Skip to content

A Trial in Stable Intermediate Coronary Lesions and Grey-zone FFR Values

A Randomised Controlled Trial in Stable Intermediate Coronary Lesions and Grey-zone FFR Values With Evaluation of the Diagnostic Utility of Invasive Coronary Physiological Indices and Quantitative Perfusion MRI. The GzFFR Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02425969
Acronym
GzFFR
Enrollment
108
Registered
2015-04-24
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2016-10-01
Last updated
2017-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Physiology, Grey-zone Fractional Flow Reserve, Intermediate Coronary Lesions, Stable Angina

Brief summary

In this randomised controlled trial of patients with stable angina and documented intermediate coronary disease with indeterminate or grey-zone Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) we will randomise patients to either optimal medical therapy alone versus optimal medical therapy with PCI and they will be followed up for the primary endpoint of anginal control as measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at 3 months.

Detailed description

Pressure derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) is recognised as being the gold standard method of assessing the physiological significance of angiographically intermediate lesions. A grey-zone exists between the originally validated cut-off for ischemia of \<0.75 and the conventionally adopted cut- off of ≤0.80. Pilot data from our centre has suggested that only 1 in 3 coronary arteries with grey-zone FFR values demonstrate myocardial perfusion defects on stress cardiac MRI and others have suggested that the clinical outcomes in patients with grey-zone FFR are favorable with medical therapy alone. As such, stenting all lesions with grey-zone FFR (as currently recommended) may represent over-treatment and could attenuate the overall benefit of an FFR strategy. In addition to this there are flow derived resistance indices of stenosis severity that have superior diagnostic accuracy and may be helpful in correctly classifying patients with grey-zone FFR. In this study we will a comprehensive analysis of lesions with grey-zone FFR values (0.75-0.82 inclusive) using invasive hyperemic pressure, flow and resistance derived indices of severity with quantitative and qualitative 3T perfusion MRI to enable identification of the best invasive predictors of true perfusion defects on 3T cardiac MRI. Patients will be randomised to optimal medical therapy alone versus optimal medical therapy with PCI and followed up for the primary endpoint of anginal control as measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at 3 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPCI

Patients will have balloon angioplasty and coronary stent insertion for their grey-zone FFR lesion.

DRUGOptimal Medical Therapy

Optimal Medical therapy consists of secondary prevention which will include high dose statin and aspirin as well as anti-anginal therapy according to ESC 2013 international treatment guidelines for stable angina as follows; B-Blocker or Calcium channel blocker as first line agents and Nicorandil or Nitrates or Ranolazine as second line treatment titrated against symptoms to maximum tolerated dose. ACE inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers will be prescribed if patients also have a diagnosis of hypertension, LVEF ≤40%, diabetes or CKD where appropriate.

Sponsors

British Heart Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Glasgow
CollaboratorOTHER
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients \>18 years 2. 30-80% Diameter Stenosis on QCA 3. Stable angina 4. Non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with stable symptoms 5. Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. STEMI within 5 days 2. Tortuous vessels which would render pressure wire studies difficult or impossible 3. Heavily calcified vessels which would render pressure wire studies difficult or impossible 4. Unstable symptoms requiring definitive interventional management 5. Severe claustrophobia 6. Age \>90 years 7. Life expectancy \<1 year 8. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate \<30 mls/min/1.73m2 9. Inability to undergo MRI scanning due to metallic implant or incompatible permanent pacemaker 10. Severe asthma or inability to safely receive an adenosine infusion 11. Left mainstem disease ≤50% or if considered clinically significant by the operating cardiologist either on angiography or intravascular ultrasound.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angina status as per Seattle Angina Questionnaire3 monthsAnginal severity as measured by the Seattle Angina Score at 3 months compared with baseline in patients randomized to PCI versus medical therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MACE3 and 12 monthsMACE (Death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation and stroke) in patients randomized to PCI versus medical therapy.
Myocardial infarction3 and 12 monthsMyocardial infarction in patients randomized to PCI versus medical therapy.
Urgent Revascularisation3 and 12 monthsUrgent Revascularisation of the grey-zone FFR lesion in patients randomized to PCI versus medical therapy.
Total number of anti-anginal medications3 and 12 monthsTotal number of anti-anginal medications in patients randomized to PCI versus medical therapy.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026