Health Behavior
Conditions
Keywords
agent-based modeling, community resources, simulation modeling, information intervention, clinic-to-community linkages
Brief summary
CommunityRx is a health information technology-based innovation that, starting with the patient-health care provider encounter, facilitates self-care coordination for patients, caregivers, and providers. The CommunityRx database interfaces with electronic medical records to provide patients with a HealtheRx. A HealtheRx is a list of community-based self-care resources tailored to the patients health needs (e.g., a person with diabetes receives information about podiatrists, nutrition classes, and other resources need to manage diabetes). CommunityRx aims to measurably improve health and health care while reducing health care costs especially in underserved health care settings. Specifically, the proposed research aims to 1) evaluate the impact of CommunityRx on health care utilization, cost, health, and patient-centered outcomes for program participants compared to controls; 2) examine the flow and spread of information to and through primary agents including: program participants, community health information experts, healthcare providers, and community-based service providers (businesses and organizations providing self-care resources); and 3) build and use an agent-based model to test the distributed impact, including economic effects, of CommunityRx system adoption on the demonstration area and predict performance over time by conducting experiments that vary assumptions about agent, environment, and population-level characteristics.
Detailed description
CommunityRx connects health care to self-care. CommunityRx begins with the medical encounter and functions like an e-prescribing system, modeled after medication e-prescribing.9 Rather than sending a medication prescription to the patient's pharmacy, a HealtheRx prescription is automatically generated at the point of care, delivered to the patient in paper (or electronic) form and stored in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for future reference. The HealtheRx is ontologically-generated, driven by standard demographic (eg. age, gender, address, language) data fields in the EMR and customized to patient problems/diagnoses like homelessness, or obesity. Like e-prescribing medicine, CommunityRx involves prescribing, fulfillment (patient signs up for a Weight Watchers class), and administration (patient participates in the weight loss program) (Fig. 2).10 The HealtheRx prescription is the primary information agent in the system, driven by simple ontologic rules that generate complexity, including iteration of the CommunityRx system itself, as human agents interact with the self-care information. CommunityRx can be best understood as part of a complex adaptive system. The HealtheRx, in contrast to a drug prescription, is designed specifically to enhance the interpersonal aspect of the patient-physician encounter, informing both agents about self-care resources. A patient receives a HealtheRx and then contacts a Community Health Information Specialist (CHIS) or not. She seeks self-care resources or not. Data captured by the CommunityRx system about patient referrals and needs are distributed to community-based service providers (CBSPs) in the form of quarterly reports delivered to CBSP contacts cultivated by CHIS. These data efficiently reveal to CBSPs real-time needs and gaps in self-care resources. The investigators hypothesize these data will be used by CBSPs over time to ensure supply. Youth who generate community resource data through employment with MAPSCorps also gain insight to community resources and engage with CBSP personnel and CHIS as they gather their data. Youth spread information to their networks about community resources and increase their use of these resources. MAPSCorps data about community resources are shared publicly (www.healtherx.org, www.southsidehealth.org, www.dondeesta.org). Self-care becomes more efficient. Supply meets demand. Patients and providers have more time and resources to devote to other salubrious activities and CBSPs become stronger. Over time, transparency in the market for self-care resources increases competition and quality. This hypothetical dynamic is an example of emergent self-organization from a complex adaptive system. The intervention starts with a simple encounter, governed by simple rules, between patient and health care provider. As the number of these encounters grow, previously siloed sectors - health care and self-care - evolve a new kind of formation that is far more efficient for the community than the current state. CommunityRx drives this new formation through multiple agents who are unaware of the complexity they are producing: …the self-organized structure simply emerges as a result of each individual doing their own thing, independently. In evaluating the economic effects of CommunityRx adoption, agent-based modeling (ABM) can test how close the attractor state, or end-point in a CommunityRx system configuration (set of assumed behaviors and designed interventions), comes to a Pareto efficient point of equilibrium. The effects of the CommunityRx intervention are non-linear, involve interactions and feedback loops, and therefore require a complex system modeling approach for evaluation. A. Purpose or Hypothesis Data inputs for agent based modeling (ABM) can come from a range of sources, including empirical quantitative and qualitative data, data from the literature, and expert opinion. Because CommunityRx targets people of all ages (0-99 yrs, to date), a prospective, experimental, community-based design (eg. RCT) to assess outcomes by age strata would be very informative about patient agents (the investigators expect age-group differences in behavior, social networks, and outcomes) but cost-prohibitive. ABM can accommodate assumptions made based on this important, but specific, population subgroup (or testbed), includes many agents, and allows for multiple simulations to assess the impact of variations in those assumptions for the much larger and more diverse population that the system-wide model includes. A cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to understand the true economic impact of CommunityRx on the total cost of the burden of disease. In addition, the research team brings clinical and research expertise and specialized interest in middle-age and older adult populations with chronic disease. Focusing on this subgroup builds on this track record and will meaningfully extend our contributions to the gerontology and geriatrics fields. Specifically, the aims (and associated hypotheses) of this research include: Aim 1. Evaluate the impact of CommunityRx on health care utilization, cost, health, and patient-centered outcomes for program participants (patients who receive care at the clinical demonstration sites and live in an 16 zip code area) compared to controls (patients who receive health care at the demonstration sites, but live outside the 16 zip code area), with a special focus on middle-age and older adults. Aim 1a. Evaluate the impact of CommunityRx on health care utilization, health care costs, and on health outcomes for program participants (patients who receive care at the clinical demonstration sites and live in an 16 zip code area) compared to controls (patients who receive health care at the demonstration sites, but live outside the 11 zip code area) of all ages. NOTE: This aim is funded separately and registered on clinicaltrials.gov separately (see ID 1C1CMS330997). Hypothesis: CommunityRx will decrease emergency/inpatient care utilization, decrease percent per beneficiary per year (%PBPY) costs and improve health. Aim 1b. Evaluate the impact of the CommunityRx system on patient-centered outcomes in a randomized control trail of 200 program participants ages 45-74 and compared to 200 controls. Hypothesis: CommunityRx will be associated with clinically meaningful improvements in: a) self-care behavior; b) perceived care quality; and c) quality of life. Aim 1c. Characterize the economic value of care augmented with the CommunityRx system compared to usual care, based on the prospective participant-control study described in Aim 1b. Hypothesis: Compared to usual care, care augmented with the CommunityRx system will be as cost-effective as commonly accepted medical devices and treatments. Aim 2. Examine the flow and spread of information to and through primary agents including: program participants, community health information specialists, healthcare providers, and community-based service providers (businesses and organizations providing self-care resources). Hypotheses: 1) Among the CBSPs receiving high volumes of CommunityRx referrals for people ≥45 years old (\>1000/year), CommunityRx will produce a self-reported increase in: a) knowledge of community resources especially for older adults, b) referrals to other CBSPs, c) older client volume, and d) aging-related goods/services /programs inventory; and 2) Delivery of the CommunityRx intervention at the point of medical care produces knowledge about self-care resources in the community that spreads to secondary agents including members of patient and provider social networks. Aim 3. Build and use an agent-based model to test the distributed impact, including economic effects, of CommunityRx adoption on the demonstration area and predict performance over time by conducting experiments that vary assumptions about agent, environment, and population-level characteristics. Hypotheses: 1) The system-level value of CommunityRx is greater than the value quantified as %PBPY health care utilization savings and is projected to increase with population aging; 2) Experiments run on a systems-based model will predict and quantify the impact of strategies to optimize CommunityRx performance for improvements, sustainability, and spread to other settings; and 3) Systems-Based Modeling is an effective and efficient tool for large-scale evaluation of a health information technology-based intervention to improve health and health care.
Interventions
The HealtheRx is an informational intervention. The HealtheRx is generated and administered at the point of care. It includes a list of community resources, tailored to a patient's needs based on diagnoses, that are located near the patient's home. A health care provider and/or administrative staff administers and reviews the HealtheRx with the patient.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 45-74 years old * Medicaid and/or Medicare beneficiary * Living in 1 of the 16 zip codes served by CommunityRx * Seen at University of Chicago primary care or emergency department
Exclusion criteria
* Recollection of previous receipt of a HealtheRx
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months | Assessed at Baseline, 1 Week, 1 Month and 3 Months; score at 3 months reported | Health-related quality of life will be measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) . Minimum value=0, maximum value=100. Higher scores equal better mental health. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Cost Effectiveness at 3 Months | Baseline, 3 months | Using claims data and self-reported data on heath care utilization, we will use data from intervention baseline and at 3 months following the intervention to assess the cost effectiveness of HealtheRx. |
| Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months | Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; 3 months reported here | Patient satisfaction will be measures using the domain of general satisfaction from the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) |
| Physical Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months | Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; 3 months reported | Health-related quality of life will be measured using the Short Form-12 (SF-12). Minimum value=0, maximum value=100. Higher scores equal better physical health. |
| Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; score at 3 months reported | Measure confidence in ability to find services to take care of health |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Access to Resources - Rent/Mortgage as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure perceived and self-reported access to help paying rent or mortgage |
| Self-efficacy - Smoking Cessation as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure confidence in ability to quit smoking |
| Access to Resources - Weight Loss Class or Support Group as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure perceived and self-reported access to weight loss classes or support groups |
| Self-efficacy - Eating Healthy as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure confidence in ability to eat healthy |
| Self-efficacy - Exercise as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure confidence in ability to exercise |
| Self-efficacy - Weight as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure confidence in ability to manage weight |
| Access to Resources - Healthy Eating Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure perceived and self-reported access to health eating classes |
| Access to Resources - Counseling as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure perceived and self-reported access to counseling |
| Access to Resources - Smoking Cessation Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure perceived and self-reported access to smoking cessation classes |
| Access to Resources - Stress Management Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months | Measure perceived and self-reported access to stress management classes |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
No participants were excluded after enrollment, prior to randomization.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Control Arm The control group will receive usual care, no HealtheRx. | 202 |
| Intervention Arm The intervention arm will receive the intervention, a HealtheRx, which includes a list of resources in their community tailored to their health needs.
HealtheRx: The HealtheRx is an informational intervention. The HealtheRx is generated and administered at the point of care. It includes a list of community resources, tailored to a patient's needs based on diagnoses, that are located near the patient's home. A health care provider and/or administrative staff administers and reviews the HealtheRx with the patient. | 209 |
| Total | 411 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Intervention Arm | Control Arm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 60.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 | 60.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 |
| Confidence in finding resources Completely confident | 134 Participants | 68 Participants | 66 Participants |
| Confidence in finding resources Not at all confident | 47 Participants | 22 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Confidence in finding resources Not very confident | 48 Participants | 22 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Confidence in finding resources Somewhat confident | 132 Participants | 70 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Confidence in finding resources Uncertain | 50 Participants | 27 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic/Latino | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Non-Hispanic Black | 370 Participants | 187 Participants | 183 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Non-Hispanic White | 23 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 12 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 411 Participants | 209 Participants | 202 Participants |
| Self-reported health Good | 128 Participants | 68 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Self-reported health Poor or fair | 208 Participants | 104 Participants | 104 Participants |
| Self-reported health Very good or excellent | 75 Participants | 37 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 281 Participants | 152 Participants | 129 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 130 Participants | 57 Participants | 73 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 202 | 0 / 209 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 202 | 0 / 209 |
Outcome results
Mental Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) . Minimum value=0, maximum value=100. Higher scores equal better mental health.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, 1 Week, 1 Month and 3 Months; score at 3 months reported
Population: The below mean includes only those who completed the 3 month follow-up survey; 1 control and 2 cases participated in the 3 months survey but did not complete the SF-12 needed for this data point
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | Mental Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months | 50.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Intervention Arm | Mental Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months | 48.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
Change From Baseline in Cost Effectiveness at 3 Months
Using claims data and self-reported data on heath care utilization, we will use data from intervention baseline and at 3 months following the intervention to assess the cost effectiveness of HealtheRx.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months
Population: We were unable to obtain the claims data necessary to conduct the cost effectiveness analysis.
Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Patient satisfaction will be measures using the domain of general satisfaction from the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18)
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; 3 months reported here
Population: Includes participates who completed 3 month survey; 1 control and 3 cases did not complete the PSQ.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months | 4.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Intervention Arm | Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months | 4.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
Physical Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the Short Form-12 (SF-12). Minimum value=0, maximum value=100. Higher scores equal better physical health.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; 3 months reported
Population: The below mean includes only participants with completed 3 month follow-up surveys; 1 control and 2 cases did not complete the SF-12 items needed to calculate this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | Physical Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months | 38.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Intervention Arm | Physical Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months | 38.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire
Measure confidence in ability to find services to take care of health
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; score at 3 months reported
Population: The below results include only those with 3 month follow-up data; 1 control and 3 cases did not complete this survey item during the 3 month follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Not very confident | 17 Participants |
| Control Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Somewhat confident | 57 Participants |
| Control Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Uncertain | 5 Participants |
| Control Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Completely confident | 51 Participants |
| Control Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Not at all confident | 27 Participants |
| Intervention Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Completely confident | 65 Participants |
| Intervention Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Not at all confident | 15 Participants |
| Intervention Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Not very confident | 15 Participants |
| Intervention Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Uncertain | 4 Participants |
| Intervention Arm | Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire | Somewhat confident | 72 Participants |
Access to Resources - Counseling as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
Measure perceived and self-reported access to counseling
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Healthy Eating Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
Measure perceived and self-reported access to health eating classes
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Rent/Mortgage as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
Measure perceived and self-reported access to help paying rent or mortgage
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Smoking Cessation Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
Measure perceived and self-reported access to smoking cessation classes
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Stress Management Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
Measure perceived and self-reported access to stress management classes
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Weight Loss Class or Support Group as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
Measure perceived and self-reported access to weight loss classes or support groups
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Self-efficacy - Eating Healthy as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale
Measure confidence in ability to eat healthy
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Self-efficacy - Exercise as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale
Measure confidence in ability to exercise
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Self-efficacy - Smoking Cessation as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale
Measure confidence in ability to quit smoking
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Self-efficacy - Weight as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale
Measure confidence in ability to manage weight
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months