Skip to content

A Study to Determine the Efficacy of ZPL-3893787 in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Determine the Effects of 8 Weeks Treatment With Oral ZPL-3893787 (30 mg od x 56 Days) on Pruritus in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02424253
Enrollment
98
Registered
2015-04-23
Start date
2015-05-18
Completion date
2016-02-03
Last updated
2021-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

This was a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study in approximately 90 subjects with moderate-severe AD Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥12 and ≤ 48 (0-72 scale). Following a run-in subjects were randomized to receive either oral 30 mg ZPL-3893787 once daily (od) or placebo od for 8 weeks (56 days).

Interventions

ZPL-3893787

DRUGPlacebo

Matched Placebo

Sponsors

Ziarco Pharma Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Males and females aged 18-65 years inclusive with physician documented history or diagnosis of atopic dermatitis for at least 12 months prior to screening. Chronic AD should be diagnosed by the Eichenfield revised criteria of Hanifin and Rajka (Eichenfield, 2004) Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) of ≥12 and \<48. An Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3 at both Screening and Day 0. A mean pruritus score of ≥ 5 on a 0-10 scale over the 7 day Run In (Days -7 to -1) Atopic dermatitis affecting ≥10% BSA

Exclusion criteria

AD of such severity (EASI \>48) that the subject could not comply with the demands of the study and/or the subject is not a suitable candidate for a placebo-controlled study Have concurrent skin disease (e.g. acne) of such severity in the study area that it could interfere with the study evaluation or presence of skin comorbidities that may interfere with study assessments. Have an active skin infection or any other clinically apparent infections. Hypersensitivity to mometasone or to any other ingredients contained by the topical corticosteroid product used as rescue medication in the study. Have received phototherapy (e.g. UVA, UVB), or systemic therapy (e.g. immunosuppressants, cytostatics) known or suspected to have an effect on AD, within 4 weeks of the start of the Run In. Have received systemic corticosteroids (\[CS\] e.g. oral, intravenous, intraarticular, rectal) within 4 weeks of the start of the Run in. Subjects on a stable maintenance dose (over the preceding 3 months) of inhaled or intranasal CS may participate. Were treated with oral antihistamines or topical calcineurin inhibitors or topical steroids within 7 days of starting Run In; intranasal antihistamines for the treatment of allergic rhinitis are acceptable.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Pruritus (Worst Itch)Baseline to Week 8The participant used the Pruritus NRS to rate his or her worst itch in the previous 12 hours. This was assessed twice daily (in the morning soon after rising and the evening prior to retiring) and recorded in the eDiary. The scale ranges from 0 (no itching) to 10 (itching as bad as can be imagined). If only 1 measurement was collected on a particular day, that score was counted as the worst measurement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreBaseline to Week 8The EASI is a validated tool used to measure the severity and extent of atopic eczema over 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs). The intensity of a representative area of eczema and the approximate percentage affected by eczema are calculated for each region. A representative area of eczema is selected for each body region. The intensity of redness (erythema), thickness (induration, papulation, and edema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin) of eczema is assessed as: 0 - None 1. \- Mild 2. \- Moderate 3. \- Severe The total score incorporates the extent of body regions affected. Scores range from 0 to 72 with higher scores indicating more severe eczema. Total score is calculated by summing the EASI scores of 6 symptoms across 4 body regions

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Poland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first informed consent was on 18 May 2015. Subjects were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either 30 mg ZPL-3893787 or matching placebo. The randomization was stratified by baseline worst daily pruritus NRS score (≤ 7.5 and \> 7.5) determined from the mean pruritus score (worst itch over 24 hours) collected during the 7-day Run-in Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ZPL-3893787
30 mg ZPL-3893787 orally once daily for 8 weeks.
65
Placebo
1 capsule orally once daily for 8 weeks.
33
Total98

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyCompliance problems10
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn by subject41
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy07
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyOther, unspecified10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalZPL-3893787
Age, Continuous35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.52
34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.64
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.22
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type I
4 participants6 participants2 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type II
11 participants35 participants24 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type III
14 participants46 participants32 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type IV
2 participants5 participants3 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type V
1 participants4 participants3 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type VI
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants56 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants42 Participants29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 33
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 6510 / 33
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 651 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Pruritus (Worst Itch)

The participant used the Pruritus NRS to rate his or her worst itch in the previous 12 hours. This was assessed twice daily (in the morning soon after rising and the evening prior to retiring) and recorded in the eDiary. The scale ranges from 0 (no itching) to 10 (itching as bad as can be imagined). If only 1 measurement was collected on a particular day, that score was counted as the worst measurement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): Included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZPL-3893787Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Pruritus (Worst Itch)Baseline summary7.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.139
ZPL-3893787Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Pruritus (Worst Itch)Week 8 summary4.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.253
ZPL-3893787Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Pruritus (Worst Itch)Change from Baseline-3.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.186
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Pruritus (Worst Itch)Week 8 summary4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Pruritus (Worst Itch)Baseline summary7.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.054
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Pruritus (Worst Itch)Change from Baseline-2.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.057
Comparison: Change from baselinep-value: =0.24990% CI: [-1.21, 0.51]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score

The EASI is a validated tool used to measure the severity and extent of atopic eczema over 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs). The intensity of a representative area of eczema and the approximate percentage affected by eczema are calculated for each region. A representative area of eczema is selected for each body region. The intensity of redness (erythema), thickness (induration, papulation, and edema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin) of eczema is assessed as: 0 - None 1. \- Mild 2. \- Moderate 3. \- Severe The total score incorporates the extent of body regions affected. Scores range from 0 to 72 with higher scores indicating more severe eczema. Total score is calculated by summing the EASI scores of 6 symptoms across 4 body regions

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: FAS: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZPL-3893787Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreBaseline21.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.889
ZPL-3893787Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreWeek 8 summary10.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.541
ZPL-3893787Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreWeek 8 change from baseline-10.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.679
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreBaseline20.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.868
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreWeek 8 summary15.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.159
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreWeek 8 change from baseline-5.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.922
Comparison: Change from baseline analysisp-value: =0.0190% CI: [-8.66, -1.46]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026