Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Participants With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Previously Treated With Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor

A Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Subjects With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Relapsed/Refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02426086
Enrollment
107
Registered
2015-04-24
Start date
2015-08-28
Completion date
2020-02-07
Last updated
2021-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelofibrosis

Keywords

Myelofibrosis, Imetelstat, GRN163L, Relapsed/refractory to JAKi, IMbark

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or is refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. Key secondary endpoint includes overall survival.

Detailed description

This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), multicenter (more than one hospital, medical school team or medical clinic work on a medical research study) study of 2 dosing regimens (treatment arms) of single-agent imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. The main study consists of 3 parts: Screening Phase (21 days before randomization); Treatment Phase (from randomization until study drug discontinuation); and Follow up Phase (until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent or study end, whichever occurs first). Participants received imetelstat 9.4 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg) intravenously (IV) for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end OR imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg IV for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. Initially, all participants were blinded to the treatment. After the first interim analysis, treatment for all participants was unblinded and participants assigned to the imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg arm could continue with their same imetelstat dose or have it increased to 9.4 mg/kg at the investigator's discretion. The percentage of spleen response and symptom response were evaluated as co-primary endpoints. Following completion of the primary analysis, participants benefiting from study treatment could continue to receive imetelstat in Extension phase for up to 2 years or until loss of benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Participants who had already stopped study treatment could enter the Extension phase to continue follow up for safety via serious adverse event collection and for survival status.

Interventions

DRUGImetelstat 4.7 mg/kg

Participants received imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Study drug was administered intravenously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.

DRUGImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg

Participants received imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.

Sponsors

Geron Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Initially single-blind; treatments unmasked after 1st Interim Analysis and continued as open-label treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) according to the revised WHO criteria; or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF) or post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) according to the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria. * Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or highrisk MF. * Measurable splenomegaly prior to study entry as demonstrated by palpable spleen measuring ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin OR spleen volume of ≥ 450 cm\^3 measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). * Active symptoms of MF as demonstrated by a symptom score of at least 5 points (on a 0 to 10 scale) on at least one of the symptoms or a score of 3 or greater on at least 2 of the symptoms. * Documented progressive disease during or after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2.

Exclusion criteria

* Peripheral blood blast count of ≥ 10% or bone marrow blast count of ≥ 10%. * Prior treatment with imetelstat. * Any chemotherapy or MF-directed therapy, investigational drug, hydroxyurea, immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, corticosteroids or JAK inhibitor therapy ≤14 days prior to randomization. * Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization. * Active systemic hepatitis infection requiring treatment (carriers of hepatitis virus are permitted to enter the study), of any type or known acute or chronic liver disease including cirrhosis. * Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Spleen ResponseWeek 24Spleen response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at Week 24 from baseline performed by the IRC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Percentage of Participants With Symptom ResponseWeek 24Symptom response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 from baseline as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 2.0 diary. The MFSAF assessed following symptoms due to Myelofibrosis (MF): night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, feeling of fullness, bone or muscle pain and degree of inactivity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. The total score ranges from 0-70, where 0 indicates absent/as good as it can be and 70 indicates worst imaginable/as bad as it can be.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRTEvery 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)Clinical response rate (CRR) was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR, or CI per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. CR: bone marrow: normocellular \<5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: not palpable and ≤350ml volume; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaEvery 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)Spleen response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Spleen response: a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at 5-10 cm, below the left costal margin (LCM), becomes not palpable or a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at \>10 cm, below the LCM, decreases by ≥50%; A spleen response requires confirmation by MRI showing \>35% spleen volume reduction (SVR). For response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for spleen response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
Percentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaEvery 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)Symptoms response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Symptoms Response: a ≥50% reduction in the modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. For response category, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for symptom response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
Percentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaEvery 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)Anemia response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Anemia response is defined as participants with baseline Hb \<10 g/dL but not meeting strict criteria for transfusion dependency: a ≥ 2 g/dL increase in Hb; Transfusion dependent participants at baseline: becoming transfusion independent. Transfusion independence is defined as absence of any pRBC transfusions for at least 12 rolling weeks. For response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for anemia response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
Duration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT CriteriaFrom date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 2.3 years)Duration of response (PR/CI/RWCI) is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a response to date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first. PR: BM: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤Grade 1 fibrosis/not meeting BM remission criteria; IMC in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL- ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI/not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia. RWCI: Participants who met criteria for response but had worsening cytopenias. PD: Splenomegaly requires MRI showing ≥25% increase in spleen volume.
Overall SurvivalDay 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days), up to the date of the participant's death (approximately up to 4.1 years)Overall Survival is measured from the date of Cycle 1, Day 1 to the date of the participants death. If the participant's was alive or the vital status was unknown, OS was censored at the date that the participant is last known to be alive.
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health StatusUp to end of the treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients. The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 items resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1= Not at all to 4= Very much); and 1 global health status scale based on 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7= Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning. Clinically meaningful improvement defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status.
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 yearsEQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and VAS. EQ-5D health state profile comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L- VAS is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Up to end of treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)The BPI rates the intensity of pain on 4 items (right now, worst, least, and average), and the interference in 7 areas (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations, sleep, enjoyment of life). Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes. Clinically meaningful improvement in BPI defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) CriteriaEvery 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)Overall Response Rate: % of participants with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) per modified IWG-MRT.CR: bone marrow: normocellular \<5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in peripheral blood (PB):\<2%;hemoglobin (Hb):10 g/dL-upper limit of normal (ULN); neutrophils:1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen:not palpable and ≤350ml volume; extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH): no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH;symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. All response categories, benefit must last \>12 weeks to qualify as response.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were AEs with onset during or after the first dose of study drug, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)Elimination half-life (t 1/2) is associated with the terminal slope (lambda \[z\]) of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, calculated as 0.693/lambda(z).
Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 yearsThe PGIC was used to capture the participant's perspective of improvement or decline in MF symptoms over time. The PGIC had a 7-point response scale ranging from 1 to 7 where, (1=very much improved, 2= somewhat improved, 3= a little improved, 4=no change, 5= a little worse, 6= somewhat worse, 7=very much worse).
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaEvery 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)CI per the modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia (Increase in severity of anemia constitutes the occurrence of new transfusion dependency or a ≥ 2.0 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from pretreatment baseline that lasts for at least 12 weeks. Increase in severity of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia is defined as a 2-grade decline, from pretreatment baseline, in platelet count or ANC, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. In addition, assignment to CI requires a minimum platelet count of ≥ 25,000\*10\^9/L and ANC of ≥ 0.5\*10\^9/L.) For all response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 55 investigative sites in Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and the United States from August 28, 2015, to 25 October 2016. Data analyses include all data through the data cut-off date February 07, 2020.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 107 participants with Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Relapsed/Refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment arms into 1:1 ratio to imetelstat 4.7 or imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg of body weight. Eligible participants were stratified based on a) spleen size ≥ 15 cm below the left costal margin by palpation (yes vs. no) and b) platelet count at study entry (platelets ≥75 x 10\^9/L \[Per Liter\] and \<150 x 10\^9L vs. ≥150 x 10\^9L).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg
Participants received imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. After the first interim analysis, treatment for all participants was unblinded and participants assigned to the imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg arm could continue with their same imetelstat dose or have it increased to 9.4 mg/kg at the investigator's discretion. After the end of main study, participants who were receiving benefit from study treatment opted to continue to receive imetelstat during the Extension Phase until there is loss of benefit or unacceptable toxicity. (Maximum duration on study was approximately 2.3 years and Maximum duration on extension phase was approximately 1.8 years).
48
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Participants received imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. After the end of the main study, participants who were receiving benefit from study treatment opted to continue to receive imetelstat during the Extension Phase until there is loss of benefit or unacceptable toxicity. (Maximum duration on study was approximately 2.3 years and Maximum duration on extension phase was approximately 1.8 years).
59
Total107

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath3336
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor514
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject89

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImetelstat 4.7 mg/kgTotalImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
Age, Continuous68.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.95
67.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.18
66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.39
Duration of Prior JAKi Treatment22.3 months23.0 months24.5 months
Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)
High Risk
19 Participants44 Participants25 Participants
Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)
Intermediate 2
28 Participants62 Participants34 Participants
Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score
0: Asymptomatic
11 Participants25 Participants14 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score
1: Symptomatic fully ambulatory
26 Participants60 Participants34 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score
2: Self care
11 Participants22 Participants11 Participants
Platelet Count
≥150 (10^9/L)
24 Participants50 Participants26 Participants
Platelet Count
<75 (10^9/L)
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Platelet Count
75 - <150 (10^9/L)
23 Participants54 Participants31 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
41 Participants85 Participants44 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
3 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
40 Participants88 Participants48 Participants
Region
European Union
19 Participants53 Participants34 Participants
Region
Rest of World
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Region
United States/Canada
25 Participants43 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants40 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants67 Participants35 Participants
Spleen Size by Palpation17.6 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.62
17.4 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53
17.3 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.51
Time from Last JAKi Treatment1.4 months1.7 months1.7 months
Type of Myelofibrosis (MF)
Post Essential Thrombocythemia (PET)
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Type of Myelofibrosis (MF)
Post Polycythemia Vera (PPV)
12 Participants25 Participants13 Participants
Type of Myelofibrosis (MF)
Primary MF (PMF)
27 Participants63 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
34 / 4836 / 591 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
47 / 4859 / 5912 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 4821 / 594 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response

Spleen response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at Week 24 from baseline performed by the IRC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Spleen Response0 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Spleen Response10.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Symptom Response

Symptom response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 from baseline as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 2.0 diary. The MFSAF assessed following symptoms due to Myelofibrosis (MF): night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, feeling of fullness, bone or muscle pain and degree of inactivity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. The total score ranges from 0-70, where 0 indicates absent/as good as it can be and 70 indicates worst imaginable/as bad as it can be.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Symptom Response6.3 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Symptom Response32.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat

Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

Population: PK subset included all participants who had serial PK sampling during cycle 1 treatment to determine the AUC 0-24 of Imetelstat by noncompartmental PK analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat171 μg*hr/mLStandard Deviation 135
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat501 μg*hr/mLStandard Deviation 283
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat

Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

Population: PK subset included all participants who had serial PK sampling during cycle 1 treatment to determine AUC 0-inf of Imetelstat by noncompartmental PK analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat193 μg*h/mLStandard Deviation 156
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat524 μg*h/mLStandard Deviation 297
Secondary

Duration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria

Duration of response (PR/CI/RWCI) is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a response to date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first. PR: BM: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤Grade 1 fibrosis/not meeting BM remission criteria; IMC in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL- ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI/not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia. RWCI: Participants who met criteria for response but had worsening cytopenias. PD: Splenomegaly requires MRI showing ≥25% increase in spleen volume.

Time frame: From date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were responders (PR/CI/RWCI) at any time.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgDuration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria36.3 weeks
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgDuration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria38.3 weeks
Secondary

Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat

Elimination half-life (t 1/2) is associated with the terminal slope (lambda \[z\]) of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, calculated as 0.693/lambda(z).

Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

Population: PK subset included all participants who had serial PK sampling during cycle 1 treatment to determine the t1/2 of Imetelstat by noncompartmental PK analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgElimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat4.6 hrStandard Deviation 1.6
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgElimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat5.5 hrStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and VAS. EQ-5D health state profile comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L- VAS is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

Time frame: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here N= participants who had data at both baseline and end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgEuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)EQ-5D-5L: Utility Score0.498 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2999
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgEuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)EQ-5D-5L: VAS51.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.143
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgEuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)EQ-5D-5L: Utility Score0.626 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2117
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgEuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)EQ-5D-5L: VAS47.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.398
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat

Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) subset included all participants who had serial PK sampling during cycle 1 treatment to determine the maximum plasma concentration of Imetelstat by noncompartmental PK analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat57.0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 72.3
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat81.9 μg/mLStandard Deviation 40
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were AEs with onset during or after the first dose of study drug, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)47 Participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)59 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is measured from the date of Cycle 1, Day 1 to the date of the participants death. If the participant's was alive or the vital status was unknown, OS was censored at the date that the participant is last known to be alive.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days), up to the date of the participant's death (approximately up to 4.1 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgOverall Survival19.91 months
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgOverall Survival28.09 months
Secondary

Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC was used to capture the participant's perspective of improvement or decline in MF symptoms over time. The PGIC had a 7-point response scale ranging from 1 to 7 where, (1=very much improved, 2= somewhat improved, 3= a little improved, 4=no change, 5= a little worse, 6= somewhat worse, 7=very much worse).

Time frame: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies number of subjects who had data at both baseline and end of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)4.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.237
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)3.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.571
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

Anemia response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Anemia response is defined as participants with baseline Hb \<10 g/dL but not meeting strict criteria for transfusion dependency: a ≥ 2 g/dL increase in Hb; Transfusion dependent participants at baseline: becoming transfusion independent. Transfusion independence is defined as absence of any pRBC transfusions for at least 12 rolling weeks. For response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for anemia response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. All treated participants were evaluated for each response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaAnemia response with CI4.2 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaAnemia response without CI0 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaAnemia response with CI6.8 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaAnemia response without CI1.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

CI per the modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia (Increase in severity of anemia constitutes the occurrence of new transfusion dependency or a ≥ 2.0 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from pretreatment baseline that lasts for at least 12 weeks. Increase in severity of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia is defined as a 2-grade decline, from pretreatment baseline, in platelet count or ANC, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. In addition, assignment to CI requires a minimum platelet count of ≥ 25,000\*10\^9/L and ANC of ≥ 0.5\*10\^9/L.) For all response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response.

Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria16.7 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria25.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

The BPI rates the intensity of pain on 4 items (right now, worst, least, and average), and the interference in 7 areas (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations, sleep, enjoyment of life). Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes. Clinically meaningful improvement in BPI defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline.

Time frame: Up to end of treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who had data at both baseline and end of treatment and Number analyzed signifies the number of participants with data available for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain at its Worst: Improvement50.0 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain at its Least: Improvement44.4 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain on the Average: Improvement55.6 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Right Now: Improvement61.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Relief Pain Treatments Provided: Improvement50.0 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered General Activity: Improvement72.2 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered with Mood: Improvement50.0 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered Walking Ability: Improvement38.9 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered with Normal Work: Improvement61.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered with Relations: Improvement44.4 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered with Sleep: Improvement61.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered Enjoyment of Life: Improvement61.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered with Sleep: Improvement78.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain at its Worst: Improvement75.8 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered with Mood: Improvement59.4 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain at its Least: Improvement51.5 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered with Relations: Improvement53.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain on the Average: Improvement66.7 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered Walking Ability: Improvement78.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Right Now: Improvement66.7 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered Enjoyment of Life: Improvement62.5 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Relief Pain Treatments Provided: Improvement53.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered with Normal Work: Improvement62.5 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Pain Interfered General Activity: Improvement68.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients. The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 items resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1= Not at all to 4= Very much); and 1 global health status scale based on 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7= Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning. Clinically meaningful improvement defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status.

Time frame: Up to end of the treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who had data at both baseline and end of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status22.2 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status36.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT

Clinical response rate (CRR) was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR, or CI per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. CR: bone marrow: normocellular \<5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: not palpable and ≤350ml volume; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT16.7 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT27.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria

Overall Response Rate: % of participants with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) per modified IWG-MRT.CR: bone marrow: normocellular \<5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in peripheral blood (PB):\<2%;hemoglobin (Hb):10 g/dL-upper limit of normal (ULN); neutrophils:1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen:not palpable and ≤350ml volume; extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH): no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: \>70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: \<5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: \<2%; Hb: 8.5 -\<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1\*10\^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -\<100\*10\^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH;symptoms: \>50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. All response categories, benefit must last \>12 weeks to qualify as response.

Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria0 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria1.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

Spleen response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Spleen response: a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at 5-10 cm, below the left costal margin (LCM), becomes not palpable or a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at \>10 cm, below the LCM, decreases by ≥50%; A spleen response requires confirmation by MRI showing \>35% spleen volume reduction (SVR). For response categories, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for spleen response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. All treated participants were evaluated for each response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaSpleen response with CI0 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaSpleen response without CI2.1 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaSpleen response with CI3.4 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaSpleen response without CI0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria

Symptoms response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Symptoms Response: a ≥50% reduction in the modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. For response category, benefit must last for \>12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for symptom response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.

Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)

Population: Treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. All treated participants were evaluated for each response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaSymptom response with CI14.6 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaSymptom response without CI4.2 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaSymptom response with CI22.0 percentage of participants
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT CriteriaSymptom response without CI8.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat

Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

Population: PK subset included all participants who had serial PK sampling during cycle 1 treatment to determine the time to reach maximum plasma concentration of imetelstat by noncompartmental PK analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat2.00 hr
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat2.00 hr
Secondary

Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat

Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

Population: PK subset included all participants who had serial PK sampling during cycle 1 treatment to determine the CL of Imetelstat by noncompartmental PK analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgTotal Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat0.0329 L/hr/kgStandard Deviation 0.0138
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgTotal Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat0.0252 L/hr/kgStandard Deviation 0.0157
Secondary

Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat

Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)

Population: PK population analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 sample collected during treatment to determine the drug concentration.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgVolume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat0.198 L/kgStandard Deviation 0.077
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgVolume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat0.190 L/kgStandard Deviation 0.104

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026