Pediatric Obesity
Conditions
Keywords
Exergaming, Weight management
Brief summary
Evaluation of the effectiveness of Exergaming for Health, a community-based multifaceted weight management program in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Primary objective: to assess impact of the program on BMI z-scores. Secondary objectives: to measure impact on cardiovascular fitness, self-worth, sedentary screen time, and the influence of exergaming component on attendance and participation.
Detailed description
Eighty-four overweight pediatric subjects will be enrolled sequentially and randomized 2:1 in experimental and control groups for six months of weight management programming. The experimental group and their parents/guardians will participate in ten weekly 2-hour sessions, comprised of 1 hour of exergaming or exergaming combined with traditional exercise and 1 hour of didactic classes focusing on nutrition and psychosocial behaviors related to weight management. Following these 10 weeks, they will attend monthly 1-hour maintenance didactic classes. The control group and their parents/guardians will participate only in the didactic portion of the curricula for the same duration of time, 10 weeks, followed by monthly maintenance classes for the remainder of the 6 month period. The control group will then be offered participation in the Exergaming for Health program upon study completion. Comparisons between the two groups will be obtained through changes in the measurements of weight, height, BMI z-scores, shuttle run times, and responses to questionnaires about screen time, self-perception, and nutrition. Measurements of both groups will be obtained at baseline and 6 months and another set of measurements will be obtained on the experimental group at 12 months.
Interventions
6 months of weight management programming consisting of 10 weekly sessions:1 hour of session was spent exergaming, which included active video game play and traditional group exercises. Some examples include: Dance, Dance, Revolution, Exerbike, Treadwall, Yoga, Spin class, etc.
6 months of weight management programming consisting of 10 weekly 1-hour sessions of didactic classes teaching behavioral and dietary curricula. Followed by monthly 1 hour didactic health teaching sessions for the remainder of the 6 month period.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Child with BMI greater than or equal to 85th percentile. * English speaking * Approval by Primary Care Doctor
Exclusion criteria
* Participants with medical, developmental or psychiatric diagnoses which preclude participation in both the physical activity and classroom portions of the curriculum. * Participants who are taking medications that positively or negatively affect weight.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BMI Z-score Change | Change from baseline at 6 months | All subjects were asked to dress in light athletic clothing and have their weight and height measured at baseline (the first group session) and at 6 months. Research assistants were trained using guidelines from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Anthropometry Procedures Manual and demonstrated accurate measures on 3 separate children. The Seca 217 portable stadiometer was used for all height measurements and the HealthOMeter 844 KL scale was used for all weight measurements. BMI z-scores were calculated using software available from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute (http://stokes.chop.edu/web/zcore). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Systolic Blood Pressure Change | Change from baseline Systolic BP at 6 months | — |
| Heart Rate Change From Baseline to 6 Months | Change from baseline at 6 months | — |
| Shuttle Run Change in Number of Shuttle Runs | Change in number from baseline shuttle run at 6 months | The shuttle run was completed by participants at baseline (session 1) and at 6 months. The shuttle run is a standardized field assessment that requires participants to run 20 meters within sequentially shortened time frames of recorded beeps. |
| After School Screen Time as Reported on Questionnaire | Change from baseline at 6 months | Change in after school screen time (reported out as fraction of 1 hour) will be measured by subject response on questionnaire taken at baseline and at 6 months for both groups. After school screen time was defined as the amount of time spent on any screen, on the average weekday afternoon/evening, including: watching television, computer use (laptop, desk top, tablet) or playing video games on the television or other hand held device. |
| Saturday Screen Time as Assessed by Questionnaire | Change in hours from baseline at 6 months | Change in Saturday screen time (reported out as fraction of an hour) will be measured by subject response on questionnaire taken at baseline and at 6 months for both groups. Saturday screen time was defined as the amount of time spent on any screen, on an average Saturday, including: watching television, computer use (laptop, desk top, tablet) or playing video games on the television or other hand held device. |
| Activity Levels Measured by Pedometers (Weekly Steps) | Change from week 1 to week 24 | Activity will be measured by pedometers (number of steps) during week 1 and week 24 for both groups. Subjects used the Yamax 200 pedometer to count the steps they took over 1 weeks time. |
| Self Perception as Assessed Using the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile (CY-PSPP): Physical Self-Worth Changes in Physical Self-worth | Change from baseline at 6 months | CY-PSPP questionnaire was completed by participants in both groups at baseline and at 6 months. Change in the Physical Self-worth scores, which was 1 of 6 sub-domains, is analyzed. This sub-domain contains 6 questions with responses ranging from 1-4 for each question with 1 being the minimum and 4 being the maximum (best) score. The sub-domain score is then calculated as the mean of the 6 responses (minimum to maximum of 1 to 4).The change in score from baseline to 6 months was compared. |
| Self Perception as Assessed Using the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile (CY-PSPP): Global Self-Worth Score | Change from baseline to 6 months | CY-PSPP questionnaire was completed by participants in both groups at baseline and at 6 months. Change in the Global Self-worth scores, which was 1 of 6 sub-domains, is analyzed. This sub-domain contains 6 questions with responses ranging from 1-4 for each question with 1 being the minimum and 4 being the maximum (best) score. The sub-domain score is then calculated as the mean of the 6 responses (minimum to maximum of 1 to 4).The change in score from baseline to 6 months was compared. |
| Waist Circumference Change | Change from baseline at 6 months | — |
| Change in Dietary Intake: % Fat (Block Alive FFQ) | Change from baseline at 6 months | The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total %dietary fat intake per day is then estimated based upon participant responses. |
| Change in Dietary Intake: % Carbohydrates (Block Alive FFQ) | Change from baseline at 6 months | The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total % dietary carbohydrates is then estimated based upon participant responses. |
| Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Vegetable Servings (Block Alive FFQ) | Change from baseline at 6 months | The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total number of vegetable servings per day is then estimated based upon participant responses. |
| Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Fruit Servings (Block Alive FFQ) | Change from baseline at 6 months | The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total number of fruit servings per day is then estimated based upon participant responses. |
| Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Sugar Sweetened Beverages (Block Alive FFQ) | Change from baseline at 6 months | The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total number of sugar sweetened beverages per day is then estimated based upon participant responses. |
| Exergaming Program Component Influence on Attendance | 6 months | The experimental group will answer a questionnaire at the end of the 6 month study period, measuring the importance of specific components of the curriculum and motivators which influenced enrollment and compliance with participation. Of interest is measuring the influence of the exergaming curriculum as compared to these other factors. This is a 16-item, 3-point Likert-scale (1 = least important and 3 = most important) questionnaire created specifically for this study. Results were reported based on % of participants rating 3 ,most important, for each curriculum component. |
| Heart Rate Change | Change from 6 month Heart rate at 1 year | — |
| Dietary Change:Total Calorie Intake (kcal/Day) (Block Alive FFQ) | Change from baseline at 6 months | The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total kcal/kg/day is then estimated based upon participant responses. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Obese and overweight children (BMI ≥85th percentile) ages 8 through 12 years were referred to the program from their primary care practices or self-referred through advertisements distributed by the local park district and a community organization.
Pre-assignment details
Participants with medical, developmental or psychiatric diagnoses which precluded participation in the curriculum or those taking medication that could significantly affect weight were excluded. Eighty-four subjects, mean age 10.1 years (SD 1.3 years), participated in the study from April 2011 through September 2013.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching Participation of child and parent/guardian in 6 months of weight management programming consisting of exergaming combined with didactic teaching.
Exergaming and Didactic health teaching: 6 months of weight management programming consisting of 10 weekly 2- hour sessions:1 hour of exergaming and 1 hour of didactic classes teaching behavioral and dietary curricula. Followed by monthly 1-hour maintenance didactic teaching for the remainder of the 6 month period. | 60 |
| Didactic Health Teaching Participation of child and parent/guardian in 6 months of weight management programming consisting only of didactic teaching.
Didactic health teaching: 6 months of weight management programming consisting of 10 weekly 1-hour sessions of didactic classes teaching behavioral and dietary curricula. Followed by monthly 1-hour didactic health teaching sessions for the remainder of the 6 month period. | 24 |
| Total | 84 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 2 |
| Cohort 1 | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 |
| Cohort 2 | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 |
| Cohort 2 | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 3 |
| Cohort 3 | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Cohort 3 | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 0 |
| Cohort 4 | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Cohort 4 | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
| Cohort 5 | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 2 |
| Cohort 5 | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 2 |
| Cohort 6 | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 |
| Cohort 6 | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Didactic Health Teaching | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 10.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 | 10.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 | 10.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 |
| Baseline BMI z-score | 2.2 z-score | 2.2 z-score | 2.2 z-score |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 16 Participants | 6 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 39 Participants | 14 Participants | 53 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 37 Participants | 12 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 23 Participants | 12 Participants | 35 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 60 | 0 / 24 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 60 | 0 / 24 |
Outcome results
BMI Z-score Change
All subjects were asked to dress in light athletic clothing and have their weight and height measured at baseline (the first group session) and at 6 months. Research assistants were trained using guidelines from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Anthropometry Procedures Manual and demonstrated accurate measures on 3 separate children. The Seca 217 portable stadiometer was used for all height measurements and the HealthOMeter 844 KL scale was used for all weight measurements. BMI z-scores were calculated using software available from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute (http://stokes.chop.edu/web/zcore).
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | BMI Z-score Change | -0.057 z-score | Standard Deviation 0.118 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | BMI Z-score Change | 0.005 z-score | Standard Deviation 0.0917 |
BMI Z-score Change
Measure was only taken on the subjects who participated in the Intervention group (exergaming combined with didactic teaching).
Time frame: Change from baseline BMI z-score at 1 year
Population: Complete data was not available for all 35 subjects for this outcome measure. BMI z-score change from baseline to 1 year was only collected on 28 of the 35 participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | BMI Z-score Change | -0.0775 z-score |
Activity Levels Measured by Pedometers (Weekly Steps)
Activity will be measured by pedometers (number of steps) during week 1 and week 24 for both groups. Subjects used the Yamax 200 pedometer to count the steps they took over 1 weeks time.
Time frame: Change from week 1 to week 24
Population: Missing data: Data was not available from all participants from pedometer use at both the 1 week and 24 week mark, therefore, this analysis only includes 13/35 participant data from the Experimental group and 10/13 participant data collected from the Active comparator group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Activity Levels Measured by Pedometers (Weekly Steps) | -6626 steps | Standard Deviation 21810 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Activity Levels Measured by Pedometers (Weekly Steps) | -9059.5 steps | Standard Deviation 26688.91 |
After School Screen Time as Reported on Questionnaire
Change in after school screen time (reported out as fraction of 1 hour) will be measured by subject response on questionnaire taken at baseline and at 6 months for both groups. After school screen time was defined as the amount of time spent on any screen, on the average weekday afternoon/evening, including: watching television, computer use (laptop, desk top, tablet) or playing video games on the television or other hand held device.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing Data: Survey data regarding after school screen time was collected from participants at baseline and again at 6 months. Not all participants completed both surveys, therefore, analysis for this outcome measure only included 28/35 participants from the Experimental group and 8/13 participants from the Active comparator group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | After School Screen Time as Reported on Questionnaire | -0.7589 hours | Standard Deviation 3.068 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | After School Screen Time as Reported on Questionnaire | 0.188 hours | Standard Deviation 1.368 |
Change in Dietary Intake: % Carbohydrates (Block Alive FFQ)
The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total % dietary carbohydrates is then estimated based upon participant responses.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing data: Not all participants completed this survey at both time points. 28/35 from the Experimental group had complete response and 10/13 from the Active comparator group had complete response regarding %carbohydrates in their daily diet. Analysis was completed on the available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: % Carbohydrates (Block Alive FFQ) | 2.10 percentage of carbohydrates | Standard Deviation 8.49 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: % Carbohydrates (Block Alive FFQ) | -5.12 percentage of carbohydrates | Standard Deviation 7.95 |
Change in Dietary Intake: % Fat (Block Alive FFQ)
The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total %dietary fat intake per day is then estimated based upon participant responses.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing data: Not all participants completed this survey at both time points. 28/35 from the Experimental group had complete response and 10/13 from the Active comparator group had complete response regarding the %fat in their daily diet. Analysis was completed on the available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: % Fat (Block Alive FFQ) | -1.25 percentage of fat | Standard Deviation 8.49 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: % Fat (Block Alive FFQ) | 3.00 percentage of fat | Standard Deviation 7.09 |
Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Fruit Servings (Block Alive FFQ)
The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total number of fruit servings per day is then estimated based upon participant responses.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing data: Not all participants completed this survey at both time points. 25/35 from the Experimental group had complete response and 9/13 from the Active comparator group had complete response regarding daily fruit intake. Analysis was completed on the available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Fruit Servings (Block Alive FFQ) | -0.13255 Servings | Standard Deviation 0.523 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Fruit Servings (Block Alive FFQ) | 0.663 Servings | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Sugar Sweetened Beverages (Block Alive FFQ)
The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total number of sugar sweetened beverages per day is then estimated based upon participant responses.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing data: Not all participants completed this survey at both time points. 27/35 from the Experimental group had complete response and 10/13 from the Active comparator group had complete response regarding sugar sweetened beverage daily intake. Analysis was completed on the available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Sugar Sweetened Beverages (Block Alive FFQ) | -2.572 servings | Standard Deviation 8.402 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Sugar Sweetened Beverages (Block Alive FFQ) | -3.2374 servings | Standard Deviation 2.44 |
Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Vegetable Servings (Block Alive FFQ)
The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total number of vegetable servings per day is then estimated based upon participant responses.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing data: Not all participants completed this survey at both time points. 25/35 from the Experimental group had complete response and 9/13 from the Active comparator group had complete response regarding daily vegetable intake. Analysis was completed on the available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Vegetable Servings (Block Alive FFQ) | 0.0078 servings | Standard Deviation 0.7755 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Change in Dietary Intake: Number of Vegetable Servings (Block Alive FFQ) | 0.8248 servings | Standard Deviation 2.06 |
Dietary Change:Total Calorie Intake (kcal/Day) (Block Alive FFQ)
The Block Alive FFQ: administered at the start and at 6 months to all participants in both groups. FFQ inquires about typical dietary patterns over the previous six months. Total kcal/kg/day is then estimated based upon participant responses.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing data: Not all participants completed this survey at both time points. 28/35 from the Experimental group had complete response and 10/13 from the Active comparator group had complete response. Analysis was completed on the available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Dietary Change:Total Calorie Intake (kcal/Day) (Block Alive FFQ) | -292.92 kcal/day | Standard Deviation 386.7 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Dietary Change:Total Calorie Intake (kcal/Day) (Block Alive FFQ) | -45 kcal/day | Standard Deviation 358.5 |
Exergaming Program Component Influence on Attendance
The experimental group will answer a questionnaire at the end of the 6 month study period, measuring the importance of specific components of the curriculum and motivators which influenced enrollment and compliance with participation. Of interest is measuring the influence of the exergaming curriculum as compared to these other factors. This is a 16-item, 3-point Likert-scale (1 = least important and 3 = most important) questionnaire created specifically for this study. Results were reported based on % of participants rating 3 ,most important, for each curriculum component.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Exergaming Program Component Influence on Attendance | 71 percentage of subjects |
Heart Rate Change
Time frame: Change from 6 month Heart rate at 1 year
Population: One year data was only collected for the participants assigned to the Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching group. Heart rate data was collected at 6 month and 1 year for 27/35 of the participants. Available data was analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Heart Rate Change | 2.7407 beats per minute |
Heart Rate Change From Baseline to 6 Months
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing Data: Heart rate measurements at baseline and at 6 months was only available for 33/35 Experimental group participants and 12/13 Active comparator group participants. Not all participants attended the 6 month measurement/data collection visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Heart Rate Change From Baseline to 6 Months | -9.9 beats per minute | Standard Deviation 13.77 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Heart Rate Change From Baseline to 6 Months | -7.0 beats per minute | Standard Deviation 9.69 |
Saturday Screen Time as Assessed by Questionnaire
Change in Saturday screen time (reported out as fraction of an hour) will be measured by subject response on questionnaire taken at baseline and at 6 months for both groups. Saturday screen time was defined as the amount of time spent on any screen, on an average Saturday, including: watching television, computer use (laptop, desk top, tablet) or playing video games on the television or other hand held device.
Time frame: Change in hours from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing Data: Survey data regarding Saturday screen time was collected from participants at baseline and again at 6 months. Not all participants completed both surveys, therefore, analysis for this outcome measure only included 28/35 participants from the Experimental group and 8/13 participants from the Active comparator group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Saturday Screen Time as Assessed by Questionnaire | -1.4 hours | Standard Deviation 3.36 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Saturday Screen Time as Assessed by Questionnaire | -0.3438 hours | Standard Deviation 2.36 |
Self Perception as Assessed Using the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile (CY-PSPP): Global Self-Worth Score
CY-PSPP questionnaire was completed by participants in both groups at baseline and at 6 months. Change in the Global Self-worth scores, which was 1 of 6 sub-domains, is analyzed. This sub-domain contains 6 questions with responses ranging from 1-4 for each question with 1 being the minimum and 4 being the maximum (best) score. The sub-domain score is then calculated as the mean of the 6 responses (minimum to maximum of 1 to 4).The change in score from baseline to 6 months was compared.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Population: Missing Data: The CY-PSPP questionnaire was not completed by all participants at both the baseline visit and the 6 month mark. Therefore this analysis only includes data for participants who completed the questionnaire at both times: 26/35 from the Experimental group and 7/13 from the Active Comparator group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Self Perception as Assessed Using the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile (CY-PSPP): Global Self-Worth Score | -0.238 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.525 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Self Perception as Assessed Using the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile (CY-PSPP): Global Self-Worth Score | -0.523 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
Self Perception as Assessed Using the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile (CY-PSPP): Physical Self-Worth Changes in Physical Self-worth
CY-PSPP questionnaire was completed by participants in both groups at baseline and at 6 months. Change in the Physical Self-worth scores, which was 1 of 6 sub-domains, is analyzed. This sub-domain contains 6 questions with responses ranging from 1-4 for each question with 1 being the minimum and 4 being the maximum (best) score. The sub-domain score is then calculated as the mean of the 6 responses (minimum to maximum of 1 to 4).The change in score from baseline to 6 months was compared.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Missing Data: The CY-PSPP questionnaire was not completed by all participants at both the baseline visit and the 6 month mark. Therefore this analysis only includes data for participants who completed the questionnaire at both times: 26/35 from the Experimental group and 7/13 from the Active Comparator group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Self Perception as Assessed Using the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile (CY-PSPP): Physical Self-Worth Changes in Physical Self-worth | -0.218 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.746 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Self Perception as Assessed Using the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile (CY-PSPP): Physical Self-Worth Changes in Physical Self-worth | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.385 |
Shuttle Run Change in Number of Shuttle Runs
The shuttle run was completed again by participants in the Experimental group at 1 year. The shuttle run is a standardized field assessment that requires participants to run 20 meters within sequentially shortened time frames of recorded beeps.
Time frame: Change in number from 6 month shuttle run at 1 year
Population: One year data was only collected for the participants assigned to the Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching group. Shuttle run was completed by 20/35 participants in the Experimental group at both 6 months and 1 year. Available data was analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Shuttle Run Change in Number of Shuttle Runs | 0.10 number of runs |
Shuttle Run Change in Number of Shuttle Runs
The shuttle run was completed by participants at baseline (session 1) and at 6 months. The shuttle run is a standardized field assessment that requires participants to run 20 meters within sequentially shortened time frames of recorded beeps.
Time frame: Change in number from baseline shuttle run at 6 months
Population: Missing Data: Shuttle run was completed by participants at baseline and at 6 months to document the change in number of runs. Not all participants attended the 6 month measurement visit, therefore, complete data was only available on 24/35 of the Experimental group and 13/13 of the Active comparator group. Available data was analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Shuttle Run Change in Number of Shuttle Runs | 0.213 number of runs | Standard Deviation 0.4014 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Shuttle Run Change in Number of Shuttle Runs | -0.00085 number of runs | Standard Deviation 0.376 |
Systolic Blood Pressure Change
Time frame: Change from 6 month Systolic BP at 1 year
Population: One year data was only collected for the participants assigned to the Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching group. Systolic blood pressure was only documented at 6 months and 1 year for 27/35 of the participants. Available data is what was analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Systolic Blood Pressure Change | 3.5185 mmHg |
Systolic Blood Pressure Change
Time frame: Change from baseline Systolic BP at 6 months
Population: Incomplete data available for analysis. Blood pressure was taken and documented at baseline and at 6 months, however, not all participants were in attendance. Complete data was only available for 33/35 Experimental group participants and 12/13 from the Active comparator group. Available data was analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Systolic Blood Pressure Change | 1 mmHg | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Systolic Blood Pressure Change | 0 mmHg | Standard Deviation 15 |
Waist Circumference Change
Time frame: Change from 6 month waist circumference at 1 year
Population: One year data was only collected for the participants assigned to the Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching group. Only 25/35 participants had waist measurements collected at both 6 months and 1 year. Available data was analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Waist Circumference Change | 1.52 cm |
Waist Circumference Change
Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Population: Incomplete data available for analysis. Change in waist circumference from baseline to 6 month measurements was only collected on 34/35 of the Experimental group and 8/13 of the Active comparator group. The other participants did not show up for the 6 month measurements.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exergaming and Didactic Health Teaching | Waist Circumference Change | -0.50 cm | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
| Didactic Health Teaching | Waist Circumference Change | -0.51 cm | Standard Deviation 5.12 |