Skip to content

Treating Social Cognition With Theta Burst Stimulation; a Pilot Sudy

Treating Social Cognition Impairments in Patients With Schizophrenia With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Theta-Burst; TBS); a Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02440867
Acronym
PilotTMS-COG
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-05-12
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Social Cognition in Patients With Schizophrenia

Keywords

theta burst stimulation, Social Cognition, MRSI, Schizophrenia, transcranial magnetic stimulation

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to test a new treatment of social cognition deficits in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder by transcranial magnetic stimulation (theta-burst). The study will also identify clinical variables, cognitive and psychomotor most sensitive to treatment, to estimate the most sensitive treatment target, assess tolerance, to assess the impact of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on the brain a multimodal imaging study and compare the imaging variables (resting network, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; MRSI) between patients before treatment and healthy subjects.

Detailed description

The language understanding of other people is based on linguistic decoding mechanisms (phonological, semantic, syntactic ...) but also more on subtle mechanisms for the recognition of emotions and intentions. Interact with another one requires understanding its language but also to infer emotions and intentions. There are patients with schizophrenia suffering from social cognition disorders that impair social interactions; These patients often have difficulty in extracting the non-verbal emotional content of language and have difficulty inferring the thoughts and intentions of others. Recently, we have suggested a link between such deficits and the hypofunction of the medial prefrontal cortex. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that increases or decreases the focal cortical excitability depending on stimulation parameters. This technique is now commonly used as a therapeutic tool. It has been tried with some success in patients with schizophrenia in some indications: * To reduce the auditory verbal hallucinations stimulating the temporal cortex * More rarely, to reduce the negative symptoms stimulating the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex So far, the medial prefrontal cortex was not considered as a possible target as the scalp to cortex distance prevent from using conventional stimulation coils. Recently new coils have been developed that permit stimulation of deeper cortical regions. We hypothesize that the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation with a theta burst intermittent protocol known to increase the cortical excitability and aiming the medial prefrontal cortex with a special antenna will improve social interaction capabilities of schizophrenic patients. This ambitious and innovative assumption shall be first supported by a study of feasibility which is the subject of this trial. Moreover, changes in the anatomical and functional connectivity, in brain metabolism and in cortical excitability will be observed after stimulation thanks to a multimodal imaging and the study of P50 wave. In this pilot study, involving 20 patients, we plan to assess the social cognition deficits before and after 10 sessions of magnetic stimulation (2 sessions per day for 5 consecutive days) using a neuronavigation system and Magstim® stimulator. In order to assess the feasibility and specificity of the stimulation of medial prefrontal cortex (MPC), the effects of this treatment will be compared to the effects of the same treatment aiming the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), also involved in aspects of negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and placebo effects induced by sham stimulation (using a sham coil). The recording of the P50 wave will be just before and after the 1st session and just after the last stimulation session. An MRI anatomical, functional and spectroscopic be performed before and 30 days after the treatment. A control group of twenty healthy subjects will perform the same MRI acquisitions.

Interventions

Non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation inducing changes in cortical excitability depending on the cortical target (except for sham stimulation)

DEVICESham TBS

Sham stimulation

Sponsors

University Hospital, Caen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV MINI R) * less than 20 years of disease duration * Having signed a written informed consent * LIS score \> 15 or negative PANSS score \> 15

Exclusion criteria

* Any change in psychotropic drugs (antidepressants, antipsychotics or mood stabilizers) during the two months preceding the inclusion * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Subjects with a neurological condition or with epilepsy * Subjects with a counter-indication to MRI or Transcranial stimulation (electronic or metal implants) * Subjects that refuse to wear earplugs during MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
V-LIS total scorechange from baseline in V-LIS total score compared to 30 days after the end of the treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GLX ratiochange in baseline GLX ratio measured in MRSI compared to 30 days after the end of the treatmentGLX (= Glutamine + Glutamate) ratio are measured in the DLPFC and in the MPC
P50 wave amplitudechange in baseline P50 amplitude compared to immediately after the end of the treatment
Motor activitychange in baseline motor activity measured with an actimeter compared to 30 days after the end of the treatment

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactClement Nathou, MD
nathou@chu-caen.fr(0)231065018
Backup ContactSonia Dollfus, MD, PhD
dollfus@chu-caen.fr(0)231065018

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026