Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Keywords
Atrial Fibrillation; Pacemaker; Device-detected; Sensitivity; Specificity
Brief summary
This study will use an automated blood pressure monitor (Microlife WatchBP03) with an inbuilt algorithm to detect atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm) in patients with an implanted pacemaker who have previously documented paroxysmal (intermittent) atrial fibrillation. This study will compare the Microlife device detected atrial fibrillation episodes to the pacemaker detected atrial fibrillation episodes.
Detailed description
The modified Microlife blood pressure monitor is able to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) with high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (86%) and has a positive predictive value of 68% and negative predictive value of 98% for single readings. In addition, the modified device was also able to accurately classify the majority of the anomalous non-AF rhythms, although the specificity was highly variable, dependent upon the rhythm. However sinus rhythm was detected with a specificity of 97%. However, we do not currently know if the device would demonstrate a similar sensitivity in detecting AF in patients with paroxysmal AF. Therefore, the present study will assess the sensitivity and specificity of the automated oscillometric device using a new AF algorithm among pacemaker patients with fast AF and atrial high-rate episodes and evaluate the effect of the specific rhythm abnormalities on the specificity for AF.
Interventions
DEVICEMicrolife WatchBP03 device
Microlife WatchBP03 device which is an automated oscillometric device using a new algorithm to detect atrial fibrillation
Sponsors
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
University of Birmingham
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with an implanted pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome with previously documented AF with atrial high-rate episodes
Exclusion criteria
* Any patient who's pacemaker has had previously documented atrial sensing or pacing problem issues * Patients with permanent AF
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of patients who are identified as having atrial fibrillation by both the pacemaker and the Microlife device (%) | 24 hours | True positive rate (sensitivity) |
| Percentage of patients who are identified as not having atrial fibrillation by both the pacemaker and the Microlife device (%) | 24 hours | True negative rate (specificity) |
Countries
United Kingdom
Outcome results
None listed