Skip to content

Effect of Aclidinium/Formoterol on Lung Hyperinflation, Exercise Capacity and Physical Activity in Moderate to Severe COPD Patients

A Multiple Dose, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial to Assess the Effect of Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate Fixed-dose Combination on Lung Hyperinflation, Exercise Capacity and Physical Activity in Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02424344
Acronym
ACTIVATE
Enrollment
267
Registered
2015-04-23
Start date
2015-04-27
Completion date
2016-07-25
Last updated
2018-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

COPD

Brief summary

The present study is planned to evaluate the effect of the aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate 400/12 μg FDC BID on the hyperinflation, exercise endurance and physical activity in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Additionally, the effect of the behavioural intervention on top of aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate 400/12 μg will be assessed both on the exercise endurance and the physical activity.

Interventions

DRUGAclidinium/Formoterol

Aclidinium bromide/Formoterol fumarate FDC 400/12μg dry powder for oral inhalation twice daily via Genuair inhaler

DRUGPlacebo

Dose-matched placebo dry powder for oral inhalation twice daily via Genuair inhaler

Sponsors

Menarini Group
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and non-pregnant, non-lactating females aged ≥ 40. 2. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of COPD according to GOLD guidelines 2014, with a post bronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 40% and \< 80% of the predicted value and FEV1/FVC \< 70% at Visit 1. 3. Functional residual capacity (FRC) measured by body plethysmography at Visit 1 ≥ 120% of predicted value. 4. Patients with modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) ≥ 2 at Visit 1. 5. Current or former cigarette smokers with a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years at Visit 1 6. Patients willing to participate in the telecoaching program during the four last weeks and to enhance their physical activity 7. Patients who understand and are able to follow the study procedures, are cooperative and are willing to participate in the study as indicated by signing the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. History or current diagnosis of asthma. 2. Any respiratory tract infection (including upper respiratory tract) or COPD exacerbation in the 6 weeks prior to Visit 1 or during the run-in period. 3. Patients who have been hospitalised for an acute COPD exacerbation within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or during the run-in period. 4. Clinically significant respiratory conditions other than COPD. 5. Use of long-term oxygen therapy (≥ 15 hours/day). 6. Oxygen saturation ≤ 85% as measured by pulse oximetry during exercise testing at Visit 1, Visit 2 or Visit 3 prior to randomisation. 7. Patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40kg/m2. 8. Patient who may need to start a pulmonary rehabilitation program during the study and/or who started/finished it within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or during the run-in period. 9. Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular conditions. 10. Patients with Type I or uncontrolled Type II diabetes, uncontrolled hypo-or hyperthyroidism, hypokalaemia, or hyperadrenergic state, uncontrolled or untreated hypertension. 11. Patient with known non-controlled history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or active hepatitis. 12. Patients with clinically relevant abnormalities in the results of the blood pressure, ECG, or physical examination at Visit 1. 13. Patients with any serious or uncontrolled physical or mental dysfunction that could place the patient at higher risk derived from his/her participation in the study or could confound the results 14. Patients with conditions other than COPD that may contribute to dyspnoea and exercise limitation or with contraindications to clinical exercise testing according to ATS recommendations for CPET 15. Patients with other relevant comorbidities that make the patient nor suitable to follow-up study procedures and/or could affect physical activity 16. Patients who cycled \< 2 minutes or \> 15 minutes during the constant work-rate exercise tests conducted at Visit 2 (Run-in Visit) or at Visit 3 even after adjustment of the work load. 17. Patients with history of hypersensitivity reaction to inhaled anticholinergics, sympathomimetic amines or inhaled medication or any component thereof (including report of paradoxical bronchospasm) 18. Patients for whom the use of anticholinergic drugs is contraindicated (acute urinary retention, symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy, bladder neck obstruction or narrow-angle glaucoma) 19. Patients unable to properly use a multidose dry powder inhaler or a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). 20. Patients using any prohibited medication (including IMP within 30 days (or 6 half-lives, whichever is longer) before Visit 1) or who have not undergone the required washout period. 21. History of malignancy of any organ system (including lung cancer), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years other than basal or squamous cell skin cancer). 22. Patients who do not maintain regular day/night, waking/sleeping cycles (e.g., night shift workers, sleep apnea). 23. Patients unable to give their consent, or patients of consenting age but under guardianship, or vulnerable patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Trough Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After 4 Weeks of TreatmentBaseline and Week 4Baseline values in FRC were defined as the corresponding values just before randomization on Day 1 of treatment (Week 0). Trough values were obtained prior to study drug administration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Endurance Time (ET) During Constant Work Rate Cycle Ergometry at Week 8Baseline to Week 8The ET was the time from the increase in work rate to 75% Wmax to the point of symptom limitation. Baseline measurements were taken prior to the IP dose on Day 1. Measurements at Week 8 were taken at 3 hours post-dose. Participants underwent a behavioural intervention (consisting of a telecoaching programme to enhance physical activity) between Week 4 and Week 8.
Percentage of Inactive Patients (Mean of <6000 Steps Per Day) at Week 8Week 8Physical activity was assessed by means of measurement of activity parameters (e.g. number of steps) through a Dynaport MoveMonitor and completion of the Daily ProActive Physical Activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) questionnaire. Compliant criterion based on at least 8 hours per day, and at least 3 days per week. Participants underwent a behavioural intervention (consisting of a telecoaching programme to enhance physical activity) between Week 4 and Week 8. Baseline was defined as mean of steps/day assessed during the week before the randomisation visit.

Countries

Canada, Germany, Hungary, Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 26 study centers, 15 in Germany, 4 in Hungary, 3 in Spain and 4 in Canada. The first patient was enrolled in April 2015 and the last patient visit was in July 2016.

Pre-assignment details

335 patients were screened; 267 were assessed as eligible and were randomized into the study. 68 patients failed screening. The main reason for screening failure was non-fulfilment of inclusion or exclusion criteria (16.7%).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AB/FF 400/12 μg
Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate 400/12 μg
134
Placebo
Placebo to Aclidinium/Formoterol
133
Total267

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event48
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAB/FF 400/12 μgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous62.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
62.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
62.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants54 Participants107 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants79 Participants160 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 13424 / 133
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1343 / 133

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Trough Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After 4 Weeks of Treatment

Baseline values in FRC were defined as the corresponding values just before randomization on Day 1 of treatment (Week 0). Trough values were obtained prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population - equal to the Safety population and defined as all randomised patients who took at least one dose of investigational product (IP) - who had available trough FRC values at baseline and Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AB/FF 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in Trough Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After 4 Weeks of Treatment-0.162 LitersStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Trough Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After 4 Weeks of Treatment-0.037 LitersStandard Error 0.05
p-value: 0.06995% CI: [-0.259, 0.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Endurance Time (ET) During Constant Work Rate Cycle Ergometry at Week 8

The ET was the time from the increase in work rate to 75% Wmax to the point of symptom limitation. Baseline measurements were taken prior to the IP dose on Day 1. Measurements at Week 8 were taken at 3 hours post-dose. Participants underwent a behavioural intervention (consisting of a telecoaching programme to enhance physical activity) between Week 4 and Week 8.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: Intention-to-treat population - which was equal to the safety population, defined as all participants who took at least one dose of investigational product - who had available ET values at baseline and Week 8.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AB/FF 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in Endurance Time (ET) During Constant Work Rate Cycle Ergometry at Week 850.7 SecondsStandard Error 18.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endurance Time (ET) During Constant Work Rate Cycle Ergometry at Week 8-4.6 SecondsStandard Error 18.2
Secondary

Percentage of Inactive Patients (Mean of <6000 Steps Per Day) at Week 8

Physical activity was assessed by means of measurement of activity parameters (e.g. number of steps) through a Dynaport MoveMonitor and completion of the Daily ProActive Physical Activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) questionnaire. Compliant criterion based on at least 8 hours per day, and at least 3 days per week. Participants underwent a behavioural intervention (consisting of a telecoaching programme to enhance physical activity) between Week 4 and Week 8. Baseline was defined as mean of steps/day assessed during the week before the randomisation visit.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population - equal to the Safety population and defined as all randomised patients who took at least one dose of IP~\- who had available activity data (compliant criterion).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AB/FF 400/12 μgPercentage of Inactive Patients (Mean of <6000 Steps Per Day) at Week 841.53 Percent of inactive participants
PlaceboPercentage of Inactive Patients (Mean of <6000 Steps Per Day) at Week 850.43 Percent of inactive participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026