Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Conditions
Brief summary
This non-interventional study will include a representative sample of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutations in Greece. Eligible NSCLC patients, for whom the physician has decided to initiate treatment with the study medication (afatinib, GIOTRIF®) will be treated according to the local prescribing information and standard medical practice in terms of visit frequency and types of assessments performed. The study will investigate the impact of GIOTRIF (Afatinib) on patients' disease-related symptom burden and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in a real world clinical setting in Greece.The Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) score of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) in eligible patients, after 6 months of therapy, will be analyzed. The overall study duration period is expected to be 60 months, including a 48-month enrollment period and a minimum 12-month follow-up period.
Detailed description
Study Design:
Interventions
Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult outpatients (18 years and older) of either gender; * Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic (IIIB/IV) NSCLC of any histological type with activating EGFR mutation(s) according to local laboratory EGFR testing; * EGFR- tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) naive patients; * Patients for whom the decision to prescribe therapy with afatinib (GIOTRIF®) according to the locally approved product's summary of product characteristics (SmPC) has already been taken prior to their enrolment in the study; the assignment of the patient to this therapeutic strategy is not decided in advance by the study protocol but falls within current practice and the prescription of afatinib is clearly separated from the physicians decision to include the patient in the current study; * Patients must be able and willing to provide written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this study protocol;
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who have initiated treatment with Afatinib more than 7 days prior to their enrolment into the study; * Patients that meet any of the contraindications to the administration of the study drug according to the approved SmPC; * Receipt of any investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent (whichever is longer) before the commencement of therapy with afatinib
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients Who Experienced a Minimum Clinically Important Improvement in Symptoms Over 6 Months of Treatment | Baseline and 6 months following start of treatment. | Number of patients who experience a minimum clinically important improvement in symptoms is reported. A patient was categorized as having an improvement if the mean score of any two consecutive post-baseline Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) assessments for that patient was at least 10 points below the patient's ASBI score of LCSS at enrolment, over 6 months of treatment. The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item is scored on a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with score reported from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions was not completed, the ASBI score was not calculated. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated total LCSS score -defined as the average of the aggregate score of all 9 items that comprise the LCSS- at enrolment and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Loss of appetite at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Loss of appetite was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Fatigue at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Fatigue was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Cough at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Cough was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Dyspnoea at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Dyspnoea was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Haemoptysis at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Haemoptysis was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Pain at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Pain was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Overall symptomatic distress at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Overall symptomatic distress was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Interference with normal activity at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Interference with normal activity was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated. |
| Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Global Quality of Life (QoL) was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated. |
| Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Mobility. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems). |
| Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Self-care. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems). |
| Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Usual activities. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems). |
| Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Pain/discomfort. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems). |
| Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Patient-rated ASBI score of LCSS at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study) is reported. The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated. |
| EQ-VAS Score | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | EQ-VAS score at enrolment and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The EQ-VAS is a visual analogue scale (VAS) that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. |
| Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 0 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead. |
| Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 1 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead. |
| Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 2 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead. |
| Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 3 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead. |
| Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 4 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead. |
| Ratio of Afatinib Tablets Actually Taken to Doses Prescribed Over the Study Participation Period | Up to 42 months. | Ratio of afatinib tablets actually taken to doses prescribed over the study participation period. Ratio = doses taken / doses prescribed. |
| Number of Patients With a Reason for Missing Afatinib Tablets | Up to 42 months. | Number of patients with a reason for missing afatinib tablets. One participant can have multiple missing doses for multiple reasons. |
| Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib | Up to 42 months. | Number of patients with a reason for discontinuation of Afatinib throughout the study observation period. |
| Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions | Up to 42 months. | Number of patients with a reason for treatment interruptions throughout the study observation period. One participant can have multiple interruptions for multiple reasons. |
| Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications | Up to 42 months. | Number of participants with Afatinib interruptions or dose modifications (i.e., a dose increase or decrease). |
| Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction | Up to 42 months. | Number of patients with a reason for dose reduction throughout the study observation period. |
| Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Increase | Up to 42 months. | Number of patients with a reason for dose increase throughout the study observation period. |
| Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline. | Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems). |
Countries
Greece
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This was a non-interventional, multicentre, cohort study, based on new data collection, which included a representative sample of patients with advanced/metastatic Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece.
Pre-assignment details
Patients were treated according to the local prescribing information of the study medication (afatinib, GIOTRIF®) and routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency and types of assessments performed. The assignment of the patient to this therapeutic strategy was not decided in advance by the study protocol but fell within current practice and the prescription of afatinib was clearly separated from the physician's decision to include the patient in the current study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier. | 77 |
| Total | 77 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Afatinib discontinuation | 46 |
| Overall Study | Death | 6 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 10 |
| Overall Study | Relocation of patient | 1 |
| Overall Study | stopped study at earlier timepoint | 14 |
| Overall Study | Study medication not received | 1 |
| Overall Study | Violation of inclusion criteria | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 66.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 77 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 48 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 29 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 7 / 80 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 56 / 77 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 49 / 77 |
Outcome results
Number of Patients Who Experienced a Minimum Clinically Important Improvement in Symptoms Over 6 Months of Treatment
Number of patients who experience a minimum clinically important improvement in symptoms is reported. A patient was categorized as having an improvement if the mean score of any two consecutive post-baseline Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) assessments for that patient was at least 10 points below the patient's ASBI score of LCSS at enrolment, over 6 months of treatment. The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item is scored on a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with score reported from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions was not completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months following start of treatment.
Population: All eligible subjects that have received at least one dose of afatinib in the study and who had two consecutive post-baseline Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) assessments over the 6-month treatment period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients Who Experienced a Minimum Clinically Important Improvement in Symptoms Over 6 Months of Treatment | 13 Participants |
EQ-VAS Score
EQ-VAS score at enrolment and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The EQ-VAS is a visual analogue scale (VAS) that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 36 | 85.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Baseline | 75.5 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 2 | 75.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 4 | 77.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 6 | 77.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 8 | 76.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 10 | 76.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 12 | 80.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 18 | 79.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 24 | 78.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 30 | 76.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | EQ-VAS Score | Month 42 | 85.0 Score on a scale | — |
Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications
Number of participants with Afatinib interruptions or dose modifications (i.e., a dose increase or decrease).
Time frame: Up to 42 months.
Population: All eligible subjects that have received at least one dose of Afatinib in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications | No interruptions/dosage modifications | 42 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications | Interruptions & Dosage modifications | 17 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications | Dosage modifications only | 9 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications | Interruptions only | 9 Participants |
Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib
Number of patients with a reason for discontinuation of Afatinib throughout the study observation period.
Time frame: Up to 42 months.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who discontinued treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib | Adverse event | 7 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib | Disease progression | 43 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib | Lost to follow-up | 4 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib | Patient's non-compliance | 1 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib | Physician's decision | 1 Participants |
Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Increase
Number of patients with a reason for dose increase throughout the study observation period.
Time frame: Up to 42 months.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who had a dose increase.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Increase | Adverse event resolution | 1 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Increase | Physician's decision (with no further specification) | 2 Participants |
Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction
Number of patients with a reason for dose reduction throughout the study observation period.
Time frame: Up to 42 months.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who had a dose reduction.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction | Adverse event/Disease progression | 23 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction | Physician's decision (with no further specification) | 1 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction | Physician's decision due to patient's impaired general health state | 1 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction | Physician's decision due to patient's impaired performance status | 1 Participants |
Number of Patients With a Reason for Missing Afatinib Tablets
Number of patients with a reason for missing afatinib tablets. One participant can have multiple missing doses for multiple reasons.
Time frame: Up to 42 months.
Population: All subjects who were evaluable for treatment adherence and had missed doses. One participant can have multiple missing doses for multiple reasons.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Missing Afatinib Tablets | Patients' initiative due to adverse event | 11 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Missing Afatinib Tablets | Patient's negligence | 1 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Missing Afatinib Tablets | Travel | 1 Participants |
Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions
Number of patients with a reason for treatment interruptions throughout the study observation period. One participant can have multiple interruptions for multiple reasons.
Time frame: Up to 42 months.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who had treatment interruptions. One participant can have multiple interruptions for multiple reasons.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions | Adverse event/Disease progression | 24 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions | Physician's advice due to receipt of antibiotic therapy | 2 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions | Surgery | 2 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions | Travel | 1 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions | Physician's decision while waiting for the liquid biopsy results | 1 Participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions | Scheduled dental work | 1 Participants |
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Patient-rated ASBI score of LCSS at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study) is reported. The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Baseline | 14.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 2 | 11.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 4 | 9.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 6 | 7.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 8 | 7.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 10 | 7.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 12 | 7.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 18 | 5.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 24 | 6.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 30 | 7.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 36 | 11.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) | Month 42 | 1.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Cough at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Cough was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Baseline | 14.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 2 | 6.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 4 | 8.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 6 | 4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 8 | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 10 | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 12 | 6.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 18 | 2.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 24 | 4.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 30 | 10.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 36 | 5.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough | Month 42 | 0.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Dyspnoea at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Dyspnoea was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Baseline | 10.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 2 | 7.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 4 | 5.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 6 | 3.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 8 | 3.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 10 | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 12 | 5.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 18 | 2.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 24 | 3.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 30 | 8.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 36 | 5.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea | Month 42 | 0.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Fatigue at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Fatigue was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Baseline | 27.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 2 | 22.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 4 | 20.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 6 | 16.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 8 | 17.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 10 | 17.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 12 | 14.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 18 | 12.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 24 | 14.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 30 | 12.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 36 | 25.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue | Month 42 | 6.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Global Quality of Life (QoL) was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Baseline | 29.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 2 | 27.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 4 | 23.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 6 | 23.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 8 | 26.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 10 | 24.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 12 | 21.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 18 | 18.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 24 | 22.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 30 | 23.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 36 | 36.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) | Month 42 | 12.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Haemoptysis at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Haemoptysis was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Baseline | 1.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 2 | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 4 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 6 | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 8 | 1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 10 | 1.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 12 | 1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 18 | 1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 24 | 0.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 30 | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 36 | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis | Month 42 | 0.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Interference with normal activity at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Interference with normal activity was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Baseline | 22.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 2 | 19.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 4 | 16.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 6 | 16.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 8 | 18.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 10 | 15.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 12 | 16.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 18 | 12.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 24 | 15.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 30 | 17.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 36 | 10.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity | Month 42 | 13.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Loss of appetite at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Loss of appetite was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Baseline | 17.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 2 | 21.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.2 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 4 | 15.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 6 | 14.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 8 | 12.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 10 | 13.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 12 | 11.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 18 | 8.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 24 | 7.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 30 | 7.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 36 | 28.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.2 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite | Month 42 | 0.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Overall symptomatic distress at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Overall symptomatic distress was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Baseline | 16.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 2 | 15.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 4 | 17.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 6 | 13.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 8 | 14.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 10 | 12.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 12 | 12.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 18 | 12.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 24 | 11.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 30 | 11.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 36 | 8.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress | Month 42 | 10.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Pain at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Pain was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Baseline | 12.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 2 | 9.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 4 | 4.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 6 | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 8 | 7.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.2 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 10 | 6.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 12 | 6.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 18 | 4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 24 | 7.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 30 | 5.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 36 | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain | Month 42 | 0.0 score on a scale | — |
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Patient-rated total LCSS score -defined as the average of the aggregate score of all 9 items that comprise the LCSS- at enrolment and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Baseline | 17.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 2 | 14.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 4 | 12.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 6 | 10.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 8 | 11.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 10 | 11.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 12 | 10.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 18 | 8.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 24 | 9.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 30 | 10.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 36 | 13.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score | Month 42 | 4.6 score on a scale | — |
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 0 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Baseline | 59.7 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 2 | 79.4 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 4 | 83.1 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 6 | 76.9 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 8 | 72.9 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 10 | 73.8 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 12 | 72.5 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 18 | 80.8 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 24 | 69.6 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 30 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 36 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0 | Month 42 | 100 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 1 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Baseline | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 2 | 17.5 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 4 | 11.9 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 6 | 21.2 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 8 | 27.1 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 10 | 26.2 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 12 | 25.0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 18 | 15.4 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 24 | 26.1 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 30 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 36 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1 | Month 42 | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 2 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Baseline | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 2 | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 4 | 5.1 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 6 | 1.9 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 8 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 10 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 12 | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 18 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 24 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 30 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 36 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2 | Month 42 | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 3 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Baseline | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 2 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 4 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 6 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 8 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 10 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 12 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 18 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 24 | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 30 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 36 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3 | Month 42 | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 4 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Baseline | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 2 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 4 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 6 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 8 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 10 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 12 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 18 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 24 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 30 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 36 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4 | Month 42 | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Baseline | 51.3 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 2 | 64.3 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 4 | 59.3 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 6 | 53.2 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 8 | 50.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 10 | 55.6 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 12 | 47.4 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 18 | 48.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 24 | 63.6 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 30 | 50.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 36 | 50.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression | Month 42 | 100 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Mobility. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Baseline | 44.7 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 2 | 30.4 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 4 | 22.2 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 6 | 17.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 8 | 35.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 10 | 30.6 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 12 | 28.9 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 18 | 28.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 24 | 27.3 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 30 | 10.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 36 | 25.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility | Month 42 | 0 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Pain/discomfort. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Baseline | 47.4 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 2 | 25.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 4 | 16.7 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 6 | 14.9 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 8 | 30.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 10 | 25.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 12 | 28.9 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 18 | 20.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 24 | 22.7 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 30 | 30.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 36 | 25.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort | Month 42 | 0 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Self-care. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Baseline | 22.4 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 2 | 14.3 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 4 | 16.7 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 6 | 14.9 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 8 | 12.5 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 10 | 8.3 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 12 | 10.5 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 18 | 12.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 24 | 13.6 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 30 | 10.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 36 | 12.5 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care | Month 42 | 0 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Usual activities. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3= extreme problems. Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 (some problems) and level 3 (extreme problems) with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 (no problems).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Baseline | 39.5 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 2 | 33.9 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 4 | 29.6 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 6 | 21.3 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 8 | 30.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 10 | 27.8 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 12 | 31.6 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 18 | 24.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 24 | 13.6 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 30 | 40.0 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 36 | 12.5 Percentage of patients |
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities | Month 42 | 0 Percentage of patients |
Ratio of Afatinib Tablets Actually Taken to Doses Prescribed Over the Study Participation Period
Ratio of afatinib tablets actually taken to doses prescribed over the study participation period. Ratio = doses taken / doses prescribed.
Time frame: Up to 42 months.
Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who were evaluable for treatment adherence.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib | Ratio of Afatinib Tablets Actually Taken to Doses Prescribed Over the Study Participation Period | 0.99 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.02 |