Skip to content

A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ALX-0061 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose-range Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ALX-0061 Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02437890
Enrollment
312
Registered
2015-05-08
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2019-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Brief summary

Primary objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of different dose regimens of ALX-0061 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to subjects with moderate to severe active, seropositive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to placebo. Secondary objectives: To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, flare rate, steroid reduction and health-related quality of life, with different dose regimens of ALX-0061.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALALX-0061
BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Sponsors

Ablynx, a Sanofi company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Man or woman ≥ 18 years and \< 65 years of age 2. Have a diagnosis of SLE for at least 6 months prior to screening and fulfill the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria 3. Have moderate to severe active SLE 4. Have seropositive disease at screening 5. Subject must be at least on one or more of the treatments for SLE as listed in the protocol 6. Others as defined in the protocol

Exclusion criteria

1. Have an A score on the revised BILAG-2004 other than in the mucocutaneous and/or musculoskeletal system at screening and at baseline for the organ systems that can be clinically assessed 2. Have a systemic inflammatory disease other than SLE 3. Clinically significant infection treated or needing treatment 4. Any active or recurrent viral infection that based on the Investigator´s clinical assessment makes the subject unsuitable for the study 5. Have received prior therapy blocking the interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway 6. Others as defined in the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) ScoreAt Week 24 visitThe primary endpoint was evaluated by determining if there was a dose-response relationship between the mBICLA response rate at Week 24 and the dose administered, using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) methodology. The existence of several candidate parametric models was assumed and multiple comparison techniques were used to choose the model(s) most likely to represent the true underlying dose-response curve. The selected model could further be used to guide the choice of adequate doses. mBICLA responders were defined as subjects who met all of the following criteria: 1. BILAG-2004 normal improvement: all A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D, and all B scores improved to C or D. 2. No worsening in disease activity: no new BILAG-2004 A scores and ≤ 1 new increase to B. 3. No worsening of total mSLEDAI-2K score from Baseline. 4. No significant deterioration (\< 10% worsening from Baseline) in PGA. 5. No treatment failure (including the premature

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The composite index mSRI-4 enables quantification of decrease and increase in disease activity in a broad spectrum of manifestations thereby offering a comprehensive assessment of SLE disease status. mSRI combines advantages from 3 validated measurement tools. The mSRI-4 criteria for response are: 1. modified SLE disease activity index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K): ≥ 4 point reduction (covers global disease improvement), 2. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004): no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B (covers organ-specific disease improvement), 3. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) (is used as validity and safety net for items that were not addressed by the other two indices): \< 10% increase from Baseline (no worsening) When all 3 criteria are met, the subject is a mSRI-4 responder at that time point. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The mSRI-5 criteria for response are: 1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 5 point reduction 2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score 3. PGA: no worsening (\< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 5 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The mSRI-6 criteria for response are: 1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 6 point reduction 2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score 3. PGA: no worsening (\< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 6 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The mSRI-7 criteria for response are: 1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 7 point reduction 2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score 3. PGA: no worsening (\< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 7 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.At Week 24 and Week 48The mSRI-8 criteria for response are: 1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 8 point reduction 2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score 3. PGA: no worsening (\< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 8 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.
Change From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 is a 1-page weighted score for 24 items (seizure, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, visual disturbance, cranial nerve disorder, lupus headache, cerebrovascular accident, vasculitis, arthritis, myositis, urinary casts, hematuria, proteinuria, pyuria, rash, alopecia, mucosal ulcers, pleurisy, pericarditis, low complement, etc). The manifestations felt to be most commonly contributing to disease activity are included and scored based on the presence (= 1 multiplied by weight) or absence (= 0) within 30 days prior to the evaluation. The total score ranges from 0-105 (= sum of individual scores), with 105 being higher disease activity. mSLEDAI-2K derives from the standard index by omitting low complement. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline mSLEDAI-2K Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Normal Improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D. Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Enhanced improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D and no worsening between consecutive visits from baseline up to the considered visit Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint
BILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48At Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) is a comprehensive composite clinical index that has been developed based on the principle of a physician's intention to treat using a nominal consensus approach. In the index, the nine systems (not organs) considered are: constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, ophthalmic and hematological. Disease activity in each of the nine systems is categorized into five levels: grades A (= severe disease activity requiring systemic high dose oral corticosteroids, i.v. pulse corticosteroids, etc.) to E (= system never involved). BILAG total score is derived by assigning the following value to each grade and summing the sores over all organ systems: A = 12, B = 8, C = 1, D/E = 0. The total score ranges from 0-108, with 108 representing high disease activity in all 9 systems requiring high doses of corticosteroids, starting/increasing immunosuppressive drugs, etc.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D. Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D. Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline prednisone equivalent total daily dose and geographic region as covariates
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The physician makes a mark between 0 (no disease) and 100 mm (severe disease) on the visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate disease activity (independent of the subject's self-assessment). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline PGA score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The subject makes a mark between 0 (very good) and 100 mm (very bad) on the VAS to indicate how the subject is doing, while considering all the ways SLE affects him/her. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline Patient's Global Assessment and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline proteinuria and geographic region as covariates
Number of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Efficacy Laboratory Parameters (Urinalysis) - Active Urine Sediment Number of subjects who were urine sediment negative at Baseline, but positive at Week 24 and Week 48, respectively.
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline serum creatinine and geographic region as covariates
Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline eGFR and geographic region as covariates
Number of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Defined as non-protocol allowed increase in steroid dose, start i.v. or i.m. steroids, or start or increase of immunosuppressant
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48Between Week 40 and Week 48Number and percentage of subjects whose prednisone equivalent dose was \>7.5 mg/day at baseline and reduced to ≤7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40-48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare after the first prednisone equivalent dose decrease.
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlareUp to and including Week 48Number and percentage of subjects who discontinued Prednisone (or equivalent) by Week 48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Twenty-eight joints are assessed for swollenness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of swollenness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are swollen). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes an improvement.
Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Twenty-eight joints are assessed for tenderness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of tenderness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are tender). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline TJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes and improvement.
Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48CLASI Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and nonscarring alopecia. Evaluation of erythema and scale/hyperkeratosis is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (erythema: 0=absent, 1=pink, 2=red, 3=dark red; scale: 0=absent, 1=scale, 2=verrucous/hypertrophic). Mucous membrane involvement and acute hair loss are scored based on the presence (=1) or absence (=0). Nonscarring alopecia is scored as 0=absent, 1=diffuse/non-inflammatory, 2=focal or patchy in 1 quadrant, 3=focal or patchy in \>1 quadrant. The total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Activity Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement
Change From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48CLASI Damage is scored based on dyspigmentation and scarring. Evaluation of dyspigmentation and scarring is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (dyspigmentation: 0=absent, 1=present; scarring: 0=absent, 1=scarring, 2=severely atrophic scarring or panniculitis). Subjects are also asked whether dyspigmentation due to SLE lesions usually remains visible for \>12 months, which is considered permanent and results in doubling of the dyspigmentation score. Scarring alopecia is scored as follows: 0=absent, 3=1 quadrant, 4=2 quadrants, 5=3 quadrants, 6=affects the whole skull. Total score ranges from 0-56, with higher scores indicating more damaged skin. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Damage Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement.
ALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48
Actual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48At Week 24 and Week 48Number and percentage of mBICLA responders at Week 24 and Week 48
Actual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) PositiveFrom first administration of ALX-0061 up to and including follow-up
Actual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Countries

Argentina, Chile, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Serbia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 312 subjects were randomized at 91 sites located in Europe (37 sites; 155 subjects), Asia-Pacific (19 sites, 53 subjects), North America (21 sites; 52 subjects), and Latin America (14 sites, 52 subjects). Consent was obtained from the first subject on 02 July 2015; the last subject completed the final visit on 25 January 2018.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 568 subjects screened, 256 were screen failures and 312 were randomly assigned to treatment (modified Intent-to-treat \[mITT\] population). All subjects received study drug and were included in the safety population. Overall, 254 subjects were included in the Per Protocol (PP) population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Two s.c. injections with placebo every 2 weeks (q2w)
62
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w
ALX-0061 75 mg every 4 weeks (q4w)
64
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w
ALX-0061 150 mg every 4 weeks (q4w)
62
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w
ALX-0061 150 mg every two weeks (q2w)
62
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w
ALX-0061 225 mg every two weeks (q2w)
62
Total312

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event495117
Overall StudyDeath00020
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy13031
Overall StudyNon-compliance to study drug01001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision00010
Overall StudySponsor's decision11402
Overall StudyUnable to attend visit(s)10000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12655

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboALX-0061 75 mg q4wALX-0061 150 mg q4wALX-0061 150 mg q2wALX-0061 225 mg q2wTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
62 Participants64 Participants62 Participants62 Participants62 Participants312 Participants
Age, Continuous42.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.11
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79
39.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.58
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants12 Participants17 Participants11 Participants13 Participants66 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants52 Participants45 Participants51 Participants49 Participants246 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
4 participants4 participants3 participants3 participants4 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
2 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
2 participants4 participants2 participants2 participants4 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
5 participants6 participants5 participants5 participants5 participants26 participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
2 participants0 participants2 participants1 participants1 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
1 participants3 participants4 participants3 participants2 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
4 participants5 participants3 participants6 participants5 participants23 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
2 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
3 participants6 participants5 participants8 participants6 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
14 participants11 participants17 participants11 participants10 participants63 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
1 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants1 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
3 participants2 participants2 participants1 participants0 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
3 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
5 participants6 participants7 participants8 participants7 participants33 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants11 participants10 participants11 participants10 participants52 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
60 Participants61 Participants61 Participants61 Participants57 Participants300 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 620 / 640 / 622 / 620 / 62
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 6240 / 6431 / 6247 / 6244 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 622 / 644 / 625 / 625 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score

The primary endpoint was evaluated by determining if there was a dose-response relationship between the mBICLA response rate at Week 24 and the dose administered, using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) methodology. The existence of several candidate parametric models was assumed and multiple comparison techniques were used to choose the model(s) most likely to represent the true underlying dose-response curve. The selected model could further be used to guide the choice of adequate doses. mBICLA responders were defined as subjects who met all of the following criteria: 1. BILAG-2004 normal improvement: all A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D, and all B scores improved to C or D. 2. No worsening in disease activity: no new BILAG-2004 A scores and ≤ 1 new increase to B. 3. No worsening of total mSLEDAI-2K score from Baseline. 4. No significant deterioration (\< 10% worsening from Baseline) in PGA. 5. No treatment failure (including the premature

Time frame: At Week 24 visit

Population: mITT Population - Non-response imputation (NRI)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score29 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score28 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score24 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score24 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score23 Participants
Comparison: A multiple contrast test was used to establish evidence of a drug effect by testing for a statistically significant dose-response signal for clinical endpoint and patient population investigated in the study. Candidate dose-response models were selected amongst the following types of parametric models: linear model, Emax model, logistic model, a 1st Beta model, and a 2nd Beta model.~Model tested: linear modelp-value: =0.526Multiple Contrast Test
Comparison: A multiple contrast test was used to establish evidence of a drug effect by testing for a statistically significant dose-response signal for clinical endpoint and patient population investigated in the study. Candidate dose-response models were selected amongst the following types of parametric models: linear model, Emax model, logistic model, a 1st Beta model, and a 2nd Beta model.~Model tested: Emax modelp-value: =0.504Multiple Contrast Test
Comparison: A multiple contrast test was used to establish evidence of a drug effect by testing for a statistically significant dose-response signal for clinical endpoint and patient population investigated in the study. Candidate dose-response models were selected amongst the following types of parametric models: linear model, Emax model, logistic model, a 1st Beta model, and a 2nd Beta model.~Model tested: logistic modelp-value: =0.548Multiple Contrast Test
Comparison: A multiple contrast test was used to establish evidence of a drug effect by testing for a statistically significant dose-response signal for clinical endpoint and patient population investigated in the study. Candidate dose-response models were selected amongst the following types of parametric models: linear model, Emax model, logistic model, a 1st Beta model, and a 2nd Beta model.~Model tested: 1st Beta modelp-value: =0.985Multiple Contrast Test
Comparison: A multiple contrast test was used to establish evidence of a drug effect by testing for a statistically significant dose-response signal for clinical endpoint and patient population investigated in the study. Candidate dose-response models were selected amongst the following types of parametric models: linear model, Emax model, logistic model, a 1st Beta model, and a 2nd Beta model.~Model tested: 2nd Beta modelp-value: =0.524Multiple Contrast Test
Secondary

Actual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline101.1 unit(s)Standard Error 7.46
PlaceboActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48102.2 unit(s)Standard Error 8.38
PlaceboActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2495.8 unit(s)Standard Error 7.94
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24107.0 unit(s)Standard Error 7.08
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline109.6 unit(s)Standard Error 8.83
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48113.1 unit(s)Standard Error 8.63
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2473.6 unit(s)Standard Error 6.94
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline98.9 unit(s)Standard Error 6.95
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4873.5 unit(s)Standard Error 8.26
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline103.0 unit(s)Standard Error 7.47
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4868.4 unit(s)Standard Error 6.95
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2456.7 unit(s)Standard Error 4.91
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2441.1 unit(s)Standard Error 3.63
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline82.4 unit(s)Standard Error 7.09
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4841.9 unit(s)Standard Error 3.32
Secondary

Actual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Time frame: at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline132.90 IU/mLStandard Error 54.467
PlaceboActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4881.80 IU/mLStandard Error 24.143
PlaceboActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2481.36 IU/mLStandard Error 30.376
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2468.27 IU/mLStandard Error 35.053
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline145.87 IU/mLStandard Error 113.907
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4859.48 IU/mLStandard Error 32.19
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2446.99 IU/mLStandard Error 33.534
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline52.88 IU/mLStandard Error 17.283
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4874.21 IU/mLStandard Error 48.03
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline68.92 IU/mLStandard Error 23.226
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 489.13 IU/mLStandard Error 2.108
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2414.98 IU/mLStandard Error 4.499
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2423.25 IU/mLStandard Error 6.417
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline73.34 IU/mLStandard Error 25.94
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4815.53 IU/mLStandard Error 6.069
Secondary

Actual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline102.3 mg/dLStandard Error 3.82
PlaceboActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4895.8 mg/dLStandard Error 4.25
PlaceboActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24101.7 mg/dLStandard Error 4.3
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2495.7 mg/dLStandard Error 3.81
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline100.2 mg/dLStandard Error 4.12
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4893.2 mg/dLStandard Error 4.2
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2482.0 mg/dLStandard Error 3.68
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline101.9 mg/dLStandard Error 3.79
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4879.0 mg/dLStandard Error 3.25
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline105.8 mg/dLStandard Error 4.38
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4883.2 mg/dLStandard Error 3.18
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2475.3 mg/dLStandard Error 2.9
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2471.8 mg/dLStandard Error 2.82
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline98.6 mg/dLStandard Error 3.98
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4872.3 mg/dLStandard Error 2.61
Secondary

Actual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline17.3 mg/dLStandard Error 1.08
PlaceboActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4816.3 mg/dLStandard Error 1.15
PlaceboActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2417.5 mg/dLStandard Error 1.09
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2417.4 mg/dLStandard Error 1.1
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline17.8 mg/dLStandard Error 1.07
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4817.3 mg/dLStandard Error 1.27
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2410.6 mg/dLStandard Error 0.85
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline15.9 mg/dLStandard Error 0.96
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4810.5 mg/dLStandard Error 0.84
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline18.7 mg/dLStandard Error 1.19
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 489.8 mg/dLStandard Error 0.89
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 248.7 mg/dLStandard Error 0.4
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 247.9 mg/dLStandard Error 0.37
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline16.3 mg/dLStandard Error 1.04
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 488.1 mg/dLStandard Error 0.41
Secondary

Actual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline43.58 nmol/LStandard Error 9.527
PlaceboActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4830.70 nmol/LStandard Error 4.709
PlaceboActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2459.43 nmol/LStandard Error 11.277
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2447.22 nmol/LStandard Error 9.607
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline49.05 nmol/LStandard Error 12.924
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4837.65 nmol/LStandard Error 8.647
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline38.89 nmol/LStandard Error 8.394
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2426.08 nmol/LStandard Error 9.995
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4823.20 nmol/LStandard Error 6.705
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline66.32 nmol/LStandard Error 17.221
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 484.41 nmol/LStandard Error 0.988
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 243.83 nmol/LStandard Error 0.668
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 243.20 nmol/LStandard Error 0.357
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline32.23 nmol/LStandard Error 4.957
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 484.02 nmol/LStandard Error 0.962
Secondary

Actual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline3.2 g/LStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 483.3 g/LStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 243.3 g/LStandard Error 0.08
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 243.3 g/LStandard Error 0.1
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline3.2 g/LStandard Error 0.08
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 483.3 g/LStandard Error 0.12
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 242.3 g/LStandard Error 0.12
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline3.2 g/LStandard Error 0.09
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 482.3 g/LStandard Error 0.11
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline3.2 g/LStandard Error 0.1
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 481.9 g/LStandard Error 0.06
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 241.9 g/LStandard Error 0.05
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 241.9 g/LStandard Error 0.05
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline3.1 g/LStandard Error 0.09
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 481.9 g/LStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Actual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline42.22 ng/mLStandard Error 2.496
PlaceboActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 4839.41 ng/mLStandard Error 2.27
PlaceboActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 2439.70 ng/mLStandard Error 1.934
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24198.26 ng/mLStandard Error 18.856
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline37.63 ng/mLStandard Error 1.933
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48224.66 ng/mLStandard Error 25.515
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24603.51 ng/mLStandard Error 31.678
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline38.10 ng/mLStandard Error 1.895
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48610.86 ng/mLStandard Error 29.445
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline42.14 ng/mLStandard Error 3.366
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48650.73 ng/mLStandard Error 38.516
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24668.57 ng/mLStandard Error 25.568
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 24634.49 ng/mLStandard Error 23.638
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Baseline36.92 ng/mLStandard Error 1.81
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wActual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48Week 48659.79 ng/mLStandard Error 32.862
Secondary

ALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.118 µg/mLStandard Deviation 2.29
PlaceboALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480.155 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.28
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48Week 482.17 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.45
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48Week 242.05 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.89
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2418.1 µg/mLStandard Deviation 1.6
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4817.9 µg/mLStandard Deviation 1.71
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2430.7 µg/mLStandard Deviation 1.62
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4836.1 µg/mLStandard Deviation 1.46
Secondary

BILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48

The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) is a comprehensive composite clinical index that has been developed based on the principle of a physician's intention to treat using a nominal consensus approach. In the index, the nine systems (not organs) considered are: constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, ophthalmic and hematological. Disease activity in each of the nine systems is categorized into five levels: grades A (= severe disease activity requiring systemic high dose oral corticosteroids, i.v. pulse corticosteroids, etc.) to E (= system never involved). BILAG total score is derived by assigning the following value to each grade and summing the sores over all organ systems: A = 12, B = 8, C = 1, D/E = 0. The total score ranges from 0-108, with 108 representing high disease activity in all 9 systems requiring high doses of corticosteroids, starting/increasing immunosuppressive drugs, etc.

Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Baseline17.4 scoreStandard Error 0.78
PlaceboBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 486.0 scoreStandard Error 0.73
PlaceboBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 246.8 scoreStandard Error 0.78
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 245.7 scoreStandard Error 0.79
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Baseline17.9 scoreStandard Error 0.69
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 484.0 scoreStandard Error 0.72
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 247.0 scoreStandard Error 0.76
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Baseline15.2 scoreStandard Error 0.68
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 485.2 scoreStandard Error 0.74
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Baseline17.4 scoreStandard Error 0.71
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 486.0 scoreStandard Error 0.92
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 247.2 scoreStandard Error 0.94
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 247.4 scoreStandard Error 0.84
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Baseline17.3 scoreStandard Error 0.82
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wBILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48Week 486.2 scoreStandard Error 0.91
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48

Twenty-eight joints are assessed for swollenness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of swollenness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are swollen). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes an improvement.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-4.8 scoreStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-5.0 scoreStandard Error 0.28
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-5.0 scoreStandard Error 0.32
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-5.4 scoreStandard Error 0.3
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-4.9 scoreStandard Error 0.31
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-4.7 scoreStandard Error 0.29
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-5.1 scoreStandard Error 0.32
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-4.8 scoreStandard Error 0.33
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-4.5 scoreStandard Error 0.32
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-4.5 scoreStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48

Twenty-eight joints are assessed for tenderness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of tenderness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are tender). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline TJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes and improvement.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-6.8 scoreStandard Error 0.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-6.6 scoreStandard Error 0.43
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-6.8 scoreStandard Error 0.5
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-7.4 scoreStandard Error 0.46
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-6.4 scoreStandard Error 0.49
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-6.4 scoreStandard Error 0.45
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-6.6 scoreStandard Error 0.5
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-5.8 scoreStandard Error 0.52
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-5.5 scoreStandard Error 0.5
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-6.5 scoreStandard Error 0.47
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

CLASI Damage is scored based on dyspigmentation and scarring. Evaluation of dyspigmentation and scarring is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (dyspigmentation: 0=absent, 1=present; scarring: 0=absent, 1=scarring, 2=severely atrophic scarring or panniculitis). Subjects are also asked whether dyspigmentation due to SLE lesions usually remains visible for \>12 months, which is considered permanent and results in doubling of the dyspigmentation score. Scarring alopecia is scored as follows: 0=absent, 3=1 quadrant, 4=2 quadrants, 5=3 quadrants, 6=affects the whole skull. Total score ranges from 0-56, with higher scores indicating more damaged skin. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Damage Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement.

Time frame: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 120.1 scoreStandard Error 0.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 480.0 scoreStandard Error 0.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.4 scoreStandard Error 0.61
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-0.4 scoreStandard Error 0.61
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 120.1 scoreStandard Error 0.47
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-0.1 scoreStandard Error 0.6
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-0.4 scoreStandard Error 0.73
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 12-0.1 scoreStandard Error 0.59
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-0.3 scoreStandard Error 0.68
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 12-0.3 scoreStandard Error 0.52
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 480.4 scoreStandard Error 0.68
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.3 scoreStandard Error 0.67
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-0.1 scoreStandard Error 0.66
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 12-0.4 scoreStandard Error 0.52
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-0.7 scoreStandard Error 0.63
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48

Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline eGFR and geographic region as covariates

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.63 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 2.869
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-6.00 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.052
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 244.83 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 2.931
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 482.47 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.231
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.72 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 2.854
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 484.66 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.125
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.47 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.562
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-0.90 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.044
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-8.91 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.014
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-8.08 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.326
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

CLASI Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and nonscarring alopecia. Evaluation of erythema and scale/hyperkeratosis is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (erythema: 0=absent, 1=pink, 2=red, 3=dark red; scale: 0=absent, 1=scale, 2=verrucous/hypertrophic). Mucous membrane involvement and acute hair loss are scored based on the presence (=1) or absence (=0). Nonscarring alopecia is scored as 0=absent, 1=diffuse/non-inflammatory, 2=focal or patchy in 1 quadrant, 3=focal or patchy in \>1 quadrant. The total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Activity Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement

Time frame: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 12-2.4 scoreStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.3 scoreStandard Error 0.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.1 scoreStandard Error 0.53
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-2.1 scoreStandard Error 0.6
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 12-1.9 scoreStandard Error 0.57
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-3.0 scoreStandard Error 0.7
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.6 scoreStandard Error 0.66
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 12-1.4 scoreStandard Error 0.65
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-2.5 scoreStandard Error 0.73
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 12-1.6 scoreStandard Error 0.63
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-2.1 scoreStandard Error 0.8
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.3 scoreStandard Error 0.65
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.8 scoreStandard Error 0.57
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 12-1.3 scoreStandard Error 0.57
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-3.0 scoreStandard Error 0.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48

The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.08 scoreStandard Error 0.703
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 481.50 scoreStandard Error 0.716
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-0.99 scoreStandard Error 0.724
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-0.58 scoreStandard Error 0.756
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-0.56 scoreStandard Error 0.703
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-0.07 scoreStandard Error 0.737
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.07 scoreStandard Error 0.827
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.45 scoreStandard Error 0.749
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.18 scoreStandard Error 0.732
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-2.02 scoreStandard Error 0.777
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48

The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 is a 1-page weighted score for 24 items (seizure, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, visual disturbance, cranial nerve disorder, lupus headache, cerebrovascular accident, vasculitis, arthritis, myositis, urinary casts, hematuria, proteinuria, pyuria, rash, alopecia, mucosal ulcers, pleurisy, pericarditis, low complement, etc). The manifestations felt to be most commonly contributing to disease activity are included and scored based on the presence (= 1 multiplied by weight) or absence (= 0) within 30 days prior to the evaluation. The total score ranges from 0-105 (= sum of individual scores), with 105 being higher disease activity. mSLEDAI-2K derives from the standard index by omitting low complement. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline mSLEDAI-2K Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-4.0 scoreStandard Error 0.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-4.5 scoreStandard Error 0.4
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-4.6 scoreStandard Error 0.43
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-5.2 scoreStandard Error 0.43
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-3.8 scoreStandard Error 0.43
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-4.3 scoreStandard Error 0.42
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-4.9 scoreStandard Error 0.48
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-4.3 scoreStandard Error 0.44
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-3.6 scoreStandard Error 0.44
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-4.9 scoreStandard Error 0.44
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48

The subject makes a mark between 0 (very good) and 100 mm (very bad) on the VAS to indicate how the subject is doing, while considering all the ways SLE affects him/her. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline Patient's Global Assessment and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-12.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-15.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-13.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.96
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-21.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.87
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-14.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.87
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-22.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.82
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-27.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.12
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-20.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.05
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-16.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.98
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-25.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48

The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 244.71 scoreStandard Error 1.241
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 483.73 scoreStandard Error 1.414
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 244.56 scoreStandard Error 1.286
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 486.97 scoreStandard Error 1.51
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 246.77 scoreStandard Error 1.242
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 488.67 scoreStandard Error 1.46
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 488.62 scoreStandard Error 1.633
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 244.67 scoreStandard Error 1.321
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 245.01 scoreStandard Error 1.292
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 488.85 scoreStandard Error 1.535
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48

The physician makes a mark between 0 (no disease) and 100 mm (severe disease) on the visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate disease activity (independent of the subject's self-assessment). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline PGA score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-25.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-28.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.73
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-28.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.09
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-32.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.82
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-26.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.04
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-30.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.82
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-30.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-23.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.16
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-22.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.08
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-30.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.87
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48

Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline proteinuria and geographic region as covariates

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 246.17 g/molStandard Error 3.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 484.89 g/molStandard Error 5.732
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 241.77 g/molStandard Error 3.847
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 483.83 g/molStandard Error 6.152
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 241.03 g/molStandard Error 3.735
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.62 g/molStandard Error 5.761
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-0.49 g/molStandard Error 6.582
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-3.02 g/molStandard Error 3.876
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.16 g/molStandard Error 3.962
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.21 g/molStandard Error 6.191
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48

Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline serum creatinine and geographic region as covariates

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.25 umol/LStandard Error 2.172
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 481.19 umol/LStandard Error 2.016
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-3.29 umol/LStandard Error 2.237
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.87 umol/LStandard Error 2.152
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.50 umol/LStandard Error 2.182
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-6.26 umol/LStandard Error 2.085
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-4.04 umol/LStandard Error 2.359
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-3.98 umol/LStandard Error 2.309
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-0.86 umol/LStandard Error 2.276
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.24 umol/LStandard Error 2.199
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 488 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 248 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 486 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 246 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 246 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 4810 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 247 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 489 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 489 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 246 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 241 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 484 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 240 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 480 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 242 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 484 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 484 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 242 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 241 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 482 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe Flare

Number and percentage of subjects who discontinued Prednisone (or equivalent) by Week 48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare

Time frame: Up to and including Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlareBILAG-2004-defined Flare0 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlaremSFI-defined Flare0 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlaremSFI-defined Flare0 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlareBILAG-2004-defined Flare0 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlaremSFI-defined Flare2 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlareBILAG-2004-defined Flare1 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlareBILAG-2004-defined Flare1 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlaremSFI-defined Flare1 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlaremSFI-defined Flare0 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe FlareBILAG-2004-defined Flare0 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48

Number and percentage of subjects whose prednisone equivalent dose was \>7.5 mg/day at baseline and reduced to ≤7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40-48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare after the first prednisone equivalent dose decrease.

Time frame: Between Week 40 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48BILAG-2004-defined Flare3 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48mSFI-defined Flare3 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48BILAG-2004-defined Flare2 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48mSFI-defined Flare2 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48BILAG-2004-defined Flare5 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48mSFI-defined Flare4 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48mSFI-defined Flare1 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48BILAG-2004-defined Flare1 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48BILAG-2004-defined Flare3 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48mSFI-defined Flare4 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive

Time frame: From first administration of ALX-0061 up to and including follow-up

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive32 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive16 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive18 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive31 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive38 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48

Enhanced improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D and no worsening between consecutive visits from baseline up to the considered visit Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 485 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 247 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2416 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4810 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 487 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2411 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 246 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 486 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 487 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2413 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48

Normal Improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D. Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2431 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4834 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2429 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4834 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2428 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4829 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4822 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2425 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2424 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4825 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48

An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D. Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2425 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4826 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2424 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4827 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2418 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4818 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4818 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2421 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2425 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4822 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48

An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D. Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2441 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4840 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2439 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4838 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2436 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4835 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4833 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2436 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2433 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4831 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48

Number and percentage of mBICLA responders at Week 24 and Week 48

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4828 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2428 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4832 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2428 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4822 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2422 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2424 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4819 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4822 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2422 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48

The composite index mSRI-4 enables quantification of decrease and increase in disease activity in a broad spectrum of manifestations thereby offering a comprehensive assessment of SLE disease status. mSRI combines advantages from 3 validated measurement tools. The mSRI-4 criteria for response are: 1. modified SLE disease activity index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K): ≥ 4 point reduction (covers global disease improvement), 2. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004): no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B (covers organ-specific disease improvement), 3. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) (is used as validity and safety net for items that were not addressed by the other two indices): \< 10% increase from Baseline (no worsening) When all 3 criteria are met, the subject is a mSRI-4 responder at that time point. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2437 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4834 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2439 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4836 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2430 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4829 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4826 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2433 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2429 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4833 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48

The mSRI-5 criteria for response are: 1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 5 point reduction 2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score 3. PGA: no worsening (\< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 5 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2417 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4820 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2424 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4828 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2419 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4818 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4816 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2420 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2416 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4822 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48

The mSRI-6 criteria for response are: 1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 6 point reduction 2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score 3. PGA: no worsening (\< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 6 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2416 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4820 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2423 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4828 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2419 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4816 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4816 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2419 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2415 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4822 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48

The mSRI-7 criteria for response are: 1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 7 point reduction 2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score 3. PGA: no worsening (\< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 7 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 249 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4812 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 248 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4814 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 248 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 487 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 488 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2412 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 247 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48Week 489 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.

The mSRI-8 criteria for response are: 1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 8 point reduction 2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score 3. PGA: no worsening (\< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 8 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint. Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 249 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 4811 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 247 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 4814 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 248 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 487 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 487 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 2410 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 247 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.Week 488 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2415 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4820 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2424 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4827 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2419 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4823 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4816 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2416 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 2416 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48Week 4819 Participants
Secondary

Number of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

Defined as non-protocol allowed increase in steroid dose, start i.v. or i.m. steroids, or start or increase of immunosuppressant

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 242 Participants
PlaceboNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 485 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 240 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 481 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 244 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 489 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 486 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 242 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 243 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48Baseline to Week 486 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48

Efficacy Laboratory Parameters (Urinalysis) - Active Urine Sediment Number of subjects who were urine sediment negative at Baseline, but positive at Week 24 and Week 48, respectively.

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 241 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240 Participants
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480 Participants
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240 Participants
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wNumber of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48Week 480 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48

Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline prednisone equivalent total daily dose and geographic region as covariates

Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 243.87 percentageStandard Error 2.781
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 486.93 percentageStandard Error 5.047
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-0.80 percentageStandard Error 2.922
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-3.22 percentageStandard Error 5.397
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 240.25 percentageStandard Error 2.689
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.03 percentageStandard Error 5.05
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-2.32 percentageStandard Error 5.758
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-1.40 percentageStandard Error 2.94
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24-3.46 percentageStandard Error 2.831
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48-1.73 percentageStandard Error 5.521

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026