Skip to content

Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block and Heart Failure (The SPARK Trial)

Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block and Heart Failure, a Pilot Clinical Trial (The SPARK Trial)

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02441101
Acronym
SPARK
Enrollment
6
Registered
2015-05-12
Start date
2016-02-01
Completion date
2020-02-11
Last updated
2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Right Bundle-Branch Block

Keywords

Cardiac Resynchronization therapy

Brief summary

This clinical study has been designed to test whether a new pacing therapy would lead to improvement in heart function, symptoms and quality of life in a specific group of heart failure patients. This group has a unique electrical conduction problem (Right Bundle Branch Block) that did not respond well to the current available pacing therapy.

Detailed description

This pilot clinical trial will be a randomized single blinded cross over trial. Each subject will undergo three study stages. Subject will be randomized initially to either of the two arms; experimental or placebo, and then will be followed up for 3 months for the first stage to assess outcomes. In the second stage, both arms transition to a two months, intervention free, wash out period. Finally, at the third stage both arms will cross over and subject will be followed up for an additional 3 months for outcomes assessment.

Interventions

DEVICERV DDD(R)-60 with AV optimization

Device to be programmed for RV pacing with AV interval optimization at the bedside to produce QRS fusion with the native conduction down the native left bundle on surface EKG

DEVICERV DDD(R)-60

AV settings programmed to minimize RV pacing - standard demand pacing programming.

Sponsors

Barry London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cardiomyopathy; ischemic or non-ischemic on optimal medical therapy per current heart failure treatment guidelines for at least 3 months. * LVEF \< 35% by trans-thoracic echocardiogram assessment * Prior implantation of pacemaker/defibrillator with at least an atrial and RV mid septal lead. Atrial lead can be waived if RV lead has atrial sensing capabilities\* * Normal sinus rhythm at enrollment * RBBB with QRS duration \>120 msec on 12 lead surface EKG. * PR interval \<250 msec on 12 lead surface EKG * Subjects with biventricular pacemaker/ICD will be eligible for enrollment if their LV lead pacing function has been turned off by the subject's primary cardiologist prior to study enrollment for at least 3 months (this could be due to lead malfunction or the decision to deactivate the LV pacing therapy for any reason per primary cardiologist discretion)

Exclusion criteria

* Age younger than 18 years old * Pregnancy * Acute Myocardial infarction within 6 months of entry into the study * Inotrope dependent heart failure condition * Left ventricular assist device or heart transplantation * Any other known conditions other than heart failure that could limit survival to \< 6 months. * Atrial fibrillation or flutter burden \>10% of the time within the last 6 months * Atrioventricular node disease that requires ventricular pacemaker support \>10% of the time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of LV Ejection Fraction Compared to BaselineBaseline to 3 monthsLV Ejection Fraction is defined as \[(end diastolic volume minus end systolic volume) / (end diastolic volume\] as measured by echocardiography. Comparison of LV Ejection Fraction with RV pacing optimization on vs. RV pacing optimization off. Arm 1 is RV pacing optimization on then off Arm 2 is RV pacing optimization off then on

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electrocardiographic: QRS DurationBaseline to 3 monthsComparing baseline to intervention on Comparing intervention off to intervention off Expect statistically significant decrease with intervention on

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RV Pacing Optimization on First, Then Off
RV Pacing Optimization on first, then Off RV DDD(R)-60 with AV optimization: Device to be programmed for RV pacing with AV interval optimization at the bedside to produce QRS fusion with the native conduction down the native left bundle on surface EKG
4
RV Pacing Optimization Off First, Then on
RV Pacing Optimization off first, then on RV DDD(R)-60: AV settings programmed to minimize RV pacing - standard demand pacing programming.
2
Total6

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyPI relocated and study terminated10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRV Pacing Optimization on First, Then OffRV Pacing Optimization Off First, Then onTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Continuous78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants2 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Change of LV Ejection Fraction Compared to Baseline

LV Ejection Fraction is defined as \[(end diastolic volume minus end systolic volume) / (end diastolic volume\] as measured by echocardiography. Comparison of LV Ejection Fraction with RV pacing optimization on vs. RV pacing optimization off. Arm 1 is RV pacing optimization on then off Arm 2 is RV pacing optimization off then on

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RV Pacing Optimization onChange of LV Ejection Fraction Compared to Baseline0 PercentStandard Deviation 4
RV Pacing Optimization OffChange of LV Ejection Fraction Compared to Baseline4 PercentStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

Electrocardiographic: QRS Duration

Comparing baseline to intervention on Comparing intervention off to intervention off Expect statistically significant decrease with intervention on

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RV Pacing Optimization onElectrocardiographic: QRS Duration-36 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 22
RV Pacing Optimization OffElectrocardiographic: QRS Duration2 MillisecondsStandard Deviation 9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026