Skip to content

Diode Laser for Harvesting Gingival Graft

Diode Laser For Harvesting Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in The Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects: A Novel Approach to Limit Morbidity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02441127
Enrollment
52
Registered
2015-05-12
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2015-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Keywords

free gingival graft, diode laser, donor site, mucogingival surgery

Brief summary

Aims: The aim of present randomized controlled clinical study was to evaluate whether the additional use of diode laser would facilitate the donor surgery, improve the palatal wound healing and reduce post-operative morbidity after the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with connective tissue (CTG) grafts. Methods: Fifty-two patients with isolated recessions were treated. The CTG resulted from the de-epithelialization of a free gingival graft (FGG) with blade (control group) or diode laser (DL) (test group). The DL was used to de-epithelialize the outer part of the FGG and photo-biostimulate the palatal wound area. Post-operative morbidity was evaluated by using Oral health related Quality of life (QoL), smile related QoL and visual analogue scale-discomfort (VAS). Root coverage outcomes were also evaluated 6 months after operation.

Detailed description

The procedure of connective tissue harvesting from the palate is often characterized by the challenge of obtaining the largest volume of tissue possible on one side while minimizing post-operative pain and reducing the risk of complications on the other.The present clinical study evaluated whether the additional use of diode laser would facilitate the donor surgery, improve the palatal wound healing and reduce post-operative morbidity after the bilaminar periodontal plastic surgery procedure for the treatment of isolated single gingival recession defects with no loss of interdental clinical attachment. In the test sites, an aluminum, gallium, and arsenide diode laser (wavelength 810 nm and power of 1W) was applied in continuous mode. In the control group,a free (epithelialized) gingival graft was harvested by two horizontal and two vertical incisions defining the area. The post operative course of the patients were evaluated by visual analogical scale and the oral health impact profile

Interventions

the laser tip was used to remove all visible epithelium in the outer side of the defined graft area. The treatment was performed from the coronal to the apical aspect in parallel paths, and care was taken to avoid any laser contact to the palatal bone and periosteum by aiming the laser beam at a 450 angle to the palatal soft-tissue. The resultant layer on the surface was totally removed with knife and moist gauze. Then, the graft was harvested from the de-epithelized area with a 15c blade.

PROCEDUREscalpel control group

In the control group tissue was obtained by two horizontal and two vertical incisions defining the area to be harvested. The blade was oriented perpendicular to the bone along the coronal horizontal incision and once an adequate soft tissue thickness was obtained; it was rotated in order to be parallel to the superficial surface. The thickness of the graft was maintained uniform while proceeding apically with the blade until the FGG was harvested. The palatal wound was protected with equine-derived collagen maintained by compressive sling 5-0 sutures

Sponsors

Cukurova University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 38 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of identifiable buccal cemento-enamel junction; * Presence of a step ≤ 1mm at the cemento-enamel junction level * No contraindications for periodontal surgery and no periodontal surgery on the involved sites * Full-mouth plaque score of \<10%; full-mouth bleeding score of \<15% * No occlusal interferences.

Exclusion criteria

* History of periodontitis or abscess formation * Presence of systemic disease * Smokers * Pregnant patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oral health related quality of life6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complete root coverage6 months
Smile related quality of life6 months
Post-operative Discomfort on the Visual Analog scale1 month

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026