Skip to content

Anterior Screw Fixation Versus Halo Immobilization of Type II Odontoid Fractures in Geriatric Patients With Increased Anesthesia Risk

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02432495
Enrollment
80
Registered
2015-05-04
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Fractures

Brief summary

The management of type II odontoid fractures in geriatric trauma victims remains a source of substantial controversy. The purpose of this study was to compare anterior screw fixation with halo-vest-immobilization in patients with type II odontoid fractures.

Interventions

OTHERANTERIOR SCREW FIXATION

Patients aged 65 years or older with an ASA score of 2 or higher who had undergone anterior screw fixation of type II odontoid fractures

OTHERHALOV VEST IMMOBILIZATION

Patients aged 65 years or older with an ASA score of 2 or higher who had undergone halo immobilization of type II odontoid fractures

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients aged 65 years or older with an ASA (= American society of anesthesiologists) score of 2 or higher * complete sets of collected data and a follow-up monitoring of at least five years

Exclusion criteria

* type III odontoid fractures * patients with incomplete data sets * patients with penetrating mechanism of injury or congenital cervical spine anomalies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
neurological deficitsat least 60 months follow upNeurologic deficits measured including the CSOQ (Cervical Spine Outcome Questionnaire) before and after surgery as well as compared in both procedure groups
radiographic outcome (documentation of boney union)at least 60 months follow updocumentation of boney union compared in both procedure groups

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026