Skip to content

Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Gonadotropin Suppression of Nestorone®-Testosterone (NES/T) Combination Gel in Men

A Randomized, Two Center, Double-Blind Trial to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Gonadotropin Suppression of Nestorone®-Testosterone (NES/T) Combination Gel in Healthy Men

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02432261
Enrollment
44
Registered
2015-05-04
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2025-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

spermatogenesis, androgen, male contraception

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, two-center trial to evaluate the gonadotropin suppressive activity of transdermal treatment with a combined NES/T gel, or T gel alone, for 28 days.

Detailed description

A total of 45 subjects will be enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups. A description of each group is as follows: * Group 1 (30 subjects): 5.0 mL of the 1.62% combined gel (containing 8.3 mg NES + 62.5 mg T) applied each day on the arms and shoulders * Group 2 (15 subjects): 4.4 mL of the 1.62% AndrogelTM (containing 62.7 mg T) applied each day to the arms and shoulders The total duration of treatment will be 28 days followed by a 72 hour sampling period to assess half-life and a recovery period of at least 28 days, at which point the subjects will return to the clinic for an end of study visit.

Interventions

DRUGNestorone® /testosterone gel

Nestorone® /testosterone combined gel

DRUGTestosterone only gel

Testosterone only gel

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Kimberly Myer
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male volunteers in good health as confirmed by physical examination, medical history, and clinical laboratory tests of blood and urine at the time of screening; 2. 18 to 50 years of age; 3. BMI \< 33 calculated as weight in Kg/(height in cm)2; 4. No history of hormonal therapy use in the last six months prior to the first screening visit; 5. Subject will agree to use a recognized effective method of contraception with his partner (i.e. at a minimum, condom for the male partner and an effective contraception for the female partner) during the course of the study treatment and recovery phase; 6. In the opinion of the investigator, subject is able to comply with the protocol, understand and sign an informed consent and HIPAA form; 7. Does not meet any of the

Exclusion criteria

. 8. Sperm concentration ≥ 15 million sperm per milliliter ejaculate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gonadotropin Suppression4 weeksTo quantify the gonadotropin suppressive activity of 4 weeks daily therapy of a combination transdermal gel containing 8.3 mg Nestorone® (NES) gel and 62.5 mg (1.62%) testosterone (T) gel, and of T gel (1.62%) alone. Specifically, the proportion (and 95% CI) of men who suppress both gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone \[LH\] and follicle-stimulating hormone \[FSH\]) to ≤ 1 IU/L in each group, will be quantified.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gonadotropin and Follicle-stimulating Hormone Suppression4 weeks• To quantify the proportion (and 95% CI) of men who suppress both gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone \[LH\] and follicle-stimulating hormone \[FSH\]) to the detection limit of the assay in each group.
Change in LH and FSH Concentrations4 weeks• To quantify the median percent change from baseline to week 4 and interquartile range for serum gonadotropins (LH and FSH) concentrations for each treatment group.
Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.4 weeksA simple acceptability questionnaire used previously in male CCTN studies was administered at treatment Day 28 (28, 29) for subjects to answer questions about the acceptability of gel as a product and as a method for contraception over the preceding 4 weeks.
T Serum Concentrations8 weeks
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (Hemoglobin)4 weeksGeneral composite safety as measured various times during the study by CBC-Hemoglobin
Assessing Sexual Function by Compare Gonadotropin Suppressive Activity of T and NES Against T Alone Through the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire.4 weeksSexual activity was rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 7 (very high enjoyment/pleasure). Erections were rated on a scale of 0 (not satisfactory) to 7 (very satisfactory). Results are change from baseline to final treatment evaluation.
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Chemistry4 weeksChange from baseline to final treatment evaluation-Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, HDL
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 5: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Psychosexual Questionnaires4 weeksChange from baseline to final treatment evaluation. Sexual motivation was rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 7 (very high). Erections were rated on a scale of 0 (not satisfactory) to 7 (very satisfactory).
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical Changes4 weeksChange from baseline to final treatment evaluation
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Patient Health Questionnaires4 weeksPHQ-9 Total Score: Change from baseline to final treatment evaluation. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 is a self-administered instrument for screening, monitoring and diagnosis of depression. This questionnaire can be used repeatedly to monitor improvement or worsening of symptoms. Scale range is from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).
NES Serum Concentrations8 weeks
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (WBC)4 weeksGeneral composite safety as measured various times during the study by CBC - WBC
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1c: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (Hematocrit)4 weeksGeneral composite safety as measured various times during the study by CBC-Hematocrit
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Chemistry4 weeksChange from baseline to final treatment evaluation-ALT, AST
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Weight)4 weeksChange from baseline to final treatment evaluation
Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Blood Pressure)4 weeksChange from baseline to final treatment evaluation

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1
5.0 mL of the 1.62% Nestorone® /testosterone gel (containing 8.3 mg NES + 62.5 mg T) applied each day on the arms and shoulders Nestorone® /testosterone gel: Nestorone® /testosterone combined gel
29
Group 2
4.4 mL of the 1.62% Testosterone only gel (AndrogelTM) (containing 62.7 mg T) applied each day to the arms and shoulders Testosterone only gel: Testosterone only gel
15
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1Group 2Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants15 Participants44 Participants
Age, Continuous33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.32
30.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.29
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.72
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants2 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants12 Participants32 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants6 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants15 participants44 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants15 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 295 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Gonadotropin Suppression

To quantify the gonadotropin suppressive activity of 4 weeks daily therapy of a combination transdermal gel containing 8.3 mg Nestorone® (NES) gel and 62.5 mg (1.62%) testosterone (T) gel, and of T gel (1.62%) alone. Specifically, the proportion (and 95% CI) of men who suppress both gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone \[LH\] and follicle-stimulating hormone \[FSH\]) to ≤ 1 IU/L in each group, will be quantified.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1Gonadotropin Suppression16 Participants
Group 2Gonadotropin Suppression1 Participants
p-value: 0.003Fisher Exact
Secondary

Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.

A simple acceptability questionnaire used previously in male CCTN studies was administered at treatment Day 28 (28, 29) for subjects to answer questions about the acceptability of gel as a product and as a method for contraception over the preceding 4 weeks.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: disagree1 Participants
Group 1Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: agree15 Participants
Group 1Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: undecided4 Participants
Group 1Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: Strongly agree7 Participants
Group 1Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: Strongly disagree1 Participants
Group 2Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: Strongly agree2 Participants
Group 2Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: Strongly disagree0 Participants
Group 2Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: disagree0 Participants
Group 2Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: undecided2 Participants
Group 2Acceptability and Satisfaction as Measured by the Contraceptive Gel Acceptability and Satisfaction Questionnaire by Comparing T and NES Serum Concentrations.Overall satisfaction: agree9 Participants
Secondary

Assessing Sexual Function by Compare Gonadotropin Suppressive Activity of T and NES Against T Alone Through the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire.

Sexual activity was rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 7 (very high enjoyment/pleasure). Erections were rated on a scale of 0 (not satisfactory) to 7 (very satisfactory). Results are change from baseline to final treatment evaluation.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: The difference in numbers means there was missing data in the questionnaire which caused some of the domains to have missing results while some domains could have a score calculated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Assessing Sexual Function by Compare Gonadotropin Suppressive Activity of T and NES Against T Alone Through the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire.Sexual Activity-0.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.483
Group 1Assessing Sexual Function by Compare Gonadotropin Suppressive Activity of T and NES Against T Alone Through the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire.Erections-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Group 2Assessing Sexual Function by Compare Gonadotropin Suppressive Activity of T and NES Against T Alone Through the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire.Sexual Activity-0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.676
Group 2Assessing Sexual Function by Compare Gonadotropin Suppressive Activity of T and NES Against T Alone Through the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire.Erections-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Secondary

Change in LH and FSH Concentrations

• To quantify the median percent change from baseline to week 4 and interquartile range for serum gonadotropins (LH and FSH) concentrations for each treatment group.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Group 1Change in LH and FSH ConcentrationsLH-94.55 IU/LStandard Deviation 26.656
Group 1Change in LH and FSH ConcentrationsFSH-90.25 IU/LStandard Deviation 24.349
Group 2Change in LH and FSH ConcentrationsLH-31 IU/LStandard Deviation 37.638
Group 2Change in LH and FSH ConcentrationsFSH-23.1 IU/LStandard Deviation 33.577
Secondary

Gonadotropin and Follicle-stimulating Hormone Suppression

• To quantify the proportion (and 95% CI) of men who suppress both gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone \[LH\] and follicle-stimulating hormone \[FSH\]) to the detection limit of the assay in each group.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1Gonadotropin and Follicle-stimulating Hormone Suppression12 Participants
Group 2Gonadotropin and Follicle-stimulating Hormone Suppression1 Participants
Secondary

NES Serum Concentrations

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: The difference in numbers means there was missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1NES Serum ConcentrationsNesterone Day 7679.73 pmol/LStandard Deviation 716.884
Group 1NES Serum ConcentrationsNesterone Day 28: 0 minutes pre-dose820.60 pmol/LStandard Deviation 706.619
Group 1NES Serum ConcentrationsNesterone Day 56 (recovery)13.03 pmol/LStandard Deviation 33.335
Group 2NES Serum ConcentrationsNesterone Day 79.26 pmol/LStandard Deviation 34.673
Group 2NES Serum ConcentrationsNesterone Day 28: 0 minutes pre-dose20.70 pmol/LStandard Deviation 49.697
Group 2NES Serum ConcentrationsNesterone Day 56 (recovery)0 pmol/LStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (Hemoglobin)

General composite safety as measured various times during the study by CBC-Hemoglobin

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (Hemoglobin)0.01 g/dlStandard Deviation 0.924
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (Hemoglobin)-0.18 g/dlStandard Deviation 0.634
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (WBC)

General composite safety as measured various times during the study by CBC - WBC

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (WBC)0.182 WBCs per microliterStandard Deviation 0.9772
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (WBC)-0.548 WBCs per microliterStandard Deviation 1.0023
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1c: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (Hematocrit)

General composite safety as measured various times during the study by CBC-Hematocrit

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1c: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (Hematocrit)0.19 percentage of bloodStandard Deviation 2.65
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 1c: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of CBC (Hematocrit)-0.58 percentage of bloodStandard Deviation 1.527
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Chemistry

Change from baseline to final treatment evaluation-Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, HDL

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryTotal Cholesterol-5.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 18.21
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryTriglycerides-12.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.16
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryHDL-2.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.65
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryTotal Cholesterol-1.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.1
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryTriglycerides-15.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 26.14
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryHDL-1.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.65
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Chemistry

Change from baseline to final treatment evaluation-ALT, AST

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryALT-4.4 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.89
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryAST-2.0 IU/LStandard Deviation 9.59
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryALT0.1 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.8
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 2b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of ChemistryAST1.6 IU/LStandard Deviation 15.9
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Blood Pressure)

Change from baseline to final treatment evaluation

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: The difference in numbers means there was missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Blood Pressure)Systolic BP2.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.91
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Blood Pressure)Diastolic BP1.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.57
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Blood Pressure)Systolic BP-2.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.08
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3a: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Blood Pressure)Diastolic BP0.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.2
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Patient Health Questionnaires

PHQ-9 Total Score: Change from baseline to final treatment evaluation. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 is a self-administered instrument for screening, monitoring and diagnosis of depression. This questionnaire can be used repeatedly to monitor improvement or worsening of symptoms. Scale range is from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Patient Health Questionnaires0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Patient Health Questionnaires0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Weight)

Change from baseline to final treatment evaluation

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: The difference in numbers means there was missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Weight)0.045 lbsStandard Deviation 3.8638
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 3b: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Vitals (Weight)1.2 lbsStandard Deviation 3.6888
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical Changes

Change from baseline to final treatment evaluation

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: The difference in numbers means there was missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesSkin: Worsened1 participants
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesHeart: No Change28 participants
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesDigital Rectal Exam: Worsened0 participants
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesHeart: Worsened0 participants
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesHeart: Improved0 participants
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesDigital Rectal Exam: Improved0 participants
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesSkin: Improved0 participants
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesDigital Rectal Exam: No Change16 participants
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesSkin: No Change27 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesDigital Rectal Exam: No Change10 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesSkin: No Change12 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesSkin: Worsened1 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesHeart: Improved0 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesDigital Rectal Exam: Worsened0 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesSkin: Improved0 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesHeart: No Change13 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesHeart: Worsened0 participants
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 4: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Physical ChangesDigital Rectal Exam: Improved0 participants
Secondary

Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 5: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Psychosexual Questionnaires

Change from baseline to final treatment evaluation. Sexual motivation was rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 7 (very high). Erections were rated on a scale of 0 (not satisfactory) to 7 (very satisfactory).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: The difference in numbers means there was missing data in the questionnaire which caused some of the domains to have missing results while some domains could have a score calculated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 5: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Psychosexual QuestionnairesSexual Motivation: Change from baseline to final treatment0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.765
Group 1Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 5: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Psychosexual QuestionnairesErections: Change from baseline to final treatment-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 5: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Psychosexual QuestionnairesSexual Motivation: Change from baseline to final treatment-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.839
Group 2Secondary Outcome # 6 Part 5: A Composite Safety of the Combined Gel Determined by Outcomes of Psychosexual QuestionnairesErections: Change from baseline to final treatment-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Secondary

T Serum Concentrations

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: The difference in numbers means there was missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1T Serum ConcentrationsTestosterone Day 7502.9 ng/dLStandard Deviation 409.2
Group 1T Serum ConcentrationsTestosterone Day 28: 0 minutes pre-dose602.1 ng/dLStandard Deviation 476.57
Group 1T Serum ConcentrationsTestosterone Day 56 (recovery)594.47 ng/dLStandard Deviation 217.718
Group 2T Serum ConcentrationsTestosterone Day 28: 0 minutes pre-dose828.1 ng/dLStandard Deviation 567.58
Group 2T Serum ConcentrationsTestosterone Day 7674.9 ng/dLStandard Deviation 283.97
Group 2T Serum ConcentrationsTestosterone Day 56 (recovery)595.81 ng/dLStandard Deviation 205.938

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026