Skip to content

Rt-fMRI NF Intervention Study in ASD

Improving Facial Expression Identification in ASD: a Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02440451
Acronym
NF-ASD
Enrollment
15
Registered
2015-05-12
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2019-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Brief summary

This study aims to demonstrate that fMRI neurofeedback training improves the identification and comprehension of emotional facial expressions (and overall social behaviour) in subjects with ASD. The intervention setup provides structured presentation of emotional facial expressions and the associated tools for mental imagery. The investigators hypothesize that the accomplishment of the proposed competence training improves the subjects ability to comprehend facial expressions, identify emotions and be able to correctly express them. Intervention Type is a Device (brain computer interface using brain imaging signals) and the specific Intervention Name is Neurofeedback. Structure: (1) initial eligibility screening, (2) pre-intervention (first week of study, baseline outcome measures and additional evaluations), (3) intervention process (8 weeks), (4) post-intervention (outcome measures and additional evaluations), and (5) follow-up (outcome measures at 6 months).

Detailed description

Clinical research has demonstrated that ASD children have deficits in the identification and interpretation of the emotional and mental state of others (Baron-Cohen 2001). An important skill to this end (impaired in ASD patients), is to appropriately recognize and discriminate emotional expressions. The main brain regions involved in face processing the inferior occipital gyri, lateral portion of the fusiform gyrus (especially a region deemed the fusiform face area or FFA), and posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) (Haxby et al. 2000). STS plays a key role on several basic aspects in social information processing, and deficits in ASD have been found associated to this region. The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of neurofeedback considering a social cognition brain region (i.e. pSTS) on the identification of facial expressions in ASD patients. The intervention comprehends seven BCI sessions spread over four months. The first four sessions are weekly, and the rest monthly. In each session, the subjects are asked to imagine different facial expressions and their brain activity (i.e. BOLD activation in the pSTS region) is interpreted and used to estimate a feedback signal.The hypothesis is that the training induced up-regulation of the target region, improves clinical symptoms.

Interventions

DEVICENeurofeedback using BCI

This group will undergo five sessions of neurofeedback intervention in the fMRI scanner. Each subject will also undergo neuropsychological evaluations before the first neurofeedback session (week 0) and after the last neurofeedback session (week 7). The first four sessions are weekly while the last one is one month later. The intervention will take a total of four months. Follow up will be performed in the the first week and 6 months after the last intervention session.

Sponsors

University of Coimbra
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Positive diagnostic results for ASD in: Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised; Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule; The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria.

Exclusion criteria

* Global Intelligence Quotient \< 80 * Associated medical condition such as epilepsy, neurocutaneous or other genetic syndromes, or other usual comorbidity in ASD samples

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FEEST - Facial Expression of Emotion: Stimuli and Tests8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-upThe Emotion Hexagon test represents the primary outcome measure. The assessment based on this test will be performed before (baseline), after the intervention - endpoint 1 (at 8 weeks) and at the 6 months follow-up. The Emotion Hexagon test uses stimuli of graded difficulty, created using computer image manipulation techniques (morphing is used to modify photographs from the Ekman and Friesen (1976) series, creating examples that lie close to or more distant from the prototype expression). The 120 test trials with unambiguous stimuli (4 pictures for each of the 6 emotions across the 5 test blocks) can be used to derive an overall (total) score out of a possible maximum of 120 expressions correctly recognized.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ATEC - Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow upAutism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) evaluates the effectiveness of autism treatments - a 1-page form designed to be completed by parents or caretakers. It consists of 4 subtests: I. Speech/Language Communication (14 items, min.0-max.28); II. Sociability (20 items, min.0-max.40); III. Sensory/Cognitive Awareness (18 items, min.0-max.36); and IV. Health/Phys./Behavior (25 items, min.0-max.75). Total score (sum) ranges from min.0-max.179. The results reported here correspond to the total ATEC score to be used for comparison at a later date. The lower the score, the fewer the problems.
VABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-upThe Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale (VABS) is a semi-structured interview designed to assess global adaptive functioning, composed by 3 main domains: Communication COM, Daily Living Skills DLS and Socialization SOC (all reported here in terms of standard scores as described in the VABS manual, i.e. mean 100 and standard deviation 15). The Adaptive Behaviour Composite ABC (total score, also reported here) is the sum of the raw scores from the three main domains. These are transformed in standard scores (m.=100;std.=15). The higher the score, better is the adaptive behavior.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
POMS - Profile of Mood States8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-up
Debriefing Interview Questionnaire8 weeks (Endpoint 1)Covers: strategies; general experience of the process; adverse effects;
HADS - Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-up24-item scale (7 depression & 7 anxiety items)
BDI - Beck Depression Inventory8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-up21-item measure of clinical depression

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The participants, mainly recruited on a collaborative effort between the Pediatrics Hospital of Coimbra and local ASD associations, were invited for an fMRI neurofeedback feasibility clinical trial study in ASD. All participants had normal or corrected to normal vision. ). The first participant was recruited in February 2016.

Pre-assignment details

There was no significant events after participant enrollment, before group assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Neurofeedback Using BCI
16 (13 + 3 in case of dropoffs) ASD subjects Neurofeedback (BCI using neuroimaging): This group will undergo five sessions of neurofeedback intervention in the fMRI scanner. Each subject will also undergo neuropsychological evaluations before the first neurofeedback session (week 0) and after the last neurofeedback session (week 7). The first four sessions are weekly while the last one is one month later. The intervention will take a total of four months. Follow up will be performed in the the first week and 6 months after the last intervention session.
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNeurofeedback Using BCI
Age, Continuous19.92 years
ATEC - Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist36.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
15 Participants
FEEST - Facial Expression of Emotion: Stimuli and Tests98 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
VABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale
Baseline [VABS ABC]
63.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.52
VABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale
Baseline [VABS COM]
70.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.65
VABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale
Baseline [VABS DLS]
74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.15
VABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale
Baseline [VABS SOC]
63.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.21

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

FEEST - Facial Expression of Emotion: Stimuli and Tests

The Emotion Hexagon test represents the primary outcome measure. The assessment based on this test will be performed before (baseline), after the intervention - endpoint 1 (at 8 weeks) and at the 6 months follow-up. The Emotion Hexagon test uses stimuli of graded difficulty, created using computer image manipulation techniques (morphing is used to modify photographs from the Ekman and Friesen (1976) series, creating examples that lie close to or more distant from the prototype expression). The 120 test trials with unambiguous stimuli (4 pictures for each of the 6 emotions across the 5 test blocks) can be used to derive an overall (total) score out of a possible maximum of 120 expressions correctly recognized.

Time frame: 8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Neurofeedback Using BCIFEEST - Facial Expression of Emotion: Stimuli and TestsEndpoint 1100.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.29
Neurofeedback Using BCIFEEST - Facial Expression of Emotion: Stimuli and Tests6 months follow-up100.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.01
Secondary

ATEC - Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist

Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) evaluates the effectiveness of autism treatments - a 1-page form designed to be completed by parents or caretakers. It consists of 4 subtests: I. Speech/Language Communication (14 items, min.0-max.28); II. Sociability (20 items, min.0-max.40); III. Sensory/Cognitive Awareness (18 items, min.0-max.36); and IV. Health/Phys./Behavior (25 items, min.0-max.75). Total score (sum) ranges from min.0-max.179. The results reported here correspond to the total ATEC score to be used for comparison at a later date. The lower the score, the fewer the problems.

Time frame: 8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Neurofeedback Using BCIATEC - Autism Treatment Evaluation ChecklistEndpoint 132 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.66
Neurofeedback Using BCIATEC - Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist6 months follow-up19.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
Secondary

VABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale

The Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale (VABS) is a semi-structured interview designed to assess global adaptive functioning, composed by 3 main domains: Communication COM, Daily Living Skills DLS and Socialization SOC (all reported here in terms of standard scores as described in the VABS manual, i.e. mean 100 and standard deviation 15). The Adaptive Behaviour Composite ABC (total score, also reported here) is the sum of the raw scores from the three main domains. These are transformed in standard scores (m.=100;std.=15). The higher the score, better is the adaptive behavior.

Time frame: 8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Neurofeedback Using BCIVABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour ScaleEndpoint 1 [VABS COM]74.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.95
Neurofeedback Using BCIVABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour ScaleEndpoint 1 [VABS DLS]76.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.46
Neurofeedback Using BCIVABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale6 months follow-up [VABS COM]79.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
Neurofeedback Using BCIVABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale6 months follow-up [VABS DLS]83.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Neurofeedback Using BCIVABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale6 months follow-up [VABS SOC]71.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.36
Neurofeedback Using BCIVABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale6 months follow-up [VABS ABC]73.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.67
Neurofeedback Using BCIVABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour ScaleEndpoint 1 [VABS SOC]66.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.42
Neurofeedback Using BCIVABS - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour ScaleEndpoint 1 [VABS ABC]67.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.22
Other Pre-specified

BDI - Beck Depression Inventory

21-item measure of clinical depression

Time frame: 8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-up

Other Pre-specified

Debriefing Interview Questionnaire

Covers: strategies; general experience of the process; adverse effects;

Time frame: 8 weeks (Endpoint 1)

Other Pre-specified

HADS - Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale

24-item scale (7 depression & 7 anxiety items)

Time frame: 8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-up

Other Pre-specified

POMS - Profile of Mood States

Time frame: 8 weeks (Endpoint 1) plus 6 months follow-up

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026