Skip to content

FLuorescence Identification of Melanoma by a Multicenter Based Algorithm (FLIMMA)

A Prospective, Non-controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Stepwise Two Photon Excited Melanin Fluorescence of Potentially Malignant Pigmented Lesions as Compared to Histopathological Diagnosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02425475
Acronym
FLIMMA
Enrollment
500
Registered
2015-04-24
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma, Moles

Keywords

Dermoscopy

Brief summary

All patients will undergo dermoscopic diagnosis and be documented with a video image storing. The diagnosis based on dermoscopy will be immediately documented. Then, as a second diagnostic procedure, fluorescence diagnostics based on the two photon excitation from a dye-laser will be performed. The classification as non-melanoma or malignant melanoma by the medical device LIMES will also be documented immediately. Afterwards, the lesion will be excised and undergo histopathologic examination by the respective histopathologist of the participating centers. The histopathologic diagnosis will serve as gold standard for subsequent evaluations of the diagnostic accuracy.

Interventions

DEVICELIMES

All patients will undergo dermoscopic diagnosis and be documented with a video image storing. The diagnosis based on dermoscopy will be immediately documented. Then, as a second diagnostic procedure, fluorescence diagnostics based on the two photon excitation from a dye-laser will be performed. The classification as non-melanoma or malignant melanoma by the medical device LIMES will also be documented immediately. Afterwards, the lesion will be excised and undergo histo-pathologic examination by the respective histopathologist of the participating centers. The histopathologic diagnosis will serve as gold standard for subsequent evaluations of the diagnostic accuracy.

Sponsors

University Hospital Heidelberg
CollaboratorOTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Tuebingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ≥ 18 years of age * Male or female * Patients having pigmented lesions with suspicion of dysplastic nevus or melanoma, in whom an excision is performed in order to exclude or diagnose malignant melanoma * Patients who gave their written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with skin type V and VI according to Fitzpatrick's scale; * Where there is a risk that the scanning head is torn off be-cause the patient cannot be placed at rest (e.g. due to motoric disorders like tremor, convulsions, tics, compulsive acts * Patients who cannot understand the patient information and provide informed consent * Deep dermal lesions ≥ 5 mm beneath the stratum corneum * Clinically or reflected-light microscopically obviously non-melanocytic lesions * Peri- and subungual lesions * Mucosal lesions * Lesions with trauma, erosion (superficial defect), excoriation (defect down to the basement membrane) or ulceration (deep substantial defect) on more than 50 % of the lesion area (measurements must in any case not be carried out directly on the trauma, erosion, excoriation or ulceration) * Tattooed lesions * Pregnant or breast feeding women * Patients suffering from albinism * Lesions with dominant (\>50%) regression * Lesions which are not suitable to fix the scanning cap

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To determine sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm for the fluorescence diagnostics of melanoma.7 daysThe comparator and gold standard for the diagnosis will be the histopathological diagnosis of the pigmented lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To collect data for training and optimization of the diagnostic algorithm.1 day

Other

MeasureTime frame
To assess the safety of the device and to assess the incidence of adverse events7 days

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026