Skip to content

A Multicentre Clinical Investigation of a Decision Support Algorithm for Neonatal Seizure Detection

A Multi-centre, Randomised, Controlled, Clinical Investigation of a Standalone Decision Support Algorithm for Neonatal Seizure Recognition

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02431780
Acronym
ANSeR
Enrollment
264
Registered
2015-05-01
Start date
2015-02-12
Completion date
2017-02-07
Last updated
2023-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Epilepsy, Nervous System Diseases, Neurologic Manifestations, Seizures

Keywords

Neonatal Seizures, Decision Support Algorithm, EEG

Brief summary

The ANSeR Clinical Investigation is a multi-centre, randomised, controlled, clinical investigation of a standalone decision support Algorithm for Neonatal Seizure Recognition, the ANSER Software system.

Detailed description

This will be an open, two arm, parallel group, randomised, controlled investigation of the ANSeR Software System as a stand-alone neonatal seizure recognition decision support tool. Term neonates requiring EEG monitoring will be stratified by recruiting site and then randomised to receive either EEG monitoring with the ANSeR Software System or EEG monitoring without the ANSeR Software System. It is proposed that the rate of true detections (sensitivity) of investigation personnel using the ANSeR Software System in clinical practice will be at least 25% higher than that of investigation personnel not using the ANSeR Software System in routine clinical practice. In addition we expect the specificity of investigation personnel using the ANSeR Software System to be no worse than 10% less than that of investigation personnel not using the ANSeR Software System. This should result in more appropriate and timely use of antiepileptic drugs (AED). Randomisation Immediately following enrolment in the investigation, each participant will be randomly assigned to receive either EEG monitoring with the ANSeR Software System or without the ANSeR Software System. Randomisation will be stratified by recruiting site with a 1:1 allocation ratio to each group. Block randomisation with varying block sizes will be used and the randomisation and allocation will be performed centrally using a web-based electronic system. Blinding As this is an investigation of a medical device (software), the investigation personnel will be aware of which group the participant is assigned to. The expert panel who are the diagnostic reference standard will be blinded to group allocation. The biostatistician will also be blinded to group allocation during the analysis of the data.

Interventions

DEVICEANSeR Software System

ANSeR Software System a stand alone, software medical device for Neonatal seizure decision support tool

Sponsors

University College, London
CollaboratorOTHER
Wellcome Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
University College Cork
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
36 Weeks to 44 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Neonates 36 weeks - 44 weeks corrected gestational age in whom EEG monitoring is indicated because they are deemed to be * at high risk of seizures or * are experiencing seizures

Exclusion criteria

* • No parental/guardian consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Seizure Detection Rate for all Neonates enrolled in the investigation arm compared to Seizure Detection Rate for all Neonates in the control arm.12-18 monthsThe rate of true seizure detection (sensitivity), as recorded on a Seizure Record form, 25% superior in the investigation arm compared to the control group (usual clinical practice). The Expert Committee will be used as the diagnostic reference standard.
The False Detections per hour (sensitivity) for all Neonates enrolled in the investigation arm compared to the False Detection Rate for all Neonates in the control arm.12-18 monthsThe False Detections per hour (specificity), as recorded on a Seizure Record form, 10% superior in the investigation arm compared to the control group (usual clinical practice). The Expert Committee will be used as the diagnostic reference standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seizure burden (min) for all Neonates enrolled in the investigation arm compared to Seizure burden (min) for all Neonates in the control arm.12-18 monthsTo quantify seizure burden (min) in the investigation arm and control arm.
Number of Neonates administered Anti-epileptic drug (AED) in the investigation arm compared to Number of Neonates administered Anti-epileptic drug (AED) in the control arm.12-18 months

Countries

Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026