Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1
Conditions
Keywords
early orthodontic treatment, activator, removable appliance, Twicare®, Herbst appliance
Brief summary
The aim of this prospective, multicentric, randomized, open-label study is to assess the efficacy of the removable Twicare® as mandibular propulsive appliance in children aged from 7 to 12 years old in the course of their orthodontic treatment, showing its noninferiority with the removable Herbst. One untreated group will be included to control the internal validity of the study as recommend in noninferiority trials. Patients will have a follow-up every two months during 6 to 12 months as planned in routine care.
Detailed description
A large number of functional appliances, mandibular advancement activators with various designs, fixed or removable, are used in Class II malocclusion correction; one of the largest means being used is the Herbst. These appliances can be individualized, made to measure by the prosthetist or standardised (on market). A new medical device, EC marked and marketed since 2011, the Twicare®, can be used as positioner, growth activator, but also for lingual re-education. There are numerous publications comparing the activators' effects or the appliance effects on mandibular growth, but none have studied the Twicare®. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of this specific removable appliance in mandibular advancement in Class II skeletal in children aged from 7 to 12 years old. The appliance will be compared with the Herbst and one untreated group will be included to control the internal validity of the study as recommend in noninferiority trials. Patients will have a follow-up every two months during 6 to 12 months until the Class I occlusion is achieved. A lateral cephalogram and a dental silicon impression will be performed at the beginning (T0) and at the end of the treatment (T1) in order to evaluate cephalometric measurement changes, ANB, overjet and canine and molar class evolutions. The data collected at the beginning and at the end of the treatment will be analyzed and compared aware from patient, treatment and time, in order to assess the Twicare® noninferiority compared to the Herbst and to confirm the superiority of these two appliances versus observation. We will study, in parallel, the nasal ventilator function as well as comfort, compliance, tolerance and acceptability of the device via an auto-questionnaire.
Interventions
DEVICETwicare® appliance
Early orthodontic treatment with the Twicare®. The Class II treatment is initiated at the age of 7-12 years and continued as long as the Class I is achieved. The Twicare® is adjusted in mandibular protraction based on the 2/3 of the condylar test and was were worn during 12 to 14 hours a day (at least 4 hours during the day and all night).
DEVICERemovable Herbst appliance
Early orthodontic treatment with the removable Herbst appliance. The Class II treatment is initiated at the age of 7-12 years and continued as long as the Class I is achieved. The Herbst appliance is adjusted in mandibular protraction based on the 2/3 of the condylar test and was were worn during 12 to 14 hours a day (at least 4 hours during the day and all night).
Sponsors
FCI System
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Children with Class II division 1 malocclusion * Overjet ≥ 4 mm, * ANB \> 4°, * Good cooperation (motivation and good dental hygiene), * Incisors width compatible with the available Twicare® appliance sizes, according to the manufacturer recommendations. * Written Informed Consent of the Child, * Affiliated to health insurance, * Parents able to receive informed consent and to express their approval for their child to take part in this investigation.
Exclusion criteria
* Non well-balanced periodontal disease, * Temporal-mandibular dysfunction, * Severe bruxism noctural episodes, * Known allergy or intolerance to one of the activators' components. * Foreseeable follow-up difficulties, * Minor under guardianship, * Simultaneous participation to an interventional study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| A point-nasion-B point (ANB) angle change | 6-12 months | ANB change is measured in lateral cephalograms between the beginning (T0) and the end (T1) of the treatment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overjet change using dental silicone impression | 6-12 months | Assessment of the overjet change between the beginning (T0) and end (T1) of the treatment using dental silicone impression. |
| Cephalometric analysis (Tweed analysis of lateral cephalograms) | 6-12 months | Assessment of cephalometric measurement changes between T0 and T1 based on Tweed analysis of lateral cephalograms: the lower and upper incisor inclination (I/APog and i/APog) and mandibular corpus growth increase will be investigated in particular. |
| Nasal ventilation (Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) change) | 6-12 months | Assessment of the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) change between T0 and T1. The PNIF is measured with a spirometer. |
| Treatment acceptability (subjective) | 6-12 months | Subjective assessment of the appliance wearing compliance and treatment tolerance/acceptability with auto-questionnaire and filling up of a diary (wearing timesheet). |
| Compliance (appliance wearing based on patient interview with a questionnaire.) | 6-12 months | Clinical Assessment of appliance wearing based on patient interview with a questionnaire. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed