Skip to content

Transperineal Ultrasound to Assess the Progress of Labour

The Sono-VE Study: Assessing the Acceptability and Feasibility of Transperineal Ultrasound and Developing an Ultrasound Based Predictive Model for Labour Outcome.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02430038
Enrollment
584
Registered
2015-04-29
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2018-01-19
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Placenta Praevia, Vaginismus

Keywords

transperineal ultrasound, labour, sonopartogram, prediction model

Brief summary

This is a prospective observational study of transperineal ultrasound between 24-42 weeks gestation and a prospective longitudinal observational study in all term (37-42 weeks) labouring women.

Detailed description

This is a prospective observational study of transperineal ultrasound between 24-42 weeks gestation and a prospective longitudinal observational study in all term (37-42 weeks) labouring women. AIMS: This study aims to firstly assess the effectiveness and acceptability of transperineal ultrasound in women presenting between 24 and 42 weeks gestation in comparison with digital vaginal examination (VE). Secondly, in all term (37-42 weeks) labouring women, investigators aim to create an ultrasound based labour record, a sonopartogram and from this develop a predictive model for the outcome of labour.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
British Medical Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Gestation 24-42 completed weeks at study entry * Aged 18-44 * Cephalic * Singleton pregnancies * Nulliparous * Multiparous (excluded for the term predictive model group) * Multiple pregnancies (excluded for the term predictive model group) * Established (Active) phase of labour (included for the term predictive model group) o Clinician opinion that patient is in the established phase of labour according to the current NICE guidelines

Exclusion criteria

* Younger than 18 years. * Imminent iatrogenic intention to deliver * Life threatening maternal or fetal compromise needing immediate medical attention and/or delivery * Women who in the opinion of the researcher by virtue of language or learning impairment would be unable to give fully informed consent to the study. * Miscarriage * Intra-uterine death * Previous cervical surgery eg. cone biopsy, cervical cerclage. Note- Single LLETZ is not excluded. * Non-cephalic presentations * Multiple pregnancies (for the term predictive model group) * Multiparous patients (for the term predictive model group) * Not in established labour (for the term predictive model group)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caesarean Delivery24 monthsNumber of Caesarean deliveries in the prediction group
Acceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound24 monthsAcceptability of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound to pregnant and labouring women. Use of modified W-DEQ questionnaires pre and post assessment. We recorded the number of women who completed both questionnaires.
Feasibility of Ultrasound Labour Parameters24 monthsThe outcome was the number of women who had all labour parameters measured by ultrasound.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study aimed to firstly assess the feasibilty and acceptability of transperineal ultrasound in women presenting between 24 and 42 weeks gestation in comparison with digital vaginal examination (VE). Secondly, in all term (37-42 weeks) labouring women, we aim to create an ultrasound based labour record, a sonopartogram and from this develop a predictive model for the outcome of labour.

Pre-assignment details

Recruitment start date 22/04/2015 Recruitment end date 19/01/2018

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acceptability and Feasibilty
Where vaginal examinations are best avoided e.g. vaginismus or contraindicated (PPROM) with controls
119
Feasibility
Where vaginal examinations are best avoided e.g. vaginismus or contraindicated (PPROM) with controls
195
Predictive Model
Nulliparous term labouring women with cephalic presentation
270
Total584

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAcceptability and FeasibiltyFeasibilityPredictive ModelTotal
Age, Continuous31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
119 Participants195 Participants270 Participants584 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Regional analgesia95 Participants178 Participants211 Participants484 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
119 Participants195 Participants270 Participants584 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1190 / 1950 / 270
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1190 / 1950 / 270
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1190 / 1950 / 270

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound

Acceptability of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound to pregnant and labouring women. Use of modified W-DEQ questionnaires pre and post assessment. We recorded the number of women who completed both questionnaires.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Only analysing patients in the acceptability arm for this primary outcome

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AcceptabilityAcceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound104 Participants
FeasibilityAcceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound0 Participants
Predictive ModelAcceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound0 Participants
Primary

Caesarean Delivery

Number of Caesarean deliveries in the prediction group

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Total number of Caesarean deliveries

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Predictive ModelCaesarean Delivery79 Participants
Primary

Feasibility of Ultrasound Labour Parameters

The outcome was the number of women who had all labour parameters measured by ultrasound.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: The outcome was the number of women who had all labour parameters measured by ultrasound.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AcceptabilityFeasibility of Ultrasound Labour Parameters0 Participants
FeasibilityFeasibility of Ultrasound Labour Parameters168 Participants
Predictive ModelFeasibility of Ultrasound Labour Parameters0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026