Skip to content

A Safety and Efficacy Study of JNJ-42165279 in Participants With Social Anxiety Disorder

A Phase 2a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multi-center Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-42165279 in Subjects With Social Anxiety Disorder.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02432703
Enrollment
150
Registered
2015-05-04
Start date
2015-06-11
Completion date
2018-08-09
Last updated
2025-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Phobic Disorders

Keywords

Social Anxiety Disorder, JNJ-42165279

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of JNJ-42165279 during 12 weeks of treatment in participants with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD).

Detailed description

This is a Phase 2a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the Investigator nor the participants know about the study intervention), placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study of JNJ-42165279 in participants with social anxiety disorder. Participants will receive 25 milligram (mg) JNJ-42165279 or matching placebo orally once-daily from Day 1 up to 12 weeks. Participants will primarily be assessed for the change from baseline in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) at Week 12. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

Participants will receive 25 milligram (mg) JNJ-42165279 orally once-daily from Day 1 up to 12 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive a matching placebo orally once-daily from Day 1 up to 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have a primary DSM-5 diagnosis of Social anxiety disorder (SAD) except those with performance only as a specifier. Participants with a diagnosis of comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) or Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) may be included if the Investigator considers SAD to be the predominant diagnosis. Participants with current or lifetime history of Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and specific phobia may be included as well * Must have a Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale score greater than or equal (\>=) 70 at Screening and Baseline * Participants with a current episode of MDD must have a HDRS17 total score less than or equal to (\<=) 18 * Must have a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 35 kilogram per meter square (kg/m\^2), inclusive, at screening * Female participants must be either postmenopausal or surgically sterile

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who have performance only SAD are excluded. Participants with other current significant psychiatric condition(s) (Axis 1 under DSM-IV), including, but not limited to, MDD with psychotic features (lifetime), bipolar disorder (including lifetime diagnosis), obsessive-compulsive disorder, borderline personality disorder, eating disorder (e.g., bulimia, anorexia nervosa), autism spectrum disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or schizophrenia are excluded. Participants with a diagnosis of comorbid GAD or MDD may be included * Participants is currently receiving specific psychotherapy for SAD * Has a history of more than two unsuccessful adequate pharmacological treatment trials for SAD, defined as lack of response to at least 10 weeks of treatment at adequate doses (e.g., paroxetine \>= 40 milligram per day (mg/day) or its equivalent; or clonazepam \>= 2.5 mg/day or its equivalent) * Concurrent use of psychotropic medications * has a history of or current thyroid disease, thyroid dysfunction and is currently untreated for it

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) Total ScoreBaseline and Week 12The LSAS is a 24-item, semi-structured interview on the severity of Social Anxiety Disorder. The LSAS separately assesses fear and avoidance of 24 social situations. The scale is divided into 2 subscales, 13 situations concerning performance anxiety, and 11 situations pertaining to social situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear/anxiety and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of social anxiety disorder (SAD).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline (Responders) on LSAS Total ScoreWeek 12Responders are participants with \>= 50% improvement from baseline. The LSAS scale consists of 24 items which are divided into 2 subscales that address social interactional (11 items) and performance (13 items) situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD.
Percentage of Participants With >=30% Improvement From Baseline (Remitters) on LSAS Total ScoreWeek 12Remitters are participants with \>= 30% improvement from baseline on LSAS total score. The LSAS scale consists of 24 items which are divided into 2 subscales that address social interactional (11 items) and performance (13 items) situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD.
Change From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total ScoreBaseline and Week 12The SIGH-A was included to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety, including participants with comorbid generalized anxiety disorders (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicated higher severity (0-absent, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe, 4-incapacitating). The SIGH-A total score was calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicated worse results.
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM)-A6 ScoreBaseline and Week 12The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A). It comprises of five psychic anxiety symptoms: anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview, as well as one somatic item, muscular tension. Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.
Change From Baseline in LSAS Fear/Anxiety and Avoidance SubscalesBaseline and Week 12The LSAS is a 24-item, semi-structured interview on the severity of Social Anxiety Disorder. The LSAS separately assesses fear and avoidance of 24 social situations. The scale is divided into 2 subscales, 13 situations concerning performance anxiety, and 11 situations pertaining to social situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually). Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD. The LSAS fear/anxiety and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72.
Change From Baseline in HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total ScoreBaseline and Week 12The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: the items for psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor total score was calculated as the sum of the 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.
Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total ScoreBaseline and Week 12A 6-item subscale from the HDRS17 (HAM-D6) was analyzed as it had been shown to be a uni-dimensional scale that provided information to core depressive symptoms and was sensitive to treatment response. The six items were: depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and general somatics (tiredness and pains). Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatics is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 total score was calculated by summing the 6 items scores, and ranges from 0 to 22. Higher scores indicated greater severity of core symptoms.
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreWeek 12The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. Percentage of participants with change from baseline (very much improved or much improved and Worsening or no change) in CGI-I score were reported.
Percentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline (Responders) in SIGH-A Total ScoreBaseline, Week 12Responders are participants with \>= 50% improvement from baseline in SIGH-A total score. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicated higher severity (0-absent, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3 severe, 4-incapacitating). The SIGH-A total score was calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicated worse results.
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-17 Total ScoreBaseline and Week 12The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess the severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression with a score range of 0 to 52. Each of the 17 items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding the scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Among 150 participants, one participant was randomized by error. Only 149 participants received treatment and were included in the analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants with social anxiety disorder (SAD) received matching placebo orally once daily for 12 weeks.
75
JNJ-42165279 25 mg
Participants with SAD received JNJ-42165279 25 milligrams (mg) orally once daily for 12 weeks.
74
Total149

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event14
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up53
Overall StudyOther65
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicJNJ-42165279 25 mgTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.53
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.07
37.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.65
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants22 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
61 Participants127 Participants66 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
18 Participants33 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
50 Participants95 Participants45 Participants
Region of Enrollment
AUSTRALIA
12 Participants23 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
CANADA
12 Participants26 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
50 Participants100 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants52 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
48 Participants97 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 750 / 74
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 7526 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 752 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) Total Score

The LSAS is a 24-item, semi-structured interview on the severity of Social Anxiety Disorder. The LSAS separately assesses fear and avoidance of 24 social situations. The scale is divided into 2 subscales, 13 situations concerning performance anxiety, and 11 situations pertaining to social situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear/anxiety and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of social anxiety disorder (SAD).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) Total Score-22.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.57
JNJ-42165279 25 mgChange From Baseline in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) Total Score-29.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.47
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score

A 6-item subscale from the HDRS17 (HAM-D6) was analyzed as it had been shown to be a uni-dimensional scale that provided information to core depressive symptoms and was sensitive to treatment response. The six items were: depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and general somatics (tiredness and pains). Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatics is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 total score was calculated by summing the 6 items scores, and ranges from 0 to 22. Higher scores indicated greater severity of core symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
JNJ-42165279 25 mgChange From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM)-A6 Score

The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A). It comprises of five psychic anxiety symptoms: anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview, as well as one somatic item, muscular tension. Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM)-A6 Score-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.32
JNJ-42165279 25 mgChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM)-A6 Score-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.79
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-17 Total Score

The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess the severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression with a score range of 0 to 52. Each of the 17 items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding the scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-17 Total Score-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.71
JNJ-42165279 25 mgChange From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-17 Total Score-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.99
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score

The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: the items for psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor total score was calculated as the sum of the 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
JNJ-42165279 25 mgChange From Baseline in HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline in LSAS Fear/Anxiety and Avoidance Subscales

The LSAS is a 24-item, semi-structured interview on the severity of Social Anxiety Disorder. The LSAS separately assesses fear and avoidance of 24 social situations. The scale is divided into 2 subscales, 13 situations concerning performance anxiety, and 11 situations pertaining to social situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually). Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD. The LSAS fear/anxiety and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in LSAS Fear/Anxiety and Avoidance SubscalesFear/Anxiety-10.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in LSAS Fear/Anxiety and Avoidance SubscalesAvoidance-11.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.16
JNJ-42165279 25 mgChange From Baseline in LSAS Fear/Anxiety and Avoidance SubscalesFear/Anxiety-14.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.65
JNJ-42165279 25 mgChange From Baseline in LSAS Fear/Anxiety and Avoidance SubscalesAvoidance-14.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.45
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score

The SIGH-A was included to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety, including participants with comorbid generalized anxiety disorders (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicated higher severity (0-absent, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe, 4-incapacitating). The SIGH-A total score was calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicated worse results.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
JNJ-42165279 25 mgChange From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With >=30% Improvement From Baseline (Remitters) on LSAS Total Score

Remitters are participants with \>= 30% improvement from baseline on LSAS total score. The LSAS scale consists of 24 items which are divided into 2 subscales that address social interactional (11 items) and performance (13 items) situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >=30% Improvement From Baseline (Remitters) on LSAS Total Score23.6 percentage of participants
JNJ-42165279 25 mgPercentage of Participants With >=30% Improvement From Baseline (Remitters) on LSAS Total Score42.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline (Responders) in SIGH-A Total Score

Responders are participants with \>= 50% improvement from baseline in SIGH-A total score. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicated higher severity (0-absent, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3 severe, 4-incapacitating). The SIGH-A total score was calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicated worse results.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline (Responders) in SIGH-A Total Score47.3 percentage of participants
JNJ-42165279 25 mgPercentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline (Responders) in SIGH-A Total Score45.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) Score

The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. Percentage of participants with change from baseline (very much improved or much improved and Worsening or no change) in CGI-I score were reported.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreVery much improved or much improved23.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreWorsening or no change45.5 percentage of participants
JNJ-42165279 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreVery much improved or much improved44.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-42165279 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreWorsening or no change35.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline (Responders) on LSAS Total Score

Responders are participants with \>= 50% improvement from baseline. The LSAS scale consists of 24 items which are divided into 2 subscales that address social interactional (11 items) and performance (13 items) situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study agent (either placebo or JNJ-42165279), and had at least 1 assessment in the double-blind treatment phase on any of the efficacy parameters.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline (Responders) on LSAS Total Score12.7 percentage of participants
JNJ-42165279 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline (Responders) on LSAS Total Score18.6 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026