoliter 'fL') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular VolumeChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of mean corpuscular volumeGeometric Coefficient of Variation 4.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular VolumeChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of mean corpuscular volumeGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular VolumeChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of mean corpuscular volumeGeometric Coefficient of Variation 5.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular VolumeChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of mean corpuscular volumeGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular VolumeChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of mean corpuscular volumeGeometric Coefficient of Variation 4.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular VolumeChange from week 0 to week 541.00 ratio of mean corpuscular volumeGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular VolumeChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of mean corpuscular volumeGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: Mean Corpuscular VolumeChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of mean corpuscular volumeGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3.7
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Monocytes

Change in monocytes (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: MonocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.05 ratio of monocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: MonocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.12 ratio of monocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: MonocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.07 ratio of monocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: MonocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.02 ratio of monocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: MonocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of monocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: MonocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.04 ratio of monocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: MonocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.01 ratio of monocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: MonocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.12 ratio of monocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.4
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Neutrophils

Change in neutrophils (measured in percentage '%') from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: NeutrophilsChange from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of neutrophilsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: NeutrophilsChange from week 0 to week 800.97 ratio of neutrophilsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: NeutrophilsChange from week 0 to week 800.99 ratio of neutrophilsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: NeutrophilsChange from week 0 to week 540.99 ratio of neutrophilsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: NeutrophilsChange from week 0 to week 540.97 ratio of neutrophilsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: NeutrophilsChange from week 0 to week 800.98 ratio of neutrophilsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: NeutrophilsChange from week 0 to week 541.04 ratio of neutrophilsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: NeutrophilsChange from week 0 to week 801.04 ratio of neutrophilsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.2
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Thrombocytes

Change in thrombocytes (measured in 10\^9 cells per liter) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of thrombocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of thrombocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.03 ratio of thrombocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of thrombocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesChange from week 0 to week 541.03 ratio of thrombocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.04 ratio of thrombocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesChange from week 0 to week 540.98 ratio of thrombocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesChange from week 0 to week 801.00 ratio of thrombocytesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.3
Secondary

Change in HbA1c

Change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in HbA1cChange from week 0 to week 54-0.7 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in HbA1cChange from week 0 to week 80-0.1 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in HbA1cChange from week 0 to week 80-0.2 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in HbA1cChange from week 0 to week 54-0.5 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in HbA1cChange from week 0 to week 54-0.3 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in HbA1cChange from week 0 to week 800.5 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 2.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in HbA1cChange from week 0 to week 54-0.3 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in HbA1cChange from week 0 to week 80-0.4 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Change in Hormone Level: Calcitonin

Change in Calcitonin (measured in nanogram per liter \[ng/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: CalcitoninChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of CalcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: CalcitoninChange from week 0 to week 800.85 Ratio of CalcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 50.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: CalcitoninChange from week 0 to week 800.93 Ratio of CalcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: CalcitoninChange from week 0 to week 540.90 Ratio of CalcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: CalcitoninChange from week 0 to week 540.89 Ratio of CalcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: CalcitoninChange from week 0 to week 800.82 Ratio of CalcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Hormone Level: CalcitoninChange from week 0 to week 540.88 Ratio of CalcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Hormone Level: CalcitoninChange from week 0 to week 800.90 Ratio of CalcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 64.5
Secondary

Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)

Change in TSH (measured in milli international units per liter \[mIU/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)Change from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of Thyroid Stimulating HormoneGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)Change from week 0 to week 801.04 Ratio of Thyroid Stimulating HormoneGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)Change from week 0 to week 541.12 Ratio of Thyroid Stimulating HormoneGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)Change from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of Thyroid Stimulating HormoneGeometric Coefficient of Variation 116.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)Change from week 0 to week 540.89 Ratio of Thyroid Stimulating HormoneGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)Change from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of Thyroid Stimulating HormoneGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)Change from week 0 to week 800.93 Ratio of Thyroid Stimulating HormoneGeometric Coefficient of Variation 84.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)Change from week 0 to week 540.91 Ratio of Thyroid Stimulating HormoneGeometric Coefficient of Variation 66.1
Secondary

Change in Insulin Dose

The total daily insulin dose was derived as the average of the doses reported on the three days prior to the visit. Change in daily total insulin dose from baseline (week 0) after 54 weeks of treatment and week 80 are presented.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Insulin DoseChange from week 0 to week 54-0.05 Units per kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.18
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Insulin DoseChange from week 0 to week 800.10 Units per kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Insulin DoseChange from week 0 to week 540.02 Units per kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.18
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Insulin DoseChange from week 0 to week 800.05 Units per kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.19
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Insulin DoseChange from week 0 to week 540.01 Units per kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.23
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Insulin DoseChange from week 0 to week 800.11 Units per kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.22
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Insulin DoseChange from week 0 to week 800.12 Units per kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.18
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Insulin DoseChange from week 0 to week 540.09 Units per kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.19
Secondary

Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)

Change in INR (measured in ratio\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)Change from week 0 to week 800.98 Ratio of INRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)Change from week 0 to week 540.97 Ratio of INRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)Change from week 0 to week 540.96 Ratio of INRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)Change from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of INRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)Change from week 0 to week 540.95 Ratio of INRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)Change from week 0 to week 800.96 Ratio of INRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)Change from week 0 to week 800.97 Ratio of INRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR)Change from week 0 to week 540.96 Ratio of INRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.7
Secondary

Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)

Change in total free fatty acids (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 540.86 Ratio of free fatty acidsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 94.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 800.89 Ratio of free fatty acidsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 85.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.06 Ratio of free fatty acidsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 112.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of free fatty acidsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 114.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.18 Ratio of free fatty acidsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 82.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.19 Ratio of free fatty acidsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 92.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 540.97 Ratio of free fatty acidsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 800.94 Ratio of free fatty acidsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 84
Secondary

Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change in HDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.04 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.04 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.08 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.06 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.12 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.14 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.07 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.10 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.2
Secondary

Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change in LDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 540.96 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 540.97 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.01 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.03 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.2
Secondary

Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change in total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.02 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.03 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.1
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.03 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.07 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.04 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.03 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.4
Secondary

Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)

Change in Triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.03 Ratio of TGGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.08 Ratio of TGGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 540.96 Ratio of TGGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 800.94 Ratio of TGGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.03 Ratio of TGGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 801.09 Ratio of TGGeometric Coefficient of Variation 51.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 800.95 Ratio of TGGeometric Coefficient of Variation 50.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Lipids: Triglycerides (TG) (Ratio to Baseline)Change from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of TGGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54.7
Secondary

Change in Mean of 7-point Profiles

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, bedtime. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 54 and week 80 in mean of 7-point profiles value is presented.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Mean of 7-point ProfilesChange from week 0 to week 800.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Mean of 7-point ProfilesChange from week 0 to week 540.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Mean of 7-point ProfilesChange from week 0 to week 800.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Mean of 7-point ProfilesChange from week 0 to week 540.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Mean of 7-point ProfilesChange from week 0 to week 54-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Mean of 7-point ProfilesChange from week 0 to week 800.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Mean of 7-point ProfilesChange from week 0 to week 800.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Mean of 7-point ProfilesChange from week 0 to week 540.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Change in Number of Insulin Injections

The number of insulin injections was derived as the average of the reported number on the three days prior to the visit. The change in number of insulin injections per day (count) from baseline (week 0) after 54 weeks of treatment and week 80 are presented.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Number of Insulin InjectionsChange from week 0 to week 800.2 Injections per dayStandard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Number of Insulin InjectionsChange from week 0 to week 54-0.3 Injections per dayStandard Deviation 1.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Number of Insulin InjectionsChange from week 0 to week 80-0.3 Injections per dayStandard Deviation 1.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Number of Insulin InjectionsChange from week 0 to week 54-0.1 Injections per dayStandard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Number of Insulin InjectionsChange from week 0 to week 54-0.5 Injections per dayStandard Deviation 1.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Number of Insulin InjectionsChange from week 0 to week 80-0.2 Injections per dayStandard Deviation 1.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Number of Insulin InjectionsChange from week 0 to week 540.2 Injections per dayStandard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Number of Insulin InjectionsChange from week 0 to week 800.2 Injections per dayStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination

Physical examination parameters are categorised as general appearance; head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; respiratory system;cardiovascular system; gastrointestinal system including mouth; musculoskeletal system; central and peripheral nervous system; skin; lymph node palpation and thyroid gland. Investigator assessed the participants with normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings at week 0, week 54 and week 80 are presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal75 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal66 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemNormal68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinNormal61 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinAbnormal, CS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemNormal74 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinAbnormal, NCS5 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinNormal61 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceNormal76 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinNormal70 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal66 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal66 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceNormal68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal76 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal75 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationNormal68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandNormal76 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemNormal76 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal76 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal75 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal76 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinNormal75 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinNormal63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinNormal62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationNormal76 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationNormal63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal74 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationNormal67 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinNormal63 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinNormal69 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinAbnormal, NCS7 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinNormal65 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemNormal65 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemNormal67 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal76 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal76 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemNormal66 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationNormal77 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal61 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS4 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinNormal66 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationNormal62 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceNormal65 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemNormal62 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal76 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal77 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandNormal62 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandNormal65 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal65 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: General AppearanceNormal61 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Respiratory SystemNormal61 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemNormal62 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinNormal62 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceNormal76 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Lymph Node PalpationNormal64 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal76 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Cardiovascular SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandNormal75 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Cardiovascular SystemNormal73 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Musculoskeletal SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal66 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal65 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckNormal60 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: SkinAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Lymph Node PalpationAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemNormal62 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, NeckAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Gastrointestinal System incl. MouthNormal65 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Thyroid GlandAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 80: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: Respiratory SystemNormal77 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: General AppearanceAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 54: Respiratory SystemNormal66 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Physical ExaminationWeek 0: SkinNormal74 Participants
Secondary

Change in Pulse

Change in pulse is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in PulseChange from week 0 to week 543 Beats/minStandard Deviation 12
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in PulseChange from week 0 to week 80-1 Beats/minStandard Deviation 10
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in PulseChange from week 0 to week 80-1 Beats/minStandard Deviation 10
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in PulseChange from week 0 to week 540 Beats/minStandard Deviation 12
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in PulseChange from week 0 to week 802 Beats/minStandard Deviation 10
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in PulseChange from week 0 to week 546 Beats/minStandard Deviation 9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in PulseChange from week 0 to week 801 Beats/minStandard Deviation 9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in PulseChange from week 0 to week 542 Beats/minStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Change in Respiratory Rate

Change in respiratory rate is evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Respiratory RateChange from week 0 to week 54-0.3 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Respiratory RateChange from week 0 to week 80-0.3 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Respiratory RateChange from week 0 to week 80-0.2 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Respiratory RateChange from week 0 to week 540.1 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Respiratory RateChange from week 0 to week 540.1 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.5
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Respiratory RateChange from week 0 to week 800.1 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Respiratory RateChange from week 0 to week 540.6 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Respiratory RateChange from week 0 to week 800.1 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)

SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains (Bodily Pain, General Health, Mental Health, Physical Functioning, Role Emotion, Physical Health, Social Functioning and Vitality) on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 54 and week 80 in SF-36 score is presented.The MCS measure is derived from domain scales of vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The PCS measure is derived from domain scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicate an improvement since baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Lim. Phy Health0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Physical Functioning0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: General Health Perception-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Lim. Phy Health0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54:Lim Emotion Prob0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Bodily pain-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Lim Emotion Prob1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Bodily Pain0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Vitality-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Mental Component Sum0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Mental Component Sum1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Social Functioning2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)week 54: Mental Health0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Vitality0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Mental Health1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: General Health Perception-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Social Functioning0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Physical Component Sum-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Physical Component Sum-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Physical Functioning0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Lim. Phy Health0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Physical Functioning0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Vitality0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Lim. Phy Health0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Mental Component Sum-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Physical Functioning1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Bodily pain-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Vitality-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Physical Component Sum0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54:Lim Emotion Prob0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)week 54: Mental Health0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Lim Emotion Prob-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Physical Component Sum-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: General Health Perception0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Social Functioning0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: General Health Perception-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Mental Health-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Mental Component Sum0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Bodily Pain-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Social Functioning1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54:Lim Emotion Prob-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Bodily pain0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Bodily Pain-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: General Health Perception-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: General Health Perception-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Mental Component Sum-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Mental Component Sum-2.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)week 54: Mental Health-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Mental Health-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Physical Component Sum-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Physical Component Sum0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Physical Functioning0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Physical Functioning-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Lim Emotion Prob-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Lim. Phy Health-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Lim. Phy Health-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Social Functioning-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Social Functioning-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Vitality-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Vitality-2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Physical Component Sum0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Physical Component Sum0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Vitality-2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Lim. Phy Health0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Mental Health-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)week 54: Mental Health-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Bodily Pain0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Social Functioning0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Mental Component Sum-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Mental Component Sum-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Bodily pain0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Social Functioning-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: General Health Perception-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54:Lim Emotion Prob-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: General Health Perception-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Lim Emotion Prob0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Physical Functioning0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Physical Functioning0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 80: Vitality-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Week 54: Lim. Phy Health-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Secondary

Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 54: Diastolic blood pressure-0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 80: Systolic blood pressure-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 54: Systolic blood pressure-3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 80: Diastolic blood pressure-0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 54: Systolic blood pressure3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 54: Diastolic blood pressure2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 80: Systolic blood pressure2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 80: Diastolic blood pressure2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 80: Diastolic blood pressure1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 54: Systolic blood pressure-2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 80: Systolic blood pressure1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 54: Diastolic blood pressure-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 54: Diastolic blood pressure-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 80: Systolic blood pressure4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 80: Diastolic blood pressure1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 54: Systolic blood pressure1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11
Secondary

Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)

Change in IgE (measured in kilo international units per liter \[kIU/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to weeks 54 and 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)Change from week 0 to week 541.31 Ratio of IgEGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.6
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)Change from week 0 to week 801.32 Ratio of IgEGeometric Coefficient of Variation 65.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)Change from week 0 to week 801.18 Ratio of IgEGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)Change from week 0 to week 541.05 Ratio of IgEGeometric Coefficient of Variation 63.1
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)Change from week 0 to week 541.08 Ratio of IgEGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)Change from week 0 to week 801.16 Ratio of IgEGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.1
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)Change from week 0 to week 541.02 Ratio of IgEGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.8
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Total Immunoglobulin E (IgE)Change from week 0 to week 800.94 Ratio of IgEGeometric Coefficient of Variation 61.2
Secondary

Change in Urinalysis: Urine Dipsticks

Urinalysis was performed by urine dipsticks for protein, glucose, erythrocytes, ketones leukocytes, nitrite, pH and specific gravity and categorised as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinially significant (CS). Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0), week 54 and 80 are presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS5 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineNormal74 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineNormal66 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineNormal63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickNormal54 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS12 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityNormal75 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickNormal74 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickNormal57 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineNormal62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickNormal75 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineNormal63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickNormal68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS9 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickNormal72 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickNormal66 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineNormal67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteNormal68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickNormal56 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS9 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS10 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineNormal63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineNormal61 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineNormal73 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineNormal62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickNormal71 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickNormal54 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickNormal73 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickNormal61 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickNormal65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineNormal74 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineNormal61 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteNormal64 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineNormal71 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineNormal62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineAbnormal, CS1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityNormal77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickNormal63 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickNormal65 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS5 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickNormal67 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineNormal65 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineNormal66 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteNormal68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickNormal54 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineNormal67 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS9 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineNormal76 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS13 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineNormal74 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS3 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickNormal73 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineNormal67 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineNormal62 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineNormal75 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineNormal65 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickNormal61 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineNormal76 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityNormal64 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityNormal62 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: pH dipstickNormal64 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickNormal71 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS11 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS4 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: pH dipstickNormal75 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, NCS6 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickNormal59 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineNormal77 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Ketone dipstickAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineNormal60 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineNormal59 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteNormal77 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Ketone dipstickNormal64 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteNormal65 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Protein urineAbnormal, CS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Ketone dipstickNormal76 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Erythrocytes in urineNormal63 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineNormal60 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteNormal61 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS4 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineNormal64 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Specific GravityNormal75 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: Erythrocytes in urineNormal72 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Glucose dipstickNormal51 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Leukocytes in urineAbnormal, NCS2 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 0: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Glucose dipstickAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteAbnormal, NCS1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: NitriteAbnormal, CS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: Specific GravityAbnormal, NCS0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 54: Protein urineNormal61 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Change in Urinalysis: Urine DipsticksWeek 80: pH dipstickNormal62 Participants
Secondary

Clearance of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (CLss, NNC0114-0006)

Clearance of NNC0114-0006 at steady state was calculated as dose/AUCtau, NNC0114-0006. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 54

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Clearance of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (CLss, NNC0114-0006)3.02 (Milliliters/day)/kilogram ([mL/day]/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Clearance of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (CLss, NNC0114-0006)2.92 (Milliliters/day)/kilogram ([mL/day]/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.1
Secondary

Cmax of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline

Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of a MMTT stimulated C-peptide at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. Cmax of C-peptide was measured as nanomoles per liter (nmol/L).

Time frame: 0-4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Cmax of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.978 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 70.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Cmax of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.779 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.6
Liraglutide (Experimental)Cmax of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.733 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 110.4
Placebo (Placebo)Cmax of C-peptide at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.644 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 89.4
Secondary

Cmax of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline

Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of a MMTT stimulated C-peptide at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. Cmax of C-peptide was measured as nanomoles per liter (nmol/L).

Time frame: 0-4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Cmax of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.580 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 74.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Cmax of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.592 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 76.8
Liraglutide (Experimental)Cmax of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.389 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 109
Placebo (Placebo)Cmax of C-peptide at Week 80 Relative to Baseline0.568 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 97.7
Secondary

Cmax of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline

Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 54 is presented as ratio to baseline. Cmax of C-peptide was measured as 'mmol/L'.

Time frame: 0-4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 54

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Cmax of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline0.937 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Cmax of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline1.068 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.4
Liraglutide (Experimental)Cmax of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline1.004 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.1
Placebo (Placebo)Cmax of Glucose at Week 54 Relative to Baseline1.057 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.9
Secondary

Cmax of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline

Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of a MMTT stimulated glucose at week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline. Cmax of C-peptide was measured as 'mmol/L'.

Time frame: 0-4 hours post-dose on week 0 and week 80

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analysed = participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Cmax of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.114 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.6
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Cmax of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.074 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.7
Liraglutide (Experimental)Cmax of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.104 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31
Placebo (Placebo)Cmax of Glucose at Week 80 Relative to Baseline1.155 Ratio of CmaxGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.5
Secondary

Diabetes Retinopathy

Number of participants evaluated for diabetic retinopathy at baseline (Day -28 to -14), week 54 and week 80 are presented as 'yes', 'no' or 'unknown'.

Time frame: Baseline, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)Yes4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54Unknown0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)Unknown0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54Yes3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80No65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80Yes3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80Unknown1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54No65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)No73 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54Unknown0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)Yes2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)No75 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54Yes2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54No63 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80No62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80Yes2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80Unknown1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)Unknown0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80No67 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)No75 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)Unknown0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54No68 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80Yes1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80Unknown1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)Yes1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54Yes1 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54Unknown0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54Yes0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)No76 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80Unknown1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)Yes1 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54Unknown0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80No63 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 80Yes0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyBaseline (Day:-28 to -14)Unknown0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Diabetes RetinopathyWeek 54No68 Participants
Secondary

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to Baseline

The eGFR was measured using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula. Change in eGFR (measured in milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters) from baseline (week 0) at week 54 and week 80 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame: (Week 0, week 54) and (week 0, week 80)

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to BaselineChange from week 0 to week 540.98 Ratio of eGFRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.3
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to BaselineChange from week 0 to week 800.97 Ratio of eGFRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to BaselineChange from week 0 to week 800.94 Ratio of eGFRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.4
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to BaselineChange from week 0 to week 540.95 Ratio of eGFRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to BaselineChange from week 0 to week 540.97 Ratio of eGFRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.2
Liraglutide (Experimental)Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to BaselineChange from week 0 to week 800.96 Ratio of eGFRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.5
Placebo (Placebo)Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to BaselineChange from week 0 to week 541.00 Ratio of eGFRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.8
Placebo (Placebo)Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)- Ratio to BaselineChange from week 0 to week 800.99 Ratio of eGFRGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.9
Secondary

Liraglutide Concentration at Steady State (C Liraglutide)

C liraglutide was defined as the liraglutide concentration at steady state. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and Liraglutide treatment arms.

Time frame: Week 54 (post-dose)

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Liraglutide Concentration at Steady State (C Liraglutide)16287 picomole per liter (pmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.7
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Liraglutide Concentration at Steady State (C Liraglutide)15920 picomole per liter (pmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66
Secondary

Mean Residence Time of NNC0114-0006 (MRT, NNC0114-0006)

This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms. Mean residence time of NNC0114-0006 is presented.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 80

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Mean Residence Time of NNC0114-0006 (MRT, NNC0114-0006)27.7 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.5
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Mean Residence Time of NNC0114-0006 (MRT, NNC0114-0006)27.2 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.6
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Injection/Infusion Site Reactions Caused by NNC0114-0006/Liraglutide/Placebo Injection/Infusion

Injection/infusion site reactions episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration. Number of participants experiencing treatment emergent episodes of injection/infusion site reactions episodes from first dose of trial product to week 54 (treatment period) is presented.

Time frame: Week 0-54

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Injection/Infusion Site Reactions Caused by NNC0114-0006/Liraglutide/Placebo Injection/Infusion2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Injection/Infusion Site Reactions Caused by NNC0114-0006/Liraglutide/Placebo Injection/Infusion0 Participants
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Injection/Infusion Site Reactions Caused by NNC0114-0006/Liraglutide/Placebo Injection/Infusion0 Participants
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Injection/Infusion Site Reactions Caused by NNC0114-0006/Liraglutide/Placebo Injection/Infusion1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participants administered a product, and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event was defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the adverse event occurs on or after the first day of trial product administration. Number of treatment emergent adverse events from first dose of trial product to week 54 and week 80 are presented. Results are based on the on-treatment and on-observation period. On-treatment period: From the day of first trial product administration to the day of the visit at week 54. On-observation: From the day after the visit at week 54 to the day of the last visit.

Time frame: Week 0-54; Week 54-80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 0-54434 Adverse events
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 54-8070 Adverse events
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 54-8073 Adverse events
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 0-54327 Adverse events
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 0-54410 Adverse events
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 54-8078 Adverse events
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 0-54364 Adverse events
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsWeek 54-8087 Adverse events
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Diabetic ketoacidosis episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration. Number of treatment emergent episodes of hyperglycaemic episodes from first dose of trial product to week 54 and from week 54 to week 80 are presented. Results are based on the on-treatment and on-observation period. On-treatment period: From the day of first trial product administration to the day of the visit at week 54. On-observation: From the day after the visit at week 54 to the day of the last visit.

Time frame: Weeks 0-54; Weeks 54-80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeek 0-540 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeek 54-800 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeek 54-800 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeek 0-540 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeek 0-540 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeek 54-801 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeek 0-540 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Episodes of Diabetic KetoacidosisWeek 54-801 Episodes
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic Episodes

Hyperglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration. Number of treatment emergent episodes of hyperglycaemic episodes from first dose of trial product to week 54 and from week 54 to week 80 are presented. Results are based on the on-treatment and on-observation period. On-treatment period: From the day of first trial product administration to the day of the visit at week 54. On-observation: From the day after the visit at week 54 to the day of the last visit.

Time frame: Week 0-54; Week 54-80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0-54302 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 54-80306 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 54-8074 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0-54256 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 54-80352 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0-54217 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0-54291 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hyperglycaemic EpisodesWeek 54-80112 Episodes
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk Definitions

Hypoglycaemia episodes were recorded as per Novo Nordisk definition: Symptomatic BG-confirmed: An episode that is blood glucose (BG) confirmed by plasma glucose (PG) value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Asymptomatic BG-confirmed: An episode that is BG-confirmed by PG value \<3.1 mmol/L without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic: An episode that is severe according to the ISPAD classification or BG-confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. BG-confirmed: An episode that is BG-confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Severe or BG-confirmed: An episode that is severe according to the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) classification or BG-confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

Time frame: Weeks 0-54; Weeks 54-80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSymptomatic BG confirmed (Week 0-54)576 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSymptomatic BG confirmed (Week 54-80)368 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSevere or BG confirmed (Week 0-54)396 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSevere or BG confirmed (Week 54-80)216 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSymptomatic BG confirmed (Week 0-54)616 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSevere or BG confirmed (Week 54-80)130 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSevere or BG confirmed (Week 0-54)394 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSymptomatic BG confirmed (Week 54-80)207 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSevere or BG confirmed (Week 54-80)244 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSevere or BG confirmed (Week 0-54)315 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSymptomatic BG confirmed (Week 54-80)332 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSymptomatic BG confirmed (Week 0-54)479 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSymptomatic BG confirmed (Week 0-54)646 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSevere or BG confirmed (Week 0-54)503 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSevere or BG confirmed (Week 54-80)240 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to Novo Nordisk DefinitionsSymptomatic BG confirmed (Week 54-80)292 Episodes
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)

Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 1 day after the date of last contact. Number of treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification from first dose of trial product to week 54 and from week 54 to week 80 are presented. Results presented hypoglycaemia episodes were recorded as per ADA definition: Severe hypoglycaemia, Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia, Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia, Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia and Pseudo-hypoglycaemia.

Time frame: Weeks 0-54; Weeks 54-80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Severe hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1305 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)514 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)9 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Pseudo-hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)0 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Pseudo-hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)1 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)2038 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)609 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Severe hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)3 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)362 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Pseudo-hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)0 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1956 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)0 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1461 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Severe hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)2 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Pseudo-hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)0 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Severe hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)1 Episodes
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)522 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)4 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Severe hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)0 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)2092 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Pseudo-hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)1 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)0 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)651 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)670 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Pseudo-hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)14 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1114 Episodes
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Severe hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)0 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)2 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Severe hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)1 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Severe hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)0 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1774 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)1625 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)10 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)449 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)527 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Pseudo-hypoglycaemia (Week 54-80)2 Episodes
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)Pseudo-hypoglycaemia (Week 0-54)2 Episodes
Secondary

Number of Weeks Off Bolus Insulin

The number of weeks off bolus insulin after 54 weeks of treatment and week 80 are presented.

Time frame: (Week 0 to week 54) and (week 0 to week 80)

Population: The FAS included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Weeks Off Bolus InsulinWeek 0 to week 5410 WeeksStandard Deviation 18
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Weeks Off Bolus InsulinWeek 0 to week 8014 WeeksStandard Deviation 25
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Weeks Off Bolus InsulinWeek 0 to week 809 WeeksStandard Deviation 20
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Number of Weeks Off Bolus InsulinWeek 0 to week 545 WeeksStandard Deviation 14
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Weeks Off Bolus InsulinWeek 0 to week 549 WeeksStandard Deviation 18
Liraglutide (Experimental)Number of Weeks Off Bolus InsulinWeek 0 to week 8012 WeeksStandard Deviation 24
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Weeks Off Bolus InsulinWeek 0 to week 544 WeeksStandard Deviation 11
Placebo (Placebo)Number of Weeks Off Bolus InsulinWeek 0 to week 806 WeeksStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Observed NNC0114-0006 Concentration 1 Hour After Dosing of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (C1h, NNC0114-0006)

C1h, NNC0114-0006 was defined as concentration of NNC0114-0006 at 1 hour after dosing of NNC0114-0006 at steady state. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.

Time frame: Week 48 (1 hour post-dose)

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Observed NNC0114-0006 Concentration 1 Hour After Dosing of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (C1h, NNC0114-0006)298.6 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.8
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Observed NNC0114-0006 Concentration 1 Hour After Dosing of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (C1h, NNC0114-0006)282.6 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.4
Secondary

Observed NNC0114-0006 Concentration Prior to Dosing of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (Ctrough, NNC0114-0006)

Ctrough of NNC0114-0006 was defined as concentration prior to dosing of NNC0114-0006 at steady state. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.

Time frame: Week 48 (predose)

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Observed NNC0114-0006 Concentration Prior to Dosing of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (Ctrough, NNC0114-0006)34.7 microgram/milliliter (ug/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.3
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Observed NNC0114-0006 Concentration Prior to Dosing of NNC0114-0006 at Steady State (Ctrough, NNC0114-0006)36.7 microgram/milliliter (ug/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.8
Secondary

Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide Antibodies

This outcome measure is applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide treatment arm and Liraglutide treatment arm. Participants was assessed for anti-liraglutide antibodies. Participant who reported anti-liraglutide antibodies were further analyzed for cross-reactivity. Number of participants who measured with anti-liraglutide antibodies at week 54 and week 80 are presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Positive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 54: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesPositive1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 54: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesNegative67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesNegative77 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 54: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Negative1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesPositive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 54: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Positive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 80: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesPositive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 80: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesNegative67 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Negative0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 80: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Positive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 80: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Negative0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 80: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Positive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 54: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesPositive2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 80: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesNegative66 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 80: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Negative0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesPositive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Negative0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Positive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 54: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesNegative65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 54: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Negative1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 54: Cross-reactivity to native GLP-1Positive1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 80: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesPositive2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide AntibodiesWeek 0: Anti-Liraglutide antibodiesNegative75 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 Antibodies

This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide treatment arm and NNC0114-0006 treatment arm. Participants was assessed for anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodies. Participant who reported anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodies were further analyzed for cross-reactivity. Number of participants who measured with anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodies at week 54 and week 80 are presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 54 and week 80

Population: The SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0: Anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodiesPositive9 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 54: Cross-reactivityNegative0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0: Cross-reactivityPositive5 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 54: Cross-reactivityPositive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0: Anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodiesNegative68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 80: Anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodiesNegative65 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 54: Anti-NNC0114-0006Negative68 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 80: Anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodiesPositive2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0: Cross-reactivityNegative4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 80: Cross-reactivityNegative1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 80: Cross-reactivityPositive1 Participants
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 54: Anti-NNC0114-0006Positive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 80: Cross-reactivityPositive2 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0: Anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodiesNegative62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0: Anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodiesPositive14 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0: Cross-reactivityNegative7 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 0: Cross-reactivityPositive7 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 54: Anti-NNC0114-0006Negative62 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 54: Anti-NNC0114-0006Positive3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 54: Cross-reactivityNegative3 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 54: Cross-reactivityPositive0 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 80: Anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodiesNegative60 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 80: Anti-NNC0114-0006 antibodiesPositive4 Participants
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Occurrence of Anti-NNC0114-0006 AntibodiesWeek 80: Cross-reactivityNegative2 Participants
Secondary

Terminal Half-life (t½) After Last Dose of NNC0114-0006

Terminal half life was calculated as log(2)/λz. The terminal rate constant λz was determined through linear regression with the logarithm to concentration as the response variable and actual measurement time as the explanatory variable. Valid observations from the terminal part of the curve, which is approximately linear, were used for the determination. This outcome measure was applicable for NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide and NNC0114-0006 treatment arms.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose during week 48 to week 80

Population: The PK analysis set comprised all randomized participants with at least one valid PK measurement. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
NNC0114-0006 + Liraglutide (Experimental)Terminal Half-life (t½) After Last Dose of NNC0114-000622.3 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.9
NNC0114-0006 (Experimental)Terminal Half-life (t½) After Last Dose of NNC0114-000622.2 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026