Skip to content

A Study of Galcanezumab in Participants With Chronic Cluster Headache

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of : Galcanezumab (LY2951742) With a Long-Term Open-Label Extension in Patients With Chronic Cluster Headache

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02438826
Enrollment
240
Registered
2015-05-08
Start date
2015-06-18
Completion date
2019-08-14
Last updated
2020-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Cluster Headache

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the study drug known as galcanezumab in participants with chronic cluster headache.

Interventions

DRUGGalcanezumab 300 mg

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with a history of chronic cluster headache occurring without a remission period, or with remissions lasting \<1 month, for at least 1 year. * Participants are able to distinguish cluster headache attacks from other headaches.

Exclusion criteria

* Current enrollment in or discontinuation within the last 30 days from, a clinical trial involving any investigational drug or device. * Current use or any prior exposure to any calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) antibody, any antibody to the CGRP receptor, or antibody to nerve growth factor (NGF). * Are taking indomethacin and/or are suspected of having another distinct trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia. * A history of migraine variants that could implicate or could be confused with ischemia. * Known hypersensitivity to multiple drugs, monoclonal antibodies or other therapeutic proteins. * A history or presence of other medical illness that indicates a medical problem that would preclude study participation. * Evidence of significant active or unstable psychiatric disease, in the opinion of the investigator. * Women who are pregnant or nursing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Cluster Headache Attack FrequencyBaseline, Week 1 through Week 12Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 12 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 14-calendar day intervals: the baseline 14-day interval, Weeks 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12. Next, the biweekly interval results were adjusted to 7-day (weekly) interval in order to report the outcome as weekly frequency. Overall mean change from baseline is derived from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Least Square (LS) means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, sex, verapamil use, pooled investigative site, week, baseline, and treatment by week as fixed effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Response of 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache AttacksBaseline, Week 3 through Week 12Sustained Response is defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the weekly cluster attack frequency from baseline to Weeks 3/4 and maintained at Weeks 5/6, Weeks 7/8, Weeks 9/10, and Weeks 11/12. Percentage of participants with a sustained response was analyzed using Koch's nonparametric randomization-based analysis of covariance method. This method adjusted for pooled investigative site by including it as a stratification variable. It also adjusted for sex, verapamil use and baseline value.
Percentage of Participants With a 30% Reduction in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache AttacksBaseline, Week 1 through Week 12A 30% responder is any participant who has a ≥30% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 14-day interval. Weeks 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1/2 to weeks 11/12 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects. .
Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)Week 4PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.
Percentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache AttacksBaseline, Week 1 through Week 12A 50% responder is any participant who has a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 14-day interval: Weeks 1/2, Weeks 3/4, Weeks 5/6, Weeks 7/8, Weeks 9/10, and Weeks 11/12. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1/2 to weeks 11/12 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects.
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Week 1 through Week 12C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal behavior: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide.
Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab (LY2951742)Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12Treatment emergent (TE) ADA evaluable participant is considered to be TE ADA+ if the subject has at least one post-baseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement. If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the participant is TE ADA+ if there is at least one post-baseline result of ADA present with titer \>= 1: 20.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of GalcanezumabWeek 2Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Week 1 through Week 12C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal ideation: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods without intent to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Study consists of a 12-week double-blind treatment phase; an optional 1-year open-label treatment phase; and a 16-week post-treatment phase (washout).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo once a month by subcutaneous (SC) injection for 3 months.
120
Galcanezumab 300 mg
Participants received galcanezumab 300 mg once a month by subcutaneous (SC) injection for 3 months.
117
Total237

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseAdverse Event1100
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy1000
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseProtocol Violation1200
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseScreen Failure2000
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject1100
Open-Label Treatment PhaseAdverse Event11600
Open-Label Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy271800
Open-Label Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up0200
Open-Label Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject6700
Post-Treatment PhaseAdverse Event3000
Post-Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy4000
Post-Treatment PhasePhysician Decision1000
Post-Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject1100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGalcanezumab 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous45.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.03
44.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81
45.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.92
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
81 Participants87 Participants168 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
18 Participants18 Participants36 Participants
Lifetime Suicidal Behavior Prior to Screening4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Lifetime Suicidal Ideation Prior to Screening25 Participants30 Participants55 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
17 Participants18 Participants35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
99 Participants101 Participants200 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
20 Participants20 Participants40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
20 Participants22 Participants42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
14 Participants17 Participants31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants34 Participants65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
86 Participants86 Participants172 Participants
Verapamil Use at Baseline55 Participants63 Participants118 Participants
Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks19.18 cluster headache attacks per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.82
18.47 cluster headache attacks per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66
18.82 cluster headache attacks per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.24

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1200 / 1170 / 1160 / 1130 / 20 / 40 / 930 / 93
other
Total, other adverse events
60 / 12068 / 11769 / 11672 / 1131 / 22 / 418 / 9316 / 93
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1202 / 11711 / 11610 / 1130 / 20 / 40 / 935 / 93

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Cluster Headache Attack Frequency

Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 12 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 14-calendar day intervals: the baseline 14-day interval, Weeks 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12. Next, the biweekly interval results were adjusted to 7-day (weekly) interval in order to report the outcome as weekly frequency. Overall mean change from baseline is derived from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Least Square (LS) means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, sex, verapamil use, pooled investigative site, week, baseline, and treatment by week as fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had baseline and at least one post baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboOverall Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Cluster Headache Attack Frequency-4.59 cluster headache attacks per weekStandard Error 0.79
Galcanezumab 300 mgOverall Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Cluster Headache Attack Frequency-5.38 cluster headache attacks per weekStandard Error 0.81
p-value: 0.33495% CI: [-2.77, 1.17]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab (LY2951742)

Treatment emergent (TE) ADA evaluable participant is considered to be TE ADA+ if the subject has at least one post-baseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement. If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the participant is TE ADA+ if there is at least one post-baseline result of ADA present with titer \>= 1: 20.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had non-missing baseline ADA result, and at least one non-missing post baseline ADA result.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab (LY2951742)0 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab (LY2951742)0.88 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had PGI-I measurement at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)19.4 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)21.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.71395% CI: [0.563, 2.314]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had PGI-I measurement at Week 8.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)32.0 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)32.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.97995% CI: [0.548, 1.856]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had PGI-I measurement at week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)35.6 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)30.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.43795% CI: [0.431, 1.44]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a 30% Reduction in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks

A 30% responder is any participant who has a ≥30% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 14-day interval. Weeks 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1/2 to weeks 11/12 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects. .

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had baseline and at least 1 post baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a 30% Reduction in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks39.0 percentage of participantsStandard Error 3.9
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With a 30% Reduction in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks49.1 percentage of participantsStandard Error 4.1
p-value: 0.05795% CI: [0.987, 2.309]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks

A 50% responder is any participant who has a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 14-day interval: Weeks 1/2, Weeks 3/4, Weeks 5/6, Weeks 7/8, Weeks 9/10, and Weeks 11/12. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1/2 to weeks 11/12 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, verapamil use, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had baseline and at least 1 post baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks27.1 percentage of participantsStandard Error 3.5
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With a 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks32.6 percentage of participantsStandard Error 3.8
p-value: 0.1795% CI: [0.83, 2.028]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Response of 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks

Sustained Response is defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the weekly cluster attack frequency from baseline to Weeks 3/4 and maintained at Weeks 5/6, Weeks 7/8, Weeks 9/10, and Weeks 11/12. Percentage of participants with a sustained response was analyzed using Koch's nonparametric randomization-based analysis of covariance method. This method adjusted for pooled investigative site by including it as a stratification variable. It also adjusted for sex, verapamil use and baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3 through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline, and at least one post baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Sustained Response of 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks17.50 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With a Sustained Response of 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks16.24 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.946Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal behavior: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post baseline C-SSRS assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)0 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal ideation: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods without intent to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post baseline C-SSRS assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)5.04 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)4.31 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Time frame: Week 2

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable galcanezumab PK samples at Week 2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab30,600 nanogram per milliliter
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Time frame: Week 4

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable galcanezumab PK samples at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab20,200 nanogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 6780
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Time frame: Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable galcanezumab PK samples at Week 8.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab29,700 nanogram per milliliter
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable galcanezumab PK samples at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab31,100 nanogram per milliliter

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026