Chronic Cluster Headache
Conditions
Brief summary
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the study drug known as galcanezumab in participants with chronic cluster headache.
Interventions
Administered SC
Administered SC
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participants with a history of chronic cluster headache occurring without a remission period, or with remissions lasting \<1 month, for at least 1 year. * Participants are able to distinguish cluster headache attacks from other headaches.
Exclusion criteria
* Current enrollment in or discontinuation within the last 30 days from, a clinical trial involving any investigational drug or device. * Current use or any prior exposure to any calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) antibody, any antibody to the CGRP receptor, or antibody to nerve growth factor (NGF). * Are taking indomethacin and/or are suspected of having another distinct trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia. * A history of migraine variants that could implicate or could be confused with ischemia. * Known hypersensitivity to multiple drugs, monoclonal antibodies or other therapeutic proteins. * A history or presence of other medical illness that indicates a medical problem that would preclude study participation. * Evidence of significant active or unstable psychiatric disease, in the opinion of the investigator. * Women who are pregnant or nursing.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Cluster Headache Attack Frequency | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12 | Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 12 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 14-calendar day intervals: the baseline 14-day interval, Weeks 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12. Next, the biweekly interval results were adjusted to 7-day (weekly) interval in order to report the outcome as weekly frequency. Overall mean change from baseline is derived from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Least Square (LS) means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, sex, verapamil use, pooled investigative site, week, baseline, and treatment by week as fixed effects. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Response of 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | Baseline, Week 3 through Week 12 | Sustained Response is defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the weekly cluster attack frequency from baseline to Weeks 3/4 and maintained at Weeks 5/6, Weeks 7/8, Weeks 9/10, and Weeks 11/12. Percentage of participants with a sustained response was analyzed using Koch's nonparametric randomization-based analysis of covariance method. This method adjusted for pooled investigative site by including it as a stratification variable. It also adjusted for sex, verapamil use and baseline value. |
| Percentage of Participants With a 30% Reduction in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12 | A 30% responder is any participant who has a ≥30% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 14-day interval. Weeks 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1/2 to weeks 11/12 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects. . |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | Week 4 | PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects. |
| Percentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12 | A 50% responder is any participant who has a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 14-day interval: Weeks 1/2, Weeks 3/4, Weeks 5/6, Weeks 7/8, Weeks 9/10, and Weeks 11/12. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1/2 to weeks 11/12 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects. |
| Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | Week 1 through Week 12 | C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal behavior: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. |
| Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab (LY2951742) | Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12 | Treatment emergent (TE) ADA evaluable participant is considered to be TE ADA+ if the subject has at least one post-baseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement. If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the participant is TE ADA+ if there is at least one post-baseline result of ADA present with titer \>= 1: 20. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab | Week 2 | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab |
| Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | Week 1 through Week 12 | C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal ideation: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods without intent to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent. |
Countries
Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Study consists of a 12-week double-blind treatment phase; an optional 1-year open-label treatment phase; and a 16-week post-treatment phase (washout).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received placebo once a month by subcutaneous (SC) injection for 3 months. | 120 |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg Participants received galcanezumab 300 mg once a month by subcutaneous (SC) injection for 3 months. | 117 |
| Total | 237 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Protocol Violation | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Screen Failure | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Open-Label Treatment Phase | Adverse Event | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Open-Label Treatment Phase | Lack of Efficacy | 27 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Open-Label Treatment Phase | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Open-Label Treatment Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Post-Treatment Phase | Adverse Event | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Post-Treatment Phase | Lack of Efficacy | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Post-Treatment Phase | Physician Decision | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Post-Treatment Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Galcanezumab 300 mg | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 45.62 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.03 | 44.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81 | 45.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.92 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 18 Participants | 15 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 81 Participants | 87 Participants | 168 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 18 Participants | 18 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Lifetime Suicidal Behavior Prior to Screening | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Lifetime Suicidal Ideation Prior to Screening | 25 Participants | 30 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 17 Participants | 18 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 99 Participants | 101 Participants | 200 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 16 Participants | 16 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Denmark | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Finland | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 20 Participants | 20 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 20 Participants | 22 Participants | 42 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Greece | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 14 Participants | 17 Participants | 31 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 18 Participants | 15 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 31 Participants | 34 Participants | 65 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 86 Participants | 86 Participants | 172 Participants |
| Verapamil Use at Baseline | 55 Participants | 63 Participants | 118 Participants |
| Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks | 19.18 cluster headache attacks per week STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.82 | 18.47 cluster headache attacks per week STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66 | 18.82 cluster headache attacks per week STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.24 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 120 | 0 / 117 | 0 / 116 | 0 / 113 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 93 | 0 / 93 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 60 / 120 | 68 / 117 | 69 / 116 | 72 / 113 | 1 / 2 | 2 / 4 | 18 / 93 | 16 / 93 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 120 | 2 / 117 | 11 / 116 | 10 / 113 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 93 | 5 / 93 |
Outcome results
Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Cluster Headache Attack Frequency
Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 12 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 14-calendar day intervals: the baseline 14-day interval, Weeks 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12. Next, the biweekly interval results were adjusted to 7-day (weekly) interval in order to report the outcome as weekly frequency. Overall mean change from baseline is derived from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Least Square (LS) means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, sex, verapamil use, pooled investigative site, week, baseline, and treatment by week as fixed effects.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had baseline and at least one post baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Cluster Headache Attack Frequency | -4.59 cluster headache attacks per week | Standard Error 0.79 |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Cluster Headache Attack Frequency | -5.38 cluster headache attacks per week | Standard Error 0.81 |
Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab (LY2951742)
Treatment emergent (TE) ADA evaluable participant is considered to be TE ADA+ if the subject has at least one post-baseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement. If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the participant is TE ADA+ if there is at least one post-baseline result of ADA present with titer \>= 1: 20.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had non-missing baseline ADA result, and at least one non-missing post baseline ADA result.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab (LY2951742) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab (LY2951742) | 0.88 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.
Time frame: Week 4
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had PGI-I measurement at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | 19.4 percentage of participants |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | 21.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had PGI-I measurement at Week 8.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | 32.0 percentage of participants |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | 32.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had PGI-I measurement at week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | 35.6 percentage of participants |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | 30.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a 30% Reduction in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks
A 30% responder is any participant who has a ≥30% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 14-day interval. Weeks 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1/2 to weeks 11/12 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects. .
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had baseline and at least 1 post baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a 30% Reduction in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | 39.0 percentage of participants | Standard Error 3.9 |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants With a 30% Reduction in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | 49.1 percentage of participants | Standard Error 4.1 |
Percentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks
A 50% responder is any participant who has a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 14-day interval: Weeks 1/2, Weeks 3/4, Weeks 5/6, Weeks 7/8, Weeks 9/10, and Weeks 11/12. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1/2 to weeks 11/12 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had baseline and at least 1 post baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | 27.1 percentage of participants | Standard Error 3.5 |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | 32.6 percentage of participants | Standard Error 3.8 |
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Response of 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks
Sustained Response is defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the weekly cluster attack frequency from baseline to Weeks 3/4 and maintained at Weeks 5/6, Weeks 7/8, Weeks 9/10, and Weeks 11/12. Percentage of participants with a sustained response was analyzed using Koch's nonparametric randomization-based analysis of covariance method. This method adjusted for pooled investigative site by including it as a stratification variable. It also adjusted for sex, verapamil use and baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 3 through Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline, and at least one post baseline value.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Response of 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | 17.50 percentage of participants |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Response of 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks | 16.24 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal behavior: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide.
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post baseline C-SSRS assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal ideation: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods without intent to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent.
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post baseline C-SSRS assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 5.04 percentage of participants |
| Galcanezumab 300 mg | Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 4.31 percentage of participants |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Time frame: Week 2
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable galcanezumab PK samples at Week 2.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab | 30,600 nanogram per milliliter |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Time frame: Week 4
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable galcanezumab PK samples at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab | 20,200 nanogram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 6780 |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Time frame: Week 8
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable galcanezumab PK samples at Week 8.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab | 29,700 nanogram per milliliter |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable galcanezumab PK samples at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab | 31,100 nanogram per milliliter |